London judge to rule on whether mining company is liable in Brazil's worst environmental disaster
High Court Justice Finola O'Farrell said she would rule later in the class action case in which claimants are seeking 36 billion pounds ($47 billion) in damages from Australia-based BHP. The case was filed in Britain because one of BHP's two main legal entities was based in London at the time.
BHP owns 50% of Samarco, the Brazilian company that operates the iron ore mine where the tailings dam ruptured on Nov. 5, 2015. Enough mine waste to fill 13,000 Olympic-size swimming pools poured into the Doce River in southeastern Brazil.
'As a result of its heavy involvement in Samarco's operations, BHP had many opportunities to avert disaster but failed to do so and instead kept allowing and encouraging the dam to be raised by constantly pushing for ever greater production by Samarco,' attorney Alain Choo Choy said in his closing argument.
A defense lawyer had argued that BHP did not own or operate the Fundao dam and the company was not responsible for the pollution. The company also said a deadline to bring the claims had expired before the lawsuit was filed on behalf of 600,000 Brazilians.
Sludge from the burst dam destroyed the once-bustling village of Bento Rodrigues in Minas Gerais state and badly damaged other towns.
The disaster killed 14 tons of freshwater fish and damaged 660 kilometers (410 miles) of the Doce River, according to a study by the University of Ulster. The river, which the Krenak Indigenous people revere as a deity, has yet to recover.
The trial began in October, just days before Brazil's federal government reached a multibillion-dollar settlement with the mining companies.
Under the agreement, Samarco — which is also half owned by Brazilian mining giant Vale — agreed to pay 132 billion reais ($23 billion) over 20 years. The payments were meant to compensate for human, environmental and infrastructure damage.
BHP had said the U.K. legal action was unnecessary because it duplicated matters covered by legal proceedings in Brazil.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The many controversies of Mark Latham — podcast
Mark Latham came close to becoming an Australian prime minister, but it's very different headlines being made now. After a career of controversy, the New South Wales upper house MP is being taken to a NSW local court by an ex-partner seeking an apprehended violence order. Separately, there have also been claims of inappropriate behaviour directed towards other female MPs. Latham will contest the allegations in the AVO matter in court and has otherwise denied any wrongdoing. Chief political correspondent Tom McIlroy speaks to Reged Ahmad about how this latest controversy has ricocheted to the upper echelons of federal Labor and sparked a debate about his portrait, which still hangs in Parliament House
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's shocking new medical diagnosis that could see her escape a life sentence behind bars
Mushroom chef killer Erin Patterson may avoid a life sentence in jail after prison doctors diagnosed her with a rare psychological condition two years ago. Daily Mail Australia has been told doctors believed Patterson had Munchausen's Syndrome when she first arrived at the Dame Phyllis Frost Correctional Centre after her arrest in November 2023. Munchausen Syndrome is a psychological condition where someone pretends to be ill or deliberately produces symptoms of illness in themselves. It is done with the intention of 'assuming the sick role' so friends and family will care for them and make them the centre of attention. The condition could potentially save Patterson from being jailed for life if it's cited as a mitigating factor for the murders, although that outcome is unlikely. Patterson, 50, was convicted of the murders of her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She admitted in court to lying about having been diagnosed with cancer to obtain sympathy from her intended murder victims. During her epic ten-week trial at the Latrobe Valley Law Courts in Morwell, the jury heard Patterson relished the attention she got from her in-laws by pretending to be sick. The court heard from sole survivor Ian Wilkinson that Patterson told her lunch guests she had undertaken a diagnostic test that showed a spot on a scan, which was a tumour. While Don Patterson was dying in Korumburra Hospital following the lunch, he told hospital staff Patterson had mentioned she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer, the jury heard. But Patterson admitted she didn't have any medical appointments relating to cancer, despite telling Gail Patterson she was undergoing medical investigations. And in the witness box, Patterson told the jury she had lapped up the attention she received from her in-laws in response to her fictitious cancer diagnosis. 