Delhi HC grants bail to alleged gangster citing violation of right to speedy trial
Delhi High Court
has said, granting bail to an alleged gangster behind bars for eight years in an MCOCA case.
"The right to a speedy trial, now firmly entrenched in our constitutional jurisprudence under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, is not an abstract or illusory safeguard. It is a vital facet of the right to personal liberty and cannot be whittled down merely because the case arises under a special statute such as MCOCA," Justice Sanjeev Narula noted in an order earlier this week.
HC was hearing the bail plea of one Naresh alias Pahelwan, who sought relief citing prolonged jail time and undue delay in the conclusion of the trial.
He also invoked the principle of parity with co-accused who have already been granted bail. However, the prosecution opposed bail, stressing that Pahelwan is an active gang member of a crime syndicate and played a direct role in multiple offences, including murder, kidnapping for ransom, robberies, and extending threats to extort, and criminal intimidation.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Listing out the 12 criminal cases lodged against Pehelwan, HC noted he was acquitted in all of them except one in which he was granted bail and the other which was before it.
On the police citing MCOCA as a ground to claim he is not eligible for bail, HC said when trials under special laws are unduly delayed, they must yield to the constitutional promise of liberty. "The more rigorous the provisions of the legislation, the more expeditious the adjudication must be... although Section 21(4) of MCOCA imposes stringent conditions for the grant of bail, these provisions must be balanced with the fundamental right to personal liberty of the accused," it underlined.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
SP will set up ‘pathshalas' in villageswhere govt has shut schools: Akhilesh
1 2 Lucknow: Accusing the BJP govt of attacking the education system by shutting basic and primary schools in villages, Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on Friday said his party would set up 'PDA Pathshalas' in such villages. "When SP is voted to form the govt, these schools will be re-opened with better facilities," he said. The announcement came amid reports that the govt has over shut 26,000 and merged another 5000 schools – mostly in rural areas. "Ahead of Lok Sabha polls, we told the people how BJP was conspiring to change the Constitution of India. People voted against them and the BJP could not get the numbers to do so. Now they have started taking steps to weaken the Constitution by shutting schools and depriving the poor of their right to education enshrined in the Constitution," Akhilesh said. "With schools being closed, poor children from PDA families will be deprived of education," he said, talking to the media in Kannauj. Akhilesh called upon party functionaries to rope in retired teachers and educated youth to impart education to children in villages where schools have been closed by the govt. "I urge the retired teachers and educated youths to set up 'PDA Pathshalas' in such villages and impart education to poor children. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now Undo We will not let poor children be deprived of education," he said. Akhilesh assured people of his constituency that pathbreaking development projects would be launched in the region after the SP forms govt. "The BJP govt has neglected development projects across the state and particularly in parliamentary constituencies of the opposition leaders," he said. "SP govt had set up a medical college in Kannauj, apart from a host of projects like cow milk plant, perfume park and kisan mandis but the BJP govt stalled these projects halfway through. Had the BJP govt got the medical college operational, it would have provided specialised healthcare to people. The govt did not complete these projects apparently because they were started by the SP govt," Akhilesh said. 'Will defeat BJP in Bihar polls' Lucknow: Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on Friday said the opposition will defeat BJP in Bihar polls. Responding to a media query. Akhilesh's comment comes close on the heels of RLD's Tejashwi Yadav saying that the way BJP was manipulating the electoral rolls in Bihar, the opposition may decide to boycott the said the BJP was looking for ways to deny people their right to reservation. "The BJP has coined a new word– NFS (Not Found Suitable) - to deny reservation to the people," he said. This was in apparent reference to appointments in various institutions where candidates were rejected after being termed as 'NFS'. SP alleged that these were mostly candidates from the PDA community.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Befriending girl doesn't give right to sex with her'
New Delhi: Befriending a girl doesn't give a man the right to have sex with her without consent, Delhi High Court stated on Thursday. It dismissed the bail plea of a man accused of sexually assaulting a minor. The court underlined that mere friendship doesn't eliminate the need for consent. Justice Girish Kathpalia rejected the man's claim of having consensual relations with the girl, pointing out that even consent could not be legal as the girl was a minor at the time. "Merely because a girl befriends a boy, the latter cannot be given liberty to indulge in sexual intercourse with her without her consent. Further, even the consent would not be lawful in the present case because the prosecutrix was minor in age," the court observed in its order. It highlighted the girl's specific allegations in the FIR and her testimony about the man's repeated sexual assaults despite her protestations. "I am unable to find it a case of consensual relations merely because in the FIR the prosecutrix stated that the accused/applicant with his sweet talk befriended her," it said, adding that for these reasons, the case is "not a fit case to grant bail to the accused." You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi The prosecution alleged that in April 2023, the man, working as a construction labourer in NDMC apartments in Vikaspuri, befriended the minor and subsequently raped her. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo According to the complaint, the girl was threatened not to confide in anyone, and the man continued to rape her until Nov 2023. The accused was subsequently booked last year for rape, stalking, criminal intimidation, and under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. In his defence, the accused maintained that the girl was a major at the time of the incident and he had consensual sex with her, while claiming several inconsistencies in her testimony. Rejecting the plea, the court said a single handpicked line from the testimony of the girl's mother cannot be read in isolation from the remaining material on record. The court considered her educational records establishing her age as a minor and said it couldn't minutely examine evidence in a bail application, leaving the issue of juvenility to be raised in trial. Recently, the Centre told Supreme Court that the age of consent for sex cannot be lowered from 18 years, as it is meant to protect minors. Loosening age-based protections could open avenues for abuse (rape) under the guise of consensual activity, it stated.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Life term or 7-yr jail: SC gives man, 67, choice in 1979 college clash verdict
NEW DELHI: Some may call it a burning example of a snail-paced justice delivery system while others may term it as "law catching up with the culprit when he is at his weakest". However one may describe it, a person who committed the crime as a hot-headed college student, now dreads spending the rest of his life as an ailing senior citizen behind bars. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The SC has now given him the option between life term or seven years in jail. A union election-related fight between two students of LokManya Inter College in Deoria district of in 1979 led to 21-year-old Hari Shankar Rai stabbing a 19-year-old Krishna Kumar, who died of injuries on Dec 14, 1979. The trial court in 1983 found Rai guilty under Section 304-I of IPC and sentenced him to four-year imprisonment. A person lost his life, there should be adequate punishment for the crime: SC The Allahabad HC took 41 years to decide the appeal filed by the state challenging the trial court decision and seeking his conviction for murder. Rai had appealed against his conviction. In May last year, the HC found the evidence strong enough to convict Rai under Section 302 and awarded life imprisonment. Rai appealed against the HC judgment before the SC. A bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran told the 67-year-old Rai that even if his conviction for murder is altered to that under Section 304-I, he cannot escape with a punishment of mere four years imprisonment. "A person lost his life and whatever may be, there should be adequate punishment for the crime," the CJI said. His counsel said the man is now 67-year-old suffering from ailments and pleaded for mercy on the ground that his wife is suffering from cancer, needing constant care. But the bench remained firm and refused to grant him bail during the pendency of his appeal in the SC. Refusing to show mercy and warning the convict's counsel that arguing for acquittal, in the face of a well-reasoned HC judgment, would result in dismissal of the appeal, CJI Gavai said, "If you are agreeable, we will convert the conviction under Sec 302 to that under Sec 304-I (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) with seven year imprisonment." SC also asked the state counsel Tulika Mukherjee to take instructions regarding the present relationship between the families of the victim and the accused.
