logo
Can an American pope apply US-style fundraising and standards to fix troubled Vatican finances?

Can an American pope apply US-style fundraising and standards to fix troubled Vatican finances?

Time of India07-06-2025
As a bishop in Peru,
Robert Prevost
was often on the lookout for used cars that he could buy cheap and fix up himself for use in parishes around his diocese. With cars that were really broken down, he'd watch YouTube videos to learn how to fix them.
That kind of make-do-with-less, fix-it-yourself mentality could serve Pope Leo XIV well as he addresses one of the greatest challenges facing him as pope: The Holy See's chronic, 50 million to 60 million euro ($57-68 million) structural deficit, 1 billion euro ($1.14 billion) pension fund shortfall and declining donations that together pose something of an existential threat to the central government of the 1.4-billion strong
Catholic Church
.
As a Chicago-born math major, canon lawyer and two-time superior of his global Augustinian religious order, the 69-year-old pope presumably can read a balance sheet and make sense of the Vatican's complicated finances, which have long been mired in scandal. Whether he can change the financial culture of the Holy See, consolidate reforms Pope
Francis
started and convince donors that their money is going to good use is another matter.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Promoções imperdíveis de voos baratos
Voos | Anúncios de Pesquisa
Saiba Mais
Undo
Leo already has one thing going for him: his American-ness. US donors have long been the economic life support system of the Holy See, financing everything from papal charity projects abroad to restorations of St. Peter's Basilica at home. Leo's election as the first American pope has sent a jolt of excitement through US. Catholics, some of whom had soured on donating to the Vatican after years of unrelenting stories of mismanagement, corruption and scandal, according to interviews with top Catholic fundraisers, philanthropists and church management experts.
"I think the election of an American is going to give greater confidence that any money given is going to be cared for by American principles, especially of stewardship and transparency," said the Rev. Roger Landry, director of the Vatican's main missionary fundraising operation in the US, the Pontifical Mission Societies.
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
Whoops, waves, tears: Faithful react to Pope Leo's first Sunday blessing in St. Peter's Square
"So there will be great hope that American generosity is first going to be appreciated and then secondly is going to be well handled," he said. "That hasn't always been the circumstance, especially lately."
Reforms and unfinished business Pope Francis was elected in 2013 on a mandate to reform the Vatican's opaque finances and made progress during his 12-year pontificate, mostly on the regulatory front. With help from the late Australian Cardinal George
Pell
, Francis created an economy ministry and council made up of clergy and lay experts to supervise Vatican finances, and he wrestled the Italian-dominated bureaucracy into conforming to international accounting and budgetary standards.
He authorized a landmark, if deeply problematic, corruption trial over a botched London property investment that convicted a once-powerful Italian cardinal. And he punished the Vatican's
Secretariat
of State that had allowed the London deal to go through by stripping it of its ability to manage its own assets.
But Francis left unfinished business and his overall record, at least according to some in the donor community, is less than positive. Critics cite Pell's frustrated reform efforts and the firing of the Holy See's first-ever auditor general, who says he was ousted because he had uncovered too much financial wrongdoing.
You Might Also Like:
Pope Leo XIV celebrates first Mass after historic election as Pope Francis' successor
Despite imposing years of belt-tightening and hiring freezes, Francis left the Vatican in somewhat dire financial straits: The main stopgap bucket of money that funds budgetary shortfalls, known as the Peter's Pence, is nearly exhausted, officials say. The 1 billion euro ($1.14 billion) pension fund shortfall that Pell warned about a decade ago remains unaddressed, though Francis had planned reforms. And the structural deficit continues, with the Holy See logging an 83.5 million euro ($95 million) deficit in 2023, according to its latest financial report.
As Francis' health worsened, there were signs that his efforts to reform the Vatican's medieval financial culture hadn't really stuck, either. The very same Secretariat of State that Francis had punished for losing tens of millions of euros in the scandalous London property deal somehow ended up heading up a new papal fundraising commission that was announced while Francis was in the hospital. According to its founding charter and statutes, the commission is led by the Secretariat of State's assessor, is composed entirely of Italian Vatican officials with no professional fundraising expertise and has no required external financial oversight.
To some Vatican watchers, the commission smacks of the Italian-led Secretariat of State taking advantage of a sick pope to announce a new flow of unchecked donations into its coffers after its 600 million euro ($684 million) sovereign wealth fund was taken away and given to another office to manage as punishment for the London fiasco.
"There are no Americans on the commission. I think it would be good if there were representatives of Europe and Asia and Africa and the United States on the commission," said Ward Fitzgerald, president of the U.S.-based
Papal Foundation
. It is made up of wealthy American Catholics that since 1990 has provided over $250 million (219 million euros) in grants and scholarships to the pope's global charitable initiatives.
Fitzgerald, who spent his career in real estate private equity, said American donors - especially the younger generation - expect transparency and accountability from recipients of their money, and know they can find non-Vatican Catholic charities that meet those expectations.
"We would expect transparency before we would start to solve the problem," he said.
That said, Fitzgerald said he hadn't seen any significant let-up in donor willingness to fund the Papal Foundation's project-specific donations during the Francis pontificate. Indeed, U.S. donations to the Vatican overall have remained more or less consistent even as other countries' offerings declined, with U.S. bishops and individual Catholics contributing more than any other country in the two main channels to donate to papal causes.
A head for numbers and background fundraising Francis moved Prevost to take over the diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, in 2014. Residents and fellow priests say he consistently rallied funds, food and other life-saving goods for the neediest - experience that suggests he knows well how to raise money when times are tight and how to spend wisely.
He bolstered the local Caritas charity in Chiclayo, with parishes creating food banks that worked with local businesses to distribute donated food, said the Rev. Fidel Purisaca Vigil, a diocesan spokesperson.
In 2019, Prevost inaugurated a shelter on the outskirts of Chiclayo, Villa San Vicente de Paul, to house desperate Venezuelan migrants who had fled their country's economic crisis. The migrants remember him still, not only for helping give them and their children shelter, but for bringing live chickens obtained from a donor.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Prevost launched a campaign to raise funds to build two oxygen plants to provide hard-hit residents with life-saving oxygen. In 2023, when massive rains flooded the region, he personally brought food to the flood-struck zone.
Within hours of his May 8 election, videos went viral on social media of Prevost, wearing rubber boots and standing in a flooded street, pitching a solidarity campaign, "Peru Give a Hand," to raise money for flood victims.
The Rev. Jorge Millan, who lived with Prevost and eight other priests for nearly a decade in Chiclayo, said he had a "mathematical" mentality and knew how to get the job done. Prevost would always be on the lookout for used cars to buy for use around the diocese, Millan said, noting that the bishop often had to drive long distances to reach all of his flock or get to Lima, the capital.
Prevost liked to fix them up himself, and if he didn't know what to do, "he'd look up solutions on YouTube and very often he'd find them," Millan told The Associated Press.
Before going to Peru, Prevost served two terms as prior general, or superior, of the global Augustinian order. While the order's local provinces are financially independent, Prevost was responsible for reviewing their balance sheets and oversaw the budgeting and investment strategy of the order's headquarters in Rome, said the Rev. Franz Klein, the order's Rome-based economist who worked with Prevost.
The Augustinian campus sits on prime real estate just outside St. Peter's Square and supplements revenue by renting out its picturesque terrace to media organizations (including the AP) for major Vatican events, including the conclave that elected Leo pope.
But even Prevost saw the need for better fundraising, especially to help out poorer provinces. Toward the end of his 12-year term and with his support, a committee proposed creation of a foundation, Augustinians in the World. At the end of 2023, it had 994,000 euros ($1.13 million) in assets and was helping fund self-sustaining projects across Africa, including a center to rehabilitate former child soldiers in Congo.
"He has a very good interest and also a very good feeling for numbers," Klein said. "I have no worry about the finances of the Vatican in these years because he is very, very clever."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A.P. BJP spokesperson Vinusha Reddy selected for IVLP
A.P. BJP spokesperson Vinusha Reddy selected for IVLP

