U.S. judge blocks Trump asylum ban at U.S.-Mexico border
By Ted Hesson
A federal judge on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's asylum ban at the U.S.-Mexico border, saying Trump exceeded his authority when he issued a proclamation declaring illegal immigration an emergency and setting aside existing legal processes.
U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said in a 128-page opinion that Trump's January 20 proclamation blocking all migrants "engaged in the invasion across the southern border" from claiming asylum or other humanitarian protections went beyond his executive power.
The ruling is a setback for Trump, a Republican who recaptured the White House promising a vast immigration crackdown. Since Trump took office, the number of migrants caught crossing illegally has plummeted to record lows.
The American Civil Liberties Union brought the challenge to Trump's asylum ban in February on behalf of three advocacy groups and migrants denied access to asylum, arguing the broad ban violated U.S. laws and international treaties.
Trump's border restrictions went beyond a similar ban put in place by former President Joe Biden, a Democrat, in 2024. Key parts of the Biden ban were blocked by a separate federal judge in May in a lawsuit also led by the ACLU.
Moss said he would stay the effective date of a related order for 14 days to allow the Trump administration to appeal.
The decision applies to migrants who were subject to Trump's ban or could be in the future, part of a certified class in the litigation. Such class certifications remain unaffected by last week's Supreme Court decision reining in nationwide injunctions.
Moss ruled that neither federal immigration law nor the U.S. Constitution gave Trump the authority to disregard existing laws and regulations governing the asylum process even if stopping illegal immigration presented "enormous challenges."
"Nothing in the [Immigration and Nationality Act] or the Constitution grants the President or his delegees the sweeping authority asserted in the Proclamation and implementing guidance," wrote Moss, an appointee of former President Barack Obama. "An appeal to necessity cannot fill that void."
The White House, Justice Department and U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Lee Gelernt, a lead ACLU attorney working on the lawsuit, said the ruling would help ensure protections for migrants fleeing danger.
'The president cannot wipe away laws passed by Congress simply by claiming that asylum seekers are invaders," Gelernt said.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
29 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
China-US Relations: Looking for an Edge
The relationship with China that the Biden administration built was seen as a competitive one: both parties sought to avoid conflict, encouraged cooperation where it was needed, and emphasized communication to maintain the relationship. That's why Secretary of State Antony Blinken met frequently with Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Communication is vital for deterrence, and both China and the U.S. took a textbook approach. Climate change encouraged the two superpowers to pursue cooperation. Under the Trump administration, this framework has collapsed. Climate change is no longer an area of cooperation. Tariffs are now the main point of dialogue, and certainly remain a major headache for China. When the international environment deteriorates, China tends to look to strengthen ties with Russia and other partner states, while building closer relationships with its neighbors. Beijing has already taken steps in this direction, holding the Central Conference on Work Related to Neighboring Countries in April 2025. Even before Trump returned to power, it was clear that he would make the U.S. trade deficit with China an issue. It was also clear that his foreign policy and national security team would take a hardline stance on China in terms of economic security. Concerned about food and energy security, China has worked to insulate itself from American influence, finding alternative soybean suppliers and stepping up imports of Iranian crude oil. Just as many developed nations have reduced their economic reliance on China, China itself is working to reduce its economic dependence on the U.S. Right now, China's economic policy is focused on building an economic structure centered on domestic demand. This differs sharply from the 'Reform and Opening Up' period, when there was a focus on foreign trade. As a result, the pressure from U.S. tariffs gives China an opportunity to double down on an inwardly focused economic model. There are, of course, sectors where trade with the U.S. remains essential. However, for those sectors where it is not vital, we can expect China to pursue a shift to domestic production or to diversify its trade partners in ASEAN and Central Asia. Faced with harsh tariffs, China has limited means to respond. Even if wanted to buy American, Beijing's shift towards a focus on domestic demand makes it less likely to be interested in boosting imports. Even with aircraft, to take one example, China is already stepping up its own production for domestic flights, making large-scale imports from the U.S. undesirable. Likewise, economic security restrictions make it extremely difficult for Chinese companies to invest in America, even if those companies wanted to contribute to job creation in the U.S. As such, one of the only options remaining for China is to impose its own retaliatory tariffs. Another avenue is to use rare earth metals and lithium-ion batteries as leverage, with the former being essential for the automotive industry and a major weapon in tariff negotiations. China has meanwhile sought to portray the U.S. to the rest of the world – and the Global South in particular – as a disruptor of the free trade system. At the same time, it has worked to rally allies of the U.S. that have been hit with high tariffs, calling on them to work with China to confront Washington over tariffs. Beijing has identified many elements within the Trump administration's policies that it thinks are to its advantage. Tariffs are one example, but there is also the effective dismantling of USAID, the elimination of funding for Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), and more. Many USAID projects have been suspended, and there have been significant repercussions and criticism from countries in the Pacific and Africa. Although China is also dealing with many economic issues of its own and cannot provide the same level of funding to these countries as it did in the late 2010s, this still represents an opportunity. The decline of VOA is particularly advantageous to China, which has long tried to expand its discourse power on the global stage. RFA once actively reported on human rights issues in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It goes without saying that China welcomes the suspension of these activities. In reality, the de facto dismantling of USAID appears to affect not only developing countries but also the state of global discourse. There are growing concerns that this will lead to a breakdown in the mechanisms that fact-check disinformation. Right now, China appears to be in the process of assessing the Trump administration's policies, looking for potential openings. The rest of the world will watch with interest to see if Washington can respond nimbly once China begins to pursue its own policies, exploiting any weaknesses in the U.S. position. KAWASHIMA Shin is a professor at the University of Tokyo.
