
Trump to make unprecedented second state visit to U.K. in September
LONDON — U.S. President Donald Trump will make an unprecedented second state visit to the U.K. between Sept. 17 and 19 when he will be hosted by King Charles II and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, Buckingham Palace said Monday.
Trump, who is a big supporter of the royal family, particularly of the monarch, will be accompanied by his wife, Melania Trump during the three-day visit, the palace confirmed.
No U.S. president has been invited for a second state visit. Trump previously enjoyed the pomp and pageantry of the state visit in 2019 during his first term when he was hosted by Charles' late mother, Queen Elizabeth II.
The invitation for the second state visit from the king was hand-delivered by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in February during a meeting at the White House.
After reading it, Trump said it was a 'great, great honor' and appeared particularly pleased by the fact he will be staying at Windsor Castle, to the west of the capital. 'That's really something,' he said.
Precedent for second-term U.S. presidents who have already made a state visit is usually tea or lunch with the monarch at Windsor Castle, as was the case for George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
State visits are ceremonial meetings between heads of state that are used to honor friendly nations and sometimes smooth relations between rivals. While the king formally issues the invitation for a state visit, he does so on the advice of the elected government.
The visit is seen as part of Starmer's effort to keep Trump close and lessen the impact of some of his polices on the U.K. The relationship between the two appears amicable, and has helped the U.K. from facing the sort of hefty U.S. tariffs that other nations are seeing.
But like Trump's previous visit, it's unlikely he will be welcomed by all. Last time, a day of protests saw the flying of a giant blimp depicting Trump as an angry orange baby from outside Parliament.
Lawmakers from Starmer's Labour Party have also questioned whether the honor should be extended to Trump at a time that he is supporting Israel's war in Gaza and threatening the sovereignty of allies such as Canada and Greenland.
Charles could also face some challenges during the visit because he is head of state of both the United Kingdom and Canada, which Trump has suggested should become the 51st U.S. state. During a speech to the Canadian parliament in May the king highlighted Canada's 'unique identity' and 'sovereignty,' while echoing the words of the country's national anthem when he said 'The True North is indeed strong and free.'
State visits to Britain are particularly prized by heads of state because they come with a full complement of royal pomp and circumstance, including military reviews, carriage rides and a glittering state banquet hosted by the monarch.
The events normally take place in and around Buckingham Palace in central London. But like last week's state visit from French President Emmanual Macron and his wife Brigitte, the Trumps will stay at Windsor Castle. Buckingham Palace is undergoing extensive remodeling.
Pan Pylas, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Republicans complain about smoke. But they voted for fire
It had to be a joke, right? A group of MAGA lawmakers moaning about 'suffocating Canadian wildfire smoke' in a complaint fired off to Canada's ambassador to the US. Someone at The Beaverton or Walking Eagle News must have been feeling especially snarky. But, no. Turns out that six of Trump's besties in Congress spent their July 4 weekend coordinating grievances and writing up a joint letter of protest, demanding action from the Canadian government. Their constituents have been 'limited in their ability to go outside … to spend time recreating, enjoying time with family and creating new memories,' the complaint reads. It makes no mention of the tens of thousands of Canadians forced to evacuate this year or those who have died. The signatories conveniently ignore the fact that smoke from the US side of the border regularly smothers those of us who live north of it. In fact, the complaint does not mention fires in the US at all, even though more than two million acres have burned so far this year, and Canadian firefighters have deployed to assist their US colleagues, just as US wildland firefighters have been helping in Canada. Given the MAGA credentials of the complainants, you may not be surprised to hear their complaint blames a 'lack of active forest management' (a nod to Donald Trump's weird conviction that countries like Finland rake their forests to remove fuel), admonishes Canada for not preventing arson and makes no mention of climate change whatsoever. It most certainly does not mention that the signatories just passed Trump's 'big beautiful bill' that will add an extra seven billion tonnes of fossil fuel pollution to the atmosphere over the next five years, compared to the Biden-era climate targets. The irony is what's suffocating — while MAGA lawmakers rage at the north for spoiling their barbecues, they're voting to supercharge the very crisis they refuse to name. The sharpest response to the US congresspeople came from Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew. He didn't mince words in his response. He called the GOP lawmakers 'ambulance chasers.' It had to be a joke, right? A group of MAGA lawmakers moaning about 'suffocating Canadian wildfire smoke' in a complaint fired off to Canada's ambassador to the US. Someone at The Beaverton or Walking Eagle News must have been feeling snarky. "This is what turns people off politics," Kinew said. "A group of congresspeople trying to trivialize and make hay out of a wildfire season where we've lost lives in our province." That group of congresspeople included Tom Emmer, the GOP's third-highest ranking member and majority whip in the House of Representatives. You might think he'd have been preoccupied over the long weekend — dealing with the horrendous floods that killed at least 120 people in Texas, sweeping away children at summer camp. In that situation, too, politicians and officials are contorting themselves to avoid acknowledging the obvious fact that catastrophes are hitting harder and more frequently. Terms like a one-hundred-year flood or one-thousand-year flood have become meaningless (the US has just been rocked by four one-in-1,000-year storms in less than a week). In Texas, the rain bomb struck at night. In about 45 minutes, the Guadalupe River surged from a stream you could wade across to a torrent two-storeys high. At its crest, more water was churning down the Guadalupe than the average flow rate over Niagara Falls. Yes, we can say climate change did this Governments should be ready for "more, bigger, extreme events," said Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M. Ever-bigger floods are 'exactly what the future is going to hold.' Other climate scientists described the Texas floods as 'precisely' the kind of disaster being supercharged by global heating. 'This kind of record-shattering rain (caused by slow-moving torrential thunderstorms) event is *precisely* that which is increasing the fastest in a warming climate. So it's not a question of whether climate change played a role — it's only a question of how much,' said Daniel Swain. That last point is a key one. Far too much coverage of fire, flood and extreme weather still operates on the old trope that you can't attribute any particular event to climate change. But, scientists like Dessler emphasize that 'the role of climate change is like steroids for the weather — it injects an extra dose of intensity.' 