
How the world's largest electronics market in Shenzhen is feeling the heat from China's power bank crackdown
The shop owner, who wanted to be known as Mei, is stuck with more than 100 unsold portable chargers, even after sending hundreds back to the factory. Another vendor told CNA she is staring at thousands of yuan in stranded inventory, as store shelves fill with products no one dares to buy - or fly with.
The sprawling bazaar, billed as the world's largest electronics market, has been thrown into disarray amid wider upheaval in China's power bank industry. A string of battery-related safety scares has triggered mass recalls, a sweeping ban on uncertified devices aboard domestic flights and intense public scrutiny.
Retailers are feeling the heat as authorities ramp up enforcement to ensure only compliant portable chargers are sold. Consumers have also found themselves in the line of fire, grappling with confusion over recall notices and difficulties securing refunds and exchanges.
Some users were even told to destroy their portable chargers by soaking them in salt water to qualify for a refund - an instruction that swiftly went viral, prompting a flood of user-submitted photos, along with ridicule and frustration.
But analysts say there may be a silver lining amid the turmoil - the sweeping crackdown could ultimately raise industry standards and power through long-overdue improvements in safety and compliance.
CHARGING TOWARDS TIGHTER RULES
But first - how did it all come to this?
The latest trigger came on Jun 28, when China enacted a ban on uncertified power banks aboard domestic flights, citing fire risks.
In August 2023, Chinese authorities mandated that power banks and lithium-ion batteries would be subject to China Compulsory Certification (CCC) requirements.
The CCC mark is a mandatory national safety and quality certification. From August 2024, devices without a valid certificate have been banned from being manufactured, sold, imported, or used commercially. Enforcement, however, has been uneven.
But now, passengers are being barred from carrying power banks that lack the official CCC mark, the country's civil aviation regulator stated in a notice issued just a day before the rule came into effect.
Portable chargers with faded or illegible CCC labels, or those subject to product recalls, are also prohibited, according to the notice by the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC).
CAAC pointed to a string of mid-flight fire incidents linked to power banks, as well as mass recalls by major brands, as contributing factors. Two leading Chinese electronics manufacturers, Anker and Romoss, recently recalled more than 1.2 million portable chargers over battery-related fire risks.
Since then, thousands of power banks have reportedly been confiscated at airports across the country. At Urumqi Diwopu International Airport in Xinjiang alone, around 3,000 devices were being seized daily, according to a Jun 28 report by Xiamen Daily.
Beyond this, authorities have ramped up on-the-ground checks, tightening enforcement at electronics markets to ensure only compliant power banks make it to store shelves.
'There have been undercover checks these past two weeks. We're all scared,' a vendor at Huaqiangbei who wanted to be known as Ling told CNA.
'If you get caught, there's a fine,' added Ling, whose store also sells mini fans and hairdryers alongside power banks.
Under China's Product Quality Law, sellers can face fines of up to three times the value of uncertified goods. That means a power bank priced at 100 yuan (US$14), for example, could result in a maximum penalty of 300 yuan per unit.
The shift is visibly playing out at Huaqiangbei.
Power banks that were once openly flaunted across shopfronts and tabletops have become harder to spot. CNA observed that many are now tucked away in drawers or stacked in boxes beneath counters, kept out of sight as sellers weigh the risk of being penalised.
'People here in Huaqiangbei are smart. If you don't adapt quickly, you'll be eliminated,' said Ling.
BALANCING COMPLIANCE AND CLEARANCE
Amid the heightened scrutiny, some vendors have decided to focus on hawking other wares for the time being.
One shop owner who declined to be named told CNA she had returned more than 100 non-compliant power banks to the manufacturer and shifted to selling other products like portable fans and hairdryers.
'The manufacturer took it back and said it would return with the CCC certification,' the shop owner said. She explained that since the domestic flight ban was announced, some factories have been retrieving stock from vendors and sending it back a week or two later with CCC labels affixed.
But many vendors are choosing to stay the course and sell power banks despite the heightened scrutiny and regulatory risks, even as not all the devices on offer appear to meet official standards.
At several shops CNA visited, vendors openly offered CCC-certified power banks but were also willing to discreetly sell uncertified ones. When asked directly, one shopkeeper pointed to a stack, saying: 'If you are not taking flights, you get these. If you are, take this other batch.'
