Italian police increase security at Tesla dealerships after 17 cars destroyed in Rome fire
Italy's state police anti-terrorism unit, Digos, is investigating whether the fire at the Tesla dealership in Torre Angela, a suburb in the east of the capital, was started by anarchists.
Firefighters worked for hours to put out the blaze in the early hours of Monday. Drone images showed a row of the burnt-out remains of the vehicles in a parking area of the dealership. Using his social media platform, X, Musk referred to it as 'terrorism'.
There are 13 Tesla dealerships in Italy, all managed by the parent company, the majority of them in Rome, but also in other cities including Florence and Milan.
An interior ministry source said the circular was aimed at 'raising awareness' of possible anti-Tesla protesters amid a global wave of vandalism in response to Musk's political activities in the US. If needed, surveillance of dealerships would be increased, it said.
Sign up to Headlines Europe
A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotion
Since the inauguration of Donald Trump as US president in January, Musk has been slashing the federal workforce as chief of the administration's so-called 'department of government efficiency', prompting the emergence of 'Tesla Takedown', a boycott movement that started in the US before spreading to Europe.
Although most protests have so far been peaceful, Tesla dealerships and cars have increasingly been targets of vandalism. Seven vehicles were set alight at a dealership in Ottersberg, Germany, on Saturday and two Tesla stores in Sweden, one in the capital, Stockholm, and the other in the costal city of Malmö, were vandalised with orange paint on Monday.
Musk has nurtured close relations with European far-right party leaders including the Italian prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, who in an interview in early January described him as 'a brilliant man'.
Matteo Salvini, who leads the far-right League, a member of Meloni's ruling coalition, expressed solidarity with Musk after the Rome incident.
'Too much unjustified hatred against the Tesla car company,' Salvini wrote on X. 'The season of hate and conflict must come to an end as soon as possible. My solidarity goes out to Elon Musk and to all the workers who have been threatened and attacked.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UEFA make rule change after kicking Crystal Palace out of Europa League
Crystal Palace have been left devastated after being demoted from the Europa League having breached UEFA's multi-club ownership rules, but the regulations are reportedly set to be scrapped within the next year UEFA are reportedly set to change their multi-club ownership rule that has led to Crystal Palace being demoted from the Europa League, with Nottingham Forest expected to take their place. Palace were jubilant after winning the FA Cup last season, knowing it secured them a place in European football after claiming their first piece of major silverware. But it quickly emerged that the Eagles' place in the Europa League was at risk because shareholder John Textor was also the majority owner of French club Lyon, who are also set to compete in the same competition, and they have now been kicked out. Because Lyon finished higher in Ligue 1 (sixth) than Crystal Palace did in the Premier League (12th), they take precedence over the South London outfit for next season's Europa League. Textor ended up selling his 43 percent stake in Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, but the Premier League club still missed UEFA's deadline of March 1, 2025 to show proof there was no signs of multi-club ownership. There were hopes that the problem had been alleviated after Lyon were relegated to Ligue 2 amid their financial troubles, but that decision has now been reversed after the Ligue 1 side's appeal was successful. According to the Telegraph, UEFA will "quietly shuffle away" their rule on multi-club ownership after the huge uproar over the controversial decision to kick Palace out. It adds that by next year the March deadline will be "consigned to history" as Palace now look to take their fight to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Previously, Manchester City successfully overturned a two-year ban from the Champions League in 2020 within four months after appealing to the CAS. The news has been difficult to digest for Palace, with chairman Steve Parish condemning UEFA's decision as "one of the greatest injustices that has ever happened in European football". 'We are devastated, and supporters of all clubs should be devastated for us," he said. "It's like winning the lottery, going to the counter and not getting the prize. It is a bad day for football. Most right-minded football fans will see what a terrible injustice this is. I don't think Uefa want to see this, clubs that rightfully qualify for a competition being locked out on the most ridiculous technicality that you can imagine. 'Everybody knows we are not part of a multi-club model. We were never part of one. I didn't have anyone's phone number there [at Lyon] before this process began. It is such an incredible travesty of justice. 'There is a real crossroads here for Uefa. Do they intervene and do the right thing? Or do they let this process play out and see probably one of the greatest injustices that have ever happened in European football?" Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Kemi Badenoch may hate the 1970s but Starmer should look to them'
The Tories are re-telling their favourite fairytale about the time a nasty wolf in left-wing clothing ate the heart out of Britain. At PMQs, Kemi Badenoch praised Norman Tebbit for rescuing this country from the Labour-run "chaos of the 1970s" before arguing that Keir Starmer wants to return us to that chaotic decade by flirting with a wealth tax. Well, seeing as you weren't alive in those bell-bottom days Kemi, let me give you some facts. Life was far from perfect in the 70s. Racism, sexism and homophobia were given free passes, the global oil crisis and shrinking post-Empire markets caused a run on the Pound, police corruption was off the scale and thanks to weak management, chronic underinvestment and powerful trade unions, industrial relations resembled a warzone. But it was, in many respects, a glorious time to be alive. There was a strong sense of community, belief in public services, free higher education, council houses aplenty, workers grafted for fewer hours in more secure jobs, The Clash