What's happening in Mali? 3 Indians abducted in Al-Qaeda-linked attack
According to the ministry of external affairs (MEA), a group of armed men stormed the factory premises and took the three Indians hostage.
'The incident occurred on July 1, when a group of armed assailants carried out a coordinated attack at the factory premises and forcibly took three Indian nationals as hostages,' the MEA said in a statement on Wednesday.
The abducted Indians were employed at the factory and were targeted during the assault. Al-Qaeda linked group claims wider attack
While no group has officially claimed the abduction, al-Qaeda-linked JNIM has reportedly taken responsibility for a series of attacks across Mali on the same day. These included strikes on military and government facilities in Kayes, Diboli, Sandere, and other towns near the borders with Senegal and Mauritania.
Reports from Mali's armed forces confirmed the scale of the coordinated violence across both western and central regions.
Mali has been grappling with a violent Islamist insurgency since 2012. What began in the country's north has expanded across its territory and into neighbouring Burkina Faso and Niger.
The crisis has worsened under the current military-led government, with the country facing continued threats from armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. In addition to jihadist violence, Mali also contends with separatist uprisings and widespread criminal activity. India demands swift rescue
India has strongly condemned the kidnapping and urged Mali to act urgently. "The government of India unequivocally condemns this deplorable act of violence and calls upon the government of the Republic of Mali to take all necessary measures to secure the safe and expeditious release of the abducted Indian nationals," the MEA said.
Meanwhile, the Indian embassy in Bamako is in "close and constant" contact with Malian officials, local police, and the management of Diamond Cement Factory. The embassy is also coordinating with the families of those kidnapped, the foreign ministry said.
"Senior officials of the ministry are closely monitoring the evolving situation and remain engaged at various levels to facilitate safe and early release of Indian nationals," MEA's statement read.
The MEA has further urged all Indians in Mali to stay alert and 'exercise utmost caution.' The external affairs ministry said, "Remain vigilant and stay in close contact with the Embassy of India in Bamako for regular updates and necessary assistance."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
This Former PM Was Evicted From His House Over Unpaid Rent, Yet Refused Govt Help
Last Updated: Born on July 4, 1898, Gulzarilal Nanda was one of those rare individuals who not only wrote history but lived it without ever seeking credit In the pantheon of Indian leaders, some names glow under the spotlight of history, while others stand quietly in its shadow. Gulzarilal Nanda, country's two-time acting Prime Minister, belonged firmly to the latter. Revered during crises but largely overlooked in peacetime, Nanda's life was not one of pomp or publicity; it was of silent sacrifice, principles, and Gandhian simplicity. A man who twice held the reins of the world's largest democracy during its most uncertain hours, Nanda was later evicted from his rented house in old age for failing to pay rent. 'He had only a few utensils, a bed and a bucket," a journalist later wrote, describing the moment neighbours intervened as the landlord forced him out. It was a haunting image of a leader who once sat at the highest table in government, now abandoned by the systems he had helped build. The news shocked the nation. A reporter's story made it to the front page, and within hours, officials from the Prime Minister's Office rushed to his aid, offering a government house and state facilities. But he turned them away with the same firmness he showed during India's freedom struggle. 'I had refused the freedom fighter's allowance because I had sacrificed for the country, not for profit. What will I do with government facilities at this age?" he said, quietly but firmly. Who Was Gulzarilal Nanda? Born on July 4, 1898, in Sialkot, Punjab province (now in Pakistan), Gulzarilal Nanda was one of those rare individuals who not only wrote history but lived it without ever seeking credit. A Gandhian to the core, he worked as a professor of economics before diving headlong into the freedom movement. He left his post at National College, Mumbai in 1921 to join the non-cooperation movement and went to jail during the 1932 and 1942 freedom struggles. His political journey was deeply rooted in labour activism. For over two decades, he was the secretary of the Ahmedabad Textile Labour Association, fiercely advocating for workers' rights. By 1937, he was elected to the Bombay Legislative Assembly and became the Labour Minister in 1946, where he pioneered the historic Labour Dispute Bill. His roles spanned from the National Planning Committee to being Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission, where he laid the foundation for India's five-year plans. Nanda's defining political moments came not through electoral victories or cabinet showdowns, but when the country stood shaken. When former PM Jawaharlal Nehru passed away on May 27, 1964, and later