Great Ormond Street Hospital surgeons forced to use mobile phone torches during surgery after power cut
The leading children's hospital has faced ongoing concerns over the maintenance of its estate and operating theatres, which have led to water leaks and power outages, according to a report by the Care Quality Commission.
The CQC warned of 'recurrent' problems, including a power outage during spinal surgery and ventilation failures.
The watchdog's inspection came after GOSH faced scrutiny over the care of hundreds of children by orthopaedic surgeon Yaser Jabber.
In its report, the CQC said it found concerns around 'surgical accountability and oversight' at the trust.
The news comes as the NHS in England faces a £14 billion backlog in estate maintenance spending, meaning hospital buildings are facing issues which can impact patient safety and lead to the cancellation of operations.
Earlier this year, the National Audit Office warned that around 5,400 clinical service incidents occur in the NHS each year due to building or infrastructure failures.
The CQC report's findings into building failures, first revealed by The Sunday Times, said: 'Concerns were raised about the maintenance of operating theatres and equipment safety. A recent power outage during a spinal surgery procedure required staff to use mobile phone torches to complete wound closure.
'This incident, alongside reports of water leaks affecting electrical systems and theatre closures due to filtration failures, indicated ongoing issues with estates and facilities management.'
The CQC report said the trust took actions to address the problems; however, it warned there were 'recurrent theatre maintenance failures that had resulted in delayed or cancelled surgical procedures, impacting patient safety and access to timely care.'
A spokeswoman for the trust said the incident was caused by an electrical system power failure and that an external review had been commissioned. The trust told The Sunday Times the surgical lights immediately over the patient remained during the power cut, but that theatre staff moving around the operating theatre had to use a phone torch to avoid cables and find the equipment needed.
The Independent has approached GOSH over the use of physician associates to fill doctor rota gaps.
According to the think tank, The Health Foundation, the NHS needs its capital spending to grow by 10.2 per cent a year between 2024-25 and 2029-30 to address its maintenance backlog, to invest in technology, buildings and equipment to improve services.
Following the government's spending review, the capital budget for the Department for Health and Social Care is expected to grow by £2.3 billion from £10.9 billion in 2023-24 to £13.2 billion in 2025-26.
Hospitals across the country report incidents due to poor infrastructure or building issues.
Last month, Gloucester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust experienced an issue with its servers, which forced it to rely on paper ahead of a five-day junior doctor strike.
According to the Sunday Times, in June, the Princess Royal Hospital in Telford was forced to close several wards and divert ambulances due to a burst pipe.
St Helier Hospital in Sutton, which had to cancel urgent tests due to flooding, told the paper 'Our ageing hospitals are deteriorating faster than we can fix them — with issues such as floods, leaking roofs, and broken-down lifts, as well as buildings that have had to be demolished because the foundations are sinking'.
Last year, the government identified more hospitals which had been impacted by a long-running issue of having reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) across its estates – a total of 47 hospitals have been identified.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prime Healthcare Hospitals Named to Becker's "100 Great Community Hospitals" List
Six Prime Healthcare and Prime Healthcare Foundation hospitals honored for clinical excellence, patient safety, and commitment to community care ONTARIO, Calif., August 04, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Prime Healthcare is honored to announce that six of its hospitals have been named to Becker's Healthcare's prestigious "100 Great Community Hospitals" list for 2025. This national recognition reflects Prime Healthcare's unwavering commitment to providing clinical excellence, patient safety, health equity, and expanding access to high-quality care in communities across the country. The Becker's list recognizes hospitals that deliver exceptional care in communities outside metropolitan areas, playing a vital role in improving wellness and access across the nation. Hospitals were selected based on nominations and performance across trusted benchmarks from leading organizations, including U.S. News & World Report, Healthgrades, CMS, The Leapfrog Group, the National Rural Health Association, and The Chartis Center for Rural Health. Here's a look at the six Prime hospitals earning a spot on this year's list: Prime Healthcare Hospitals Desert Valley Hospital (Victorville, Calif.) – Among the top 5% of hospitals nationwide for clinical performance; recipient of the Healthgrades Patient Safety Excellence Award two years in a row; launched the High Desert region's first internal medicine residency program; earned five "A" grades from the 2025–26 Lown Institute Hospitals Index. Lake Huron Medical Center (Port Huron, Mich.) – Earned the Healthgrades Patient Safety Excellence Award for seven consecutive years; awarded consistent "A" grades by The Leapfrog Group since 2018; ranked among the top five hospitals in Michigan for Social Responsibility by the Lown Institute with six "A" grades on the 2025–26 index. Prime Healthcare Foundation Hospitals Encino Hospital Medical Center (Encino, Calif.) – Nine-year 5-star recipient for hip fracture treatment; ranked among the top 5% nationally for patient safety; earned six "A" grades from the Lown Institute; recognized for heart failure and stroke care by the American Heart