
Today in Politics: Rahul, Priyanka Gandhi expected to lead Opposition charge on Day 2 of Op Sindoor debate
The speakers from the Opposition have, by and large, focused their attacks on the alleged security lapses and intelligence failure, the alleged role the US government led by Donald Trump played in the ceasefire declaration, and the aircraft the Air Force lost in the May 7-10 military offensive against terror infrastructure in Pakistan.
The government countered by saying that the Opposition was asking the wrong questions — this was the crux of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's remarks, as Vikas Pathak reported — and clarified there was no link between the trade talks with the US and the halt in military operations against Pakistan.
The Rajya Sabha, meanwhile, will start the debate on Tuesday. What punches the two sides land in the two Houses will be among the top political stories of the day.
The Supreme Court will take up the reference made to it by the President under Article 143 of the Constitution, following the court's April 8 verdict setting a three-month deadline for the President and Governors to act on Bills passed by state Assemblies. Under Article 143(1), the President may refer a 'question of law or fact' to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The opinion, unlike a ruling, is not binding.
On Tuesday, a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai is likely to decide the schedule of the hearings, which are expected to begin sometime in the middle of August. The Tamil Nadu government has moved the court, urging it to declare the Presidential reference as not maintainable and return it as unanswered. It labelled the Presidential reference an 'appeal in disguise'.
As Apurva Vishwanath quite lucidly explained in this article, in its 1991 opinion on the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, the court said Article 143 was not a mechanism for the executive to seek review or reversal of its established judicial decisions. The government can, however, file for a review of the April 8 ruling and move a curative petition in an attempt to reverse it.
The Assam government is gearing up to conduct one of the biggest eviction drives of late, in eastern Assam's Golaghat district, reports Sukrita Baruah. Officials estimate that around 15,000 bighas (around 4,900 acres) of land in the Rengma Reserve Forest in the Uriamghat area of Golaghat will be cleared of 'encroachers' over two phases, with the first phase scheduled for Tuesday. Around 2,700 families, mostly Bengali-origin Muslims, live on this land.
The Himanta Biswa Sarma government's eviction drive has been politically contentious, given that it comes at a time when the Mamata Banerjee government and the Trinamool Congress (TMC) have mobilised over the alleged mistreatment of Bengali migrant workers in various BJP-ruled states, including Assam, framing it as 'linguistic terrorism'. Assam's neighbouring states, too, are on guard about the possible influx of undocumented migrants into their territory and have heightened vigil in the border districts, Sukrita reported last week.
To know how these eviction drives play out, affecting people's lives, read Sukrita's ground report from earlier this month: 'Even if you cry, your house won't be spared': Inside Assam's latest mega eviction drive
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
15 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Don't Control Me": Jaya Bachchan Scolds Fellow MP, Sparks A 'Sindoor' Row
New Delhi: Samajwadi Party MP and veteran actor Jaya Bachchan sparked a row today after she questioned Operation Sindoor's name and asked why it was named so when the Pahalgam terror attack "destroyed the sindoor" of so many women. Speaking in Rajya Sabha during the debate on Operation Sindoor, Ms Bachchan started her speech by expressing her condolences to the families of the 26 innocents murdered in Pahalgam's Baisaran Valley on April 22. Addressing the treasury benches, she said, "I would congratulate you on the writers you have hired. You give grand names. Why did you name it 'Sindoor'? Sindoor toh ujad gaya (sindoor was destroyed), the wives of those who were killed." Ms Bachchan was also riled when MPs from the ruling party interrupted her speech. "Either you speak or I will speak. When you speak, I don't interrupt. When a woman speaks, I never interrupt. So please mind your tongue," she said. On one occasion, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, who was seated next to Ms Bachchan, came under fire for trying to calm her down. "Priyanka, don't control me," said the veteran actor as Ms Chaturvedi responded with a laugh. The Samajwadi Party MP questioned the government on the intelligence failure that led to the Pahalgam terror attack. "You have destroyed the faith of the people. The families (of victims) will never forgive you." Ms Bachchan's remarks on Operation Sindoor's name have now drawn fire from the BJP. "Just see their mindset. Jaya Bachchan ji, the terrorists destroyed sindoor, but sindoor is not just for embellishment; it is also a symbol of strength and capability. The name Operation Sindoor was chosen to send a message: you wipe off sindoor, we will destroy you. This was achieved," BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla said, accusing opposition parties Congress and Samajwadi Party of lowering the morale of the armed forces with such remarks. Operation Sindoor, reports have said, was a name chosen by Prime Minister Narendra Modi after the killers in Pahalgam rounded up Hindu men and shot them at close range in front of their wives and children. Sindoor in Hindi means vermilion, which Hindu women put on their head as a symbol of marriage. The name of the operation captured the loss of these women, whose partners were brutally killed in front of their eyes.