'We have added a lot of carbon to the atmosphere, and that extra carbon traps energy in the climate system,' Dessler wrote after the tragedies in Texas. 'Because of this extra energy, every weather event we see now carries some influence from climate change. The only question is how big that influence is.' 'Measuring the exact size takes careful attribution studies, but basic physics already tells us the direction: climate change very likely made this event stronger.' The first attribution studies have already been published. These rapid response analyses don't have time to undergo peer-review and instead apply peer-reviewed methodologies to the conditions for a specific event. EU-based ClimaMeter has released just such a rapid-response study which concluded that the heavy rain that caused the floods in Texas 'cannot be explained alone by natural variability and points to human-caused climate change as one of the main drivers of the event.' Davide Faranda of ClimaMeter summarized the organization's findings: The flash flood that tore through Camp Mystic at night, when people were most vulnerable, shows the deadly cost of underestimating this shift. We need to rethink early-warning systems, land-use planning, and emergency preparedness. And above all, we must reduce greenhouse gas emissions to limit future risks.' The basic pattern is that hotter air can hold more water vapour. And warmer oceans evaporate more water into the atmosphere. The rain bomb in Texas resulted from a tropical storm fuelled by an overheated Gulf of Mexico. The US-based organization Climate Central calculated that these unnatural early-July sea surface temperatures were made 10 to 30 times more likely by climate change. Fossil-fuels triple heat deaths As heart-breaking as the US floods have been, the death toll is many times lower than attribution studies are finding for heat waves. The early attribution studies are now rolling in for the heat wave that has been searing Europe. And for the first time, scientists are now taking the step of estimating the number of deaths linked to climate change. About 1,500 people died because of supercharged heat in just 10 days, across 12 cities, according to the team of scientists led by Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The researchers found that 65 per cent of the estimated heat deaths resulted from the extra heat caused by climate change, 'meaning the death toll was tripled due to the burning of fossil fuels.' The science is not subtle: fossil fuel pollution is killing people. The question is no longer if climate change is making disasters worse — it's how many lives it's already taken. When scientists can now calculate the number of deaths resulting from human-caused heating, we're witnessing the emergence of a macabre new metric: bodies per barrel. This isn't hyperbole, it's attribution science. The same methodology that can trace Texas floods to an overheated Gulf of Mexico can now count the bodies piling up from burning fossil fuels. And while the MAGA lawmakers may be insufferable, the deeper truth is harder to face: that same macabre math applies across the board, and border. The metric isn't confined to one political party or one country. In Canada, politicians continue to propose and celebrate new fossil fuel infrastructure, from LNG export terminals to new pipelines, gas networks to gas-guzzling vehicles. We can pretend to look away from the gruesome side of the ledger, but the bodies keep piling up.


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Too much growth too fast, says councillor, of rezoning proposal in her ward
Social Sharing A proposal coming to London politicians this week that could transform a southwest London neighbourhood is being received with apprehension by the councillor whose ward it would impact. In a report that landed on the desks of councillors last Wednesday, city planners recommend that council greenlight the proposal from Southside Construction Ltd., which seeks to add roughly 4,000 new dwellings to a stretch of Pack Road, between Colonel Talbot and Bostwick roads. It would do so in part by changing the zoning rules at 6309 Pack Rd., to allow increased density and building height limits. "I'm so disappointed," said Coun. Anna Hopkins, whose ward the potential development site is in. "It's great to see all this intensification, but we don't need this [much] intensity." "Our schools and our parks and our amenity spaces are going to be so far behind." The zoning application at 6309 Pack Rd. is the latest in the area near Lambeth and Talbot Village that would add to the significant growth seen in that portion of the city in the past decade — growth that has only accelerated in recent years. Its approval would pave the way for 206 single family houses, 36 street townhouse units, and five high-density apartment blocks, served by six new streets. It would significantly increase the maximum density of parts of the area to 300 units per hectare, and raise maximum building heights along pack road as high as 16 stories. Future developments in the area could make room for more than 17,000 new people, with a number of high density residential blocks along Pack Road, and lower density areas including single detached homes and townhouses south of those. The added density, while expected in the neighbourhood that's been home to many recent developments, is too much too soon, and with too many questions still unanswered, Hopkins said. "If you read this recommendation, there's still a lot more work to be done as we approve it. We still have to look at how we get in and out of Pack Road [with the additional traffic]." Issues identified by staff in the report include concerns over the capacity of the existing sewer system in the area. Another concern is potential great blue heron habitat existing on nearby land. Development actually happening once the land is rezoned is dependent on some of those concerns being addressed before any shovels hit the dirt. The site plan process required for anything to be built on the land is likely to address the issues, but Hopkins questions if city hall would be doing the right thing by deferring such critical decisions to later. "We're starting to do that more and more with applications, and I'm starting to put my feet on the brakes a little bit. We want to meet our housing targets. We can still get to where we're going, but we can do it, I think, in a more thoughtful way," Hopkins said. She said she's heard similar concerns from constituents, some of whom have submitted letters to the committee in opposition to the application. Those letters say the neighbourhood would be drastically altered by the plan, and the addition of high rises across the street from homes that back on to Pack road would be detrimental. While Hopkins isn't on the planning and environment committee, she said she'll encourage councillors on it to ask for more work to be done to address the existing concerns before approving it. The committee will consider the proposal on July 15, and if it's approved there, it will go full council for approval later this month.


