logo
Politicians in power should not consider themselves kings, says Madras HC

Politicians in power should not consider themselves kings, says Madras HC

The Madras High Court has decided to keep pending its suo motu case against former Tamil Nadu forest minister K Ponmudi for allegedly narrating an obscene joke referring to the Shaivite and Vaishnavite communities, reported by Bar & Bench. The decision comes despite the Tamil Nadu police having closed all related complaints.
Justice P Velmurugan, presiding over the matter, remarked that politicians in power should not see themselves as kings or queens entitled to sovereign immunity. He made this comment after Advocate General PS Raman informed the court that Tamil Nadu police had closed all 124 complaints filed against the former minister over his alleged remarks.
Justice Velmurugan remarked that nowadays, all politicians and individuals making public speeches seem to believe that Article 19 grants them absolute rights, as if "only the sky is the limit". He added that the court could not remain a silent spectator in such matters.
"Everyone taking a mic in public must understand. A strong message should go. So many things are being said, as if they (politicians) are the kings of this country. Whatever they say, (they think) they can do no wrong. The court cannot watch these things silently," Justice P Velmurugan said.
The controversy stems from a public event organised by Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam, during which Ponmudi allegedly made a lewd joke referring to Shaivite and Vaishnavite religious symbols. A video of the speech went viral, drawing widespread condemnation, including from DMK MP Kanimozhi.
In response, party president and Chief Minister MK Stalin removed Ponmudi from his role as DMK's deputy general secretary. Later, Ponmudi was forced to resign from the Cabinet as well.
Case to be heard in August
In response to the advocate general's argument that the complainants had the option to approach senior police officials regarding the closure of their cases, Justice P Velmurugan decided to keep the suo motu case pending. He also instructed that police officers must serve closure reports to all 124 complainants.
The case is scheduled for further hearing on August 1, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Madras High Court Raps Bureaucrat In Contempt Case, Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Fine
Madras High Court Raps Bureaucrat In Contempt Case, Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Fine

NDTV

time42 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Madras High Court Raps Bureaucrat In Contempt Case, Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Fine

Chennai: The Madras High Court has come down heavily on the Greater Chennai Corporation Commissioner, questioning whether he considers himself "above the court" simply because he is an IAS officer. The court has ordered the Commissioner to appear in person tomorrow, explaining his conduct. The strong observations came during a contempt of court hearing filed by advocate and former councillor Rukmangathan. He had approached the court, seeking action against illegal constructions in Zone 5 of the Chennai Corporation, particularly in Royapuram. The court had earlier directed the Corporation to take action not only in Zone 5 but across other zones as well, in an order dated December 2021. However, the petitioner alleged that the Corporation failed to act on the court's directive, prompting him to file a contempt petition against the Commissioner. Hearing the matter, a bench of Chief Justice S.V. Gangapurwala and Justice Sundar Mohan questioned why the earlier order had not been implemented. The bench imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh on the Commissioner, which would be deducted from his salary and donated to the Adyar Cancer Institute. When the matter came up again, Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran sought to suspend the fine, admitting there had been a lapse on the part of the legal team. The Chief Justice, however, was unsparing in his criticism. He remarked that even if the legal counsel had filed incorrect affidavits, the Commissioner was duty-bound to verify them before signing. Failure to do so, he said, made him unfit to hold the post. The court asked why the Commissioner failed to appear for the contempt proceedings earlier and directed him to be present tomorrow with a proper affidavit. The decision on the penalty will be made later.

Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation
Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation

ANI 10 Jul 2025, 00:38 GMT+10 Kochi (Kerala) [India], July 9 (ANI): The Kerala government has filed an appeal against the High Court single bench order quashing the KEAM rank list. The appeal will be considered by the Division Bench on Thursday. The High Court quashed the Kerala Engineering, Architecture, and Medical (KEAM) exam results announced by the government after consolidating marks in the new formula. The single bench of the High Court also ordered that the KEAM rank list be revised. The state government announced the KEAM results last week based on the new formula, considering the long-standing complaint of Kerala syllabus students that marks were being reduced due to mark consolidation. Hana Fathima, a student who passed Plus Two in the CBSE syllabus, filed the petition, questioning the consolidation of marks in the rank list. The state government announced the results last week based on the new formula, considering the long-standing complaint of Kerala syllabus students that marks were reduced due to the consolidation of marks. The Plus Two student approached the High Court challenging this. The High Court's action accepted the student's argument that the prospectus was changed at the final stage of the admission process. The High Court's verdict also took into account the argument that CBSE students had lost the weightage they had earlier due to the new equation for consolidation of marks. The government had announced yesterday that the rank list was prepared by considering the marks obtained in the entrance exam and Plus Two together. There were complaints that when the previous equation was prepared, Kerala syllabus students scored 15 to 20 marks less than CBSE students. Justice D K Singh delivered the ruling, observing that the revised method of calculating engineering entrance ranks adversely affected students from the CBSE syllabus. (ANI)

Major row erupts over use of temple funds in Tamil Nadu
Major row erupts over use of temple funds in Tamil Nadu

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Major row erupts over use of temple funds in Tamil Nadu

A political controversy has erupted in Tamil Nadu over the use of temple funds to build government colleges. AIADMK chief Edappadi K. Palaniswami accused the DMK-led government of diverting donations meant for temples to construct colleges. The DMK defended the practice, stating it has been done for years and temple funds are used for humanitarian needs like education. This has reignited the debate on whether temple funds should be used solely for temple development or can be utilised for broader social welfare. The AIADMK and BJP have criticised the government's actions, while the DMK argues temples have historically supported education in the state. The issue has become a major political flashpoint ahead of next year's assembly elections in Tamil Nadu. And in Karnataka, there's widespread panic over heart attacks, with large crowds gathering at Mysore's Jayadeva Hospital for check-ups. The Karnataka High Court has stayed a state government order to close Jan Aushadhi Kendras in government hospitals, seen as a setback for the Siddaramaiah government. The BJP has criticised the state's move to shut these centers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store