'My uncle's UK's most dangerous prisoner – there's now been a startling change'
The nephew of serial killer Robert Maudsley has said his uncle is 'not in a great place' after being removed from HMP Wakefield in Yorkshire – also known as 'Monster Mansion'.
Maudsley, who is Britain's longest serving prisoner, is now 125 miles away after being relocated to Whitemoor prison in Cambridgeshire on April 8. Gavin, who has a close bond with his uncle, said he spent 40 years unbroken inside Wakefield, and has not reacted well to the sudden change.
Speaking to Behind Bars TV, he said: 'In Whitemoor, to the best of our knowledge, he hasn't got his stuff. His regime is an hour out of his cell each day, and that is not an hour in the yard, within this hour you have to get your shower and all that. Any time you take a shower, that comes off your yard time.'
He added: 'He is not in a great place right now. I am still trying to confirm and verify if he has a TV or if he has his books and stuff – but I can't imagine how it will be for him if he hasn't.'
Gavin, who is from Merseyside, last saw his uncle weeks before he was transferred and he has said him and his father are 'dying to get down to see him'.
Maudsley was once considered to be the most dangerous inmate in Britain having slaughtered two prisoners inside Wakefield. This was after having already tortured a patient to death inside Broadmoor after he was first caged for killing builder John Farrell in 1974 when he was 21.
He was even given the nickname Hannibal the Cannibal after being rumoured to have eaten the brains of one victim. Despite this being disproved, the nickname stuck.
But, referencing the horrific child abuse Maudsley, Gavin told reformed ex-prisoner Ricky Killeen: 'You will be hard pushed to find someone who can't empathise with what he has been through. I always say, nobody is born a serial killer, there is certain things to happen in one's life for it to end up in that place.'
Maudsley was reportedly moved to Whitemoor jail after a disagreement with staff over 'privileges' in Wakefield. The row resulted in him going on hunger strike for up to five weeks before he was moved to a specialist wing in Cambridgeshire.
The 71-year-old, who spent most of his life in a solitary cell after executing his own wave of vigilante justice, is now reportedly lodging an appeal about his transfer.
According to Gavin, his uncle found himself in a 'relatively comfortable' position in Wakefield. He said he accepted his whole life tariff and has never tried to appeal his sentence.
And giving an insight into prison life, Gavin said: 'Most of them (prison guards) respected him and would play chess with him, they would have conversations with him, and eventually he found himself in a position where he had a TV in his cell.
'He had a PlayStation in his cell, he had his music system, his CDs, he had his books, he would get an hour in the gym, he would get an hour in the yard, and he would get an hour in the kitchen.
'And for him, he said, 'All I ever wanted was my own space, Gavin, I've got it now.' Unfortunately it is in the underbelly of Wakefield, but he has got his own space.'
Gavin added: 'He had a phone in his cell in Wakefield, he doesn't now in Whitemoor. He had a phone and he could phone family and stuff like that.
'He had his canteen money, he was only ever on basic because he wouldn't go into psychology programs. He was only on basic but he had what he needed. He was comfortable.'
Gavin expressed concern for his uncle's mental state and claimed that he has been told that a return to Wakefield would be a 'difficult' task.
The Prison Service declined to comment on individual prisoners.
However, a source told us that prisoners in Whitemoor prison receive at least one hour out of their cell per day. They also stressed that Maudsley has access to the exercise yard and that he does have his belongings along with a telephone in his cell.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Mum of teen murdered with ninja sword makes powerful plea on day of major law change
Pooja Kanda, whose son Ronan was murdered in 2022, has called on anyone who still owns a ninja sword to 'do the right thing' and surrender it as a ban comes into force Since her 16-year-old son Ronan was murdered with a ninja sword, Pooja Kanda has been on a mission to make the streets safer. The heartbroken mother has a powerful message to those who still have the deadly weapons, which today become illegal to possess. "Do the right thing - save yourself, your family and your future," she said. Pooja knows full well the misery such swords - which for years have been readily available online with minimal checks - can cause. Schoolboy Ronan was stabbed through the heart as he walked home in June 2022 in a tragic case of mistaken identity. Her voice cracking, Pooja reflected on the way her life changed that day - and her desperate need to stop others going through the same thing. Ronan's teenage killers had bought the 20-inch blade online, and murderer Prabjeet Veadhesa collected it along with a machete on the morning of the attack. Pooja only learned how easy it was to buy these weapons at the trial of Veadhesa and Sukhman Shergill, who were both found guilty of murder. Speaking at her home in Wolverhampton she said: "When I left that courtroom I just didn't know how it was happening. It was a shock to my whole system, I was in pain. "And my son, when you see the reality of what happened to Ronan, that is beyond words. There was no chance that he would have survived that." During the harrowing weeks of evidence, it emerged that Veadhesa - who was only 16 when he murdered Ronan - had amassed an array of weapons that he purchased online. A 16-year-old was able to buy 25 of those weapons, it was beyond words," Pooja said softly. "I had to do something at that point. I lost the most beautiful, loving, caring, intelligent human being who would have made a positive difference