The Hindu

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

A.P. BJP spokesperson Vinusha Reddy selected for IVLP

BJP State spokesperson Vinusha Reddy has been selected as the Indian delegate for the prestigious International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP), a professional exchange programme funded by the U.S. Department of State. The IVLP, established in 1940, is a foundational exchange programme designed by the U.S. to introduce emerging global leaders to their American counterparts and to U.S. society and culture. She was officially selected and invited by the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi to attend the programme. Ms. Vinusha Reddy made the announcement in the presence of former Rajya Sabha member and senior leader T.G. Venkatesh, Adoni MLA P.V. Pardhasaradhi in Kurnool on Monday. The 2025 IVLP will be held from August 9 to 30 on the theme 'Women in Politics and Civil Society'. Emerging leaders from 20 nations across different regions like Japan, Germany, Poland, Argentina, South Africa, Taiwan, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Singapore, Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon will also attend the programme, which includes civic engagement across multiple cities in the U.S.. Ms. Vinusha Reddy will visit Washington D.C., Boston, Massachusetts, Manchester and Concord, New Hampshire, Columbia, South Carolina, and Salt Lake City, Utah. The programme includes meetings with U.S. policymakers, women leaders, and civil society organisations to discuss initiatives promoting equal pay, fair treatment, and women leadership in political and civic spheres. The IVLP alumni in India include the present Prime Minister Narendra Modi and also former Prime Ministers Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Indira Gandhi. 'I am truly humbled to be selected for this global programme. It reflects India's growing leadership in promoting women's participation in governance under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Modi. I thank the BJP for giving me a platform, mentoring, and offering opportunities at every step since I joined the party. It reflects the way BJP nurtures new voices, especially women leaders, and promotes our global engagement rooted in Indian values,' Ms. Vinusha Reddy said.

