Harvard University, under pressure from Trump administration, renames its DEI office
The office has been renamed Community and Campus Life, an internal email to the Harvard community says.
The email does not detail what further changes would be made as a result of the renaming but states the change 'requires us to find new ways to bring people of different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives together as one community, focusing on the unique experiences and contributions of the individual and not the broad demographic groups to which they belong.'
Its release came the same day lawyers for Harvard and the Trump administration met for the first time in a lawsuit Harvard filed over the $2.2 billion freeze in its federal research funding. The Trump administration on Monday also announced it was launching investigations into the university and the Harvard Law Review, saying authorities have gotten complaints about race-based discrimination.
Harvard sued after the Trump administration announced it was putting a hold on billions of dollars in grants and contracts following what the White House said was a breakdown in discussions over combating antisemitism on campus. The White House also has cited discrimination probes in slashing funding for other universities – including Cornell and Northwestern – and sent letters to 60 institutions of higher learning, warning them of potential punishment if they fail 'to protect Jewish students.'
Monday's letter to the Harvard community was from Sherri Ann Charleston, who signed off as the Chief Community and Campus Life Officer; since 2020, she had served as the Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer.
'It seemed like the right time to adjust my title to better reflect what the offices under my direction do for our campus community,' Charleston wrote Monday in the message released with a internal survey conducted in 2019 and last fall that seeks to gauge the climate around inclusion and belonging of the campus community.
Her letter also cited a reference, from Harvard's president's April 14 open letter, to the need to be in compliance with the Supreme Court's landmark 2023 decision ending affirmative action in American colleges. A case at the heart of that ruling involved Harvard.
'(W)e must continue 'to work together to find ways, consistent with law, to foster and support a vibrant community that exemplifies, respects, and embraces difference' and, in doing so, 'also continue to comply with Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which ruled that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act makes it unlawful for universities to make decisions 'on the basis of race,''' Charleston wrote.
Harvard also announced Monday it would no longer host or fund affinity group celebrations during commencement, according to the school's student-led newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, citing an email sent to affinity groups Monday. The decision was made after the Department of Education threatened funding cuts if Harvard did not cancel graduation celebrations that could separate students based on race, it reported.
Harvard's president this month said the school would not make key policy changes the White House demanded of colleges across the country, including eliminating its diversity, equity and inclusion program. 'The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,' Harvard President Alan M. Garber wrote at the time.
CNN has reached out to Harvard for comment.
Harvard's decision to rebrand its DEI office follows similar reorganizations at government agencies, schools and companies across the country amid President Donald Trump's crackdown on such programs. The White House has decried DEI practices – designed to advance racial, gender, class and other representation in public spaces – as 'illegal and immoral discrimination.'
In addition to freezing federal funding to Harvard, the White House has threatened to rescind Harvard's tax-exempt status and its eligibility to host foreign students.
Harvard, one of the oldest and wealthiest universities in the country, argues in its lawsuit the funding freeze measure is not only the Trump administration's 'attempt to coerce and control Harvard' while disregarding 'fundamental First Amendment principles,' and also that Washington violated an arcane 1946 law governing administrative policies.
In particular, the Administrative Procedure Act 'requires this Court to hold unlawful and set aside any final agency action that is 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,'' the Harvard lawsuit says.
Trump administration attorneys have not responded to the allegations in the lawsuit, but White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said April 22: 'The president has made it quite clear that it's Harvard who has put themselves in the position to lose their own funding by not obeying federal law, and we expect all colleges and universities who are receiving taxpayer funds to abide by federal law.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report
President Trump said in a social media post Friday afternoon that he directed members of his administration to fire Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after the BLS on Friday published the July jobs report that contained what it called "larger than normal" revisions to data from May and June. The July jobs report published Friday morning showed the US economy added 73,000 jobs last month, fewer than expected while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%. The most notable number to emerge from the report, however, was a downward revision to job gains in May and June which that saw 258,000 jobs taken away from what had been initially reported. May's job gains were revised down to 19,000 from 144,000, while June's additions were cut to just 14,000 from the 147,000 initially reported. In its release on Friday, the BLS said these revisions, "result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." Economists on Friday were near-unanimous in their view that July's jobs data and the revisions to May and June reflect a labor market that is far weaker than had been suggested by recent data and characterizations by some officials, notably Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. "The 'solid' state of the labor market described by the FOMC earlier this week looks more questionable after the July employment report," Wells Fargo senior economists Sarah House wrote in a note Friday. Job gains over the last three months have now averaged just 35,000 after Friday's revisions. This is breaking news, more to come...