NHK
34 minutes ago
- NHK
Trump says Iran wants to meet and Hamas wants a ceasefire
US President Donald Trump has welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House for talks on Iran and a ceasefire in Gaza. The meeting on Monday was the leaders' first face-to-face since the United States struck Iranian nuclear sites just over two weeks ago, amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump said at the outset, "We had a tremendous success together, and I think it will only go on to be even greater success in the future." Netanyahu said he nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for "forging peace, as we speak, in one country and one region after the other." Asked about a possible resumption of nuclear talks with Iran, Trump said the country "would like to meet, and we're going to have a meeting." Trump's Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff added that the talks would take place "in the next week or so." On prospects for Hamas to agree to a truce in Gaza, Trump said, "They want to meet and they want to have that ceasefire." The US president appears eager to score diplomatic points in the Middle East. But it remains unclear how Iran and Hamas might respond.
The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
Silencing RFA Uyghur Echoes Past Mistakes
Forty-five years ago, the U.S. silenced Uyghur voices in the name of diplomacy. Today, they are being silenced in the name of austerity. In 1979, the United States shut down Uyghur-language radio broadcasts to appease the Chinese government ahead of Deng Xiaoping's visit to Washington. Forty-five years later, Uyghur voices are being silenced once again, this time in the name of budget cuts. In March, the Trump administration eliminated Radio Free Asia's Uyghur Service, the only source of uncensored Uyghur-language news in the world. Whether for diplomatic gain or domestic political theater, the result is the same: the silencing of our voices and the empowerment of Chinese state propaganda. The U.S. must not repeat this mistake. RFA Uyghur was the first outlet to confirm mass deaths in Chinese internment camps in 2017. When international journalists were blocked from reporting in our homeland, RFA Uyghur revealed that internment camps were still operating despite government claims to the contrary. Its closure is not just a blow to press freedom; it is the silencing of an entire people amid an ongoing genocide. Starting in the late 1960s, the Uyghur-language service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) broadcasted 15 minutes a day into Central Asia and East Turkistan. The programming — uncensored news, history, culture, and politics — was a lifeline for Uyghurs desperate for truthful reporting. Just before Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping's historic visit to Washington in 1979, RFE/RL's Uyghur language service was abruptly closed. U.S. officials, eager to strengthen ties with China to counter the Soviet Union, proactively shut down Uyghur language programming to win favor with the Chinese government ahead of the important meeting. Just 15 minutes of independent Uyghur journalism was important enough to be factored into high-level diplomatic calculations. Later, we were told that the directive came from President Jimmy Carter's national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, a staunch anti-Soviet who viewed China as a key partner against Moscow. Erkin Alptekin, a senior staff member at RFE/RL's Uyghur service, wrote in a letter to The Washington Post that the U.S. government was 'trying to eradicate a presumed source of embarrassment to blossoming U.S.-Chinese relations.' In other words, Uyghurs were collateral damage in a global chess game. Under the leadership of Alptekin, Uyghurs advocated strongly to try to save RFE/RL's Uyghur service. Some in Congress listened and tried to right the wrong. In 1979, Rep. John M. Murphy introduced urging RFE/RL to resume Uyghur-language programming. The resolution did not pass, but it gave us a spark of momentum to keep fighting for independent Uyghur journalism. When I was hired as a journalist at RFE/RL in 1988, there was no Uyghur language programming; instead, I worked for RFE/RL's Tajik Service. Even so, the 1979 resolution inspired us to keep advocating for Uyghur language programming. We finally succeeded in 1998, when Radio Free Asia's Uyghur Service was founded. I'll never forget the first broadcast, when independent reporting in our language finally reached our homeland for the first time in nearly 20 years. Now, history is repeating itself. With the elimination of RFA's Uyghur Service, the Chinese government faces one less challenge to its disinformation campaigns. CCP-run newspapers openly celebrated the closure of RFA and VOA. Since March, Chinese state media have added 16 new Uyghur-language radio frequencies, flooding the airwaves with propaganda. Abroad, Beijing's influence expands through tourism-promotion, all-expense-paid tours for foreign vloggers, censorship on Beijing-controlled applications like TikTok, and transnational repression campaigns that go unchecked. We must learn from history instead of repeating our past mistakes. China is far more powerful now than it was when Uyghur language programming was first shut down in 1979. Allowing CCP propaganda to go unchallenged is even more dangerous this time. When the first Uyghur service was cut, China was opening its doors to the West, and allowing Uyghurs slightly more freedom. But now, China is waging a brutal genocide against our people. Uncensored Uyghur journalism is more important than ever before. Sacrificing RFA Uyghur Service at such a desperate time for our people creates a perception that the U.S. only supports fundamental freedom when convenient. Forty-five years ago, the U.S. silenced Uyghur voices in the name of diplomacy. Today, they are being silenced in the name of austerity. Either way, the result is the same: empowering the Chinese government's repression and abandoning a people struggling to survive genocide. The United States must reverse this dangerous decision and restore Radio Free Asia's Uyghur Service. The cost is modest. The stakes could not be higher. Let us not make the same mistake twice.
