Sinn Féin needed for left presidential candidate, says PBP
joint left candidate for the presidency
largely depends on whether
Sinn Féin
decides to run its own candidate, People Before Profit TD
Paul Murphy
has said.
He said he hoped that Sinn Féin's intentions might become clear next week.
'I would be very hopeful that we would have progress towards a joint left candidate before the Dail recess,' Mr Murphy said. 'There is a meeting being scheduled for next week.
'Obviously Sinn Féin is having its own internal process to decide whether it will run a candidate or not . . . That's pretty crucial. If they have their own candidate then there isn't going to be a joint left candidate, certainly including Sinn Féin,' he said.
READ MORE
'My understanding is that is due to end around now. So it makes sense to come back together, for Sinn Féin to report on the internal process, to say whether Sinn Féin, are they interested in pursuing further a joint left candidate or are they going to go their own way. And that's a choice for them to make,' he said.
He said he hoped there would be a meeting to discuss this next week.
If Sinn Féin are agreeable to a joint left candidate, then the parties of the left should move 'rapidly enough' to selecting a candidate.
Sinn Féin
,
Labour
, the
Social Democrats
,
People Before Profit-Solidarity
and the
Greens
have held exploratory talks about agreeing a 'consensus candidate' in recent months, on the basis that their combined votes would be more than enough to secure a nomination and could also funnel significant numbers of voters towards a chosen candidate.
Mr Murphy said that People Before Profit was 'very enthusiastic' about a candidate of the left.
'We think it can be won and we think
Michael D Higgins
is an example of how that position can be quite important, in the context of genocide, of rising racism, of homophobia, having a progress left voice in the presidency is politically important,' he said.
He said winning the presidency would be step in the direction of having a left-led government without Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael.
Asked if he had floated the names of possible candidates, Mr Murphy replied: 'Yes.'
However, he would not be drawn on who they were.
If Sinn Féin decides to run its own candidate Mr Murphy said the rest of the left would have to decide how to respond but from People Before Profit's perspective, it would be 'much, much, much more preferable' to have Sinn Féin on board.
Also speaking on Tuesday, Labour TD Marie Sherlock said that there was 'a whole kaleidoscope of names out there at the moment' but she expected that decisions would not be made until the end of August or the start of September
But she said that there was a 'massive appetite out there' for someone to continue the 'incredible legacy' of Mr Higgins.
'I think across the left we want to see there's a strong and viable candidate going into November but I think those conversations are continuing,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
‘I am proud that we are holding the line on liberal values': The Mayo man speaking for EU in Trump trade talks
Brussels may seem worlds away from a teenager's band practice in a sheep shed on a Co Mayo island cliff edge, but it has been a seamless journey for Olof Gill. From an early age, he lived between his mother Anna's native city of Gothenburg – population 600,000 – and the family's home on Clare Island Co Mayo, which has a population of just 150. Educated in both Sweden and Ireland, including Clare Island's two-teacher primary school, and later at University College Cork , via an Erasmus year in Paris, rough seas were often his highway. [ How the Gill family perfected the art of tri-location Opens in new window ] Clearly, his experience of living on the edge has afforded him perspectives which he can take into his role as European Commission spokesman for Economic Security, Trade, Financial Services, Customs, and EU-UK relations. READ MORE 'Spending my childhood years between two very different environments, whilst being brought up bilingually was very instructive in terms of my formative experiences,' says Gill. Since his appointment last year, it has been extremely busy. The job has lead him to be a well-known commentator in Irish media, particularly in light of the trade tariffs imposed by US president Donald Trump, but he loves nothing more than getting back to the island. 'I love going home to Clare Island for the obvious reasons of reconnecting with the soil and sea, seeing my family and friends, and tuning my brain back into the rhythms of island life. 'This is a welcome – and I think very healthy – antidote to the high-pressure arena of international politics I inhabit in my day job,' he says. Indeed, Gill muses that working as a volunteer board member of the island's local development company was 'every bit as politically intense and challenging as fighting a trade war. 'I also really appreciate talking to fellow islanders about the work they do, and how it relates to the work I do. It gives me very useful perspectives and insights. 'If they perceive a weakness or error in any aspect of EU policy, they'll challenge me on it. This forces me to think on my feet and reflect on how to effectively present the work the EU institutions do,' he says. Gill is proud of the long history of islanders' interest in politics – there was a so-called parliament on Clare Island in the early 20th century when a man known as The Spaker convened meetings about local, national and world affairs. 'Islanders tend to be very well informed and fully tuned into national and global news, and they always have interesting, challenging views on the interplay between peripheries and political centres. 'This gives me a functional understanding on how policies devised in Brussels meeting rooms impact lives and businesses on the ground,' says Gill. Olof Gill speaking at a Brussels press conference. Photograph: European Commission/EU Debates In many ways, the microcosmic world of an island provides a perfect picture of the impact of EU policies on the sustainability of its peripheral communities. 'If you take a 20-minute walk from the pier on Clare Island, you will see EU funding and policies at work to support local community development: CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) support for farmers, rural development support for local business, regional funding for vital infrastructure and so on. 