The uncertified power banks were selling for around 60 yuan, roughly 30 yuan less than certified models.
Other shops displayed portable chargers marked as flight-safe, but asked this reporter to delete photos of the devices after they were taken.
Similar scenes have played out across China. At Beijing's Kemao Electronic City, the capital's largest electronics market, vendors kept a low profile and discouraged photo-taking even as product packaging displayed signs claiming 'with national CCC certificate, (you are) safe and secure'.
In some cases, even the authenticity of the CCC mark on power banks being sold has come into question.
On this reporter's visit to Huaqiangbei, a vendor who gave her name as Zhan revealed a separate box of power banks affixed with CCC labels. She acknowledged that the devices were not truly certified – the manufacturer had simply printed the labels to make them appear compliant.
'The factory took them back to print the CCC labels and only sent them back today for packing. But we don't want to lie to customers, so we just tell them honestly,' she said.
'For international flights, it's okay because we've been selling these for years,' Zhan remarked.
'It's a waste to throw them away,' she added. 'We are making only a 2 yuan profit per portable charger sold. We want to clear them as soon as possible.'
Zhan claimed that after the existing stock was cleared, she would no longer sell power banks without the CCC mark.
But even the CCC mark itself has become a source of confusion. In the rush to comply, fake 3C stickers have been circulating online, with some listed for as little as 5 yuan each. Checks by CNA found that the search term '3C sticker' has been blocked on major e-commerce platforms, including Taobao, JD.com and secondhand platform Xianyu.
Under Chinese laws, legitimate CCC-certified power banks must display key identifiers: the manufacturer's name and address, rated capacity, input/output specifications, the official CCC mark with factory code, and clear safety warnings. These markings help distinguish certified products from counterfeits.
Some power banks sold at Huaqiangbei and seen by CNA carried CCC labels, but several appeared dubious—markings were inconsistent, airplane logos were printed in different ink, and some lacked key identifiers required by regulations.
Some power banks sold at Huaqiangbei and seen by CNA carried dubious-looking CCC labels, with aeroplane logos printed in a different ink. Others were missing key identifiers required by regulations.
Another Huaqiangbei shopkeeper, Lei, claimed that not all power bank manufacturers are going through the process of getting all their products CCC-certified.
'It cost them 20,000 yuan to get the certification. It will increase the cost price,' Lei said.
As an example, he held up a 10,000mAh power bank affixed with the CCC mark. 'It was priced at 50 yuan, now it's 80 to 90 yuan,' he said.
Obtaining the CCC mark takes time, effort and money, industry players point out.
Wang Shuhai, the general manager of Nohon, a Hong Kong-headquartered consumer electronics firm with 18 years of experience in replacement batteries, told CNA that CCC certification for a single product can cost around 30,000 yuan to 40,000 yuan.
'That includes testing fees, factory audits and certificate maintenance … on top of that, the battery cells themselves require separate aviation safety certification,' he said.
'The whole process takes about three months.'
CONSUMERS CAUGHT IN THE CRACKDOWN
It's not just electronics vendors feeling the heat - consumers are also caught in the fallout from China's crackdown on uncertified power banks.
A content creator from Shandong, who goes by the username LoseHeart, said he relies on two portable chargers to support his video work. One of them, a Remax-branded device bought from an official Taobao store in March last year, is no longer allowed.
'My wallet's already thin,' he said. 'People's incomes and budgets are tight. Forcing us to spend more just builds resentment.'
Still, he said he would avoid pricier models moving forward. 'I'll keep it within 100 yuan.'
David Liu, 27, a Taiwanese student in Shanghai, told CNA that both of his portable chargers - an Asus and a Xiaomi - only carry the CE mark, which is valid in the European market but not in China.
He was travelling in Guangzhou when the new aviation policy took effect and tried mailing the devices back to Shanghai. 'Before June, I could send the portable charger anywhere in China, so I thought this would work,' Liu said.
But he was unsuccessful as logistics firms had already begun refusing to ship non-CCC-certified devices amid the latest crackdown.
'There wasn't enough buffer time for the policy to take place, and they also (enforced the ban on) shipping companies from handling uncertified power banks, so a lot of customers had to give up on their portable chargers,' Liu said.
At the same time, owners of power banks under recall orders have also run into issues getting refunds on their devices or exchanging them for a certified replacement.