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
FICO UK Credit Card Market Report: May 2025
The latest UK credit card data from global analytics software leader FICO provides stark evidence that consumer financial confidence remains low. Whilst spending has followed the usual seasonal drop after Easter, the average active balance is 4.7% higher year-on-year, suggesting consumers are not able to clear as much of their credit card debt. The percentage of balance paid is also trending downwards year-on-year by 5.8%. Another critical sign of financial difficulty is the percentage of customers using credit cards to take out cash, which has increased month-on-month by 2.5%. Highlights Spending fell by 4.1% month-on-month and 1.7% year-on-year Balances fell slightly compared to April, to £1,865 but remain 4.7% higher year-on-year Percentage of overall balance paid has increased by 4.7% month-on-month to 35.6%, but is 5.8% lower year-on-year Year-on-year, missed payments have fallen across all delinquency periods The average balance on one missed payment accounts has increased 2.4% compared to April, and 7.2% year-on-year Customers using credit cards to take out cash increased for the second month in a row, by 2.5% FICO Comment Sales tend to decrease after the Easter holidays, and FICO data shows that May 2025 was no exception. Spending fell by 4.1% month-on-month and 1.7% year-on-year, to an average of £790. However, with the percentage of overall balance paid dropping by 5.8% year-on-year, balances have risen by 4.7% compared to May 2024, which will be a concern for lenders. Lenders will also want to keep a close eye on delinquencies, as May saw the erratic patterns of 2025 continuing. After the significant 22.1% drop in April 2025, May saw a 10.4% increase in the percentage of customers missing one payment. Year-on-year, there has been a 12.4% decrease. For customers missing two payments, there has been a 9.6% decrease month-on-month and 8.1% year-on-year. However, the percentage of customers missing three payments increased month-on-month by 3.9%. When comparing the ratio of the average delinquent balance to the overall balance, this ratio is slightly trending upwards, indicating that missed payment balances are increasing at a faster rate. Lenders may wish to review balance segmentation in risk strategies, as goods and services that cost £2,000 in 2020 would cost £2,350 today. They may also want to consider adopting or reviewing pre-delinquency strategies in order to identify and proactively act on customers before they get into financial trouble. Key Trend Indicators – UK Cards May 2025 Metric Amount Month-on-Month Change Year-on-Year Change Average UK Credit Card Spend £790 -4.1% -1.7% Average Card Balance £1,865 -0.4% +4.7% Percentage of Payments to Balance 35.59 +4.7% -5.8% Accounts with One Missed Payment 1.43 +10.4% -12.4% Accounts with Two Missed Payments 0.29 -9.6% -8.1% Accounts with Three Missed Payments 0.21 +3.9% -6.0% Average Credit Limit £5,855 +0.2% +2.9% Average Overlimit Spend £95 +3.3% +5.6% Cash Sales as a % of Total Sales 0.85 +2.3% -3.7% Source: FICO These card performance figures are part of the data shared with subscribers of the FICO® Benchmark Reporting Service. The data sample comes from client reports generated by the FICO ® TRIAD ® Customer Manager solution in use by some 80% of UK card issuers. For more information on these trends, contact FICO. About FICO FICO (NYSE: FICO) powers decisions that help people and businesses around the world prosper. Founded in 1956, the company is a pioneer in the use of predictive analytics and data science to improve operational decisions. FICO holds more than 200 US and foreign patents on technologies that increase profitability, customer satisfaction and growth for businesses in financial services, insurance, telecommunications, health care, retail and many other industries. Using FICO solutions, businesses in more than 80 countries do everything from protecting 4 billion payment cards from fraud, to improving financial inclusion, to increasing supply chain resiliency. The FICO® Score, used by 90% of top US lenders, is the standard measure of consumer credit risk in the US and has been made available in over 40 other countries, improving risk management, credit access and transparency. Learn more at FICO and TRIAD are registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation in the United States and other countries.