&w=3840&q=100)
UK: ‘Starmtroopers' in rebellion, can Starmer steer welfare overhaul package through key vote?
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer marks his first year in office this week, facing a rebellion within his own Labour Party over welfare reforms, as well as a sluggish economy and low approval ratings.
It's a stark contrast to the landslide victory he achieved on 4 July 2024, when his centre-left Labour Party won 412 out of 650 seats in the House of Commons, ending 14 years of Conservative rule.
Over the past year, Starmer has navigated global challenges, earning praise for rallying support for Ukraine and convincing U.S. President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal that reduced tariffs on UK goods.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But at home, his government has struggled to show voters—and even his own MPs—that it's delivering the change it promised. Inflation remains high, economic growth is slow, and efforts to ease the cost of living have fallen short. Starmer's personal approval ratings are now approaching those of former Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who resigned after just 49 days in office in 2022.
John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, called Starmer's first year 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.'
On Tuesday, Starmer faces a crucial parliamentary vote over welfare spending after scaling back plans to cut disability benefits. Originally, the government proposed raising the threshold for disability payments, which the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimated would reduce income for 3.2 million people by 2030.
More than 120 Labour MPs threatened to vote against the bill, forcing the government to make concessions. Ministers promised that current benefit recipients wouldn't be affected and pledged to consult disability groups and help disabled people find work.
Some MPs were persuaded to back the bill after the changes, but others remain opposed.
This welfare U-turn is the third policy reversal in just a few weeks. In May, the government dropped plans to scrap winter heating subsidies for millions of pensioners. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organised child sexual abuse following pressure from opposition politicians and tech billionaire Elon Musk.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,' said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. 'I can't think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.'
The welfare climbdown also makes it harder for the government to save money without raising taxes. The reforms were initially expected to save £5 billion ($7 billion) a year from welfare spending, which has surged since the COVID-19 pandemic. After concessions, savings are likely to be only half that amount.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Luxmi Grp buys majority stake in UK-based Brew Tea co
1 2 3 Kolkata: Luxmi Group, owner of the iconic Makaibari Tea Estate, has acquired a majority stake in UK-based Brew Tea Co. Brew Tea deals exclusively with orthodox tea and has both an online and offline presence in the UK. Luxmi Group acquired an 80% stake in the company, while the remaining 20% remains with the existing promoters. After Tetley and Typhoo, this acquisition marks another British tea company being acquired by an Indian corporate, though it may not be of the same magnitude. Brew Tea Co was founded in Manchester by Phil and Aideen Kirby and has grown into a specialty tea brand, having a revenue between 5 million-10 million pounds (around Rs 100 crore). According to Brew Tea, its subscription service, delivering 500g of loose leaf or proper tea bags on a regular basis, now reaches nearly 10,000 homes across the UK — "brewed in over 40,000 kitchens". You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Since the discovery of Indian tea in Assam in 1823, more than two centuries have passed. For most of its history, India produced orthodox whole-leaf teas. Since the 1950s, CTC (crush-tear-curl) processing revolutionised tea by enabling mass production, faster brewing and lower costs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Today, over 80% of India's tea production is CTC, catering to the global demand for bagged, commoditised tea. "We've always believed that if you start with great leaves and the right partners, you don't need to interfere too much," said Aideen. "Sourcing directly from estates that share our values — with care for people, land and craftsmanship — is what makes our tea taste as good as it does. This partnership allows us to strengthen those relationships at the source. What matters most to us is the experience in people's kitchens every single day," said Phil. Luxmi Group, one of the world's leading tea producers, has estates in Assam, Darjeeling and Rwanda. "As India celebrates its bicentennial of tea grown first in Assam, we are honoured to help bring the traditional craft that made Indian tea world-famous back into global focus," said Rudra Chatterjee, MD of Luxmi Group. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Why music duo Bob Vylan's pro-Palestine chants at UK festival prompted US visa ban
Picture this: you're ankle-deep in Glastonbury's infamous mud, surrounded by thousands of strangers, the air buzzing with the thrill of live music. Olivia Rodrigo's belting out heartbreak anthems, Neil Young's strumming his way through decades of grit, and Charli XCX is driving the crowd wild. But then, on the West Holts Stage, a lesser-known duo called Bob Vylan grabs the mic and shifts the vibe. 