Chinese name brands like Anker and Romoss have announced product recalls. Anker has recalled more than 712,000 units across seven models, while Romoss recently pulled nearly half a million power banks spanning three models - both citing battery defects that pose fire risks.
In the initial recall notice for Anker's A1681 power bank issued in late June, customers were told to return the devices to a designated warehouse in Dongguan, Guangdong. But many soon reported that major courier companies such as SF Express, JD Logistics, China Post and YTO Express refused to ship the items due to safety concerns and tightened regulations.
Ten days later, Anker issued an update. Users were instead instructed to soak the devices in salt water for 24 hours in a well-ventilated area, then dispose of them in a hazardous waste bin. To qualify for a refund, they had to submit a video of the process.
'This is to completely drain the internal battery and reduce potential safety risks before disposal,' Anker stated in a message sent to customers.
The instruction quickly went viral, prompting users to flood Chinese social media with photos and videos of themselves carrying out the act.
'They made me soak the power bank and upload proof, then said it'll take four to eight weeks to send a new one. Every day it's a different story,' one user wrote on the social media platform Xiaohongshu.
'It breaks my heart to see (my power bank) go. It works perfectly, doesn't overheat, looks great and charges fast,' another commented.
POWERING TOWARDS BETTER STANDARDS
Even as retailers and consumers navigate the new landscape, analysts say China's power bank industry is facing a long-overdue reckoning - one that's exposing cracks in safety standards, compliance practices and supply chain integrity.
In both the Anker and Romoss recalls, the companies pointed to faulty battery cells as the root cause. The defective cells came from a shared supplier, Amprius (Wuxi), which also supplies other major brands including Xiaomi and Baseus.
According to industry sources cited by Chinese news site The Paper, a subcontractor had quietly replaced key materials in the cells, potentially compromising safety. China's market watchdog has since suspended dozens of Amprius' CCC certifications and launched a formal investigation.
Battery cells typically account for close to half of a power bank's total cost, making them a common target for cost-cutting.
'Margins are tight. Brands outsource, factories compete on price, and suppliers get squeezed,' one longtime manufacturer told The Paper. 'If something goes wrong at the cell level, the whole chain is exposed.'
Peter Xie, the founder of Guangdong-based phone accessories maker Prosment, said that focus should be placed on the inspection and control of raw materials.
'Avoid making high-density cells and mobile power bank assemblies with overly tight dimensions,' he told CNA.
Wang Shuhai, general manager of Hong Kong-headquartered Nohon, said the effects of the 'one-size-fits-all' rule have been swift, referring to the blanket enforcement of the CCC mark requirement on all power banks.
'After-sales pressure has surged,' he said, referring to the wave of customer returns for uncertified power banks that were legally sold before the mandatory CCC certification requirement came into effect in August 2024.
At the same time, certified brands are seeing a surge in demand, he said.
'Sales orders have jumped … consumers now prioritise products with clear compliance guarantees,' said Wang, while also noting that raw material prices are 'higher than before'.
The recent enforcement of the compliance policy is accelerating a market reshuffle. 'Many small and mid-sized sellers unable to absorb compliance costs are exiting the industry,' Wang said.
'Production capacity is increasingly concentrated among top-tier brands.'
According to a 2024 industry report, China's shared power bank market was worth 12.6 billion yuan, with an estimated annual growth rate of around 20 per cent.
Still, Wang believes the shake-up is necessary. 'This will improve regulatory oversight, accelerate innovation, and weed out low-quality products - bringing the industry back to a healthier track,' he said.
Tian Xuan, vice dean at Tsinghua University's PBC School of Finance, described the industry shake-up as short-term pain for long-term gain.
'While its sudden rollout may inevitably cause inconvenience, it serves as a timely and effective measure to reduce potential hazards and ensure passenger safety,' he said, referring to the domestic flight ban on non-compliant power banks.
