Eluned Morgan to ask Keir Starmer to 'start coughing up' to make up for Wales shortchanges
First Minister Eluned Morgan says she will ask Prime Minister Keir Starmer to 'start coughing up' to make up for areas where Wales has been shortchanged when the two leaders meet on Friday.
Baroness Morgan is in London ahead of a meeting of the Council of the Nations and Regions being hosted by Sir Keir.
It will be the first time she has formally met her fellow Labour leader since setting out a list of concerns in her 'Red Welsh Way' speech earlier this month.
In that speech, she said she would 'call out' what she thought were mistakes by the Labour UK Government, saying: 'When Westminster makes decisions that we think will harm the Welsh communities, we will not stay silent."
She had also called for her UK colleagues to reconsider cuts to winter fuel payments for pensioners. On Wednesday this week, the PM announced a U-turn which will see more pensioners become eligible for the payment.
The FM's speech came on the same day as the latest Barn Cymru poll for ITV Cymru Wales which suggested that Labour could fall to third place at next year's Senedd election.
The poll showed Labour gaining 18% share of the vote, with Plaid Cymru coming first and winning 30% while Reform UK would come second with 25%.
All that will be in the background when Eluned Morgan and Keir Starmer meet on Friday, 23 May.
In an interview ahead of that meeting, she told ITV: 'I'll obviously be taking that opportunity to really push the case for those things that I outlined in my Red Welsh Way speech, making sure that we get a fairer deal on things like the railways and coal tips and other issues that are absolutely top of my agenda, where we think we've been hard done by in the past and we want them to make up for it."
When asked if that would make the meeting a difficult one, she said: 'Let's see how it goes. But the spending review is coming up.
"That's the opportunity for them to make a difference. I'll be pushing that case. I know lots of people pushing the case at the moment, but my job is to stand up for Wales and that's what I'm doing.'
She repeated her claim that Wales has been shortchanged under 14 years of Conservative-led UK Government but added that now it falls to her party in power to change things.
'They've had a bit of time to bed in now, so we want some action and that's what I'll be pushing for. They've had a year, more or less. Now's the time for them to start coughing up for us.'
The FM met Welsh Labour MPs at a dinner in Soho on Wednesday, with some signs of tension between them.
We understand that some MPs had been upset by her Red Welsh Way speech and wanted to reassure her that they were doing their part.
The meeting was described as a "bit fraught", although another source insisted that though differences were aired, the night ended with hugs and kisses.
Eluned Morgan insisted that it was a happy get-together, saying: 'I spoke to lots last night and they understand and they reassured me that they're making the case as well.'
But with a year to go to a difficult election, is now the time to ruffle feathers?
'Look, we were fine last night," she said. "I spoke to lots of MPs last night. They understand that we're under pressure. They understand that there is a need for the UK Labour government to deliver for Wales as well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Lisa Nandy hits out at BBC leadership over Glastonbury live stream
The Culture Secretary said 'several' editorial failures 'becomes a problem of leadership', during a statement to the Commons on Monday. It came after rapper Bobby Vylan led crowds at the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)' on Saturday. Bobby Vylan performing at Glastonbury Festival (Ben Birchall/PA) Ms Nandy said the Government is 'exasperated' with the 'lack of account from the leadership', as MPs from across the chamber called for accountability. In a statement on the BBC and Glastonbury, she said 'problems with broadcasts' at the festival 'should have been foreseeable'. Labour MP Peter Prinsley (Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) said: 'How are Jews such as myself, in this country, to be reassured about the editorial processes of the BBC? And who on Earth will be held accountable for this error?