'But I'm not convinced the EU always succeeds in communicating this in an impactful, relatable way. This is something we should strive to improve on constantly,' he says. Singing Jimi Hendrix, Cream and The Beatles songs with his island friends Rory and Niall McCabe was not the only childhood pastime which helped to develop his easy performance abilities. Singing sean nós, as a Gaeilgeoir , dancing a half-set and playing Gaelic football also helped him with today's professional challenges of daily press briefings and media grillings. Of course, home life with his wife, Dublin native Lucy Moylan and three small boys – Patrik (almost 4), Joey (2) and Henry (3 weeks) – is full of life lessons too. Olof Gill, his wife Lucy Moylan and their two older children Patrik and Joey 'With a young family, we worry about the state of the world we'll be sending them out into, so I am a true believer in the European integration project. The value of working across borders to maintain peace and prosperity was never more apparent than in this current time. 'I am proud that we are holding the line globally when it comes to democracy, institutions and liberal values,' he says. Gill adds that he is very fortunate to be married to someone who has worked in frontline politics and understands the demands of the job. 'Lucy and I met while working for different Irish MEPs in the European Parliament, and we've also worked for Irish Government ministers at different times. This means I have a fantastic sounding board at home when I'm working on messaging,' says Gill. The family loves holidaying on Clare Island, where the older boys paddle in rock pools, play hide-and-seek in their grandmother's garden and listen to their grandfather, Peter's colourful stories. As Gill returns to work in early July after paternity leave, he observes: 'I'm returning to work as EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic engages in crunch talks with the Trump administration in Washington DC to reach a deal on tariffs. 'These are crucial moments for the EU trade agenda, and it'll be a case of all hands to the wheel to achieve an outcome that is acceptable to our member states and businesses.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Why the EU's plan to access our phones and data is daft
Precognition, an idea examined by Philip K Dick all the way back in 1956, is the latest misguided plan to make us all feel safer. In Dick's The Minority Report, better known for its Tom Cruise big-screen adaptation in 2002, crimes could be stopped before they happened. Dick's method was precogs, a psychic trio of people that could recognise when a crime was going to happen. The European Commission has a different approach, decryption through its Protect EU plan, which has noble motives. It aims to combat child sexual abuse material by giving law enforcement authorities access to encrypted data . The method would involve scanning private communications, including on platforms well-known for end-to-end encryption like WhatsApp or Signal. READ MORE [ Have EU laws to protect our privacy online worked? Opens in new window ] The way of doing this would be to scan messages on the client-side before they are encrypted, essentially checking what the user plans to send before it gets to the encryption stage that happens during the process of sending. For context, these are infinitesimally small amounts of time in which the actions would occur. This would make it easier for law enforcement authorities to access the communications of those that distribute illegal content. It rather feels like the European Commission missed the point of Dick's work. Well, maybe not everyone involved. The proposal was announced on April 1st after all. The methods outlined in ProtectEU undermine the strong cybersecurity stance the EU itself wishes to push There are layers of terrible to this awful idea, which is basically shielding itself in the argument that it's for the greater good. Before the matter of user privacy rights, there are obvious cybersecurity challenges. The backers of ProtectEU are missing the most obvious issue with their plan: any attempt to weaken encryption weakens everyone's security. While criminal actors benefit from it, it also impacts pretty much everyone else from journalists through doctors, law enforcement itself, businesses, whistleblowers and, rather importantly in this context, the victims of crime. [ How businesses can help protect themselves from cyber attack Opens in new window ] Any tool that would create a means to weaken encryption, even if the tool was created for the purposes of doing good, can be exploited by criminals and other bad actors. Even Lindsey Graham, the US senator and a noted hawk when it comes to anti-terror measures, agrees on this. Graham was one of the loudest calling for Apple to find a way to access the iPhones of the culprits in the San Bernardino terrorist attack in 2015. He changed his tune to the opposite when the risk this would create was made clear to him. As it happened, the phones in question were later accessed by targeting a zero-day vulnerability, or security flaw. The methods outlined in ProtectEU undermine the strong cybersecurity stance the EU itself wishes to push. Governments across the bloc, along with agencies within it, constantly push for greater digital resilience yet this measure would erode the strongest protection it has at the front line of security. Then there's the matter of the would-be good actors that would have access to such a system. Between the tech companies that would need to comply and the law enforcement agencies involved, the amount of people with potential legitimate access to such a backdoor would easily number in the tens of thousands. Simply assuming these would all be good actors, even with the most rigorous of vetting processes is laughable. That puts to bed the classic argument of 'if you have nothing to hide, you've nothing to fear.' ProtectEU would essentially be prosecuting the intent not the attempt We all have lots to hide, every one of us. Sadly, most of it isn't even that interesting. Personal information regarding our finances and the likes would be the most obvious example. That's why the privacy issue is so entangled with the cybersecurity one here. Even if encryption isn't removed, scanning before it acts nullifies its very purpose. This in turn would enable less democratic regimes to point to the EU – meant to be a bastion of democracy – as justification for their own efforts to outlaw or inhibit encryption. A successful implementation of ProtectEU would effectively have the Commission