logo
Trump fights complicate latest budget brawl between McKee and Neronha. Here's why.

Trump fights complicate latest budget brawl between McKee and Neronha. Here's why.

USA Today13-02-2025
Trump fights complicate latest budget brawl between McKee and Neronha. Here's why.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
RI governor, legislators announce 2025 bills to ban assault weapons
Tuesday's news conference centered on bills to ban the purchase, sale and ownership of the military-style firearms categorized as "assault weapons."
The attorney general asked for $3.65M budget boost to hire 13 new employees
Neronha took issue with McKee denying his budget ask in 2023
Dispute comes as Neronha's office leads state court cases against President Trump's orders
Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha and Gov. Dan McKee are at odds over the state budget again, this time as Neronha spearheads the Ocean State's opposition to President Donald Trump's agenda.
In his annual request to state budget writers last fall, Neronha asked for a $3.65-million increase in his office's budget for the year starting July 1.
The extra money would allow him to add 13 new employees, including additional prosecutors, and bring it closer in line with staffing levels in other states, he said.
"In the last budget cycle, my office kept our budget request to the absolute minimum, with no new requested [Full-time Equivalent positions] and a modest increase in our base budget," Neronha wrote in his request to McKee. "This year, it is essential that we increase our staff and budget to keep pace with the needs of Rhode Islanders ‒ and to ensure this Office is positioned to meet its statutory, ethical and legal obligations."
Neronha argues he needs more money to fight Trump administration's actions
Not long after Neronha submitted his request, Trump won the 2024 presidential election, raising the probability of litigation between the state and federal government.
That did not convince McKee to give Neronha more money, however. In the budget McKee proposed to lawmakers last month, staffing levels for the attorney general's office were kept flat, as they were for most state agencies in a year of diminished federal resources and a projected revenue deficit.
Neronha's request "for additional [full-time equivalent employees] was not presented in the context of addressing a new administration in Washington, D.C.," state Budget Office spokesman Derek Gomes wrote in an email. "The governor's office recognizes that the Office of the Attorney General can bring forward a request to the General Assembly, and the governor's office will monitor it, as it does with all budget-related items during the legislative session."
When McKee told reporters he would stand by unauthorized immigrants threatened by Trump administration deportation sweeps, Neronha took to the social media platform Bluesky.
"The best way for the governor to stand up for the people of Rhode Island is to give my office the resources we need to protect Rhode Islanders and their interests, as other govs have done," Neronha posted. "We are already litigating v. Trump overreach – and only we can do that. Instead he rejected our request."
Neronha's office is part of four lawsuits challenging Trump administration actions and is leading the 22-state suit to block a federal funding freeze in the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island. The other suits challenge cuts to National Institutes of Health funding, ending birthright citizenship and access to private information for Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
Neronha spokesman Timothy Rondeau said the attorney general's office is evaluating "numerous opportunities" to file amicus briefs on federal cases, fielding a "barrage of outreach" from constituents, helping "navigate the fallout" from executive orders and "issued guidance with respect to ICE in schools."
What does Neronha want?
What would the state get for the extra $3.65 million Neronha requested in his budget for next year?
Four new prosecutors, including two to handle drunken driving cases
One victims services advocate
A new three-employee Charities Unit to investigate philanthropies
One attorney and one paralegal to bolster the Open Government Unit
Two new Information Technology employees and one "eDiscovery Management" specialist
New software for cybersecurity, body worn cameras and eDiscovery
Complex litigation expenses for health care, energy rate reviews, and gun cases
McKee's budget for next year includes $51.6 million for the attorney general's office, up from $46.5 million approved by lawmakers for the current year and nearly the $52.5 million Neronha asked for.
But the extra money in the budget would not pay for the new hires Neronha wants, but rather the 5% pay raises the McKee administration awarded state workers last year, which were not included in the budget passed by lawmakers over the summer.
Not the first budget brawl between departments
This isn't the first time Neronha has asked for a budget boost and been denied by McKee. In 2023 Neronha's requested a $2-million increase to pay for, among other things, a new cold case unit. After McKee didn't include it in his budget, state lawmakers added it to the state's final end of session spending plan. (McKee's office noted that they had included extra funding for the attorney general in 2022.)
McKee and Neronha have also clashed over issues including the eviction of a State House homeless encampment, enforcement of an apartment lead abatement law and the investigation of McKee's contracts to friendly education nonprofit the ILO Group.
Now Neronha's request for a bigger budget is once again in the General Assembly's hands.
"The Attorney General has discussed these issues with the Speaker, and is very grateful to both the Speaker and the Senate President for the support they have given our Office over the years to expand our capacity to help Rhode Islanders," Rondeau wrote in an email on the budget.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leaked memo from Hegseth's brother calls for US army to help with deportations nationwide ‘for years to come': report
Leaked memo from Hegseth's brother calls for US army to help with deportations nationwide ‘for years to come': report

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Leaked memo from Hegseth's brother calls for US army to help with deportations nationwide ‘for years to come': report