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He makes an extremely important point about accountability, and that is something that is not lost on me as the Secretary of State, and something that I've impressed upon the BBC leadership as well. 'When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership.' Conservative former minister John Glen said: 'I think we all in this place understand the fine editorial judgments that the BBC and their staff have to make, but this is of a completely different order, and when people are losing faith in the great institutions of this country, could I urge the Secretary of State, in her follow-up conversations that … the BBC actually identified accountability to individuals?' He added: 'Somebody didn't follow that guidance, and I think the country expects people to be held individually to account for why they fail to do their job properly.' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think people do expect people to be held to account for the way that they do their jobs, be that on the front line or at senior levels. It's a point that I've made to the BBC. 'They will have heard what he said and what (Mr Prinsley) said as well about accountability, and it's a point that I will continue to press.' Jim Allister, TUV MP for North Antrim, described the live stream as 'an appalling pro-terrorist broadcast', adding: 'The BBC deliberately chose not to cut the broadcast, perhaps therefore it's time for Government to consider cutting the licence fee?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He will know that this Government supports the BBC. We believe it is an important institution. 'That is why we are so disappointed that this has happened, why we have been so exasperated with the lack of account from the leadership, not just about this, but about a previous Gaza documentary and a number of other issues as well. 'The BBC is one of the most important institutions in our country, and that is the reason why it is held to the highest of standards.' Conservative MP Dame Caroline Dinenage, who chairs the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said: 'I wonder if the Secretary of State could say what explanation the BBC has given for why this live stream wasn't cut? 'Now it can't be for lack of staff on the ground. They took a reported 400 people to Glastonbury at the weekend. What were they all doing?' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think she's right to raise the question of what the number of staff who were present at the Glastonbury Festival, or working on the broadcast, were doing. 'But I do think this also raises very, very serious questions at the highest levels of the BBC about the operational oversight and the way in which editorial standards are understood and reflected in the decisions that are made by individual staff.' Shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew called for an independent inquiry, claiming the BBC 'has repeatedly failed to call out antisemitic rhetoric, when it emerges under the guise of political commentary, and has faced serious allegations of minimising attacks on Jewish communities'. Ms Nandy replied: 'What I want to see from the BBC, and I know he shares this, is rapid action to make sure this cannot happen again.' She also claimed an Independent MP was 'aligning himself with antisemites'. Ayoub Khan, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, had accused the Government of 'hypocrisy' because it did not make a statement when Israeli football fans 'were chanting 'death to all Arabs'' in November last year. Ms Nandy said she 'could not disagree more', adding: 'I think every member of this House will utterly condemn chants of 'death to all Arabs' – it's disgusting and disgraceful.' She continued: 'The reason I have brought a statement to the House today is because our national broadcaster, which is funded by the licence fee, which is paid by the public in this country, has broadcast something that is deeply, deeply offensive to a community in this country, that has made many, many people feel and may actually have made them unsafe. 'Can I just say to him that as a longstanding supporter of justice for the Palestinians, he does nothing for the Palestinian cause by aligning himself with antisemites.' In a point of order, Mr Khan said: 'At no stage have I said in my question or statement that I was aligning myself to anyone at that Glastonbury event.'