on this earth." Determined that Ronan's death would make a difference, Pooja set about campaigning for the law to change and outlaw weapons like the one that killed her son. She said: "There is no reason for these weapons. This is not a kitchen knife, there is no sense of purpose. "These large knives do not serve any purpose. And when they get into the wrong hands they are used for what happened to Ronan, for a murder to harm somebody else." Ronan was walking home after buying a a PlayStation controller from a friend when he was set upon. His killers had mistaken him for another teenager, Wolverhampton Crown Court heard the following year. Pooja said: "The weapon went through his heart. It was small and sharp and long, and what Ronan went through in that moment he should not have gone through. This type of weapon should have been banned years ago. "They should have been monitoring online activity of these types of weapons years ago. They should have been doing that and my son would have been here today." Pooja, who was awarded an OBE in the King's birthday honours list in June, branded internet weapon vendors "heartless". "All they care about is their money," she said. "And the bloodshed, what's happening behind it, they do not care about it." Her tireless work in Ronan's memory has already made a huge difference in tackling the horrendous online loopholes. Today's ban is a landmark, but it's not the end. Legislation working its way through Parliament will bring in mandatory two-step age checks for anyone buying blades. Tougher sentences for those who sell knives to under-16s will be brought in what the Government has called Ronan's Law. There will also be a new criminal offence of possessing an offensive weapon with intent for violence - carrying a jail term of up to four years in prison. The bereaved mum said today is a "strong step forward" - but more needs to be done to keep kids safe. She said: "This is very important legislation that will be protecting youths. Children will be able to walk home not much more safely. "I'm not saying this is the end. I'm saying this is a one strong step forward, but there are many more to take." She said now is the time for families to stand up and make the streets safer. Her next step, she revealed, will be to demand a licensing system for online and face-to-face sales of sharp blades. "We need the community to come forward and, come forward, speak to us, support us," she said. "Right now I could do with more support from the public and I want mums and dads and the siblings, everyone to come forward now. These kind of people (knife sellers) must be held accountable." She praised Home Secretary Yvette Cooper for finally tightening the law around online knife sales. "I believe that the government is walking on the right path," Pooja said. "They're doing much more than the previous governments do, and they are definitely committed to halving knife crime." Since June more than 1,000 ninja swords have been handed in at amnesty bins and police stations ahead of the ban. This will make it illegal to possess, manufacture, import or sell these deadly weapons. From now on anyone caught in possession of a ninja sword in a private place could be jailed for six months. This will go up to two years when the Crime and Policing Bill becomes law. And there is already a penalty of up to four years in prison for carrying any weapon in public. Writing for The Mirror, Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson said ninja swords are "a deadly weapon bought online with no legitimate purpose beyond causing harm". She praised Pooja for her relentless campaigning since Ronan's death, writing: "Ronan's memory deserves nothing less than our unwavering commitment to create communities where every child can walk home safely." The ban on ninja swords has been welcomed by police chiefs. Simon Foster and Matthew Barber, who lead on serious violence at the Association for Police and Crime Commissioners (APCC) said it will make a "significant difference" in the availability of these deadly weapons.
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
Sadistic Saw-inspired murderer who sliced through victim's spinal cord has his jail term extended to 2065 for savagely stabbing two prison guards
A notorious inmate known as the 'Saw Killer' is to stay behind bars until at least 2065 after he stabbed two prison guards in the jail dubbed 'Monster Mansion'. Sadistic Matthew Tinling, 38, attacked the officers in HMP Wakefield, West Yorkshire, after becoming enraged that his exercise regime had been altered. Tinling, who was already serving three life sentences for murder, attempted murder and wounding, was today handed a further life sentence after pleading guilty causing grievous bodily harm with intent on the prison guards on January 23 last year. A judge told him he was 'a potentially lethal and real danger' to both prison staff and fellow inmates. One of the officers stabbed 'feared for his life', Leeds Crown Court heard. The convicted murderer now cannot be considered for parole until he is at least 78 years old. Tinling killed former soldier Richard Hamilton in 2012 after stabbing him 17 times in the head, neck and legs in a 'savage and prolonged' attack. At the climax of the frenzied attack, he mimicked a torture scene from the notorious horror film Saw VI by trying to sever the 46-year-old's spinal cord. He was sentenced to life with a minimum of 30 years before he was eligible for parole. Outlining attacks Tinling then carried out in prison, Judge Robin Mairs said that in April 2015 he was convicted of wounding with intent and sentenced to a further five years after slashing a fellow prisoner with a razor to the face and neck and telling him 'you're going to die'. In March 2019 he was convicted of attempted murder and had a further ten years added to his life sentence after he and another prisoner stabbed a fellow inmate 50 times with a sharpened