and Sex Pistols ushered a new era of music, watching football was as cheap as chips and Thatcher had yet to turn Britain into a selfish, divided bearpit where only the strong survived. Plus, 1976 was officially the year when incomes in this country were at their most equal. Indeed, the only European country where the gap between rich and poor was narrower was Sweden. But Thatcher came to power at the end of the 70s and decreed this equality nonsense had gone too far. So she let the free markets rip and slashed higher rates of tax, helping the rich gorge on the nation's wealth and leaving the poor, the weak and the old industrial heartlands to rot. The gap between the top and the bottom in the UK has only carried on widening, which is why today we are the second most unequal G7 economy after America and the second most unequal nation in Europe after Bulgaria. The richest 70,000 people now take home 67 times more than the average worker, with CEOs like Tesco's Ken Murphy picking up £10 million last year, 431 times more than his company's mean wage. Recent research from The Equality Trust showed the UK's richest 50 families have more wealth than half the population and the billionaire count has soared from 15 in 1990 to 165 last year. We live in times of peak inequality making us an impoverished, unhealthy country where public services have stagnated, the economy has flatlined and a third of children live below the poverty line. Which is why the likes of Neil Kinnock is calling on Starmer to bring in a wealth tax on assets worth more than £10million and why this generation of Tories hate the idea almost as much as they hate the 1970s. Because equality is anathema to them. Whether it's Kinnock's tax on assets, a mansion tax, increasing capital gains tax, a new tax band for the super-wealthy or slashing relief on pensions for the richest, the government has to act. It's no longer a question of whether Labour's reputation can afford a wealth tax, it's whether, in the face of staggering debt and limited options, it can afford not to address the terminal dysfunction caused by a vampiric economy in which most of the wealth gets sucked up by the few at the top. It's about our country Stayin' Alive, as we used to sing in bell-bottom days.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Councils are for emptying bins – ban them from playing monopoly with our money
Poor, late and incomplete reporting. A culture of denial, a bias of optimism and a limited understanding of finance. These are the damning descriptions of council officials in charge of investing the hard-earned money of thousands of taxpayers in Spelthorne. A review commissioned by the Government uncovered a 'prevailing sense of insularity' in the Surrey borough, where the mountain of debt stands at more than £10,000 per resident. To put it simply, the council is a gargantuan failure. Its shambles – which have now sparked government intervention – are symbolic of problems across the UK. Too often, egotistical council officials believing they are the next Elon Musk attempt to flex their feeble muscles in the property market only to fall flat on their faces. With no risk to their personal finances, officials can blow holes in public funds with no accountability while residents are punished with increased tax bills and reduced services. It begs the question as to whether local authorities should possess the 'general competence' powers bestowed upon them in 2012. They give councils the remit to do anything an individual can do, paving the way for a scourge of risky investments. Many local leaders will say they've had little space to come up with creative money-making ventures due to continual funding cuts from central government. Yet the gung-ho decision-making is incredibly damaging. The prime example is Thurrock, where the council ignored what Essex County Council called 'multiple red flags' and poured £665m of taxpayers' money into alleged sham solar farm investments. A Serious Fraud Office investigation into the deals is ongoing. Thurrock was left with debts of £1.5bn at the time of its bankruptcy, and saddled residents with a 23pc tax rate increase in the past three years. This is what happens when councils – which people simply want to empty bins, repair roads and clean the streets – are given free reign to act like big shot financiers. It very rarely works. In 2020, the Commons Public Accounts Committee found risky council investments in commercial property had ballooned 14-fold in just three years. In total, 91pc of the £6.6bn spend was financed through borrowing. The Tory government was accused of being blind to the shenanigans occurring on its 'sleepy watch'. Councils took on large debts to invest in new sources of income, such as offices and shopping centres. The latter was a mind-boggling trend considering the death of the high street and rise of internet shopping. The pandemic hit, interest rates soared, commercial property values slumped and councils were left scrambling to pick up the pieces. Spelthorne borrowed £1.1bn against annual core spending power of £11m. That's like a mortgage-holder somehow managing to borrow 100 times their income. An inspection report released in March said 'inherent risks are beginning to materialise and could accelerate rapidly'. Such recklessness wouldn't happen in the real world, yet councils can play monopoly with public money. And it's not just risky investments in existing property. Councils also believe they can become developers. Blowing millions on building a leisure complex which then fails to attract commercial tenants or visitors due to expensive parking is all too common. The usual spiel of 'we'll regenerate this area into a thriving community hub' generally results in a very costly white elephant. Look at Brighton's i360, Woking's cluster of skyscrapers (a failed Singapore) and Crewe's £11m car park used by 80 cars a day. The list is endless. Last week, we analysed West Norfolk Council's embarrassing failure to sell a single flat at its new seafront complex in Hunstanton. As well as reportedly going £2m over its £7m budget, the council enforced a ban on selling any of its 32 flats to second home owners in an effort to prioritise locals. But 19 months after hitting the market, the council reversed the second homes restriction after facing the impending threat of its own empty homes premium triggering a self-inflicted £100,000 tax bill. You couldn't make it up. Local government has well and truly become the byword for incompetence.