Hans India
15 minutes ago
- Hans India
EAM Jaishankar roasts Oppn over India's ‘new normal' policy
New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Wednesday lashed out at the Opposition over feigning ignorance over the term 'India's new normal' and coined a new name 'Modi normal' to elucidate the new defining strategy of the country in responding to acts of terror and crushing terrorists as well as their masterminds, irrespective of their location. Joining the Operation Sindoor debate in Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said that some members raised hue and cry over the term 'new normal' and hence he was explaining India's new security doctrine via 'Modi normal' and 'Congress normal'. He said that the 'Modi normal' has clearly laid out guidelines and principles on matters of national security that remain steadfast and non-negotiable. 'Terrorists will not be treated as proxies, cross-border terror will get an appropriate response, talks and terror won't go together, we won't give into nuclear blackmailing, and blood and water won't flow together,' he told the House, outlining the redefined national strategy under the Modi government. Notably, the 'new normal' policy came into being after the Modi government gave full operational freedom to the forces during Operation Sindoor and stated that any act of terror on Indian soil will now be seen as an attack on India's sovereignty and therefore will be responded to by the armed forces in the strongest possible manner. EAM Jaishankar further said that India's Operation Sindoor did a global service by destroying hubs of global terror in Pakistan. 'Bahalwapur and Muridke remain the biggest centres of nurturing terrorists and spreading terrorism in India and abroad. Our forces reduced it to dust; they did a global service and are being suitably applauded by all,' he said. Lambasting the 'sceptical' Opposition, he said that there are ample examples of Pakistani military establishments facing the fury of Indian forces, but there are some who continue to undermine our security forces for certain political motives. The Minister said that Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif made a candid confession about Indian military strikes pulverising its military installations, but this fails to convince those who continue to remain sceptical of the Army's accomplishments. 'Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif admitted that General Munir called him, saying that Indian ballistic missiles hit their Noor Khan air base and missiles like Brahmos targeted their provinces like Rawalpindi,' he said and lamented that the political parties back home are decrying the great achievements of the Indian Armed Forces for scoring political points.


Hans India
15 minutes ago
- Hans India
Jaishankar Dismisses Opposition Claims, Confirms No Modi-Trump Call During Military Operations
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has categorically refuted Opposition allegations regarding communication between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump during India's military operations, telling parliamentarians to "listen carefully" to the facts. Speaking in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, Jaishankar emphasized that no telephone conversation took place between the two leaders from April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack occurred, until June 16. His statement directly addressed ongoing Opposition questions about Trump's repeated assertions of American mediation in the India-Pakistan ceasefire. The minister reiterated India's consistent position that no third-party intervention facilitated the cessation of hostilities between the neighboring countries, maintaining that all bilateral issues with Pakistan would be handled through direct channels. He confirmed that multiple nations contacted India during Operation Sindoor to assess the situation's severity and duration, but all received identical messages about India's rejection of external mediation. Jaishankar detailed India's operational framework, explaining that any cessation of military action required a formal request from Pakistan through the Director General of Military Operations channel. He stressed that this protocol was communicated to all countries that inquired about the conflict's progression. The minister referenced the May 9 conversation between PM Modi and US Vice President JD Vance, during which Vance warned of Pakistan's planned major attack against India. Modi reportedly responded that India's retaliation would be proportionate, stating the country would "respond to bullets with missiles." Regarding the April 22 Pahalgam attack that claimed 26 civilian lives, Jaishankar characterized the incident as crossing India's "red line" due to its shocking nature. He highlighted the attackers' methodology of questioning victims about their faith before killing them and their apparent intent to destabilize Jammu and Kashmir's economic recovery following Article 370's revocation. The clarification comes amid continued assertions from Trump claiming credit for facilitating the May 10 India-Pakistan truce, while Pakistan has publicly thanked the US President for his alleged role in the agreement.