On the crackdown, he noted that vendors may face unsold inventory and slower sales.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
38 minutes ago
- Business Times
The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened
WHEN expectations are at rock bottom, simply showing up counts as progress. That is the story of this week's EU-China summit in Beijing – a hastily truncated, one-day event after China's President Xi Jinping declined to travel to Brussels. The absence of a formal joint communique and the palpable lack of deliverables should not obscure a critical fact that this meeting still matters. The reality of interdependence Despite rising tensions, the European Union (EU) and China together account for roughly a third of global gross domestic product and 30 per cent of world trade. Their economies are intertwined, and their geopolitical futures increasingly entangled. Whether on trade, climate action, or global security, EU-China relations have outsized consequences that go far beyond the boundaries of Brussels and Beijing. That is why, even in a climate of mistrust and mutual suspicion, face-to-face dialogue at the highest level is a meaningful step forward. Given how close the summit came to not happening at all, Xi's confirmation – reportedly just days before – signals a reluctant but essential recognition: disengagement is not a viable strategy. Fractured trust and strategic calculus The optics were clear. A shortened visit, no banquet, and icy body language contrast sharply with the six-day red-carpet treatment extended to Australia's prime minister just a week ago. The EU is not currently in Beijing's diplomatic good books, and the reasons are manifold. First and foremost is Ukraine. China's tacit support for Russia's war has alarmed European policymakers. Beijing's reported position that a Russian loss could embolden US pressure in Asia, reflects a calculus starkly misaligned with European values. The EU's recent sanctions on two Chinese banks linked to Russian military supply chains have further strained ties. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China's restriction of rate earth exports to Europe, after easing them for the US, has inflamed tensions across the EU industry. Though fast-tracked licences have been promised, details remain opaque. And for industries already grappling with competitiveness in areas like clean tech, automotive and computing, the uncertainty is as damaging as the restrictions themselves. Caught between powers Europe's dilemma is exacerbated by the looming presence of the US. Even absent from the summit table, Washington was very much 'in the room'. Both China and the EU are calibrating their moves with one wary eye on US trade policy. China fears a transatlantic deal that will shut it out while the EU fears becoming the dumping ground for excess Chinese goods that can no longer enter American markets. Also, the timing of this summit could not have been worse. With the US trade deadline looming on Aug 1, the incentive on all sides is to avoid provocation. But long-term alignment remains murky. The EU's attempt to 'de-risk' from China, as EU President Ursula von der Leyen has framed it, involves walking a tightrope: reducing strategic dependencies without provoking confrontation. That is a hard sell in both Beijing and Washington. The search for leverage elsewhere China is not the only partner the EU is looking at. Negotiations with Australia, South-east Asia and Mercosur signal a concerted push to diversify trade partnerships. While these will not fully offset dependence on China, they send a clear message: Europe is broadening its options. Climate change might seem like one area ripe for cooperation. Both the EU and China have deadlines approaching for commitments ahead of COP30 in Brazil. Yet even here, progress is stymied. The EU refuses to endorse any joint declaration unless China offers firmer pledges on emission reductions. The concern? That aligning too closely with Beijing could strain transatlantic ties. Small steps, significant implications So, will this summit be deemed a success? That depends on the yardstick. If the expectations are major breakthroughs or a reset in bilateral relations, then ultimately it will be a disappointment all around. But in geopolitics, showing up can sometimes be half the battle. In a world becoming more fragmented and multipolar, structured engagement, however imperfect, is still our best hope. The EU and China may not trust each other much, but they understand that coexistence, and even cooperation, are inescapable. And that, in today's world, is reason enough to keep talking. The writer is senior partner at Penta, based in Brussels
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Is gold still shining?
