&w=3840&q=100)
China rolls out $500 child subsidies to boost birth rate: But is it enough
The initiative, retroactive from January 1, 2025, marks Beijing's most comprehensive pro-birth move yet — but will this amount, though welcome, be sufficient to reverse deep-rooted demographic trends?
What's happening with China's population?
China recorded its lowest-ever birth rate in 2023, with just 6.39 births per 1,000 people. Although 2024 saw a modest rebound of 520,000 additional births, analysts widely attribute this to a temporary post-Covid-19 recovery. Moreover, 2024 was the year of the Dragon according to Chinese zodiac signs. Children born during this year are believed to possess unique personality traits and are associated with good fortune, which could explain the rare uptick in birth rates.
However, the overall population still shrank by two million, its steepest decline since 1961, officially ceding the title of most populous country to India.
This is no small concern. By 2035, China is projected to have 400 million citizens over the age of 60—nearly one-third of its total population—raising red flags over future labour shortages, pension sustainability, and economic stagnation.
China's one-child policy
China's one-child policy, in place from 1980 to 2015, has also left a cultural imprint that will be difficult to erase. The country has been actively reversing the policy, allowing two children from 2016 and three from 2021. While these efforts are slowly being realised, they are not keeping up with the population decline.
New subsidy to aid 20 million
The new subsidy, which will not be taxed or counted against other welfare benefits, is expected to benefit over 20 million families annually, Xinhua reported. It follows years of local pilot schemes offering more generous incentives, such as Hohhot's 10,000-yuan annual grants per child and Shenyang's monthly payments of 500 yuan for third children.
While these schemes have shown some encouraging signs— Tianmen city, for instance, recorded a 17 per cent spike in newborns in 2024 —experts warn against overstating the impact of cash handouts alone.
Professor Mao Zhuoyan of Capital University of Economics and Business told Xinhua that while subsidies are helpful in easing day-to-day expenses like formula or diapers, they are not a 'cure-all' to the full cost of raising a child in China.
Cost of parenthood in China
According to a 2024 report by the YuWa Population Research Institute, the average cost of raising a child from birth to college graduation in China now stands at 680,000 yuan (about ₹82 lakh or $94,557). Even raising a child to the age of 17 costs over 538,000 yuan, placing China among the most expensive countries in the world to have children.
Compare this with average annual urban salaries of 125,100 yuan in affluent provinces like Jiangsu and just 58,100 yuan in hospitality sectors—according to Statista, based on annual salaries drawn in 2023—and it becomes evident why many young Chinese are reluctant to start families.
Parenthood crisis: What's really deterring China's youth?
Beyond finances, broader cultural and societal shifts are at play. Many young people, especially women, cite career pressures, lack of childcare support, and unaffordable housing as key deterrents to parenthood, a report by Think Global Health showed. Delayed marriages, rising infertility, and a longstanding preference for smaller families have further complicated matters.
How is the Chinese govt responding to population crisis?
In response, Beijing has been introducing a plethora of reforms. Some of these are:
Promoting flexible work hours and work-from-home options for parents
Offering preferential housing for families with multiple children
Expanding childcare and preschool infrastructure
Providing IVF and fertility treatments under public health insurance
Mandating epidural access in large hospitals by 2027
Is the subsidy too little, too late?
While the subsidy signals serious intent, experts argue it's far from a silver bullet. Yang Yiyong from the Academy of Macroeconomic Research told Xinhua that China needs affordable education, accessible child and maternity care, workplace protections for mothers, and social support structures.
And time is running out. Projections of the United Nations estimate China's population could shrink to 1.3 billion by 2050, and further to 633 million by 2100, losing over 750 million people this century.
Are there lessons for India here?
As India assumes the role of the world's most populous nation, Beijing's policy evolution holds crucial lessons. India, too, is seeing a fertility slowdown, and the economic and social costs of parenthood are rising rapidly in urban areas. Last month, a LinkedIn post by Bengaluru-based startup founder Meenal Goel went viral, where Goel estimated the cost of raising a child in India to be between ₹38-45 lakh. Other media reports suggest these costs can even go above ₹1 crore, depending on school fees, tuition, college, lifestyle, etc.
China's experiment is a sign that reversing a demographic slide is complex and expensive. Moreover, while subsidies may be helpful, a much wider structural transformation is still needed.