doing the hard work for totalitarian states in designing a mass surveillance system. Europe wouldn't use it, I think, but plenty of others would. Yes, it really is that bad an idea but it somehow gets worse. Let's assume the method for scanning pre-encryption, as ProtectEU plans, occurs and, implausibly, no cybercriminals or anyone else ever misuse the new means of attack. In that instance, when should law enforcement authorities act on the information? If they act the moment they know the person has illegal digital material in their possession then that actor has clearly got possession of illegal material and could probably be proven to have intent to distribute. Likewise the intended recipient could potentially be charged with intent to receive, where such laws exist. Yet they couldn't be charged with actually distributing it, while the would-be recipient would not yet have committed the crimes related to receipt and possession. If authorities act immediately, then they are limiting what they can charge and likely who they can charge as well. If they wait, then they get to add on more charges but have knowingly failed at preventing a criminal act. It's quite a dizzying moral puzzle. ProtectEU would essentially be prosecuting the intent not the attempt. The Minority Report was meant to be a warning not an instruction manual.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Paschal Donohoe well placed in Eurogroup job race despite Spanish challenge
Carlos Cuerpo was on manoeuvres. The Spanish economy minister walked into a meeting of euro zone finance ministers last October with a proposal under his arm. The European Union has for years been debating capital market reforms that would make it easier for finance to move across borders and encourage people to invest their savings, unlocking a huge pot of money that could be pumped into European businesses. Progress has been glacial because governments are reluctant to align national rules around subjects such as insolvency regimes and oversight. So what if a smaller group keen on the financial reforms went ahead without the rest? Cuerpo suggested this cohort could plough on and integrate aspects of their capital markets, with other EU states following later. READ MORE The idea was trailed in the media the morning of the Eurogroup, which is the monthly meeting bringing together finance ministers from the 20 euro zone countries. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe , who has been president of the Eurogroup since 2020, certainly took notice. It was as good an indication as any that Cuerpo was after his job. Donohoe got out early this year to signal he wanted to continue chairing the meetings for a third term. Just as the deadline for challengers was about to close last Friday, the Spanish minister put his name forward, as did Lithuania's finance minister Rimantas Sadzius. The 20 ministers will vote at the next Eurogroup meeting on Monday. A simple majority of 11 elects a winner and Donohoe is heavily tipped to hang on to the position. Cuerpo, a former senior finance official, has served as economy minister in Pedro Sánchez's left-wing government in Spain since late 2023. The Lithuanian candidate has pitched himself as someone who would represent smaller EU states, though Donohoe has largely cornered that share of the market. The vote is likely to be a contest between Ireland and Spain. It was the same story five years ago. Donohoe was up against Spain's Nadia Calvino, who had the backing of France and Germany. The Irish minister built a coalition of small and mid-sized states to clinch the influential role. Those in Donohoe's circle are confident he has more than a dozen votes heading into the election. Holding on to those commitments of support has been the focus of this week. The Dublin politician has spent months laying the groundwork for his re-election with other finance ministers. Fine Gael 's stock is at a low ebb within the European People's Party (EPP), the centre-right grouping that dominates EU politics, but Donohoe remains well regarded. Cuerpo and Sadzius come from centre-left governments and the EPP want one of their own to hold on to the Eurogroup chair. Ireland's network of Ambassadors have been put to work, making calls to their counterparts in capitals across the euro zone to talk up Donohoe. 'The time has come to move from discussion to delivery. The credibility of our collective project depends not on what we say, but on what we achieve – together, and without delay,' Cuerpo wrote in a letter to finance ministers announcing his bid. There is an implicit dig there that the Eurogroup has been too much of a talking shop during Donohoe's stewardship as chair. Though in some sense that is the remit. The group usually tees up decisions that are later taken during meetings of all 27 EU finance ministers, or by national leaders at summits. 'What the Eurogroup can do is co-ordinate the positions of the euro zone member states,' says Menelaos Markakis, an associate professor of European law at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 'During the previous financial crisis, the key terms of bailouts were agreed essentially in the form of the Eurogroup and formally adopted by other institutions ... There's no doubt the Eurogroup took the lead in that context,' he says. 'It's very obvious that he has a certain style, driving towards consensus,' Markakis says of Donohoe. The Eurogroup president is there to cajole the rest of the room in the same direction, one EU official said. There was a slight ring of former Fianna Fáil taoiseach Bertie Ahern's 2002 steady-as-she-goes election slogan in Donohoe's campaign letter to finance ministers. 'We have achieved much together in recent years, but we have a lot more to do,' he wrote. One thing working in Ireland's favour is the fact Sánchez's government in Spain doesn't have a lot of favours to call in with other European capitals at the moment. The Government will also be thankful the Eurogroup position has not been sucked into the bartering to fill several senior European Central Bank (ECB) posts coming vacant in the next two or so years. Picking a Eurogroup chair could well have become one piece of some grand deal to settle on Christine Lagarde's successor as ECB president, if the election had taken place next year. Donohoe still faces a nervous weekend before the votes are cast on Monday. When it comes to the back-room horse trading that decides who gets some EU job, you're never safe until you're actually over the line.