SHIFTING macroeconomic conditions and easing geopolitical tensions are reshaping market sentiment and clouding gold's near-term outlook. After hitting record highs earlier this year, gold prices have begun to retreat, prompting a fresh question for investors: Has the metal's rally run its course, or is this merely a pause before the next surge? Below are eight key questions I address about the current state of the gold market. Was the recent high in gold a short-term peak? Gold has been one of the top performing assets in 2025, rising 28 per cent year-to-date (as at Jul 24, 2025) amid strong demand from investors and central banks. Prices peaked in late April, driven by tariffs, high uncertainty, and market volatility. Another high occurred in early May, which was influenced in part by a weaker US dollar, and a mid-June rise was largely fuelled by geopolitical risks. But since the April peak, gold has been trading mostly sideways within a wide and volatile range of US$3,200 to US$3,400 per ounce, losing a bit of momentum as of late. The metal appears to be supported in the medium term, given trade policy and economic uncertainty, the impact of tariffs on the US and world economies, and continuing central bank purchases. However, with the absence of a major geopolitical event that would typically drive investor demand higher, as well as slowing jewellery and coin purchases, we believe the strong upward momentum appears to have run its course. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up What drove gold's decline from its April 2025 peak of about US$3,500? In April, US-China tensions escalated sharply and as a result, tariffs were significantly increased on both sides of the Pacific. We saw increased volatility in the markets, a condition in which gold typically thrives. Investor demand increased substantially as a result. But since then, conditions have begun to improve. The May 12 joint statement regarding a tariff truce between the United States and China signalled progress, and tariffs have moderated. Meanwhile, cross-border hostilities between Iran and Israel seem to have eased with those countries' mutually agreed upon truce, at least in the short term. At the same time, we believe there are signs of softening jewellery and coin demand, largely due to high prices and volatility. In India, which is a key market for gold, consumer purchases seemed to be a bit slow during key festive events. While the total value of purchases remains high, this seems driven more by elevated prices than by quantity. Is this a temporary correction or a trend reversal? Despite heightened regional instability due to the Iran-Israel conflict, gold prices have failed to surpass their April highs. We believe central bank gold purchases gold buying was lower in the first quarter of 2025, both sequentially and on a year-over-year basis, suggesting that even though dollar diversification as a trend is likely to continue, high gold prices might disincentivise part of the demand from central banks. Investor positioning in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have increased sharply this year, but the trend is not mirrored in futures. While there are enough catalysts to support gold prices at current levels, a sustaining rally from here might prove more challenging. Is gold headed to US$4,000 – or falling back to US$2,800? We see a wide range in gold price forecasts, from bullish US$4,000 targets to bearish calls near US$2,400 for 2026, which reflects underlying market uncertainty. To better understand momentum, we believe demand should be viewed across three segments: central banks, institutional investors, and physical demand for coin and jewellery. Since 2022, central banks have structurally increased gold holdings to help diversify away from the US dollar; many emerging market (EM) central banks still have room to expand allocations to gold. In contrast, elevated prices have begun to curb physical demand in gold. Investor demand has been very strong so far this year amid economic and geopolitical risks due to gold's perception as a safe haven. In our view, a strong upward momentum in gold from current levels would require investors to further increase their allocations – something we believe may be challenging. And, as always in periods of high commodity prices, supply and recycling are incentivised, which could limit the rally's upside potential. What would need to happen for gold to surpass its recent peak? A combination of weaker growth because of tariffs and an uptick in inflation could put the US Federal Reserve in wait-and-see mode, making the US dollar less attractive. This could be in favour of gold prices, as we believe gold remains a reliable hedge against uncertainty, recession, and stagflation risks. In addition, meaningful escalation in geopolitical conflicts or trade wars could be positive catalysts for a gold rally. We believe central bank gold purchases are also likely to continue, driven by dollar diversification due to persistent deficits and policy uncertainty in the United States. What would need to happen for gold to pull back even further? We're seeing signs that investors are trimming their gold exposure. Futures positioning has come down, and ETF holdings have started to taper off. If sentiment continues to improve and tariffs end up being less damaging to growth, we believe investors may rotate back into risk assets, which could weigh on gold prices. We've also seen signs of weaker physical demand in key markets, such as India, as retail investors and consumers delay or reduce purchases on the back of high prices and volatility. Given market volatility, how reliable are gold price forecasts? So far in 2025, gold price forecasts have been revised four to five times in most major forecasting institutions, which is far more frequently than the usual quarterly or semiannual updates. This underscores how volatile and unpredictable the current environment is, making it especially difficult to rely solely on forecasts for investment decisions. Instead, we focus on fundamentals such as quarterly central bank purchases, gold reserves in central bank balance sheets, futures and ETF positioning, and gold's correlation with the US dollar. We also closely track economic and trade news to gauge sentiment and momentum. What should EM debt investors consider now? About 80 per cent of mined gold comes from EM countries, providing plenty of investment opportunities for investors in EMs. Our approach to investing in gold companies in EMs involves thorough research analysis on the company's operations and financials as well as the gold market as a whole. We also stress test gold miners' resilience across different price scenarios, focusing on companies that invest in reserve growth and expansion while managing downside risks. We believe the current environment presents good hedging opportunities for disciplined producers. The writer is senior corporate credit and sustainability analyst on William Blair's emerging markets debt team


CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
02:27:25 Min
From the opening bell across markets in Southeast Asia and China, to the biggest business interviews and top financial stories, tune in to Asia First to kick-start your business day.