The bottom line
China's 3,600-yuan subsidy is a notable step, but unless backed by deeper social reforms, it may not be enough to convince families that parenthood is affordable or desirable in the modern Chinese economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
It's the world's job to spin around, our job is to be the axis
If you like to choose allegory and atmosphere out of cinematic art to describe the contemporary, a piece of classic Hitchcock horror would seem to be in our midst. There's a bird species that's seeing an increase in its population these days. No, not the pesky pigeon, which has been rendered jobless by email. There's another that's squeaking and gnawing at our window panes. It is the black swan. It's absurd. By definition, it shouldn't be there. Certainly not in such numbers. But being devoid of logic or precedence is no disqualification these days. A handful of years ago, we were stalked by a genocidal virus. Half a season ago, we had war. A small spat in a nuclear family. Both sides complained to Papa. He came and sorted it out. His fondness for young, attractive model democracies is, anyway, all over the news in America. This is one version of the story, not particularly unprecedented if you look at Indo-Pak history. And Donald J Trump speaks only the truth. His social media platform is named for that. Every time you repost what he writes there, it's apparently called a 'retruth'. Those fervently 'retruing' his version in Parliament included Rahul Gandhi, who threw that into the debate along with a gauntlet to the government. If you believe otherwise, he thundered, say it clearly that Trump is no Mahatma Gandhi. But we know that in classical Indian logic, for every assertion, the opposite is equally untrue. Meanwhile, across the border, in Pakistan, it seems America has struck oil! No one from the colonial British to the contemporary Chinese had the foresight to dig beneath those bungalows in Abbottabad. Snake oil, perhaps? The Pakistan army is known to have inexhaustible reserves. Well, in material terms, past US prospectors have talked about shale. Hope our sensitive radars don't get alarmed by the sounds of fracking. Actually, no, this is just Trumpspeak. It means they have dug deep and discovered a new kind of strategic depth. Old-timers may recall that Rafi song which Lalu Yadav once quoted in parliament and got even Manmohan Singh grinning like a Cheshire cat: it's okay if you don't love me, as long as you don't love that—other—guy. Alas, it is happening.


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nepal, China steel may face duty evasion probe
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence may investigate steel imports from Nepal and China. This action aims to shield the Indian steel industry from substandard products. Nepal has become a major steel exporter to India. Concerns arise about Chinese steel being routed through Nepal. Some Chinese companies are allegedly falsifying quality compliance documents. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence could initiate a probe into steel imports from Nepal and China, a move aimed at protecting the domestic industry from cheap, substandard imports, said people familiar with the comes after Nepal emerged as one of the top three steel exporters to India despite the absence of significant manufacturing facilities, they said."In some instances, a Nepal-based company was exporting steel many times over its nameplate capacity," an official told ET on condition of triggered apprehensions of Chinese steel being routed through Nepal, as alleged by the Indian has unilateral duty-free access to the Indian market, allowing its exporters to send steel products to India without paying any duty. On the contrary, direct exports from China attract at least 12% safeguard share in India's finished steel imports during the first three months of this financial year averaged 15.93%, making the neighbouring country the third largest steel exporter to India during this another instance, China's Shangyang Steel wrote to India's Directorate General of Foreign Trade alleging that other Chinese companies were falsifying documents affirming quality compliance. Shangyang Steel holds a certificate issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)."The company alleged that other Chinese companies were misrepresenting the BIS certificate issued to Shangyang Steel and lying while exporting to India," the official month, the steel ministry issued a clarification saying that not only are finished and semi-finished steel imports required to adhere to quality control orders (QCOs) but also the raw material used as input needs to comply with the quality also found that some Indian importers with a BIS certificate were importing substandard steel products from China or Nepal and doing just cosmetic value addition to them."The QCO norms require importers not only to comply with the coating part for which it has certification, but also to ensure that the base material also sticks to quality norms," the official said.A BIS certificate is enforced through QCO, which the government order mainly affects the traders who act as middlemen in importing steel without adding any value to the steel. "MSMEs (micro, small and medium enterprises) are not affected by this order; it hurts the middle parties, and they are the ones who are creating a furore over this," the official added.