'I had initially thought I had an issue with my elbow, I'd had a lot of pain for a number of weeks, I thought I had a lump,' she told the jury. 'I had told Don and Gail about what I was worried about. I'd probably whinged a bit too much to Don and Gail about it and felt a bit embarrassed by that. 'They made me feel loved and cared for in the way that they were asking about my health and I didn't want that to stop, so I kept going.' On July 7, a jury found Patterson killed and attempted to kill her victims in cold blood. A date for Patterson's pre-sentence plea hearing is yet to be fixed, but is expected to take place sometime in August. Patterson had been defended at trial by top Melbourne barrister Colin Mandy, KC and Sophie Stafford. A plea hearing allows a convicted criminal to have submissions made on their behalf to try and mitigate a jail sentence. Patterson faces the prospect of a life sentence without parole unless she can persuade Justice Christopher Beale that there are compelling reasons for her eventual release. These reasons often revolve around remorse and an offender's 'insight' into the crimes that led to their conviction. A person who pleads not guilty and goes to trial traditionally receives a far more severe penalty than someone who spares their victims the burden of having to give evidence at trial. Often, a medical explanation for one's offending can help mitigate a sentence. Such mental conditions, when accepted by the court, routinely earn violent offenders discounts on their sentences. The Leongatha home of Erin Patterson where she lured her lunch guests to their deaths 'Verdins principles' - as they are known under Victoria's Sentencing Act of 1991 - reduce the offender's moral culpability and force a judge to consider the added 'hardship' jail will have on them. They are principles rolled out and relied upon by convicted criminals and their lawyers on a daily basis in Victoria. It remains unclear if Patterson intends to allow herself to be assessed by a forensic psychiatrist before her sentence. Both prison and police sources have suggested Patterson is unlikely to admit to any form of mental illness or change her story at plea in an effort to save her skin. 'She's a narcissist,' one source said. 'She loves the attention and I doubt she'll be falling on her sword now and making any kind of admissions.' Patterson remains locked up in solitary confinement for her own safety. There she spends almost 24-hours a day alone. Prison sources have since poured water on earlier reports that suggested Patterson had been working in the prison kitchen. 'She's not working anywhere. And she sure as hell isn't working in the prison kitchen. She gets all her food brought into her. She's not going anywhere anytime soon,' a source said. High profile Melbourne criminal lawyer George Balot, of Balot Reilly Criminal Lawyers, told Daily Mail Australia Patterson still faced significant challenges to earn herself a discounted sentence. 'Mitigating factors are details about the offender and their offence that tend to reduce the severity of their sentence for example the offender's previous good character, the likely effects of prison on the offender for example, if the offender has a medical condition that would be hard to manage in prison,' he said. 'Courts can consider factors such as the offender's mental health. 'Generally speaking ill health will be a factor tending to mitigate punishment only when it appears that imprisonment will be a greater burden on the offender by reason of their state of health or when there is a serious risk of imprisonment having a gravely adverse effect on the offender's health. 'Sentencing individuals with Munchausen Syndrome or Factitious Disorder is a difficult exercise because the condition is complex. 'Sentencing decisions consider the offender's potential for rehabilitation. 'While it is not a recognised medical diagnosis, the courts acknowledge the underlying personality disorder and its impact on behaviour when determining appropriate sentences. 'Also protective custody is normally mitigating if evidence shows conditions are harsh.' Patterson will be sentenced at a date to be fixed.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Four Corners 'meltdown' two hours before going to air. Plus, blind gossip hints at media Lothario's dark side... and which TV star has meth on his mind? INSIDE MAIL
By and JO SCRIMSHIRE and NICHOLAS COMINO and PETER VAN ONSELEN, POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA Published: | Sore corners In case you missed it, Four Corners poured a steaming bucket of s*** on Melbourne neurosurgeon Greg Malham this week, digging Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.
