Two galaxies seen in a 'joust' preceding a cosmic mega-merger
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Astronomers have observed two distant galaxies - both possessing roughly as many stars as our Milky Way - careening toward each other before their inevitable merger at a time when the universe was about a fifth its current age, a scene resembling two knights charging in a joust.
The galaxies, observed using two Chile-based telescopes, were seen as they existed about 11.4 billion years ago, approximately 2.4 billion years after the Big Bang event that initiated the universe.
At the heart of one of the galaxies resides a quasar, a highly luminous object powered by gas and other material falling into a supermassive black hole. The intense radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum unleashed by the quasar is seen disrupting clouds of gas and dust, known as molecular clouds, in the other galaxy.
It is molecular clouds that give rise to stars. But the effects of the quasar's radiation turned the clouds in the affected region into "only tiny dense cloudlets that are too small to form stars," said astrophysicist Sergei Balashev of the Ioffe Institute in Saint Petersburg, Russia, co-lead author of the study published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.
This is the first time such a phenomenon has been observed, Balashev said.
Stars form by the slow contraction under gravity of these clouds, with small centers taking shape that heat up and become new stars. But the galaxy affected by the quasar's radiation was left with fewer regions that could serve as such stellar nurseries, undermining its star formation rate.
The interaction between the two galaxies reminded the researchers of a medieval joust.
"Much like jousting knights charging toward one another, these galaxies are rapidly approaching. One of them - the quasar host - emits a powerful beam of radiation that pierces the companion galaxy, like a lance. This radiation 'wounds' its 'opponent' as it disrupts the gas," said astronomer and co-lead author Pasquier Noterdaeme of the Paris Institute of Astrophysics in France.
Supermassive black holes are found at the heart of many galaxies, including the Milky Way. The researchers estimated the mass of the one that serves as the engine of the quasar studied in this research at about 200 million times that of our sun.
The intense gravitational strength of the supermassive black hole pulls gas and other material toward it. As this stuff spirals inward at high speed, it heats up due to friction, forming a disk that emits extremely powerful radiation in two opposite directions, called biconical beams.
The ultraviolet light from one of these beams is what played havoc with the gas in the companion galaxy.
This supermassive black hole is much more massive than the one at the center of the Milky Way - called Sagittarius A*, or Sgr A* - which possesses roughly 4 million times the mass of the sun and is located about 26,000 light-years from Earth. A light-year is the distance light travels in a year, 5.9 trillion miles (9.5 trillion km).
The researchers used the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, or ALMA, to characterize the two galaxies and used the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, or VLT, to probe the quasar as well as the gas in the companion galaxy.
The configuration of the galaxies as viewed from the perspective of Earth enabled the researchers to observe the radiation from the quasar passing directly through the companion galaxy.
Most galactic mergers that have been observed by astronomers occurred later in the history of the universe.
"Galaxies are typically found in groups, and gravitational interactions naturally lead to mergers over cosmic time," Noterdaeme said. "In line with current understanding, these two galaxies will eventually coalesce into a single larger galaxy. The quasar will fade as it exhausts the available fuel."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Your organs have their own age – and it may predict health risks better than your birthday
If you've always thought your birthday was the best way to define how old you are, think again. Your organs, it turns out, are aging on their own schedules. A growing body of scientific research is shifting focus from chronological age to biological age, where your body's roughly 30 trillion cells, tissues and organs each have their own 'clocks' that can tick at different speeds. According to a groundbreaking peer-reviewed study published last week in Nature Medicine, Stanford University researchers found that an organ that is substantially 'older' than a person's actual age is at greater risk of disease. Researchers tracked this hidden timeline by analyzing thousands of proteins flowing through our blood. The body's cells, tissues and organs all have different 'clocks' ticking at different speeds (Getty Images) 'With this indicator, we can assess the age of an organ today and predict the odds of your getting a disease associated with that organ 10 years late,' Tony Wyss-Coray, a professor of neurology and neurological sciences at the university's Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, said in a statement. Take the brain, for example: an older one increases your risk of death by about 182 percent within the next 15 years, compared with people whose brains are aging normally, researchers found. On the flip side, those with brains biologically younger than their chronological age are believed to live longer. The study's authors concluded that having an older brain increased the risk of dementia threefold, while those with youthful brains have just a quarter of the usual risk. 