First Minister demands answers over UHI Perth aviation collapse
Air Service Training (Engineering) Limited (AST) is a wholly owned subsidiary of UHI Perth.
It plunged into administration earlier this month, putting 28 jobs at risk.
More than 190,000 students have qualified through its courses since it was founded in 1931.
UHI Perth has provided enough money to ensure its BSc in aircraft maintenance engineering and management programme will continue until the end of the academic year.
However, all other courses will end immediately.
This has troubled Mr Swinney, who is the MSP for Perthshire North where the airport and college is located.
He has now written to the institution demanding to know what safeguards are in place and whether there are any further 'financial difficulties' UHI Perth needs to make public.
Most recent financial accounts for UHI Perth show it posted a deficit of £1.7 million to July 31 2024.
In a joint letter, Mr Swinney, local SNP's MP Pete Wishart and fellow Perthshire MSP Jim Fairlie, 'seek urgent clarity' from Dr Cook on a number of unanswered issues, including:
Mr Swinney said: 'AST is a world-class facility located in the heart of Perthshire.
'It has a rich history of providing specialised training and has a profoundly positive impact on the local economy.
'To that end, it is vital that all possible avenues to save AST are explored.
'Along with Pete Wishart and Jim Fairlie, I will continue to engage with all stakeholders and strongly advocate for a solution that secures the future of AST and safeguards the jobs and training opportunities that it provides within the local area.'
The company has struggled financially since the pandemic, due to falling student numbers, reduced commercial contracts and rising costs.
This combination of factors has put significant strain on its cash flow.
AST was to receive up to £8m in funding from the Tay Cities Deal, in a partnership with Tayside Aviation.
Tayside Aviation collapsed in 2023, and subsequently no business case has been submitted for the cash.
UHI Perth and Dr Cook have been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
10 hours ago
- Daily Record
Kates Forbes walking away from Holyrood shows independence is off the radar
Daily Record Political Editor Paul Hutcheon says the exodus of SNP MSPs shows a lack of confidence that indyref2 will ever be delivered. Kate Forbes standing down from Holyrood when she is still in her 30s spells trouble for John Swinney and the SNP. If the First Minister's deputy believed Scotland was on the cusp of independence, would she quit Holyrood? Forbes is the latest senior Nationalist and Cabinet Secretary to desert Swinney at a time when is trying to shore up support for his ailing party. He too was intending to quit next year until the implosion of Humza Yousaf's leadership forced him to delay his retirement. Holyrood opinion polls look positive for the SNP next year, but their lead is precarious and built on sand. They have lost the ability to deliver in Government and the party is deeply split on the route to a second referendum. Nicola Sturgeon held the line for most of her leadership that indyref2 was around the corner, but this was a fiction. Westminster refused to indulge Sturgeon and Supreme Court judges said Holyrood did not have the power to organise a vote. The SNP under Swinney, as was the case when Yousaf was briefly in charge, also has a strategy for indyref2 that will not deliver independence. Forbes cited a desire to spend more time with her young family as the reason for her departure, but she knows the SNP is jaded and past its best. She will also be mindful of the bruising leadership contest she lost to Yousaf in 2023. Her opposition to same sex marriage was a key factor behind her defeat and her chances of winning a future contest stood at 45% at best. She had a decent chance of becoming the First Minister, but even in these circumstances she has chosen a life outside Holyrood. Nine months before the election, Labour and SNP are crawling towards the finishing line. The Nationalists have lost their drive and Scottish Labour are being dragged to the sea-bed by the drag anchor of the UK Government. Scottish politics is an unpopularity contest and Forbes has decided to walk away.
Scottish Sun
10 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
The SNP look knackered & they're clinging on – a second independence referendum is last thing John Swinney wants now
Mr Swinney both wants and doesn't want IndyRef2 - both things are true CHRIS MUSSON The SNP look knackered & they're clinging on – a second independence referendum is last thing John Swinney wants now JOHN Swinney may well be telling the country he wants to style next year's Holyrood election as a referendum on having an independence referendum. But here's a thing. I don't think he is remotely serious about the idea of a re-run of 2014, at least not any time in the next few years. Advertisement 3 First Minister John Swinney Credit: PA 3 Swinney wants next year's Holyrood vote to be a referendum on IndyRef2 Credit: Alamy 3 The Scottish Sun's political guru Chris Musson Credit: Andrew Barr In fact, it's probably one of the last things the First Minister wants right now. It's probably on a list somewhere in the recesses of his mind alongside the nightmare news that Donald Trump loved their dinner so much that he's on his way back to Scotland and asking to play 36 holes with him. Advertisement All of this may sound odd — the idea that the SNP leader says he wants an independence referendum, and at the same time he doesn't. But both can be true. Because we have entered the realm of the Nats talking up the break-up of the UK purely because it's a neat line which helps shore up their core vote and whip up their activists at elections, and not because they have any expectation of actually delivering it. That will doubtless come as a disappointment to the many supporters of independence, but there are many advocates of indy who would agree with me. Bluntly, the SNP look knackered. They are clinging to power, with many in the ranks fearing a day of reckoning on May 7 next year, regardless of currently being ahead in the opinion polls due to Labour's rocky first year in power down south. So, here we are. In case of emergency, break glass and hit the indy button. Advertisement Scotland is being asked to go along with the man known as Honest John — if a tad mockingly — but on this occasion, at least, he's being anything but. I have no doubt Swinney wants independence but he would only want a second referendum when he would be sure to win, and having won, have a chance of not plunging Scotland — utterly dependent on UK pooling and sharing — into economic meltdown. That time is not