Finding the right tax preparer: BBB offers tips to help you file this year
South Bend Tribune
While many will choose to use an app or purchase tax software to complete and submit their own tax forms, others are in search of some extra help in the form of a tax return preparation service or a tax consultant.
How do you know when to get help with your taxes?
Significant life changes, business ownership, or simply a lack of knowledge about the ever-changing tax laws can make finding a trustworthy tax preparer a good idea. Just like choosing an expert to put a roof on your home is probably a better idea than tackling it yourself, sometimes it just makes sense to hire a professional.
A professional tax preparer is not only familiar with tax laws and how to file but can also help navigate things like deductions, tax credits, and whether a married couple should file jointly or separately.
In addition, a BBB Accredited tax preparer has agreed to uphold the BBB standards to tell the truth, honor promises and be transparent – and most importantly, when dealing with personal information: to safeguard your privacy.
Find the loan that's right for you: Best personal loans
That said, not all tax preparers have the same level of experience and training. Here are tips for finding someone you can trust with your finances and sensitive personal information.
First, it's essential to understand the different types of tax preparers and their qualifications. While all the types listed below can prepare your taxes, only enrolled agents, certified public accountants, and tax attorneys may represent their clients to the IRS on matters such as audits, collection issues, and appeals.
Tax preparers: Thousands of people work as tax preparers in the United States. Some are full-time workers, and others work part-time or only during the tax season. These preparers must have an active preparer tax identification number (PTIN) through the IRS. Beyond the PTIN, regulating tax preparers is done at the state level. Check with your state's department of taxation or revenue to learn more. Most tax preparers are legitimate and competent, but keep in mind that without a national license requirement, they may be working off of their research and experience. Because of this, you should conduct a thorough interview with the tax preparer before hiring them.
Enrolled Agent (EA): An EA is a tax preparer approved by the IRS to represent taxpayers. An EA must either have prior qualifying employment with the IRS or pass a comprehensive IRS test on individual and business tax returns. To maintain EA status, they must complete several credit hours of continuing education courses in accounting methods and tax regulations. An EA may work independently or as part of a firm and specialize in specific areas of tax law. An EA may be a good option if you have a more complex tax situation. However, you'll want to make sure their area of expertise applies to your personal situation. An EA is also qualified to help you with financial planning and give you tips that could help you reduce your taxes in the future.
Certified Public Accountants (CPA): CPAs are licensed after passing a state professional qualifying exam. They are highly skilled in accounting. These skills and qualifications make them good candidates for complex tax planning and preparation ifthey have experience in handling tax matters and they enroll in continuing education programs that keep them abreast of the constant changes to tax laws. If your return is quite complex, a CPA may be your best choice for tax preparation.
Tax returns 2025:Tax help is easier than ever to find online. Should you file them yourself or pay a pro?
Tax attorneys: A tax attorney helps their clients with legal issues related to taxes. They can represent individuals or businesses. Hiring a tax attorney is a good option for taxpayers looking to shelter part of their income legally or for those needing specialized advice on municipal bonds, estate planning, and the like. A tax attorney can also represent clients in tax court and draft appropriate legal documents.
How to choose the right tax preparer:
Choosing the right kind of tax preparer for you will depend on the complexity of your tax situation. After you've decided what qualifications your tax preparer needs, the following tips will help you choose someone trustworthy and competent:
• Review the tax preparer's credentials. EAs, CPAs, and tax attorneys are qualified to represent their clients to the IRS on all matters. Other preparers can help you with forms and basic matters but cannot represent you in case of an audit. Don't be afraid to ask about these or other qualifications before you hire someone.
• Be wary of spectacular promises. If a tax preparer promises you larger refunds than the competition, this is a red flag. Some tax preparers base their fees on the amount of your return and may be likely to use shady tax preparation tactics. In addition, you might want to avoid tax preparers who offer "refund anticipation loans" as you could lose a large percentage of your return to commission fees. Read the fine print!
• Get referrals from friends and family – and BBB. One of the best ways to find a trustworthy tax preparer is to ask your loved ones for recommendations, and another is to check your Better Business Bureau. Check BBB.org, paying careful attention to other consumers' reviews or complaint details. This research will give you a clear view of what you can expect.
• Think about availability. If the IRS finds errors in your tax forms or decides to perform an audit, will your tax preparer be available to help you with the details? Find out whether you can contact the tax preparer year-round or only during tax season.
• Ask about fees ahead of time. Before you agree to any services, read the contracts carefully and understand how much the tax preparer charges for their services. Ask about extra fees for e-filing state, federal, and local returns and fees for any unexpected complications.