'The brain is the gatekeeper of longevity,' Wyss-Coray said. 'If you've got an old brain, you have an increased likelihood of mortality.' An older biological heart age was linked to a higher risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure, while aging lungs signaled an increased likelihood of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While your chronological age only goes up, the good news is that biological age can be slowed, paused or even reversed. Forty-year-old soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo has an estimated biological age of just under 29, according to data from the health tech brand Whoop. Bryan Johnson has documented his journey to reverse his biological age to that of a teenager (Dustin Giallanza) Kim Kardashian may be blowing out 44 candles on her next birthday but her biological age came in nearly a decade younger, according to results from an epigenetic clock test taken on The Kardashians last year. Meanwhile, Bryan Johnson, 47, the anti-aging tech guru and 'biohacker,' has documented his bizarre journey in an attempt to reverse his biological age to that of a teenager. You don't need to be into biohacking to change your organ's age — they can shift depending on a variety of factors, including your genes, how much you move, what you eat, your sleep habits and how you manage stress. Regular exercise, good nutrition and avoiding harmful habits like smoking all contribute to younger organ age and better health outcomes, according to Stanford University's research. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Fighting dragons' light up little-known constellation in the Southern sky: Space photo of the week
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. QUICK FACTS What it is: NGC 6188, also known as the Fighting Dragons of Ara or the Firebird Nebula Where it is: 4,000 light-years away, in the constellation Ara ("the altar") When it was shared: July 9, 2025 From a cat's paw to a cosmic tadpole, humans love to see figures of animals in the night sky — but the "'Fighting Dragons of Ara" has to be one of the most dramatic. Astronomers using the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) in Chile have unveiled a mesmerizing new image that evokes a mythical duel of two celestial beasts. The striking image appears to show two dragon heads emerging from dense clouds of cosmic dust, seemingly locked in an eternal standoff. Their glowing, sinuous forms are shaped by powerful stellar winds emitted from bright young stars born within the nebula, most of which are only a few million years old. The mesmerizing shapes created by the interplay of radiation and dust are officially known as NGC 6188. It's an emission nebula, which forms when the intense radiation of stars energizes gas, causing it to emit light, according to NASA. It's in the little-known constellation Ara and is observable only from the Southern Hemisphere, where it's found just under the tail of Scorpius, "the scorpion." NGC 6188 is close to the edge of a massive molecular cloud, where stars form. Related: 42 jaw-dropping James Webb Space Telescope images The red in NGC 6188 comes from ionized hydrogen being illuminated by 27 very bright stars, which are barely a few million years old — newborns, on a cosmic scale — giving the image incredible depth. Ultraviolet radiation in the stellar winds coming from these stars have ignited, sculpted and shaped the gas and dust into the dragons' heads. According to NASA, this ultraviolet radiation floods the gas with so much energy that it strips electrons from the hydrogen atoms in the nebula. This is called ionization. As the atoms recombine, they emit energy in the form of photons, which makes the nebula's gas glow. DECam is mounted on the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at the U.S. National Science Foundation's Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. For more sublime space images, check out our Space Photo of the Week archives. Solve the daily Crossword
WIRED
12 hours ago
- WIRED
The Hunt for a Fundamental Theory of Quantum Gravity
Jul 20, 2025 7:00 AM Black hole and Big Bang singularities break our best theory of gravity. A trilogy of theorems hints that physicists must go to the ends of space and time to find a fix. ILLUSTRATION: MARK BELAN FOR QUANTA MAGAZINE The original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine . Two blind spots torture physicists: the birth of the universe and the center of a black hole. The former may feel like a moment in time and the latter a point in space, but in both cases the normally interwoven threads of space and time seem to stop short. These mysterious points are known as singularities. Singularities are predictions of Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity. According to this theory, clumps of matter or energy curve the space-time fabric toward themselves, and this