when Lal Bahadur Shastri died in Tashkent on January 11, 1966, Nanda was chosen both times as acting Prime Minister, a testament to the trust he commanded across party lines. His interim terms may have been brief, but they reinforced a powerful message: that Indian democracy, even in its most fragile moments, could still be handed over to the hands of a principled man, someone who embodied continuity, dignity, and calm leadership. In 1967, leaving behind his roots in Gujarat, Nanda made Kaithal in Haryana his new political home after winning the Lok Sabha seat. He soon turned his focus toward Kurukshetra, establishing the Kurukshetra Development Board, a move that would rejuvenate the city's spiritual and cultural identity. For the next 22 years, he served as its chairman, ensuring sites like Jyotisar, Sannihit Sarovar, Shri Krishna Ayurvedic College, and Pehowa received the care and recognition they deserved. Today, Kurukshetra's standing as the cultural heart of Haryana owes much to Nanda's untiring commitment. In 1997, the government finally awarded him the Bharat Ratna award, the nation's highest civilian honour. But the honour came late. A year later, on January 15, 1998, he passed away quietly, leaving behind no wealth, no real estate, no foundation in his name. His last wish was poignant and symbolic, 'Let my ashes remain in Kurukshetra." Fulfilling his request, his ashes were enshrined in the Gulzarilal Nanda Memorial, a humble structure that stands today not just as a tribute, but as a living testament to what honest public service can look like.
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
SEBI Jane Street scandal: How retail investors can protect themselves
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently cracked down on Jane Street, a US based trading giant. The crackdown is to do with alleged manipulation of Indian financial markets and profiting unfairly. The total profit garnered as per the SEBI report is of ₹ 36,502 crore. SEBI's interim order against Jane Street clearly reveals how expiry day trades can be engineered to distort and create complexities in index movements. This case highlights the very serious hidden risks retail investors face in the rapidly evolving, fast moving algorithm driven equity markets. Source: Sebi order link: (Page 10 of the SEBI order) The SEBI order charges Jan Street Group with the manipulation of equity indices. This has been done under SEBI Act Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11B(1), 11(D) and PFUTP Regulations. PFUTP stands for Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices. These provisions are discussed in order. Hence, as the case continues to unfold, here are five key takeaways for retail investors: 1. Big players can influence the market — Stay informed: Jane Street's alleged 'pump and dump' tactics on expiry days showcase how easily large trades distort market levels. Retail investors and traders must take note of this fact that indices may not always show a clear reflection of genuine market sentiment, even more so during high volatility periods such as derivatives expiry. 2. Don't blindly follow index movements: SEBI noted that Jane Street's actions gave a misleading and false sense of bullishness in Nifty50 and Bank Nifty. This highlights the need for retail investors to avoid impulsive trades based on sudden index fluctuations and instead use technical indicators or volume data to carefully check and validate trends. 3. Understand how expiry day manipulation works: The alleged rigging involved large scale strategic buying and selling to move index levels on expiry days, thus influencing option prices. That is why if you trade options be extremely cautious around expiry. Sudden moves may not be driven by fundamental market strength but by large institutional strategies. 4. Watch for SEBI advisories and warnings: Earlier SEBI had already warned Jane Street in February 2025. As a prudent retail investor in this case you should always keep an eye on such regulatory red flags. SEBI's website, circulars, notices, along with financial news can all cumulatively offer early warning signs about irregular market behaviour or risk in the equity markets. That is why consistent monitoring, reading and building knowledge is the best way to keep yourself safe in such an environment. 5. Regulators do act — But vigilance is key: This case highlights SEBI's increasing scrutiny of foreign entities along with the complex strategies deployed by them to make money in the Indian equity market. Given regulators act in sincere public interest, the onus is on investors to stay cautious, avoid FOMO i.e.,the fear of missing out, keep themselves away from greedy F&O trades and prioritise risk management to successfully navigate the complexities of the equity markets. Hence, the Jane Street case is a strong wake-up call for retail investors in the country who are busy with emotion based short term trading. Do keep this fact in mind, that in today's data-driven markets, knowledge, patience, and discipline matter more than chasing quick profits. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial or investment advice. Readers are advised to consult with a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
The Dragon's Own Goal: How China's Trade War Is Boosting India's Manufacturing Rise
