
Why Columbia's deal with Trump could drive international students away
Columbia University's recent settlement with the Trump administration has sparked concern across the academic sector due to the introduction of new monitoring and reporting requirements for international students.
The agreement, made public through university sources and media reports, includes obligations that significantly expand Columbia's role in policing non-US student populations on campus.
As part of the settlement, Columbia will pay $221 million and adopt stricter oversight measures, including reporting minor student infractions such as trespassing to the federal government. These measures go beyond existing requirements under the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), the US government's platform for monitoring international students.
Expanded reporting obligations for Columbia
According to a university official cited in the original press release, Columbia will now report arrest information to SEVIS, even in cases that do not result in suspension or expulsion. These infractions include offences like trespassing, which led to the arrest of 78 students during a pro-Palestinian protest at a university library. Previously, such incidents were resolved internally and did not involve federal authorities.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think
Villas In Dubai | Search Ads
Get Quote
Undo
In an official statement issued by Columbia and referenced in the press release, the university confirmed: "In addition to those longstanding requirements, Columbia will now also notify the programme if it is made aware of arrest information." The university emphasised that its participation in SEVIS already required it to report disciplinary actions resulting in suspensions or expulsions but acknowledged that this new measure adds further obligations.
Concerns over international student recruitment
With nearly 40% of its student population coming from outside the US, Columbia is among the top three US institutions with the highest number of international students, as per data from the Institute of International Education. Many of these students pay full tuition fees, contributing significantly to the university's revenue, particularly at the graduate level.
William Brustein, a veteran international student officer, stated that "international students and their parents were already hesitant about studying at US colleges," and noted that other countries such as the UK and Australia are viable alternatives. His remarks were included in the original press release.
Potential impact across higher education sector
The new conditions placed on Columbia may set a precedent for similar agreements at other US universities.
Fanta Aw, Executive Director of NAFSA, said the arrest and disciplinary reporting requirement was "outside of the jurisdiction of universities" and warned it "sets a precedent that all institutions should be aware of," as reported in the press release.
Acting Columbia President Claire Shipman, in a letter to students and staff, stated that one motivation for reaching the agreement was "the potential revocation of visa status of thousands of international students."
She added that Columbia had not agreed to report information beyond what the federal government is legally entitled to access.
Ongoing federal investigations at other universities
Other institutions have also come under federal scrutiny. The University of Chicago is currently being investigated for its admissions policies regarding international students. Additionally, the US State Department has launched a probe into Harvard's compliance with foreign research programmes.
In contrast, Brown University recently reached a settlement with the Trump administration that did not include measures affecting international students.
Stephen Yale-Loehr, a former immigration law professor at Cornell University, stated that the implementation of such agreements is critical and that "no matter how this is implemented, it shows international students that Columbia — and other universities that accept similar language — will be less welcoming," as quoted in the press release.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliament must condemn Trump blabber
US President Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on India, calling its economy "dead" and imposing a 25 pr cent tariff on its imports, effective from August 1. Trump expressed displeasure with India's purchase of oil and defence equipment from Russia, stating that India has "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia" and is Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China. He said that maybe India will buy oil from Pakistan someday, which further strained the already tense relationship between the two neighbours. The Indian Parliament should condemn Trump's statement in one voice, as his remarks have sparked concern and added fuel to the escalating tensions between the US and India. Ganti Venkata Sudhir, Secunderabad Modi's foreign policy dealt Trump blow US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods has dealt a severe blow to the Indian economy. Citing India's trade ties with Russia and high tariffs as reasons, this decision is set to disrupt Indian exports, particularly in critical sectors like pharmaceuticals and textiles. The move has sparked widespread criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy, which has failed to avert the crisis. Despite Modi's much-touted close relationship with Trump, the lack of progress in securing a favourable trade agreement highlights a perceived leadership shortfall. Urgent measures are needed to safeguard India's economic interests. Srinivaas Goud Muddam, Hyderabad


Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chinese man posed as wealthy businessman to con multiple wives out of $280,000, jailed for 13 years
A 39-year-old man in China has been sentenced to 13 years in prison for defrauding more than 20 individuals, including five of his ex-wives, out of nearly two million yuan (approximately US$280,000). A Chinese man was sentenced to 13 years in prison for defrauding 20 people, including five of his ex-wives, by pretending to be a wealthy businessman.(Representational image/Unsplash) (Also read: 'China, did you try to make a copy of Paris?': 'Eiffel Tower' in Asian nation amuses social media) According to a report by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the man, identified by his surname Liu, was convicted by a court in Ziyang, located in Sichuan province in southwestern China. He was found guilty of running a prolonged fraud scheme that lasted over a decade. As per state broadcaster CCTV, cited by SCMP, Liu married six women between 2009 and 2024. He later divorced all of them, and the last five, along with their families, fell prey to his elaborate scam. A calculated con Liu presented himself as a successful entrepreneur, frequently posting photos on social media with luxury cars that he had rented. His charm and apparent wealth attracted several women, whom he manipulated into lending him large sums of money. His excuses included paying staff salaries, expanding his toy business, and purchasing property. In one instance, Liu forged a medical report claiming his mother was seriously ill, in order to convince a girlfriend to lend him money. When asked to repay, he routinely stalled, telling victims he needed more time. One ex-wife recalled, 'He is good at comforting girls and he has a good temperament. That is why I was attracted to him although I knew he had divorced.' Another said, 'The first impression Liu left for me was that he was wealthy and honest. I did not expect that he was a fraudster. I regret lending him more than 400,000 yuan.' Trail of deceit In 2021, Liu was already labelled a defaulter after failing to return 320,000 yuan to a former girlfriend who sued him. Despite this, he continued borrowing from others, never intending to repay. 'His actions obviously had the purpose of illegal possession, so he has constituted the crime of fraud,' a police officer was quoted as saying. His web of lies unravelled in late 2023 when his sixth wife, Xiaolu, reported him to the police. They had married in June that year, only two weeks after meeting. Liu soon persuaded her to quit her job, mortgage her flat, and borrow money from online lenders and her family—none of which he returned. Xiaolu told officers, 'I was cheated by him and have lost my flat and my job and became pregnant. I am under a big amount of debt because of him. I really would like to commit suicide,' During interrogation, Liu admitted to his crimes, stating, 'I want to seek revenge on women. They are not trustworthy and too materialistic.'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Hamas denies disarmament claim, calls US envoy's Gaza visit a 'staged show'
Hamas has dismissed reports that it expressed willingness to disarm during Gaza ceasefire negotiations with Israel, affirming its "national and legal" right to resistance against Israeli occupation, Al Jazeera reported. The Palestinian group issued a statement on Saturday in response to comments allegedly made by United States President Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, during a meeting with relatives of Israeli captives held in Gaza. Citing a recording of the conversation, Israeli outlet Haaretz reported that the US envoy told the families Hamas was "prepared to be demilitarised." However, Hamas firmly denied the claim. In its statement, Hamas said, "The resistance and its weapons are a national and legal right as long as the [Israeli] occupation persists." It added that this right "cannot be relinquished until our full national rights are restored, foremost among them the establishment of a fully sovereign, independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital," according to Al Jazeera. Witkoff had met the families in Tel Aviv on Saturday, a day after visiting a US and Israeli-backed aid distribution site in Gaza run by the controversial GHF group. Hamas previously criticised the envoy's visit as a "staged show" intended to mislead the public about conditions in the enclave, Al Jazeera reported. The group pointed to worsening humanitarian conditions, highlighting a United Nations report stating that more than 1,300 Palestinians have been killed while attempting to access food at GHF-run sites since the organisation began operating in Gaza in May. Despite growing international criticism of the group's operations, the Trump administration has stood firmly behind GHF. In June, Washington announced $30 million in funding support for the organisation, Al Jazeera reported. Witkoff's remarks on disarmament come amid intensifying global efforts to push for recognition of a Palestinian state, as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues. At a two-day United Nations conference in New York this week, the United Kingdom said it may follow France in recognising a Palestinian state in September if Israel does not implement a ceasefire. Echoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer's earlier stance, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK would proceed with recognition under specific conditions. The UN meeting also saw 17 countries, along with the European Union and the Arab League, endorse a seven-page document supporting a two-state solution. The text called on Hamas to "end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State," Al Jazeera reported. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)