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Taps Banks For Fannie, Freddie IPO Ideas
Trump pulled in big-bank CEOs to pitch how to turn Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) back into public companies, and the market reacted fastafter-hours the two mortgage giants popped about 15% and 6% on light volume. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with FNMA. The conversations are wide open and informal: Jamie Dimon has already been in the room after years of cool relations, David Solomon was slated to meet Thursday, and Brian Moynihan is up next. Other banks are likely in the mix too as the White House crowdsources ideas on structuring a major public stock offering that would monetize the government's stake. Both GSEs have been in conservatorship since 2008, but the pitch is leaning on the narrative that they've rebuilt capital, paid back federal support, and could be shifted toward private markets. The meetings are exploratory, and there's no clean roadmap yet officials have signaled that conservatorship isn't suddenly ending, so any shift would take time and political alignment. That ambiguity is why the pop feels part hope, part speculation. The talks put a long-dormant privatization story back into play and give investors a reason to price a potential regime change. The next few days of follow-up meetings and any clearer White House signal will tell if this is groundwork or just noise. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This week in Trumponomics: The Trump slowdown is here
Economists have been warning that President Trump's trade wars will depress growth and hiring. Trump and his defenders say pshaw. But the Trump economy is suddenly looking shaky. Hiring slowed dramatically in July, and downward revisions for the two prior months reveal the weakest job market since the COVID recession in 2020. Employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, with the average for the past three months an anemic 35,000. In 2024, job growth averaged 168,000 new jobs per month. Up till now, Trump has waged his trade war with impunity. His tariffs have raised the average tax on imports from 2.5% to about 18%. That's a hefty tax on some $3 trillion worth of goods, paid by American businesses and consumers. Yet inflation is still below 3%. The stock market flinched in April and May but has since hit a series of new record highs. The second quarter of 2025, however, is now looking like it may have been the last respite before Trump's disruptive policies take their it's not just hiring. Second quarter GDP rose by 3%, which would be solid in normal times. But the numbers are distorted by a surge of imports in the first quarter and a corresponding plunge in the second. Even it out, and GDP growth in the first half of 2025 was a weak 1.2%. That's less than half the growth rate in the first half of 2024, which was a more robust 2.8%. Many companies are beginning to say Trump's tariffs are harming profits, including bellwethers Ford (F), General Motors (GM), and Procter & Gamble (PG). The US manufacturing sector has contracted for five months in a row, and manufacturing employment has dropped for three months straight. Tariff-related inflation might also be materializing. The inflation rate inched up from 2.4% in May to 2.7% in June. There were notable month-to-month price hikes in product categories dominated by tariffs, including clothing, appliances, sporting goods, and toys. Consumers don't normally notice small monthly price hikes, but they notice for sure if price hikes persist and stuff continually gets more expensive. All of these trends are exactly what the many critics of Trump's trade wars have predicted. Tariffs raise costs for any firm or household dependent on imports. Higher costs reduce spending and investment. Trump's episodic tariff announcements also create uncertainty because affected businesses can't predict future costs. That creates an incentive to wait instead of investing, expanding, or hiring. The net effect is lower growth, lower employment, and possibly stagflation. Read More: What is stagflation, and how does it impact you? It's possible that Trump will get the message and wind down his trade wars. But not before more chaos. Just as Trump was inking trade deals with Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, and the European Union, he upped the ante on some five dozen other countries by threatening tariffs on their imports as high as 40%, including a new 35% rate — up from 25% — on some Canadian imports. The US stock market had been hovering near record levels on the hope that the worst of Trump's tariff fulminations were over. But stocks sank anew on Aug. 1 on the latest tariff shock, plus the lousy job numbers. There's yet another tariff deadline, Aug. 7, when the latest barrage of tariffs will go into effect unless those 60-odd countries make trade deals with Trump. Some of them probably will. But the new regime of higher tariffs is here to stay, and whether the average tariff rate is 18% or 20% or 22%, everybody's going to have to deal with Trump's new import taxes. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances The consolation prize is that the weakening economy makes the Federal Reserve much more likely to cut interest rates in the fall. Odds of a quarter-point rate cut in September jumped from 38% to 81% after the latest job and tariff news, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool. Trump, of course, has been hectoring the Fed to cut rates, and the weakening Trump economy now gives it a reason to. Most economists think the economy will slow from 2.8% GDP growth in 2024 to around 1% in 2025 and 2026. That's not a recession, but weak growth will make jobs more scarce, keep a lid on wages, and intensify the economic blahs many people feel. It's probably happening now. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data