The recent recall of over 300 skilled technicians from smartphone manufacturing plants in India sent a jolt through the global technology industry. But this dramatic move, coupled with restrictions on critical materials like rare earth magnets and fertilizers, reveals more than just escalating trade tensions. It exposes the fundamental weakness of a strategy that may ironically accelerate the very outcome it seeks to prevent: the shift of manufacturing dominance. What we are witnessing is not merely another trade dispute, but a desperate attempt to cling to manufacturing supremacy through increasingly extreme measures. The irony is profound: these actions are likely to backfire, creating the perfect storm for India to emerge as the world's next manufacturing powerhouse. The Desperation Behind the Restrictions The decision to pull hundreds of skilled workers from Indian facilities represents a significant escalation in economic warfare. These technicians weren't just employees; they were the vital conduits for knowledge transfer, making high-end smartphone production possible in sudden departure has, predictably, disrupted production lines and temporarily delayed plans to manufacture the latest generation of devices. Similarly, the restrictions on rare earth magnets—crucial for electric vehicles and advanced electronics—and specialized fertilizers like di-ammonium phosphate signal a coordinated effort to impede India's industrial progress. With India historically importing over 80 percent of its rare earth magnets from a single source, delays in export approvals could indeed disrupt production by months and significantly inflate prices. But here lies the fundamental miscalculation. These measures reveal not strength, but vulnerability. When a dominant player resorts to denying competitors access to skilled workers and raw materials, it's a clear signal that competitive advantages built on sheer cost and scale alone are no longer sufficient to maintain an insurmountable lead. India's Unstoppable Ascent: The Numbers Don't Lie Despite these calculated disruptions, India's manufacturing trajectory continues its robust upward climb. Between March and May 2025, smartphone exports from India soared to an impressive $3.2 billion, with an overwhelming 97 percent destined for the United States. This marks a dramatic pivot from previous years, when only about half of India's smartphone exports found their way to American markets. The broader figures are even more compelling. In just the first five months of 2025, smartphone shipments from India to the United States totaled a staggering $4.4 billion—already surpassing the entire previous year's total of $3.7 billion. May 2025 alone saw shipments worth nearly $1 billion, with March setting a new record at $1.3 billion. This accelerating growth suggests that India's manufacturing ecosystem has reached a crucial tipping point. It now possesses the resilience to absorb temporary disruptions and continue its expansion. The strong foundation built over recent years—including improved infrastructure, a rapidly developing skilled workforce, and supportive government policies—provides a level of stability that external pressures cannot easily undermine. The Folly of Dependency Warfare The strategy of restricting access to critical materials and expertise rests on a flawed assumption: that alternative sources cannot be developed, or that dependencies cannot be diversified. This assumption is proving increasingly brittle. India's swift and adaptive response to these restrictions demonstrates the agility of a dynamic, growing economy. Government sources confidently describe the current disruptions as 'temporary,' while companies are already deploying alternative skilled workers and aggressively hiring and training a significant number of local employees. The ambitious goal of training 500 to 1,000 Indian workers this month alone underscores that knowledge transfer, once disrupted, can be rebuilt with far greater local ownership and self-reliance. More fundamentally, these restrictions are accelerating precisely the kind of supply chain diversification that global companies have been actively seeking. When faced with the stark choice between dependence on an increasingly unreliable supplier and strategic investment in alternative sources, rational businesses overwhelmingly choose diversification. India's Built-In Advantages for Manufacturing Leadership India enters this global manufacturing competition with several distinct and formidable advantages that external pressures cannot easily erode. The country's vast and rapidly expanding domestic market provides an exceptionally stable foundation for manufacturing operations, making it highly attractive to establish local supply chains that can serve both the burgeoning domestic demand and lucrative export markets. The demographic advantage is equally significant. India's growing middle class, projected to encompass an estimated 38 percent of the population by 2031, creates a powerful dual benefit: a substantial and eager consumer base, alongside a massive pool of skilled and semi-skilled dual role—as both a robust producer and a voracious consumer—provides an economic resilience that heavily export-dependent economies often lack. Furthermore, India's policy frameworks have evolved