'Free, free Palestine!' Bob Vylan shouts, his voice raw with conviction. The crowd joins in, chanting 'Death to the IDF' as a screen behind him flashes, 'The UN calls it genocide. The BBC calls it a 'conflict.'' It's a gut-punch moment, broadcast live by the BBC until they pull the plug. Social media explodes—some cheer, others rage. The next day, Bob's on Instagram with a defiant 'I said what I said,' admitting he's getting love and hate in equal measure. British police start sniffing around, and the US announces that the bands visas will be revoked. In justification Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau wrote on X, 'Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country.' Suddenly, Glastonbury 2025 isn't just about music—it's a battleground. This wasn't Glastonbury's first political rodeo. Even before the festival kicked off, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer was grumbling about Kneecap, an Irish rap crew whose member Mo Chara got slapped with a terrorism charge for allegedly waving a Hezbollah flag at a 2024 gig in London. Starmer didn't think they belonged at Worthy Farm. Kneecap didn't care—they'd already stirred things up at Coachella earlier in 2025, chanting 'Free Palestine' and flashing anti-Israel messages, only to lose their US visa sponsor. Festivals like these aren't just parties; they're places where people – artists and fans alike – wear their hearts and their politics on their sleeves. Nothing amplifies this sentiment more than Woodstock. In 1969, over 400,000 people crammed onto a New York farm while the Vietnam War and racial violence tore America apart. Jimi Hendrix didn't just play 'The Star-Spangled Banner,' he turned it into a howl of protest, his guitar screaming like bombs and sirens. Country Joe's 'Fixin'-to-Die' had the crowd singing along, half-laughing, half-furious at the war machine. Bruce Springsteen explained it years later saying, 'artists sing and think to throw in our two cents, right in front of everyone. Maybe people don't come to concerts for politics, but we can get them thinking about the big stuff together.' Then there's the Concert for Bangladesh in 1971. George Harrison saw a war-torn crisis with refugees, famine, horror, and decided to do something. He got Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, and others to play, raising millions for UNICEF. But it wasn't all feel-good. Pakistan's government, cozy with US President Richard Nixon, was livid that Harrison shone a spotlight on the conflict. Nevertheless, it showed how music can be a megaphone for the voiceless, even if it ruffles powerful feathers. Live Aid in 1985 was another game-changer. Irish singer Bob Geldof, fed up with the Ethiopian famine, rounded up everyone from Queen to U2 for a global concert that pulled in over $125 million. Asked why he did it, he said he'd being trying to raise awareness to the humanitarian crisis in Africa for months. I was 'dialling 999 for six months, but the ambulance never came.,' he said. Live Aid was proof that musicians could outdo politicians in rallying people. But it wasn't perfect—years later, whispers surfaced that some money got tangled up with armed groups, and Geldof found Ethiopia still struggling when he visited. It was a painful reminder that good intentions don't always mean clean results. To those familiar with Glastonbury, politics isn't new. Glastonbury's always had that rebel spirit. It started in 1970 as a scrappy £1 hippie fest, dreamed up by Michael Eavis. Now it's a £400-ticket giant, with corporate sponsors and beefy security. Some old-timers grumble it's lost its edge, especially after 1990, when clashes with New Age travellers forced it to tighten up. But the politics never left. In 2016, Brexit cast a shadow, and Adele told the crowd to 'look after each other.' In 2019, Stormzy got everyone yelling 'F— Boris' about the then-Prime Minister. This year, Kneecap aimed the same at Starmer. It's like Glastonbury's a place where the world's frustrations get a mic. It's not just Glastonbury, though. In 1985, Brazil's Rock in Rio was a victory lap after a brutal dictatorship fell. Serbia's EXIT Festival was born in 2000 from kids fighting to oust Milošević, turning music into resistance. And in 2025, Georgia's Tbilisi Open Air became a full-on protest, with bands like LoudSpeakers slamming the pro-Russian government and calling for freedom. Festivals are where music and heart collide with the world's chaos. When Bob Vylan or Kneecap take a stand, they're following a path carved by Hendrix, Harrison, and countless others. Sure, it can backfire—visa bans, police probes, or fans turning away. But standing in that crowd, chanting, feeling the pulse of thousands who agree, it's electric. It's a reminder that music doesn't just entertain, it can shake things up, make you think, and maybe, just maybe, change the world a little.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Absentee senior IAS officers should be tied up and brought to House like it was done in British Parliament, suggests BJP MLA Sudhir Mungantiwar in Maharashtra legislative assembly
Mumbai: Criticising senior bureaucrats for skipping key discussions in the assembly related to their own departments, BJP MLA Sudhir Mungantiwar on Tuesday said that if secretaries do not attend even after being summoned, they should be tied up and brought to the legislature like it was done in the British Parliament. Panel Speaker Chetan Tupe mentioned that often, officials watch the proceedings on television, so their TV sets should be switched off so that they come to the House. Mungantiwar raised the issue of the absentee senior IAS officers after around 50 MLAs moved a motion for discussion on important public issues in the legislative assembly under Rule 293. He said: "When I was an MLA in 1995, the department secretaries used to sit in on important discussions. If the secretaries do not attend even after being called, can we give them some directions, like the way such officials were tied up and brought in the British Parliament?" You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Pointing out that it is necessary for secretaries of the departments concerned to be present during discussions in the House, Mungantiwar said: "The discussion under Rule 293 is necessary for the progress of the state. We proposed the discussion to create a happy, prosperous, advanced, progressive, reformist Maharashtra. The ministers may be busy with the work of their departments, but why is not a single secretary sitting in the House?" Sena MLA Arjun Khotkar backed Mungantiwar. "I have been elected for the last 40 there was no space to sit in the was difficult to accommodate all officers. But if there is such apathy today, how will the state's issues be resolved? Mungantiwar gave the example of the British Parliament, where there was an option to tie up secretaries and bring them here, let's see if something can be done," Khotkar said. Responding to the two MLAs' grievances, Tupe said, "...govt should take the issue and the feelings of the members seriously, and take appropriate action in this regard. Often these officials watch the proceedings on TV. If necessary, their TVs should be switched off so that they will get used to coming to the House." Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!