Association; top five in California for Pay Equity. Pampa Regional Medical Center (Pampa, Texas) – Honored for expanding rural healthcare access and introducing advanced diagnostics; recognized for excellence in sepsis treatment. Saint Francis Hospital (Evanston, Ill.) – Earned its third consecutive "A" from The Leapfrog Group; received six "A" grades from the Lown Institute, including national No. 1 ranking for Pay Equity; top five in Illinois for Patient Safety and Health Equity. Sherman Oaks Hospital (Sherman Oaks, Calif.) – Healthgrades Patient Safety Excellence Award winner for 12 consecutive years; top 5% in the nation for patient safety; received eight "A" grades from the Lown Institute, including top 5 in California for Value of Care; nationally recognized for wound care and stroke services. "This recognition reflects the heart of Prime Healthcare's mission — to save hospitals, elevate care, and ensure that no community is left behind," said Sunny Bhatia, MD, President and Corporate Chief Medical Officer of Prime Healthcare. "Our hospitals were founded on the belief that every patient deserves access to exceptional care, regardless of geography or circumstance. These awards honor the incredible work of our teams who embody that vision each day, improving lives and strengthening communities across the country." Becker's emphasizes that inclusion on the list is based on merit alone — hospitals cannot pay to be included — underscoring the significance of this national recognition. "Community hospitals are the heart of healthcare in America," said Kavitha Bhatia, MD, President and Chair of the Prime Healthcare Foundation. "This recognition affirms our mission to serve with compassion and purpose. It reflects the tireless efforts of our teams who work every day to provide care with dignity, improve outcomes, and ensure patients have access to the care they deserve—close to home." Prime Healthcare and the nonprofit Prime Healthcare Foundation operate 51 hospitals and more than 360 outpatient locations in 14 states. With a mission to save hospitals, improve healthcare, and give back to communities, Prime has earned hundreds of awards for quality and patient safety, including "100 Top Hospital" rankings and national recognition for value-based care. About Prime Healthcare and Prime Healthcare Foundation Prime Healthcare is an award-winning health system operating 51 hospitals and more than 360 outpatient locations in 14 states, providing over 2.5 million patient visits annually. It is one of the nation's leading health systems, with nearly 57,000 employees and physicians. Eighteen of the Prime Healthcare hospitals are members of the Prime Healthcare Foundation, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit public charity. Based in Ontario, California, Prime Healthcare is nationally recognized for award-winning quality care and has been named a 10 Top and 15 Top Health System by Truven Health Analytics. Its hospitals have been named among the nation's "100 Top Hospitals" 72 times and is one of Healthgrades' most awarded health systems in the nation for patient safety. To learn more, please visit Find us on: LinkedIn: Facebook: Instagram: View source version on Contacts Mark Reecemreece@ 916-303-6440 Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
Eating minimally processed meals doubles weight loss even when ultraprocessed foods are healthy, study finds
Food & health UKFacebookTweetLink Follow People in the United Kingdom lost twice as much weight eating meals typically made at home than they did when eating store-bought ultraprocessed food considered healthy, the latest research has found. 'This new study shows that even when an ultraprocessed diet meets nutritional guidelines, people will still lose more weight eating a minimally processed diet,' said coauthor Dr. Kevin Hall, a former senior investigator at the US National Institutes of Health who has conducted some of the world's only controlled clinical trials on ultraprocessed foods. 'This (study) is the largest and longest randomized controlled clinical trial of ultraprocessed foods to date,' Hall added. Hall's past research sequestered healthy volunteers from the world for a month at a time, measuring the impact of ultraprocessed food on their weight, body fat and various biomarkers of health. In a 2019 study, he found people in the United States ate about 500 calories more each day and gained weight when on an ultraprocessed diet than when eating a minimally processed diet matched by calories and nutrients. The weight loss from minimally processed food in the new study was modest — only 2% of the person's baseline weight, said study first author Samuel Dicken, a research fellow at the department of behavioral science and health and the Centre for Obesity Research at University College London. 'Though a 2% reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their (food) intake,' Dicken said in a statement. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13% weight reduction in men and a 9% reduction in women.' Men typically have more lean muscle mass than women, which along with testosterone often gives them a quicker boost over women when it comes to weight loss, experts say. The study, published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine, provided free ultraprocessed or minimally processed meals and snacks to 55 overweight people in the UK for a total of eight weeks. After a short break, the groups switched to the opposite diet for another eight weeks. Study participants were told to eat as much or as little of the 4,000 daily calories as they liked and record their consumption in a diary. By the end of the study, 50 people had spent eight weeks on both diets. While the number of participants may seem small at first glance, providing 16 weeks of food and implementing randomized controlled clinical trials can be costly. For the first eight weeks, 28 people received daily deliveries of minimally processed meals and snacks, such as overnight oats and