
Trump administration targets George Mason University in widening war on diversity hiring in higher education
The move brings federal scrutiny to Virginia's largest public university and signals that public institutions, not just elite private colleges, are now firmly in the administration's crosshairs.
Allegations of racial preferencing in hiring
The U.S. Department of Education opened the investigation in response to a complaint filed by several faculty members at George Mason. The complaint alleges that the university has prioritized diversity considerations over traditional academic credentials in its hiring and promotion decisions.
It points to internal practices such as including 'equity advisers' in academic departments and implementing 'diversity cluster hire' initiatives to increase representation of underrepresented groups.
At the heart of the complaint is university president Gregory Washington, whose internal guidance allegedly encouraged departments to weigh diversity-related factors even when candidates may not have had superior qualifications compared to others.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Get ₹2Cr life cover@ ₹700 p.m.
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
Federal response and legal grounds
Preliminary statements from the Education Department suggest that George Mason's current hiring practices could constitute illegal racial preferencing under federal civil rights laws. The administration has argued that race-conscious hiring policies amount to reverse discrimination, especially against white and Asian American applicants, and has made dismantling such frameworks a key focus of its education policy.
This probe reflects a broader ideological and legal strategy that frames DEI initiatives as violations of anti-discrimination laws, rather than efforts to promote inclusion and equity.
University's position and recent changes
George Mason University has denied the allegations and maintains that it remains fully compliant with all federal and state regulations. Earlier this year, the university renamed its DEI office, though it concluded that its broader policies already aligned with legal standards.
The institution has emphasized that its recruitment processes are designed to attract qualified candidates while fostering a diverse academic environment.
Despite its strong reputation in conservative law and economics circles, George Mason has drawn criticism from right-leaning groups for its commitment to DEI programming. The university has defended its practices, rejecting claims that they compromise academic excellence or fairness.
A pattern across public universities
This investigation comes just weeks after a similar probe at the University of Virginia, which led to the resignation of its president under political and legal pressure. Conservative advocacy groups have been actively filing complaints and monitoring DEI policies at public institutions, arguing that these programs are ideologically motivated and not legally defensible.
A 2023 report by a conservative think tank singled out George Mason for its 'bloated' DEI staffing and programming, further fueling criticism.
Though the university disputed the report's accuracy and methodology, it marked a turning point in public discourse around its campus policies.
Higher education at a crossroads
The George Mason case underscores a growing divide in American higher education. While many universities continue to defend DEI as essential to academic and social progress, the Trump administration has doubled down on its efforts to roll back such policies, particularly in institutions that receive federal funding.
As the investigation proceeds, George Mason finds itself navigating a complex and politically charged environment—balancing institutional values, public accountability, and legal risk in a time of shifting federal priorities.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
32 minutes ago
- First Post
US may deport migrants to 'third countries' with just six hours notice under new ICE policy: Report
US immigration authorities can now deport migrants to other countries with as little as six hours' notice, under a new Trump administration policy aimed at speeding up removals. read more US judge rules Trump admin violated court order in deporting migrants to South Sudan. File Image/US Department of Defense via Reuters US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could deport migrants to countries other than their own with as little as six hours' notice, according to a new memo from a top Trump administration official. Usually, ICE waits at least 24 hours after notifying migrants of their deportation to a 'third country.' But in 'urgent situations,' the agency can now carry out deportations much faster, said the memo dated July 9 from acting ICE director Todd Lyons. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Migrants could be sent to countries that have promised not to persecute or torture them, without needing further legal procedures. The new policy signals the Trump administration's intent to speed up deportations to countries around the world. In June, the US Supreme Court cleared the way for the administration to resume such deportations by lifting a lower court order that had blocked removals without first checking whether migrants feared persecution in the third country. Following that ruling, ICE deported eight migrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan, and Vietnam to South Sudan. Reports say the administration also recently urged officials in five African nations—Liberia, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, and Gabon—to accept migrants being deported from other places. The Trump administration argues that the policy helps quickly remove people who should not be in the US, especially those with criminal records. However, critics warn that the policy is dangerous and cruel, saying it could send people to countries where they might face violence, lack connections, or not speak the language. Trina Realmuto, a lawyer representing a migrants' group challenging third-country deportations in court, said the new policy 'falls far short of providing the statutory and due process protections that the law requires.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Gaza Stripped
…or, in Trump-speak, LOSERS can be choosers Hallelujah! Gazans, says Bibi, must have 'free choice'. Even at gunpoint. Sometime ago Israel unleashed 'Gideon's Chariots' on the Strip-of-land Gazans consider homeland. Just before this airpower-aided ground blitz, Bibi reportedly suggested folks being rendered homeless would 'desire' to 'emigrate'. It followed that, by choosing to emigrate, they'd be protected from bombardment – by those bombarding them into choosing to emigrate. Wanting it US-'owned', Trump visualises Gaza stripped into a 'freedom zone', its residents ideally opting to be cleared out along with the rubble. That way you get a 'freed-up zone', so that a Riviera runs through it. Gaza 'freed' of Gazans, property (re)developers can 'zone' in, building resorts for celebrity sun-tanners. And, consensually 'zoned out', Palestinians can 'free' themselves from demolished homes, bombed-out hospitals and weaponised hunger. Call it VRS – voluntary removal scheme. Kudos to Katz, though, for unveiling the grandest (game)plan. Israel's defence minister wants a 'humanitarian city' rising from Rafah's ruins where 600,000 Palestinians would first be shunted. Followed by everyone else still alive and cart-loadable. 'Screened', they'd all enter haven on earth. And, Katz reportedly eyeing an 'emigration plan', they'd exit when exiled…to greener pastures, naturally. Aren't refugees abroad chirpier than dead men walking to food-as-bait sites at home? Where's 'choice' here, you ask. Well, copy-Katz plainly likes Trump's 'clean-out' Gaza project to 'relocate' Gazans for – you guessed it – their own good. Here's Bibi explaining Trump's 'brilliant vision': 'It's called free choice. If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to…' Remember, for Trump, the best (one-state) solution to conflict is 'surrounding countries' welcoming Gaza's 'emigrants'. If only immigrants in America found him as MAGA-nanimous. So here's how Katz's 'humanitarian' (strata)gem promotes 'free choice'. Round up 2.1mn war-ravaged people caught between Hamas's atrocities and Israel's excesses. Herd them into a veritable internment camp. Let them live cheek-by-jowl, face misery and hardship, and have no exit. Then watch them depart, 'willingly'. Bibi says Gaza shouldn't be a 'prison', but an 'open place' where Palestinians (and butterflies?) are free. Well, make that 'open' as in open-air prison, where freedom's just another word for nothing left to choose. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Taliban Calling
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. The extremist regime wants tourists. Why shouldn't it? It's part of the normalisation of brutality Kim Jong Un last month posed on a beach, surfing on the 'wave of happiness' that North Korea's Dear Leader has promised tourists visiting the newly developed Wonsan Kalma coastal tourist zone. The dictator wants more international tourists. So far, small Russian groups are the only package deal North Korea receives. This month, it's Taliban's turn to invite tourists to Afghanistan. Wonsan Kalma and Afghanistan are beautiful places. But they are not on tourists maps for good reason. Taliban's ad is made by a tour operator. It starts with a familiar chilling scene of beheadings: men, heads covered, kneeling in front of gun-wielding, presumably, Afghans. Only here, the headcover is yanked off to reveal a grinny White male flashing a thumbs-up sign. A flower tucked in the barrel of a machine gun, a close-up of an M4 rifle with 'property of US govt' etched, the 50-second ad flits between making light of Taliban as people who terrorised to stunning footage of Afghanistan. It is as extraordinarily tone-deaf as many of Trump's Truth Social posts. Taliban meanwhile is intensifying its war against Afghan women. Banned from work and education, they're publicly flogged, refused healthcare unless a male relative's present, and their movement is fully restricted. Heavily sanctioned Taliban wants tourists to earn some hard cash. But to make a beheading scene part of a promotion targeted at Americans is a cold measure of how normalised brutality is. Will Americans go, though their govt says don't? Undoubtedly. Indifference to violence is global culture, the unthinkable is routinely normalised. So, for a certain section, what could thrill more than swinging an M4 or Kalashnikov at Afghanistan's majestic peaks? Reality and rights & wrongs can take a vacation. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.