curvature induces the force of gravity. Pack enough stuff into a small enough spot, and Einstein's equations seem to predict that space-time will curve infinitely steeply there, such that gravity grows infinitely strong. Most physicists don't believe, however, that Einstein's theory says much about what really happens at these points. Rather, singularities are widely seen as 'mathematical artifacts,' as Hong Liu, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, put it, not objects that 'occur in any physical universe.' They are where general relativity malfunctions. The singularities are expected to vanish in a more fundamental theory of gravity that Einstein's space-time picture merely approximates—a theory of quantum gravity. But as physicists take steps toward that truer and more complete theory by merging general relativity and quantum physics, singularities are proving hard to erase. The British mathematical physicist Roger Penrose won the Nobel Prize in Physics for proving in the 1960s that singularities would inevitably occur in an empty universe made up entirely of space-time. More recent research has extended this insight into more realistic circumstances. One paper established that a universe with quantum particles would also feature singularities, although it only considered the case where the particles don't bend the space-time fabric at all. Then, earlier this year, a physicist proved that these blemishes exist even in theoretical universes where quantum particles do slightly nudge space-time itself—that is, universes quite a bit like our own. This trilogy of proofs challenges physicists to confront the possibility that singularities may be more than mere mathematical mirages. They hint that our universe may in fact contain points where space-time frays so much that it becomes unrecognizable. No object can pass, and clocks tick to a halt. The singularity theorems invite researchers to grapple with the nature of these points and pursue a more fundamental theory that can clarify what might continue if time truly stops. Space-Time's Fatal Flaws Karl Schwarzschild first discovered an arrangement of space-time with a singularity in 1916, just months after Einstein published general relativity. The bizarre features of the 'Schwarzschild solution' took years for physicists to understand. Space-time assumes a shape analogous to a whirlpool with walls that swirl more and more steeply as you go farther in; at the bottom, the curvature of space-time is infinite. The vortex is inescapable; it has a spherical boundary that traps anything falling inside, even light rays. It took decades for physicists to accept that these inconceivable objects, eventually dubbed black holes, might actually exist. The British mathematical physicist Roger Penrose proved that given two simple assumptions, space-time must end at points called singularities. COURTESY OF PUBLIC DOMAIN J. Robert Oppenheimer and Hartland Snyder calculated in 1939 that if a perfectly spherical star gravitationally collapses to a point, its matter will become so dense that it will stretch space-time into a singularity. But real stars bubble and churn, especially while imploding, so physicists wondered whether their nonspherical shapes would stop them from forming singularities. Penrose eliminated the need for geometric perfection in 1965. His landmark proof relied on two assumptions. First, you need a 'trapped surface' inside of which light can never escape. If you cover this surface in light bulbs and switch them on, their light rays will fall inward faster than they can travel outward. Crucially, this shell of light will shrink regardless of whether it started out as a perfect sphere, a dimpled golf ball, or something more misshapen. Second, space-time should always curve in such a way that light rays bend toward each other but never diverge. In short, gravity should be attractive, which is the case so long as energy is never negative. With these two stipulations, Penrose proved the mortality of at least one of the trapped light rays. Its otherwise eternal journey through space and time must terminate in a singularity, a point where the space-time fabric ceases to exist, where there is no future for the light ray to travel into. This was a new definition of a singularity, distinct from the infinite curvature of the Schwarzschild solution. Its generality enabled Penrose to prove in three scant pages of math that, under his two assumptions, singularities will inevitably form. Caption: A hand-drawn figure in Penrose's 1965 paper proving the singularity theorem shows the collapse of space-time to form a singularity. The paper has been called 'the most important paper in general relativity' since Einstein's. ILLUSTRATION: Roger Penrose, Physical Review Letters, American Physical Society 'Penrose's paper was probably the most important paper in general relativity ever written, other than Einstein's original paper,' said Geoff Penington, a physicist at the University of California, Berkeley. Stephen Hawking soon extended Penrose's argument to the early universe, proving that a cosmos described by general relativity must have sprung from a singular point during the Big Bang. This cosmological singularity resembles a black hole in that, if you imagine rewinding the history of the universe, light rays will run into a wall at the beginning of time. Over the years, physicists have accumulated heaps of evidence that black holes exist, and that the universe began with an event that looks very much like a Big Bang. But do these phenomena truly represent space-time singularities? Many physicists find the actual existence of such points unthinkable. When you try to calculate the fate of a particle approaching the singularity, general relativity glitches and gives impossible, infinite answers. 