homemade spaghetti Bolognese. Minimally processed foods, such as fruits, vegetables, meat, milk and eggs, are typically cooked from their natural state, according to NOVA, a recognized system of categorizing foods by their level of processing. Concurrently, another 27 people received a daily delivery of ultraprocessed foods — such as ready-to-eat breakfast bars or heat-and-eat lasagna — for eight weeks. Ultraprocessed foods, or UPFs, contain additives never or rarely used in kitchens and often undergo extensive industrial processing, according to the NOVA classification system. Because ultraprocessed foods are typically high in calories, added sugar, sodium, and saturated fat and low in fiber, they have been linked to weight gain and obesity and the development of chronic conditions including cancer, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and depression. Such foods may even shorten life. Researchers in this study, however, did something unusual, said Christopher Gardner, Rehnborg Farquhar Professor of Medicine at Stanford University in California who directs the Stanford Prevention Research Center's Nutrition Studies Research Group. 'They tried to make a healthy ultraprocessed diet by picking ultraprocessed foods with the recommended number of fruits, veggies and fiber and lower levels of salt, sugar and saturated fats,' said Gardner, who was not involved in the study. Both the ultraprocessed and the minimally processed meals had to meet the nutritional requirements of the Eatwell Guide, the UK's official government guidance on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. The United States has similar dietary guidelines, which are used to set federal nutritional standards. 'This is a very solid study, matching dietary interventions for nutrients and food group distribution, while varying only the contribution of ultra-processed foods,' said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine, in an email. Katz, who was not involved in the study, is the founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine. The study's goal was weight loss, which often comes with improved cardiovascular readings, such as lower blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar levels. That happened, but in rather odd and surprising ways, said Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard professor emerita of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University, who was asked to write an editorial to be published with the study. Instead of gaining weight, people on the ultraprocessed diet chose to eat 120 fewer calories a day, thus losing a small amount of weight. People on the minimally processed diet, however, ate 290 fewer calories a day, thus losing even more weight and some body fat as well. 'One possible explanation is that (people on the minimally processed diet) did not like the 'healthy' meals as much as their usual diets,' Nestle, who was not involved in the research, wrote in the editorial. 'They deemed the minimally processed diet less tasty,' Nestle said. 'That diet emphasized 'real' fresh foods, whereas the ultra-processed diet featured commercially packaged 'healthy' ultra-processed food products such as fruit, nut, and protein bars; sandwiches and meals; drinking yoghurts, and plant-based milks.' Less than 1% of people in the UK follow all of the government's nutritional recommendations, according to the study, often choosing ultraprocessed foods as the basis of their normal daily intake. In the US, nearly 60% of an adult's calorie consumption is from ultraprocessed foods. 'People in this study were overweight or obese and were already eating a diet high in all kinds of ultraprocessed foods,' Gardner said. 'So the ultraprocessed diet in the study was healthier than their typical normal diet. Isn't that an odd twist?' People on the minimally processed diet had lower levels of triglycerides, a type of fat in the blood linked to an increased risk of heart disease and stroke, but other markers of heart health didn't vary much between the two diets, according to the study. There was one notable exception: low-density lipoprotein, or LDL, known as 'bad' cholesterol because it can build up in arteries and create blockages to the heart. 'Surprisingly, LDL cholesterol was reduced more on the ultra-processed diet,' said dietitian Dimitrios Koutoukidis, an associate professor of diet, obesity and behavioral sciences at the University of Oxford, who was not involved in the study. 'This might imply that processing is not as important for heart health if the foods already meet the standard UK healthy eating guidance,' Koutoukidis said in a statement. 'Further research is needed to better understand this.' According to Hall, the results fit quite nicely with preliminary results from his current study that is still underway. In that research, Hall and his team measured the impact of four configurations of ultraprocessed foods on the health of 36 volunteers. Each lived for a month in the Metabolic Clinical Research Unit of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. 'When you modify an ultraprocessed diet to have lower energy (calorie) density and fewer highly palatable foods, you can offset some of the effects of ultraprocessed foods in causing excess calorie intake and weight gain,' Hall said. In other words, choose healthier foods regardless of the levels of processing. 'People don't eat the best ultraprocessed foods, they eat the worst ones, so the take home here is to follow the national guidelines for nutrient quality,' Gardner said. 'Read your nutrient label and choose foods that are low in salt, fat, sugar and calories and high in fiber, and avoid foods with too many additives with unpronounceable names. That's the key to a healthier diet.' Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sir Roger Daltrey is afraid he won't make it to the end of The Who tour
Sir Roger Daltrey fears he won't make it to the end of The Who tour because he fears he has "the potential to get really ill".