Pakistan's Asim Munir crafts a new gambit against India
Pakistan's Asim Munir crafts a new gambit against India

Economic Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Pakistan's Asim Munir crafts a new gambit against India

Synopsis Tensions escalate in South Asia as Pakistan, under Field Marshal Asim Munir, considers a multi-front strategy against India. Renewed US support emboldens Pakistan, potentially involving Bangladesh and India's northeast. Pakistan's military spokesman signals intentions to strike deeper within India, starting from the east. Agencies Asim Munir In a region long accustomed to fraught borders and historical enmities, a potentially dangerous new front is emerging in South Asia. At the center of this shifting strategic chessboard is Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief and the de facto ruler of the country. Bolstered by renewed American support and emboldened by shifting geopolitical currents, Munir appears to be recalibrating Pakistan's strategy toward India.A recent interview with The Economist of a spokesperson for Pakistan's military provided a telling glimpse into this strategy. Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry told The Economist that in a future conflict, 'we'll start from the East,' a remark that can be interpreted as a signal of intentions to open a new front against India through the eastern corridor, where the regime change in Dhaka has significantly altered the security landscape."Field Marshal Munir wants to bring it to the negotiating table," The Economist wrote. "Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, is determined to resist and has vowed to respond to any more terrorist attacks with further military action. Asked how Pakistan would react to that, its military spokesman says it would begin by striking deeper within India. 'We'll start from the East,' he says. 'They also need to understand that they can be hit everywhere.' The Field Marshal's grip on power may have increased since May. But so too have the risks of a bigger clash between South Asia's nuclear strongmen." A new axis in Dhaka Until early 2025, India enjoyed a relatively stable and cooperative relationship with Bangladesh under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina. Her administration had proven to be a bulwark against Islamist extremism and a reliable partner in cross-border security coordination. However, her ouster last year, followed by the rise of hardline Islamist factions, has undone years of diplomatic new political leadership in Dhaka has signaled a softening stance toward Pakistan, reviving old Islamist solidarity rhetoric and quietly reactivating links with Pakistan's intelligence services. Signs of renewed cooperation between radical groups in Bangladesh and Pakistan's deep state have emerged in the form of arms trafficking, madrassa activism and movement of operatives in the Chittagong Hill Tracts and border areas adjacent to India's northeast. While the statement from Pakistan's military spokesman could be dismissed as rhetorical bravado, the regional shifts suggest it may represent a broader strategic calculation that aims to surprise and overwhelm India by exploiting vulnerabilities in the east. Munir's strategic plan Field Marshal Munir's actions over the past year reveal a deliberate attempt to re-anchor Pakistan's position in global geopolitics. His overtures to the United States have begun yielding tangible results. His June 2025 luncheon with US President Donald Trump at the White House, followed by Pakistan awarding its highest civilian award upon General Michael Kurilla of CENTCOM, indicates a strategic reset in US-Pakistan relations. Kurilla had earlier called Pakistan as a "phenomenal partner in counterterrorism". Trump's mocking criticism of India -- including the imposition of new tariffs and the farcical suggestion that US companies would drill for oil in Pakistan which Pakistan can sell to India -- has emboldened Munir's camp. For a Pakistani military used to leveraging superpower patronage, this signals a return to relevance. Munir is now clearly positioning himself as a regional player who can assist Washington's objectives in Iran, the Islamic world, and possibly even in normalising relations between Muslim countries and patronage gives Munir both the diplomatic cover and strategic confidence to challenge India in unconventional ways, and perhaps even consider an expansion of conflict zones beyond Kashmir. India's eastern theatre The logic behind opening a front in the east is grounded in Pakistan's need to offset India's superior conventional power. By involving Bangladesh or using its territory to facilitate proxy operations, Pakistan could stretch Indian military resources and force the Indian leadership to divide its focus and assets between two fronts. The northeastern states of India, already dealing with porous borders, demographic sensitivities, and sporadic insurgencies, present exploitable cultural and linguistic proximity in the border regions of West Bengal, Assam, and Tripura allows operatives to move with a level of deniability not available in the west. Unlike the heavily militarised Line of Control, the eastern frontier is not bristling with weapons and surveillance to the same degree. For Pakistan, this opens an opportunity for deniable attacks, possibly through sleeper cells or cross-border militants supported by Bangladesh-based jihadi is not merely a tactical shift but a strategic evolution toward hybrid warfare, incorporating disinformation, cyber-operations and irregular warfare in areas where India's response infrastructure is still catching up. The shadow of Operation Sindoor India's most recent military operation, Operation Sindoor, was a significant departure from its earlier doctrine of strategic restraint. In response to coordinated terror attacks, Indian forces launched missile strikes deep into Pakistani territory, targeting nine terror camps and disabling nearly a dozen air bases. The action demonstrated both technological superiority and a willingness to escalate beyond the conventional limits of conflict the deterrence effect of Operation Sindoor appears to be limited. The Pakistani establishment, particularly Munir, seems to have interpreted it as a warning shot rather than a constraint. This may have catalysed Pakistan's shift toward asymmetric warfare, with the goal of circumventing India's conventional dominance. Indian intelligence agencies are reportedly taking the eastern threat seriously. Surveillance has increased, with military intelligence and border forces in Assam and Meghalaya placed on alert. Diplomatic engagement with key regional allies, especially ASEAN countries and Gulf states, has been strengthened to deny Pakistan broad-based Islamic world support in the event of another confrontation. Munir's pursuit of a multi-front strategy against India, involving not just Kashmir but potentially Bangladesh and India's vulnerable northeast, marks a dangerous evolution in South Asian geopolitics. His confidence is rooted in a reinvigorated relationship with the US, domestic consolidation of power and the perception that India may be overstretched or distracted. But this is a high-risk gamble. For India, the imperative is to preempt such moves with strategic foresight, integrated intelligence operations and a recalibrated eastern defense posture.