strategically to support this ambitious transition. Pioneering initiatives like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes provide concrete financial incentives for companies that invest in Indian manufacturing and meet specific output targets. These targeted interventions address critical bottlenecks while allowing market forces to guide optimal resource allocation. Recent comprehensive trade agreements with major partners like the United Kingdom and ongoing negotiations with the European Union provide a robust framework for expanded market access. These agreements significantly reduce the perceived risk for companies making long-term manufacturing investments in India, assuring them of stable export pathways. The Electric Vehicle Opportunity: India's Electrifying Leap Perhaps nowhere is the potential for transformative supply chain shifts more evident than in the burgeoning electric vehicle (EV) battery manufacturing sector. Current restrictions on critical battery materials from traditional suppliers are creating urgent pressure for diversification, and India is strategically positioning itself to seize this monumental opportunity. The country has set an ambitious target to localize an impressive 60 percent of its EV battery manufacturing supply chain by 2030, backed by significant government investments supporting domestic production capabilities. Companies are already pouring capital into developing cathode materials, electrolyte production, and essential raw material processing to forge a truly integrated, self-sufficient ecosystem. This represents far more than mere import substitution; it positions India to emerge as a global supplier in one of the fastest-growing and most strategically important technology sectors worldwide. As global EV adoption accelerates, nations that control the vital battery supply chains will undoubtedly capture a disproportionate share of value and influence. Broader Implications: A Resilient Future for Global Manufacturing The current disruptions are not mere skirmishes; they reveal a fundamental and irreversible shift in how global manufacturing will be organized. The era of single-source dependency for critical components and materials is rapidly drawing to a close. It is being replaced by diversified, multi-country supply chains that prioritize resilience and geopolitical stability just as much as cost efficiency. India's manufacturing sector, currently contributing approximately 17 percent to its GDP with an ambitious target of 25 percent, represents exactly the kind of robust alternative that global companies desperately need. The compelling combination of cost competitiveness, rapidly expanding technical capabilities, and a stable political environment makes India an increasingly attractive long-term partner for global industry. The recall of skilled workers and the imposition of material restrictions, while creating short-term challenges, are paradoxically accelerating a transition that was already underway. Companies that were merely considering diversification for long-term strategic reasons now have immediate, pressing operational incentives to establish alternative supply chains with urgency. Looking Forward: India's Moment to Shine The true test of any manufacturing strategy is not whether it can maintain dominance through restrictive controls, but whether it can continue to innovate, adapt, and compete effectively on its own merits. The current approach of denying competitors access to expertise and materials suggests a tacit acknowledgment that competing purely on economic fundamentals has become increasingly challenging for established players. For India, the path forward requires unwavering, continued investment in world-class infrastructure, high-quality education, and robust institutional capabilities. The country's ultimate success will depend not on the failures of others, but on its own ability to proactively create a vibrant and attractive ecosystem where global companies actively choose to invest and operate. The recent disruptions, far from derailing India's manufacturing ambitions, may very well accelerate them. When faced with artificial constraints, economies often tap into capabilities they did not even know they possessed. India appears to be entering precisely such a phase of accelerated discovery, innovation, and self-reliant development. The global manufacturing landscape is irrevocably shifting toward greater diversification and resilience. Countries that can consistently provide political stability, a highly skilled workforce, and competitive operational costs will undoubtedly capture the lion's share of benefits from this profound transition. India's compelling combination of progressive policy support, immense demographic advantages, and rapidly growing industrial capabilities positions it powerfully to be among the primary beneficiaries of this global transformation. The question is no longer if supply chain diversification will continue—the current disruptions make that an absolute inevitability. The more pressing question is which countries will emerge as the preferred, reliable alternatives to traditional manufacturing centers. Based on current trends and rapidly expanding capabilities, India is exceptionally well-positioned to provide that compelling and resilient alternative.