'The singularity means a lack of predictability,' Liu said. 'Your theory just breaks down.' But the particle in the real world must have a fate of some sort. So a more universal theory that can predict that fate—very likely a quantum theory—must take over. General relativity is a classical theory, meaning that space-time takes on one, and only one, shape at every moment. In contrast, matter is quantum mechanical, meaning it can have multiple possible states at once—a feature known as superposition. Since space-time reacts to the matter in it, theorists expect that any matter particles in a superposition of occupying two different locations should force space-time into a superposition of two distortions. That is, space-time and gravity should also follow quantum rules. But physicists haven't yet worked out what those rules are. Into the Onion Theorists approach their quest for a quantum theory of gravity the way they might peel an onion: layer by layer. Each layer represents a theory of a universe that imperfectly approximates the real one. The deeper you go, the more of the interplay between quantum matter and space-time you can capture. The German physicist-soldier Karl Schwarzschild calculated the shape that space-time takes around a massive point. Years later, physicists realized that this geometry contains a singularity. COURTESY OF PUBLIC DOMAIN Penrose worked in the outermost layer of the onion. He used the general theory of relativity and ignored quantumness entirely. In effect, he proved that the space-time fabric has singularities when it is completely devoid of any quantum matter. Physicists aspire to someday reach the onion's core. In it, they'll find a theory describing both space-time and matter in all their quantum glory. This theory would have no blind spots—all calculations should yield meaningful results. But what about the middle layers? Could physicists resolve Penrose's singularities by moving to something a little more quantum, and therefore a little more realistic? 'It was the obvious speculation, that somehow quantum effects should fix the singularity,' Penington said. They first tried to do so in the late 2000s. The assumption that had confined Penrose's proof to the outermost layer was that energy is never negative. That's true in everyday, classical situations, but not in quantum mechanics. Energy goes negative, at least momentarily, in quantum phenomena such as the Casimir effect, where (experiments show) two metal plates attract each other in a vacuum. And negative energies play a role in the way black holes are thought to radiate particles, eventually 'evaporating' entirely. All the deeper, quantum layers of the onion would feature this exotic energetic behavior. The physicist who peeled the top layer was Aron Wall, then based at the University of Maryland and now at the University of Cambridge. To cut into the quantum realm and abandon Penrose's energy assumption, Wall latched on to a theoretical discovery made in the 1970s by Jacob Bekenstein. Bekenstein knew that for any given region of space, the contents of the region grow more mixed up as time goes on. In other words, entropy, a measure of this mixing, tends to increase, a rule known as the second law of thermodynamics. While considering a region that contains a black hole, the physicist realized that the entropy comes from two sources. There's the standard source—the number of ways that quantum particles in the space around the black hole could be arranged. But the black hole has entropy too, and the amount depends on the black hole's surface area. So the total entropy of the region is a sum: the surface area of the black hole plus the entropy of nearby quantum stuff. This observation became known as the 'generalized' second law. Wall 'made it his mission to understand the generalized second law,' said Raphael Bousso, a physicist at Berkeley. 'He was thinking about it in much clearer and much better ways than everybody else on the planet.' Reaching the quantum layers of the onion would mean accommodating negative energy and the presence of quantum particles. To do so, Wall reasoned that he could take any surface area in general relativity and add to it the entropy of those particles, as the generalized second law suggested. Penrose's proof of his singularity theorem had involved the trapped surface. So Wall upgraded it to a 'quantum trapped surface.' And when he reworked Penrose's singularity theorem in this way, it held. Singularities form even in the presence of quantum particles. Wall published his findings in 2010. In 2010, Aron Wall, now at the University of Cambridge, revamped Penrose's proof to show that singularities exist in a world where space-time has no quantum properties but is filled with particles that do. PHOTOGRAPH: NICOLE