• If things don't add up, find someone else. If a tax preparer can't verify their credentials, has a record of bad reviews from previous clients, or their business practices don't seem convincing, don't do business with them. Remember that if you hire them, this individual will handle your sensitive personal information – information you need to keep safe from corrupt or fraudulent tax preparers.
For more information and to learn how to protect yourself, Google 'BBB 10 Steps to Avoid Scams.' If you spot a scam, whether you have lost money or not, report it to BBB's Scam Tracker at BBB.org/ScamTracker and the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. Your story can help protect consumers from similar scams.
Jan Diaz is the President/CEO of the Better Business Bureau serving Northern Indiana, which serves 23 counties. Contact the BBB at 800-552-4631 or visit www.bbb.org.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 hours ago
- The Hill
DC has highest threshold for top 1 percent
The nation's capital emerged as the location with the highest threshold to be the top one percent of earners, a new study found. The new study by personal finance site SmartAsset analyzed households that bring in enough money annually to be considered among the top one percent of earners in each state and the nation's capital. The study was based on the 2022 tax return data, the latest available from the IRS, and adjusted for 2025 dollars. The study found the District of Columbia has the highest necessary threshold to rank as a top earner, where a household needs an income of about $1.07 million, according to SmartAsset. Only about 3,300 households in D.C. qualify. There's only one other location where it takes more than $1 million to fall under the category. Connecticut falls in a close second, whose residents must earn roughly $1.06 annually to be in the top 1 percent. Nationwide, there are about 1.5 million households that bring in enough income to be among the top one percent if earners in their state. The average threshold to rank among the nation's top earners is $731,000 — and in 11 states and the District of Columbia, you'll need more than that. West Virginia proved to be the state with the lowest income needed to be considered the top one percent of earners in the state. There, residents would need to earn $416,300 annually to fall under the category, and about 7,300 households fall into that category. Only three other states — Mississippi, New Mexico, and Kentucky — would have a household income under half a million dollars push a household into the top earners group. SmartAsset this year also found that a single person living in the nation's largest cities would need an income of at least $85,000 to 'live comfortably,' and a family of four would need about $200,000 to do the same. The data comes as inflation continues to put more pressure on households nationwide. While President Trump has pressed for lower interest rates, economists warn such a move could drive inflation higher. Trump insisted, though, that inflation has settled, and he is pressing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. Still, Americans are largely happy with the way Trump has handled inflation as he marks six months into his second term, with 64 percent in a CBS News/YouGov poll released Sunday saying they disapprove of how the president is handling the issue.
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Government Watchdog Confirms Mass Exodus Of IRS Employees—More Cuts Are Expected
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 15: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) building stands on April 15, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by) Getty Images The IRS workforce dropped from 103,000 employees in January 2025 to approximately 77,000 in May 2025 (a 25% reduction). Those numbers, which have been previously reported, have now been confirmed by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). According to IRS records, more than 25,000 employees either separated, accepted a deferred resignation program offer, or took some other incentive to leave. These departures represent 25% of the IRS's workforce—and some job positions were impacted more than others. For example, approximately 27% of tax examiners (they review and process tax returns) and 26% of revenue agents (they conduct audits) left the agency. Beginning in January 2025, the IRS began to take steps to reduce the size of its workforce. This was the result of executive orders issued by President Donald Trump and subsequent guidance from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). While the President has repeatedly called for significant reductions in the size and scope of the federal government workforce, the tax agency has been a particular target. In February 2025, the Internal Revenue Service had approximately 103,000 employees. By March, more than 11,400 of those workers had received termination notices as probationary employees or voluntarily resigned under the so-called "Fork in the Road" or Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) pushed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Depending on their circumstance, IRS employees could be eligible for one of three Treasury incentive offerings: (1) Treasury Deferred Resignation Program; (2) Treasury Deferred Resignation Program and Voluntary Early Retirement Authority ; or (3) Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment. Treasury Deferred Resignation Program (TDRP version 1) The deferred resignation program allowed federal employees to resign but retain all pay and benefits through September 30, 2025, or later if the employee's retirement date was between October 1 and December 31, 2025. Employees who were working from home and accepted this offer were also exempted from any return-to-office requirements. Employees had until February 6 to opt into the program. The IRS subsequently recalled some of these resigned workers to work, noting that specific, critical tax return filing season positions would be exempt from the DRP until May 15, 2025. Those who had previously accepted the offer and stopped working but fell within the exception were advised they would be told when to return to work. As of May 2025, 4,575 IRS employees were approved for the program. These employees are on administrative leave with pay and benefits until their separation—in other words, the government has been paying these employees to not work. Treasury Deferred Resignation Program (TDRP and VERA) In April 2025, the IRS offered a second DRP to its employees. This version also included paid leave and benefits through September 30, 2025. Employees were also offered the opportunity to claim an 'early out' retirement. Under the Voluntary Early Retirement Authority (VERA) program, the age and service requirements for retirement were temporarily lowered to increase the number of employees who are eligible for retirement. Employees taking the VERA were required to officially separate under the TDRP. Over 23,000 employees applied for the TDRP. TIGTA has confirmed that 17,071 employees were approved. Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) The Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) was widely referred to as a 'buyout.' Under the VSIP, agencies can offer employees lump-sum payments up to $25,000 (or the employee's severance pay amount, whichever is less) as an incentive to retire or resign. TIGTA has confirmed that 776 employees were approved for the VSIP. Probationary Employees In January 2025, the IRS, like other federal agencies, was asked to identify all employees on probationary periods. While probationary employees are often recent hires (meaning within the last one to two years), they don't have to be—those who have been serving for years but were recently moved or promoted into a new position also qualify as probationary. The IRS subsequently fired approximately 7,000 probationary employees in response to an executive order signed by President Trump on February 11, 2025. Following the order, the Office of Personnel Management advised various federal agencies, including the Department of the Treasury (which includes the IRS), to fire non-essential probationary employees. Several legal challenges followed, and in March, U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup for the Northern District of California ordered six agencies, including the Treasury Department, to rehire the employees. In his ruling, Alsup said the federal government was required to follow normal reduction in force (RIF) rules. The government appealed the ruling—that case is currently pending in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In the meantime, the matter was escalated to the U.S. Supreme Court, which paused Alsup's order on administrative grounds. The unsigned Supreme Court order indicated that the group of unions and non-profit groups lacked standing to sue. Standing is a legal term that refers to your right to bring a lawsuit or have a court hear your case—to be heard, you typically have to show that another party has harmed you and that the only fix for that harm can be found in court. The idea is to ensure that matters that end up in court aren't frivolous and are raised by the right parties. The Supreme Court's order does not mean that it found the firings lawful, just that the wrong parties raised the issue in court. In May 2025, IRS and Treasury decided to return all probationary employees to full work status by May 23, 2025. However, in July 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted the federal court's prohibition on covered agencies implementing Agency RIF and Reorganization Plans and issuing or executing RIF notices. According to TIGTA, it is unclear whether any terminated probationary employees called back to work will be subject to a large-scale RIF. Reduction in Force Actions and Administrative Leave In February 2025, the President signed an executive order that advised federal agencies to begin preparations to initiate large-scale RIFs. In April 2025, the IRS began implementing a RIF that resulted in involuntary staffing cuts across multiple offices and job categories. As of May 2025, 294 employees in three offices (Office of Civil Rights and Compliance, Taxpayer Experience Office and Taxpayer Service's Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion) received RIF notices. However, a district judge placed an injunction on the removal of these employees. In addition, in March 2025, 48 senior Information Technology employees were placed on administrative leave. Of the 48 employees, 26 took the Treasury incentive offerings, while 22 remain on administrative leave. Other Separations TIGTA also identified an additional 3,093 employees classified as other separations—such as resignations, retirements, and terminations—since January 2025. According to the IRS, 752 of these are probationary employees who received termination notices and decided to resign. These employees did not participate in the DRP, TDRP, or other offerings from the IRS. Business Units Business units at the IRS were impacted at different rates. IRS employee reductions, by business unit. Kelly Phillips Erb The top six business units affected by the cuts are: Small Business/Self Employed (SB/SE) helps small business and self-employed taxpayers understand and meet their tax obligations. SB/SE reported a 35% reduction. The Human Capital Office (HCO) supports IRS employees with Human Resource topics. HCO reported a 28% reduction. Information Technology (IT) supports IRS employees by delivering IT services and solutions. IT reported a 25% reduction. Tax Exempt & Government Entities (TE/GE) helps taxpayers with pension plans, exempt organizations, and government entities comply with tax laws. TE/GE reported a 25% reduction. Taxpayer Services (TS) helps taxpayers understand and comply with tax laws. TS reported a 20% reduction. Large Business and International (LB&I) helps corporations and partnerships with assets greater than $10 million to comply with tax laws, including emerging international issues. LB&I reported a 19% reduction. Geographical Impact Every state, including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, has been impacted by the reductions. To date, TIGTA reports that California, Georgia, New York, Texas, and Utah have the highest numbers of anticipated employee separations. Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, and Mississippi have the highest percentage of anticipated employee separations compared to the IRS workforce in those states. Hiring Freeze In addition to mandatory reductions, IRS employee levels will also be impacted by attrition, including those employees opting for retirement. Importantly, they will not be replaced. As part of his January 20 executive order, Trump issued a hiring freeze that was intended to be temporary, with one exception—the IRS. While the freeze was slated to expire for other federal government agencies after 90 days, the hiring freeze for the IRS will remain in place until "it is in the national interest to lift the freeze." In her recent report to Congress, the National Taxpayer Advocate recommended that the hiring freeze be lifted so that the IRS can hire essential filing season staff to meet taxpayer needs next year. This needs to happen by the end of summer, she says, to allow time for onboarding and training by January. That will be particularly important following recent changes in the tax law, thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including new, temporary deductions for seniors, tipped workers, employees who work overtime, and taxpayers who buy new cars. In addition to getting its employees up to speed on those issues, IRS has been tasked with issuing guidance, including new withholding tables. It's also likely the case that Forms W-2 and 1040 will need a redesign—and IRS systems will have to follow suit. Getting all of that together before the filing season, especially with a reduced workforce, will be a challenge. A successful filing season, Collins wrote in her report, 'is not only an IRS imperative but also a national one.' About TIGTA TIGTA was established in January 1999 by the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 to provide independent oversight of IRS activities. Today, TIGTA provides audit, investigative, and evaluation services to promote integrity, efficiency, and economy in the administration of the nation's tax system. While TIGTA sits organizationally within the Department of the Treasury and reports to the Secretary of the Treasury and to Congress, the agency is considered to be independent. Forbes Under Trump, IRS Has Shed More Than 11% Of Its Workforce. More Cuts Are On The Way By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes Taxpayer Advocate Calls 2025 Filing Season A Success But Waves Warning Flag On Cuts By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes What The One Big Beautiful Bill Act Will Mean For You And Your Business By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes IRS Issues Guidance On New Deductions For Seniors, Tips, Overtime And Car Interest By Kelly Phillips Erb
CNBC
15 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump floats 'no tax on capital gains' for home sales. Here's who could benefit
President Donald Trump on Tuesday said the administration is considering ending capital gains taxes on home sales to boost the housing market. When asked about the idea in the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump told reporters, "we're thinking about that." "If the Fed would lower the [interest] rates, we wouldn't even have to do that," he said. "But we are thinking about no tax on capital gains on houses." Under current law, home sellers can face capital gains taxes once profits exceed $250,000 for single filers or $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. More from Personal Finance:Trump's 'big beautiful bill' created a new student loan plan: What to knowAffordable Care Act health plan enrollees could face 'subsidy cliff' in 2026Trump's 'big beautiful bill' includes these 2025 tax changes Trump's comments come roughly two weeks after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., introduced the No Tax on Home Sales Actto eliminate capital gains taxes on primary home sales. "Homeowners who have lived in their homes for decades, especially seniors in places where values have surged, shouldn't be forced to stay put because of an IRS penalty," she said in a statement. "My bill unlocks that equity, helps fix the housing shortage, and supports long-term financial security for American families." However, the proposal could be costly, and it's unclear whether the measure has broad Congressional support, experts say. "I think this could generate some interest, but they're more likely to raise the exemption than they are to eliminate the tax entirely," Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told CNBC. Enacted in 1997, the $250,000 and $500,000 capital gains exclusions — which apply to primary home sales — have never been indexed for inflation. Since 1997, the median home sales price has climbed by nearly 190%, from about $145,000 to roughly $417,000, as of the first quarter of 2025, according to Federal Reserve data. As home values rise, certain individuals, such as long-time homeowners, are more likely to exceed the $250,000 and $500,000 thresholds, which could trigger capital gains taxes, experts say. When home sales profits exceed $250,000 or $500,000, capital gains are levied at 0%, 15% or 20%, depending on taxable income. Excess profit above those thresholds can also trigger the so-called net investment income tax of 3.8%, depending on other investment earnings, according to the IRS. Some 29 million homeowners (34%) could exceed the $250,000 threshold for single filers, and 8 million (10%) could be above the $500,000 limit for married couples filing jointly, according to a 2025 study from the National Association of Realtors, or NAR. The organization has long advocated for capital gains reform for home sales. Homeowners in states like Washington, California, Utah and Massachusetts are more likely to be impacted, according to NAR data. However, many homeowners don't realize it's possible to reduce your home sales profit by adding so-called "capital improvements," such as home renovations to the original purchase price, experts say. If capital gains taxes for home sales were eliminated, the measure would primarily benefit sellers who are older and wealthier, according to an analysis released Tuesday from The Budget Lab at Yale University.