Economic Times
32 minutes ago
- Economic Times
MPC must ignore Trump's latest jibe, and stay focused on inflation risks and price stability goals
Oh, it's very much undead Nothing is certain except death and taxes,' said Benjamin Franklin. In the post-Trump world, one can add a third: slower growth and higher inflation or stagflation, in economists' lexicon. And possibly a fourth: Trump-induced turbulence, as evidenced by the latest round of tariff hikes announced last week. In a profession noted for its discontents-'If all the economists were laid end to end, they'd never reach a conclusion,' said George Bernard Shaw-Trump has achieved the near impossible. He's ensured almost complete unanimity among economists on the likely outcome of his chop-and-change policy on tariffs: lower growth, higher inflation. What explains economist-dominated MPC's decision to tread a different path and take a decidedly one-sided view of how Trump's tariffs will impact India's macro economy? Indian exceptionalism? Market capture? The desire of a relatively newly minted MPC (it has yet to complete a year in office in its present avatar) to respond to a nod-and-a-wink from North Block? 'Core inflation remains subdued, and overall inflation is comfortably below the RBI's 4% target, affording room for the easing cycle to be sustained,' says the finance ministry, crossing the unstated Lakshman rekha between the executive and RBI on interest rate policy in its latest monthly report. More importantly, will it continue down that path at its three-day meet, starting tomorrow? Unlike its peers worldwide, MPC seems to believe that growth will be adversely impacted, but not inflation. So, it has cut the policy repo rate by 100 bps since February 2025, reduced CRR by 100 bps and flooded the system with liquidity. All this, even as central banks in the US, China, the EU and Britain have opted to hold rates constant till there is greater fall in inflation to a more than six-year low in June was driven primarily by F&B group, which accounts for close to 46% of the consumption basket/index and can quickly reverse (one extreme weather event is all it takes). The US and Britain have seen an uptick in inflation. Oil prices are likely to move up post-Trump's threat to impose a penalty (100% tariff?) on countries that buy oil from Russia (India is a big buyer). Hardeep Puri has warned that removing Russian supplies from the market could push oil prices to $130-140 a the market has been signalling higher rates for some time now, with savers deserting bank deposits for riskier forms of investment, including, yes, cryptos. In its third buyback of this fiscal year, on July 17, RBI accepted only 79% of the notified amount, suggesting market participants wanted higher yields than its comfort level. Experience has shown that more liquidity may or may not spur credit growth, and hence economic growth. But it will almost definitely spur inflation in a scenario where supply-side factors (disruption of supply chains and higher tariffs worldwide) are likely to shift the balance of risks towards higher inflation, even as our domestic-focused economy navigates these shocks better. No wonder IMF has just hiked its growth projections for India. There is also the attendant risk of banks and NFBCs lending to less creditworthy borrowers. In a conversation with Raghuram Rajan, Jerome Powell, put it well: 'Tariffs are highly likely to generate at least a temporary rise in inflation. The inflationary effects could also be more persistent.'In a speech on economic outlook in April, Powell said: 'Our obligation is to keep longer-term inflation expectations well anchored and to make certain that a one-time increase in the price level does not become an ongoing inflation problem. We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual-mandate goals are in tension. If that were to occur, we would consider how far the economy is from each goal, and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close.'To assume, as Sanjay Malhotra seems to have done, 'Inflation is under control, and we can assume that we have won the is good, but there is still room for improvement,' is unwise. RBI's mandate under the inflation targeting regime is clear. It is 'price stability, keeping in mind the objective of growth'. It is not a dual objective, as in the case of the US Fed. In terms of priorities, inflation ranks first. It is most certainly not 'aspirational' growth, a term that has newly entered MPC's might have won the battle against inflation, thanks in part to statistical sleight of hand (base effects) but not the war. Fortunately, RBI governor seems to have realised he might have erred. Last month, Malhotra's statement that 'though the RBI has won the battle against inflation, it continues its war against price rise, keeping in mind its objective of price stability', is a notable shift. One that suggests he, and MPC, will not rush in with another hasty rate cut. Never mind what Trump says, or the market wants. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Zomato delivered, but did the other listed unicorns? US tariff hike to hit Indian exports, may push RBI towards rate cuts Will TCS layoffs open the floodgates of mass firing at Indian IT firms? Indian IT firms never reveal the truth hiding behind 'strong' deal wins Is Bajaj Finance facing its HDFC Bank moment? Tata Motors' INR38k crore Iveco buy: Factors that can make investors nervous Stock Radar: Strides Pharma stock hits fresh 52-week high in July; will the rally continue in August? F&O Radar| Deploy Short Strangle in Nifty to gain from Theta decay For investors who can think beyond Trump: 5 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 36%