Haryana Agricultural University standoff: Talks fail again as students adamant on VC's removal
The panel, comprising Haryana education minister Mahipal Dhanda, social justice and empowerment minister Krishan Bedi and Nalwa MLA Randhir Panihar and district administration officials, held day-long deliberations with the students' delegation at the mini-secretariat. However, the students alleged that the ministers were pressuring them to end the protest without providing strong assurances.
While the committee agreed to change the university's stipend structure and rollback seat reservations for Land Donation Villages (LDV), they refused to guarantee action against those involved in the June 10 lathicharge and the removal of vice-chancellor BR Kamboj.
'It seems the government panel wants to escalate the protest. The ministers told us they have no power to remove the vice-chancellor, which clearly shows they're shielding him. They also failed to assure us that action would be taken against those named in the FIR for assaulting students,' said a student after the seven-hour meeting.
Dhanda, however, expressed hope that the issue would be resolved during further discussions on Monday. 'These students are our children. Some of their demands have been agreed to and the remaining issues will also be discussed,' he said.
Meanwhile, students announced they would prepare for a mahapanchayat on June 24 to demand the V-C's removal and the arrest of the university's registrar and chief security officer.
The unrest began on June 10 when students gathered outside vice-chancellor BR Kamboj's residence to protest changes in the stipend structure and the rollback of seat reservations for LDV. The situation escalated when university officials and security personnel allegedly unleashed a lathicharge, leaving at least 20 students injured. Some of them sustained deep head wounds that required six to 30 stitches.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
GADVASU professor travelled to Delhi, misused BIS scientist's computer to send defamatory mails: FIR
The arrested professor from Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU) allegedly travelled from Ludhiana to Delhi, borrowed the desktop of a senior scientist at Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) headquarters and sent out defamatory e-mails against a PAU professor and the wife of a Punjab Police officer, according to the FIR registered by the Batala Police in the case. GADVASU suspended Dr Navdeep Singh, professor and former head, department of veterinary surgery, after he was arrested and remanded in judicial custody. The FIR was registered on the complaint of the cop's wife named in the e-mails following a thorough probe by the Batala police. The probe has been shifted to Gurdaspur Police as the woman's husband is also posted in Batala Police on a senior post. As per the FIR, Dr Navdeep Singh first created an email ID on July 8 using the official Wifi network on GADVASU campus in Ludhiana, and then he travelled to Delhi where he had an official conference. In Delhi, he allegedly sent the defamatory bulk mails, first, on July 14, from the WiFi of the hotel where he was staying and later from the BIS headquarters. 'The content was sent under the false identity of 'Harinder Kumar S/o Shripal', further indicating impersonation,' read the 11-page FIR. 'The content was sent to over 500 individuals…The accused also violated the digital and institutional trust of BIS scientist Pradeep Sharma by misusing his system under the pretext of official work,' it adds. Ludhiana to Delhi: How it happened According to the FIR, the woman in her complaint on July 14 alleged that some unknown persons 'made malicious allegations against her' in a ' deliberate attempt to sabotage my reputation, isolate me socially and professionally'. A probe was initiated and a request was made to Google to provide IP address details. The probe found usage of three IP addresses. The first, using which the mail ID was created, was found registered with National Knowledge Network (NKN). The NKN confirmed it was assigned to GADVASU, read the FIR. 'After creation of the said email, the accused travelled from Ludhiana to New Delhi via Vande Bharat Express train on July 13' and checked into Hotel Royal Plaza at Cannaught Place. On checking CCTV footage, it was found that a turbaned man arrived at the hotel on July 14 'with a computer keyboard in hand' and met Singh, and both of them took elevator, and went inside a room. 'During this time, as per Google response, the said email was logged in and logged out multiple times on the morning of July 14. The criminal mail was sent at 9:09 am to VC PAU, Registrar PAU and all dean/directors by accused using the internet of Hotel Royal Plaza,' adds the FIR. How the senior scientist's desktop at BIS was 'misused' The FIR further states that Singh reached the Food and Agriculture Division (FAD), BIS, Delhi, around 9.45 am on July 14, to attend 6th meeting of Animal Husbandry and Equipment Sectional Committee, and left at around 3.20 pm. The FIR, while citing the statement received from BIS scientist Pradeep Sharma, states that after the meeting was over, Singh sought permission to use his office computer (desktop) for some official work. 'I allowed him in good faith. Accordingly, he used my system during lunch time from approximately 1 to 2 pm and further 3 to 3.30,' the FIR quoted BIS scientist as saying. The FIR adds: 'While using the system a second time, the accused…sent the criminal mail at 3:11 pm to more than 160 persons and then again send a bulk mail with criminal contents at 3:16 pm to around 105 people.' 