toilet brush. Tinling then attacked a prison officer at HMP Woodhill near Milton Keynes in February 2021 as he was being escorted back to his cell after a work-out. He 'launched himself' at the officer in the exercise yard after he asked him to return to his cell earlier than normal. As the gate opened, he came 'flying out' at the guard and slashed him with a razor blade. The killer admitted attempted murder and in a letter reportedly bragged about how he had 'mangled his face'. As he was sentenced for that offence, Tinling was told that the earliest he could then be eligible for parole was 2062 - instead of 2055. Tinling was first jailed at the Old Bailey in 2013 for the murder of Mr Hamilton. He had tortured the former soldier in a bid to get him to hand over the PIN for his bank account and later withdrew £240 to spend on crack cocaine. Tinling had watched Saw VI on DVD while living at a homeless hostel in Maida Vale, west London. He then broke into Mr Hamilton's room and tried to imitate a scene from the film. He inflicted 17 wounds during the attack, the most serious of which was delivered specifically with the intention of severing Mr Hamilton's spinal cord to cause paralysis and death. Tinling had denied murder but was convicted after a trial. Leeds Crown Court heard the most recent stabbings occurred at HMP Wakefield. Prosecutor Michael Collins said Tinling was on the segregation wing, which houses the jail's 'most disruptive and violent' inmates. He had been there for four years. His cell was regularly searched for weapons and he was scanned going in and out of the cell. In the morning Tinling was shouting angrily that his exercise time had been moved, the court heard. Prison officer Mark Smith was Tinling's personal officer and he told the inmate 'Play the game' and his exercise time would be returned. After showering and returning to his cell, in the shower area he armed himself with a 7cm long knife and used it on prison officer Martin Fletcher, who sustained a 2cm deep wound to the back of his neck. Fellow officer Mr Smith was stabbed through the left bicep as fought to save his colleague from the frenzied attack. The court heard Mr Fletcher 'turned grey' and 'feared for his life' from the wound. Tinling, attending the sentencing hearing via video link from HMP Belmarsh, heard both officers remain signed off work. Mr Fletcher struggles to sleep and can no longer drive. Mr Smith suffers flashbacks and anxiety and keeps reliving the image of his colleague and how he 'thought he was going to die'. Sentencing Tinling to another life sentence for the attacks on the guards, Judge Mairs added a further three years to the minimum date he can be considered for parole. That term now totals 40 years and brings the date to 2065 - when Tinling will be aged 78. Judge Mairs told Tinling: 'It was plainly a preconceived plan of yours to obtain the knife and to arm yourself for attack.' He added: 'You threw yourself at the officers without warning. 'You swung at Prison Officer Fletcher, aiming at his head and neck area. It was done with such speed that the officer was only able to turn his head slightly and the blow landed to his lower neck area.' The judge said the 'frenzied' attack continued on other officers as they tried to contain him. Judge Mairs said that arming himself with the knife and stabbing the offices because of a change in his regime was 'extreme and entirely unnecessary'. 'You are a potentially lethal and real danger to anyone within the prison estate you may encounter, officer or inmate,' he added. 'Those who work in the prison service do a difficult and dangerous job.'
Reuters
18-07-2025
- Reuters
US judge rejects Sony settlement over PlayStation game sales
July 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge in California has declined to approve a class action settlement with Sony that would have distributed $7.8 million in electronic credits to millions of users of the company's PlayStation video game consoles. Sony had agreed to the settlement to resolve claims that it overcharged for digital games, but U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín in San Francisco said in a ruling, opens new tab on Thursday that the plaintiffs had not convinced her the accord was adequate. Martínez-Olguín described the agreement as a coupon settlement, and said those types of deals are generally disfavored. The judge said the consumers who brought the case can file a revised proposal. Michael Buchman, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs, declined to comment. Sony did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The plaintiffs, who estimated the class size at more than 4.4 million individuals, sued Sony after its 2019 move to bar retailers such as Best Buy and GameStop from selling so-called download codes for digital PlayStation games. The lawsuit accused Sony of illegally monopolizing the sale of digital PlayStation games. Martínez-Olguín in her ruling said any updated settlement proposal should show how the 'value and structure of this settlement remain defensible,' with an estimate of what individual class members would receive. She asked for examples of comparable cases and their outcomes. In a court filing, Sony said it was settling to avoid the further expense and distraction of continued litigation. The company denied any wrongdoing. The settlement period covers eligible PlayStation game purchases made between April 2019 and December 2023, according to court filings. The plaintiffs' lawyers in a filing in December said they had invested about 13,700 hours in the litigation, which began in 2021. They had planned to seek up to about 33% of the settlement for legal fees, or about $2.61 million. The case is Agustin Caccuri et al v. Sony Interactive Entertainment, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-03361-AMO. For plaintiffs: Michael Buchman of Motley Rice For defendant: Shawn Estrada of Paul Weiss