now. And beneath the bluster, there is no serious plan — not for achieving a referendum, and not for indy itself. John Swinney's Edinburgh show interrupted To win independence, the Nats must do three things. Firstly, govern Scotland so well that people think they are capable of running an independent country. Secondly, they must be up front that it will be extremely hard work. Advertisement Thirdly, they must persuade Scots that hard work will be worth it. At the moment they are a light year away from meeting any of these tests, all of which are linked by the key theme of trust. Salmond got pretty close in 2014, but fell short on the second and third. If and when the tests are met, and opinion polling shows a clear majority of Scots want a referendum imminently, then the UK Government will — politically at least — be unable to say no. But there is no mass clamour now for a referendum. Polls may show support for independence among decided voters is at around 50 per cent, but it's a whole lot easier to say Yes to something when it's entirely hypothetical. Our leaders could learn a thing or two from President Trump DONALD Trump may be deeply disliked by many, but he certainly isn't camera shy. Our governments could learn a thing or two about transparency from the President. As underlined by his visit to Scotland, he has a reporters following him everywhere, who he speaks to often multiple times a day. You may not like his answers, but at least he's willing to be quizzed. Compare that to the petty secrecy from the Scottish Government, who act like guard dogs and tend to keep the Press away from the First Minister, and hide his whereabouts. If the Leader the Free World can face the music on a daily basis, why can't the Leader of a Devolved Scottish Administration? The world has become a far more unstable place in recent years, and the idea that a majority of Scots want a referendum thrown into all that is ridiculous, and Swinney knows it. So, what's he up to? He sees those opinion polls, with support for independence far higher than support for the SNP. Advertisement He wants to persuade activists and voters to act in the same way as they would if there was a realistic prospect of a referendum. He is inviting you into an alternative reality. It's a campaigning device. A trick. A ruse. His desired outcome is three-pronged. Mobilise the SNP base, try to hoover up some of those voters who say they back independence but not the Nats, and distract from the real big picture — not the constitution, but the terrible state of Scotland's public services after what will be 19 years of his party's rule. But the strategy is fraught with pitfalls. Will it mobilise the base? With the best will in the world, I'm not sure even Swinney in his self-styled Full-On John mode can energise the Nats like Salmond or Nicola Sturgeon. Advertisement Will it hoover up some of those pro-indy non-SNP voters? It may. But it may also have an opposite effect, which is to alienate the floating voters who think he's at it, or current SNP backers who don't support independence. And on that distraction technique — it may only serve to sharpen the focus on those failures, if the opposition calls it out. The referendum-on-a-referendum strategy is also a lazy one. It betrays a lack of confidence in campaigning on their track record or vision for Scotland. It shows what a state the SNP are in, behind the bravado of the press releases celebrating being ahead in the opinion polls. They know the lead is precarious and they know they are a long way down on their levels of support at the 2021 election. Advertisement They know independence is as far away as it has been at any point since 2014. Yet Swinney is telling you and telling his tribe that the next election is all about indy. Not only does it show how daft Swinney thinks voters are, but also his own party. It's all about clinging on to power — on the back of a lie.
Spectator
10 hours ago
- Spectator
Why Kate Forbes is standing down
A year is a long time in politics. Just over 12 months ago, Kate Forbes MSP was made Deputy First Minister of Scotland when John Swinney took the reins from Humza Yousaf. This morning, with less than a year to go until the 2026 Holyrood election – and after the SNP had finalised its candidate list – Forbes has announced she no longer plans to stand at the Scottish parliament election. In a letter she has shared on social media, the Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic has informed Swinney that 'after careful thought over the summer recess' she will not stand again for the Highland constituency of Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch. Forbes, who has a two-year-old, added that: Quite rightly this job entails long days far from home, constant attention and total dedication. As I consider the upcoming election and the prospects of another term, I have concluded that I do not wish to seek re-election and miss any more of the precious early years of family life. Forbes's announcement is significant: she ran for the leadership contest after Nicola Sturgeon stepped down in early 2023, and while she came a close second to continuity candidate Humza Yousaf, she had been expected to go for the top job again. Even after Yousaf's election, her campaign team – slightly depleted after the furore caused by Forbes's religious views – remained intact and were considering their next moves. Although Swinney has said that he plans to stay on as First Minister for the next parliamentary term, there has been much discussion about who his successor may be. Forbes was expected to be a contender, alongside Westminster leader Stephen Flynn and housing secretary Mairi McAllan. The timing is interesting: the SNP finalised its candidate list three months ago, which saw Forbes as one of 37 MSPs selected to stand again. Pulling out with nine months to go is not ideal for a party that is 15 points behind where it was in 2021 and in need of improving its ground campaign efforts. It's a shock to those who previously supported Forbes's leadership campaign, with one insider explicit in their surprise: 'No one expected this, and I'm not sure why she arrived at this decision.' While Forbes has claimed her turnaround is down to family reasons, others aren't convinced that's the full picture. She represented a decreasing group in the SNP with socially conservative views and her pro-growth agenda hasn't always gone down well with some of her more left-wing colleagues. Some have suggested that the late announcement shows a lack of faith in Swinney's leadership. Others wonder whether the post-2026 makeup of the group – with 15 councillors and 10 ex-MPs standing for election – looks to push the party further from Forbes's values.