'The act was meticulously pre-planned, timed just before important faculty selections, and aimed at forcing the complainant out of her professional space. The facts of the case reveal a ghastly misuse of digital tools, breach of institutional integrity, impersonation, and targeted defamation against a female professional. The calculated misuse of government infrastructure (GADVASU, BIS), hotel networks, and fake identities makes this a grave cybercrime,' adds the FIR, stating that the probe was headed by Inspector Kirandeep Singh, head, cyber crime, Batala Police. Speaking to The Indian Express, Singh's wife Dr Achla Sharma, a senior wheat scientist in PAU, said that her husband has been framed. 'Someone has misused his ID and system to send those mails,' she said. Contacted for comments, the police officer from Batala said that neither he, nor his wife would like to comment on the matter as of now. Divya Goyal is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, based in Punjab. Her interest lies in exploring both news and feature stories, with an effort to reflect human interest at the heart of each piece. She writes on gender issues, education, politics, Sikh diaspora, heritage, the Partition among other subjects. She has also extensively covered issues of minority communities in Pakistan and Afghanistan. She also explores the legacy of India's partition and distinct stories from both West and East Punjab. She is a gold medalist from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), Delhi, the most revered government institute for media studies in India, from where she pursued English Journalism (Print). Her research work on 'Role of micro-blogging platform Twitter in content generation in newspapers' had won accolades at IIMC. She had started her career in print journalism with Hindustan Times before switching to The Indian Express in 2012. Her investigative report in 2019 on gender disparity while treating women drug addicts in Punjab won her the Laadli Media Award for Gender Sensitivity in 2020. She won another Laadli for her ground report on the struggle of two girls who ride a boat to reach their school in the border village of Punjab. ... Read More
Hindustan Times
21 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Pakistani Instagram user threatens attack on Ayodhya Ram temple, case filed
A threat message to a man on social media about an attack at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya has prompted the police in Maharashtra's Beed district to register a case, an official said on Saturday. The complainant has claimed that the accused commented on the Hindu religion in the chat and sent an audio clip.(PTI) According to the police, the complainant, Suraj Gadekar (24), a resident of Shirur Kasar, alleged that he was watching a reel on Instagram when he found an objectionable comment from an account on July 11. Gadekar then exchanged angry chats with the Instagram user, who claimed he was a resident of Pakistan and shared his location in Karachi, the FIR stated. The complainant has claimed that the accused commented on the Hindu religion in the chat and sent an audio clip, in which he threatened an attack on the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. A case has been registered under section 302 (uttering words, making gestures, or placing objects with the deliberate intention to wound the religious feelings of any person) and 299 (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and a probe is underway, an official said.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Wife's impotency claim against husband during divorce not defamation: Bombay High Court
Man claimed reputation was damaged Family sought to quash earlier court order Live Events Court supports wife's legal right (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has held that a wife's allegation of impotency against her husband, made during divorce proceedings , cannot be treated as defamation . The court observed that such a claim is legally relevant and made to protect the woman's interest in a marital dispute, a PTI report S M Modak passed the order on July 17, which was made public on Friday. He dismissed a defamation complaint filed by a man against his estranged wife and her family. The court said that under the Hindu Marriage Act, impotency is a valid ground for divorce, and allegations made in that context are part of the legal process.'This court feels that when litigation between spouses arises in a matrimonial relationship, then the wife is justified in making those allegations to support her interest,' the court said. It added that such allegations 'cannot be held as defamatory.'The man had filed a defamation complaint, arguing that his wife's claims had harmed his reputation. According to him, she made the allegation of impotency not only in her divorce and maintenance pleas but also in a First Information Report (FIR) filed against him and his parents. Since these documents were now part of the public record, he said they caused damage to his woman, along with her father and brother, approached the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an earlier order by a sessions court. That order had asked a magistrate's court to begin an inquiry into the man's defamation complaint. In response, the woman told the high court that her husband's impotence was one of the reasons she wanted the marriage Modak ruled that the wife's statements, made during the course of legal proceedings, were 'justified' as she was trying to show that she had suffered cruelty during the marriage. The court said such allegations are part of the judicial process and are not defamatory in nature.(Inputs from PTI)
