Clashes in Istanbul over alleged 'Prophet Mohammed' cartoon
The incident occurred after Istanbul's chief prosecutor ordered the arrest of the editors at LeMan magazine on grounds it had published a cartoon which "publicly insulted religious values".
"The chief public prosecutor's office has launched an investigation into the publication of a cartoon in the June 26, 2025 issue of LeMan magazine that publicly insults religious values, and arrest warrants have been issued for those involved," the prosecutor's office said.
A copy of the black-and-white image posted on social media showed two characters hovering in the skies over a city under bombardment.
"Salam aleikum, I'm Mohammed," says one shaking hands with the other who replies, "Aleikum salam, I'm Musa."
But the magazine's editor-in-chief Tuncay Akgun told AFP by phone from Paris that the image had been misinterpreted and was "not a caricature of Prophet Mohammed".
"In this work, the name of a Muslim who was killed in the bombardments of Israel is fictionalised as Mohammed. More than 200 million people in the Islamic world are named Mohammed," he said, saying it had "nothing to do with Prophet Mohammed.
"We would never take such a risk."
As the news broke, several dozen angry protesters attacked a bar often frequented by LeMan staffers in downtown Istanbul, provoking angry scuffles with police, an AFP correspondent said.
The scuffles quickly degenerated into clashes involving between 250 to 300 people, the correspondent said.
- Cartoonist, two others held -
In several posts on X, Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said police had arrested the cartoonist responsible for "this vile drawing", the magazine's graphic designer and two other staffers.
Police had also taken over the magazine's offices on Istiklal Avenue and arrest warrants had been issued for several other of the magazine's executives, presidential press aide Fahrettin Altin wrote on X.
In a string of posts on X, LeMan defended the cartoon and said it had been deliberately misinterpreted to cause a provocation.
"The cartoonist wanted to portray the righteousness of the oppressed Muslim people by depicting a Muslim killed by Israel, he never intended to belittle religious values," it said.
Akgun said the legal attack on the magazine, a satirical bastion of opposition which was founded in 1991, was "incredibly shocking but not very surprising".
"This is an act of annihilation. Ministers are involved in the whole business, a cartoon is distorted," he said.
"Drawing similarities with Charlie Hebdo is very intentional and very worrying," he said of the French satirical magazine whose offices were stormed by Islamist gunmen in 2015.
The attack, which killed 12 people, occurred after it published caricatures lampooning the Prophet Mohammed.
- 'A very systematic provocation' -
"There is a game here, as if we were repeating something similar. This is a very systematic provocation and attack," Akgun said.
Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc an investigation had been opened on grounds of "publicly insulting religious values".
"Disrespect towards our beliefs is never acceptable," he wrote on X.
"No freedom grants the right to make the sacred values of a belief the subject of ugly humour. The caricature or any form of visual representation of our Prophet not only harms our religious values but also damages societal peace."
Istanbul governor Davut Gul also lashed out at "this mentality that seeks to provoke society by attacking our sacred values.
"We will not remain silent in the face of any vile act targeting our nation's faith," he warned.
bur-hmw/phz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Israeli Officials Express Optimism on Gaza Cease-Fire as Netanyahu Prepares to Meet With Trump
Israeli officials projected cautious optimism on Wednesday over the possibility of a new Gaza cease-fire and hostage release agreement ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's meeting with President Trump next week in Washington. It was still unclear whether the latest U.S.-backed effort can overcome the most entrenched sticking point between Israel and Hamas: whether the pause in the fighting would actually end the 20-month war in Gaza. Israel informed the United States on Tuesday that it had assented to 'conditions to finalize' a 60-day cease-fire with Hamas, President Trump wrote on social media on Tuesday. During the truce, all sides would attempt to use the temporary pause to end the war, he said. The latest effort goes beyond a previous proposal in May, with more extensive guarantees that mediators, including the United States, would ensure that talks continue during the two-month truce until both sides agreed to an end to the war, according to three Israeli officials, speaking anonymously to discuss the matter. Hamas had yet to respond to the proposal, which would provide the basis for intensive talks to flesh out details of the accord. But two of the three Israeli officials said they were hopeful that the latest effort might finally give some momentum to the long-stalled cease-fire talks amid rising pressure from Mr. Trump to reach an agreement. Hamas leaders say they will only release the remaining hostages if Israel ends the war in Gaza. Mr. Netanyahu has said he is ready for a 'temporary cease-fire,' but that he won't end the war unless Hamas ends its rule in Gaza and its leaders go into exile, conditions the Palestinian group rejects. Israel had made new concessions by agreeing to the guarantees, two of the officials said. The precise language was unclear, but Hamas has demanded similar clauses in the past. Israeli officials have rejected them, saying they would effectively turn the temporary truce into a permanent one by default. Some analysts say Mr. Netanyahu — basking in what many Israelis consider his successful June war with Iran — may now be ready to change course. More than 56,000 people, including thousands of children, have been killed in the war in Gaza, according to the Gaza health ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. The war began when Hamas and its allies attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians. More than 250 others were taken hostage, according to Israel.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
US Diplomats, Not Bombers, Must Finish the Job in Iran
American and Israeli forces have done the world a favor by setting back Iran's nuclear program, whether by a little or a lot. But, unless the US now binds the regime to a deal with strict, long-term constraints on its nuclear activities, the risks they've taken may well be for naught. The Beltway debate over whether Iranian nuclear capabilities have been 'obliterated' or can be revived within months largely misses the point. An accurate damage assessment will take weeks, not days, and it will likely require the return of international nuclear inspectors to the sites at Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow. More important, the whereabouts of Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium remain unclear. Advanced centrifuges may be hidden away. Not all the country's nuclear scientists have been killed. The possibility that the regime might put those three elements together and race to build a crude nuclear device can't be ruled out.


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Iran Strike Was a Triumph That Showed American Weakness
It's useful to be reminded, occasionally, that there's only one superpower. Operation Midnight Hammer, the globe-spanning strike against Iran's nuclear program, was a demonstration of power projection that America's rivals can only envy. Unfortunately, the operation is also testament to how badly US military power is being strained, and how unserious the nation's debate on defense strategy has become. That debate has featured, in recent years, two warring camps. In the first are those who warn that the threat of war with China is rising and that interventions elsewhere make it harder to prepare for that fight. In the second are those who argue that the US has vital stakes outside the western Pacific and that a global power can't simply quit crucial regions such as the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Oddly, recent events show that both groups have a point.