WALL 'Aron's paper was a seminal breakthrough in combining quantum mechanics and gravity in a more precise way,' Penington said. Having peeled back the classical outer layer of the onion, where energy is always positive, Wall reached a lightly quantum layer—a context physicists call semiclassical. In a semiclassical world, space-time guides the journeys of quantum particles, but it cannot react to their presence. A semiclassical black hole will radiate particles, for instance, since that's a consequence of how particles experience a space-time warped into a black hole shape. But the space-time—the black hole itself—will never actually shrink in size even as the radiation leaks energy into the void for all eternity. That's almost, but not exactly, what happens in the real universe. You could watch a black hole radiate particles for a century without seeing it shrink a single nanometer. But if you could watch for longer—many trillions upon trillions of years—you would see the black hole waste away to nothing. The next onion layer beckoned. Dialing Up the Quantumness Bousso recently revisited Wall's proof and found that he could cut a little deeper. What about the world where black holes shrink as they radiate? In this scenario, the space-time fabric can react to quantum particles. Using more refined mathematical machinery developed by Wall and others since 2010, Bousso found that, despite the intensified quantumness of his scenario, singularities continue to exist. He posted his paper, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, in January. The world of Bousso's new theorem still departs from our universe in notable ways. For mathematical convenience, he assumed that there's an unlimited variety of particles—an unrealistic assumption that makes some physicists wonder whether this third layer matches reality (with its 17 or so known particles) any better than the second layer does. 'We don't have an infinite number of quantum fields,' said Edgar Shaghoulian, a physicist at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Still, for some experts, Bousso's work delivers a satisfying denouement to the Penrose and Wall singularity story, despite its unrealistic abundance of particles. It establishes that singularities can't be avoided, even in space-times with mild reactions to quantum matter. 'Just by adding small quantum corrections, you can't prevent the singularity,' Penington said. Wall and Bousso's work 'answers that pretty definitively.' The Real Singularity But Bousso's theorem still doesn't guarantee that singularities must form in our universe. Some physicists hold out hope that the dead ends do somehow go away. What seems like a singularity could actually connect to somewhere else. In the case of a black hole, perhaps those light rays end up in another universe. And a lack of a Big Bang singularity might imply that our universe began with a 'Big Bounce.' The idea is that a previous universe, as it collapsed under the pull of gravity, somehow dodged the formation of a singularity and instead bounced into a period of expansion. Physicists who are developing bounce theories often work in the second layer of the onion, using semiclassical physics that exploits negative-energy quantum effects to get around the singularity required by the Penrose and Hawking theorems. In light of the newer theorems, they will now need to swallow the uncomfortable truth that their theories violate the generalized second law as well. One physicist pursuing bounces, Surjeet Rajendran of Johns Hopkins University, says he is undaunted. He points out that not even the generalized second law is gospel truth. Rejecting it would make singularities avoidable and continuations of space-time possible. Singularity skeptics can also appeal to the theory at the core of the onion, where space-time behaves in truly quantum ways, such as taking on superpositions. There, nothing can be taken for granted. It becomes hard to define the concept of area, for instance, so it's not clear what form the second law should take, and therefore the new theorems won't hold. Bousso and like-minded physicists, however, suspect that a highly quantum arena with no notion of area is tantamount to a dead-end for a light ray, and therefore that something Penrose would recognize as a singularity should persist in the core theory and in our universe. The beginning of the cosmos and the hearts of black holes would truly mark edges of the map where clocks can't tick and space stops. 'Inside of black holes, I am positive there is some notion of singularity,' said Netta Engelhardt, a physicist at MIT who has worked with Wall. In that case, the still-unknown fundamental theory of quantum gravity would not kill singularities but demystify them. This truer theory would allow physicists to ask questions and calculate meaningful answers, but the language of those questions and answers would change dramatically. Space-time quantities like position, curvature and duration might be useless for describing a singularity. There, where time ends, other quantities or concepts might have to take their place. 'If you had to make me guess,' Penington said, 'whatever quantum state describes the singularity itself does not have a notion of time.' Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.