Channel 4
38 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Welfare reform on knife edge as Labour rebels consider plans
The government says it had made changes to its welfare bill after listening to rebel Labour MPs. But it was hard to hear them over the screech of the U-turn made by ministers as they sought to swerve an embarrassing backbench rebellion in a vote tomorrow. But even since the concessions were made to rebels on Personal Independence Payments and Universal Credit an assessment suggests 150,000 more people could be plunged into poverty by 2030 because of the changes. Our political editor Gary Gibbon reports.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Even after the welfare rebellion, it is too soon to write off Keir Starmer
In a parallel universe, and perhaps a happier one for him, Sir Keir Starmer would have ended up as attorney general in some sort of Labour government, led by someone other than him. He confessed as much to his sympathetic biographer, Tom Baldwin, some time ago. More recently, this accidental prime minister has been unburdening himself in a series of interviews to mark his first, rather difficult year in office. 'In office', that is, rather than 'in power', as the old saying goes, because his authority has been draining away at an alarming rate lately. It seems to be getting him down. The leadership was a job Sir Keir may not have wanted that much, but it was almost thrust into his safe hands after the debacle of the 2019 general election, and he did his duty. Picking up the pieces after Jeremy Corbyn stepped down, the most famous son of a toolmaker in the country was soon rolling up his sleeves – a favourite expression – and rebuilding his party in his image. He took on the role because there was no one else in the party capable enough, and willing to take it on. He thought, as did virtually everyone, that it would take two terms to unwind Boris Johnson's thumping majority. As it turned out, Mr Johnson and his colleagues, most notably Dominic Cummings and Liz Truss, plus Brexit, helped make sure that the task of returning Labour to government could be undertaken rather more quickly. Sir Keir and his advisers did well to campaign in such a way as to secure a landslide Commons majority – but at 34 per cent of the vote, their mandate was less solid than it looked, and Sir Keir's personal ratings never approached the stellar figures achieved by, say, Tony Blair, or indeed Mr Johnson. Now, those ratings are heading towards nadirs suffered by prime ministers much further into their tenure. The general sense of malaise seems to have entered the prime minister's soul, confessing to any passing journalist his regrets, mistakes and failures, including, most unfortunately, not realising what an impact his 'island of strangers" speech would make. The latest U-turn, on reforms to social security, must surely eat further into his self-confidence. It is not so much the details of the changes – they are mostly sensible – but the way they have been wrung out of the government that has done the damage. Despite early warnings, Sir Keir seems to have failed to engage with the whips and his own ministers until it was too late to prevent an open mutiny of such strength that any premier would have had to back down. As a result, Sir Keir looks like he is following his backbenchers rather than leading them – weak. This is bad enough, but the measures in the revised welfare reforms aren't all that popular with the general public. At least when the prime minister climbed down on the pensioners' winter fuel payment and the grooming gangs inquiry, eventually, he was on the right side of public opinion. He may not get much credit, but at least he tried to rescue some goodwill; the U-turn on welfare doesn't even have that meagre consolation. In fact, it might have been better to pause and work for a more comprehensive resolution that protected the fiscal position and the welfare of vulnerable people. As the Liberal Democrat spokesperson Steve Darling reminded more experienced colleagues in the chamber, rushed legislation has often proved bad legislation. After all, there is no logic in someone with exactly the same mobility challenges as an existing claimant receiving less financial assistance. This messy compromise is an unfortunate way to mark the Labour government's first year of ' change ' – changing their minds three times in as many weeks. Still, hope springs eternal in the Labour Party, as it generally must. Sir Keir's battalion of sorrows has arrived remarkably quickly, but they are not so different from the 'mid-term blues' that have awaited almost every government since the Second World War. The prime minister can be proud of his record on foreign affairs – three substantial trade deals, including the Brexit reset, plus an inexplicably warm relationship with Donald Trump. Proof, at last, that opposites attract. The prime minister has also ended long-running disputes relating to the Chagos Islands and Gibraltar – and, albeit far too little and too late, has at least now declared that the conduct of Israel's war in Gaza is unacceptable. The UK should be boosting spending on defence, and trying to sustain Nato and the defence of Ukraine. The prime minister has done all of that, too. Domestically, things have not proceeded so smoothly – and that has hammered his authority, as rounds of elections and the resurrection of Nigel Farage show. Only if the public perceives tangible changes in the quality of public services will they be prepared to back Labour for a second term of office. The same goes for the economy more broadly, and on control of migration. The government still has time on its side here, if it is not complacent. It needs a 'narrative' – but also improvements people can see and sense. Thanks to his restless health secretary, Wes Streeting, the NHS is being reformed and restored, and waiting times are coming down. There is clearly much more to do, but previous prime ministers have been through worse, and some even went on to win, against all odds. One year in, it is far too soon to write off Sir Keir, unless he himself decides to do so.