What Harvard's $500 million rejection means for the future of higher education in the US
What Harvard's $500 million rejection means for the future of higher education in the US

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

What Harvard's $500 million rejection means for the future of higher education in the US

Harvard's $500 million settlement rejection could make a huge change in the American education system. In a dramatic standoff with the Trump administration, Harvard University has rejected a $500 million federal settlement offer, choosing legal resistance over compliance. The move is more than a high-profile rebuke; it's a watershed moment for the future of higher education in the United States, with ripple effects likely to touch every major university, student, and research institution across the country. A clash over more than funding The proposed deal wasn't just financial support. It came with strings attached: compliance with political directives involving diversity initiatives, admissions policies, and increased federal oversight. Many institutions, facing immense pressure, accepted similar deals. But Harvard took a different path, insisting that academic freedom and institutional autonomy are not up for negotiation. By turning down the $500 million offer, Harvard is betting on the courts and public opinion to defend its values. The university has already secured preliminary injunctions allowing limited research funding to resume, but the long-term outcome remains uncertain. Why Harvard's stand matters Harvard's decision sets a precedent that could shape how other institutions respond to political pressure in the years to come. 1. Strengthening legal resistance Rather than settling, Harvard has chosen to fight. This legal path could establish protections for universities that resist government overreach tied to federal grants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo If the courts uphold Harvard's stance, it could insulate campuses from future political interference. 2. Sending a message to peers Other top universities that accepted settlements are now under scrutiny. Harvard's high-profile defiance may embolden students, faculty, and trustees across the country to resist similar pressures and challenge deals they see as compromising academic integrity. 3. Reframing public debate Harvard has turned a behind-closed-doors negotiation into a public battle over the soul of higher education. The resulting media coverage, campus protests, and political commentary have reignited national conversations about who controls America's universities—and at what cost. The cost of defiance Choosing principle over funding has immediate consequences. Research projects remain stalled, hiring freezes are in place, and international students face visa uncertainty. Some faculty have warned of long-term damage to academic competitiveness if the standoff continues. Moreover, universities nationwide are feeling the aftershocks. Fearing similar action, many are reviewing their diversity and admissions programs, even in the absence of direct federal threats. Broader implications for students and scholars Harvard's decision affects more than just elite academia. It could redefine how students, both domestic and international, experience US education. For international students, the case raises concerns about the stability of visa pathways and the political conditions tied to enrolment. For American students, it calls into question how much autonomy their institutions will have in shaping educational content, campus policies, and student life. A turning point for academic freedom At its core, Harvard's refusal to settle is a stand for the principle that universities should be governed by academic leaders and not shaped by political directives from Washington. Whether that principle holds will depend on the outcome of court battles and continued public scrutiny. But regardless of the legal result, this moment marks a turning point. It's a reminder that higher education is not just about degrees and research—it's about values, governance, and the future of democratic institutions. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store