A leaked memo from the Department of Homeland Security suggests that the Trump administration is considering using the U.S. military to boost its ongoing mass deportation agenda, while acknowledging the deployment of troops in Los Angeles earlier this year wasn't 'perfect." The memo was written by DHS senior adviser Phil Hegseth, the brother of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. The New Republic published the texts on Saturday. President Donald Trump has already used U.S. military personnel in his aggressive deportation campaign. In June, Trump nationalized approximately 5,000 National Guard members and sent them to LA to push back against protesters demonstrating against Immigrations and Customs Enforcement raids in their neighborhoods. In addition to the National Guard members, Trump also sent 700 U.S. Marines to the city to stomp out the "violent insurrectionist mob." Most of the military members sent to LA have since been pulled out of the city. The DHS memo outlines a June 21 meeting between senior DHS and Pentagon officials, according to The New Republic, and suggests that U.S. military members will be needed to carry out Trump's deportation efforts for "years to come." Top level officials from both agencies, including Hegseth and acting ICE commissioner Todd Lyons, were listed as participants, the outlet reported. The memo advises departments on how they can "better plan for national security and illegal immigration" via three action items, including utilizing the Pentagon's "nationwide operational planning capabilities." "The U.S. military leadership (the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and NORTHCOM) need to feel — for the first time — the urgency of the homeland defense mission. They need to understand the threat, what's at stake, and the political importance the administration has placed on this issue," the memo reads. Later in the memo, it acknowledges that the troop deployment to LA didn't go the way the Trump administration had hoped. It does suggest that they are expecting similar operations to be carried out in the future, however. 'Everyone here is also aware of our joint work in L.A.,' it states. 'It hasn't been perfect, and we're still working through best practices together, but I think it's a good indicator of the type of operations (and resistance) we're going to be working through for years to come.' The Independent has requested comment from the Department of Homeland Security.

Smithsonian says Trump label removed from impeachment exhibit due to 'appearance'
Smithsonian says Trump label removed from impeachment exhibit due to 'appearance'

USA Today

time17 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Smithsonian says Trump label removed from impeachment exhibit due to 'appearance'

The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History confirmed the removal of a placard that displayed both of President Donald Trump's impeachments occurred due to aesthetic reasons and not because "asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit." The museum in Washington, D.C., said the placard didn't fit with "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden" exhibit in an X post on Saturday, Aug. 2. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a 25-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the post reads. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." The museum added that the impeachment placard will be "updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." Confusion over the exhibit began on July 31 when The Washington Post first reported that references to both of President Donald Trump's impeachments were removed. Why were Donald Trump's impeachments removed from exhibit? The museum explained on Aug. 1 in a statement to USA TODAY that the references to Donald Trump's impeachments, which occurred in 2019 and again in 2021, were part of a "temporary label." In September 2021, a "temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" was added, according to the Smithsonian's statement, with the museum adding that "it was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." For now, the display currently appears how it did nearly 20 years ago, according to the Smithsonian statement and the Washington Post's report, which also noted that the exhibit now reads, "only three presidents have seriously faced removal," omitting Trump. 'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed," the museum's statement reads. "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the 'Impeachment' case back to its 2008 appearance." Where is the impeachment placard located at the Smithsonian? The "impeachment" placard is housed within an exhibition called 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden," which opened in 2000, according to the emailed statement from the Smithsonian. The placard is part of a display featuring information and artifacts about Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, the display's companion website says. Nixon resigned before he could be formally impeached. Other impeached presidents featured on Smithsonian website The display's companion website does not include a dedicated section for the Trump impeachments, but does note in an introductory sentence, "The House of Representatives impeached Andrew Johnson in 1868, William J. Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019 and again in 2021. In all four cases the Senate voted to acquit." Additionally, the website features sections about Johnson's impeachment, including tickets and newspaper clips from the time; Nixon's Senate hearing and resignation, including testimony papers and photos from the proceedings; and Clinton's trial, with tickets and Senate question cards.

Smithsonian denies White House pressure to remove President Donald Trump impeachment references
Smithsonian denies White House pressure to remove President Donald Trump impeachment references

Chicago Tribune

time17 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Smithsonian denies White House pressure to remove President Donald Trump impeachment references

WASHINGTON — The White House did not pressure the Smithsonian to remove references to President Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit and will include him in an updated presentation 'in the coming weeks,' the museum said Saturday. The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the Smithsonian statement said. A museum spokesperson, Phillip Zimmerman, had previously pledged that 'a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments,' but it was not clear when the new exhibit would be installed. The museum on Saturday did not say when in the coming weeks the new exhibit will be ready. A label referring to Trump's impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History's exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called 'Limits of Presidential Power.' The section includes materials on the impeachment of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to President Richard Nixon's resignation. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation,' the statement said. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard.' Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice — in 2019, for pushing Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate Joe Biden, who would later defeat Trump in the 2020 presidential election; and in 2021 for 'incitement of insurrection,' a reference to the Jan. 6 siege of the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters attempting to halt congressional certification of Biden's victory. The Democratic majority in the House voted each time for impeachment. The Republican-led Senate each time acquitted Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store