logo
'If We Find Evidence...': ED May Name Congress As Accused In National Herald Case

'If We Find Evidence...': ED May Name Congress As Accused In National Herald Case

News183 days ago
Last Updated:
The Enforcement Directorate may accuse Congress in the National Herald money laundering case if enough evidence is found. Sonia and Rahul Gandhi are alleged conspirators.
The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday said it can make the Congress party accused in the money laundering case linked to the now-defunct National Herald newspaper if the probe agency gets adequate evidence.
Additional Solicitor General V Raju, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate (ED), made the submission before a special court in Delhi that began daily hearings in the case.
'I have not made the AICC an accused, but it does not deprive me of my right to make them an accused in the future. If we find adequate evidence, we can make them an accused as well," ASG Raju said.
The ED told the court that Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson Sonia Gandhi and her son, and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, were behind the conspiracy to usurp Rs 2,000 crore assets of the Associated Journals Limited (AJL), which used to publish the National Herald newspaper.
The AJL used to publish the National Herald newspaper, founded by former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.
Raju said that a conspiracy was hatched to form Young Indian, in which Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi held 76% shares, to siphon away Rs 2,000 crore assets for a Rs 90 crore loan taken from Congress.
The ED said that even advertisement money was paid to the AJL on the instructions of senior Congress leaders. Whatever income that was generated from this fraudulent incorporation is the proceeds of crime, it added.
During the previous hearing on May 21, the ED said that Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi have enjoyed Rs 142 crore of 'proceeds of crime" linked to the alleged National Herald money laundering case.
The anti-money laundering agency filed a prosecution complaint against senior Congress leaders, including the Gandhis, in the National Herald case. Others named in the charge sheet include Congress Overseas Chief Pitroda, Suman Dubey, and others.
The charge sheet valued the alleged proceeds of crime to the tune of Rs 988 crore. It is alleged that the Congress leadership had misappropriated property belonging to the Associated Journals Limited (AJL), the original publisher of the National Herald, by converting public trusts into personal assets.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India-US trade deal: Rahul Gandhi reacts to Piyush Goyal's 'national interest' remark; claims PM Modi to 'meekly bow' before Trump
India-US trade deal: Rahul Gandhi reacts to Piyush Goyal's 'national interest' remark; claims PM Modi to 'meekly bow' before Trump

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India-US trade deal: Rahul Gandhi reacts to Piyush Goyal's 'national interest' remark; claims PM Modi to 'meekly bow' before Trump

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi NEW DELHI: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi would "meekly bow" to US President Donald Trump , as New Delhi weighs its interests amid ongoing trade talks with Washington. Gandhi's remark was a reaction to Commerce and Industry minister Piyush Goyal 's statement, where he said: "We are not working towards any specific deadlines, we are working towards national interest". Trump has set July 9 as the deadline for trade agreements. "Piyush Goyal can beat his chest all he wants, mark my words, Modi will meekly bow to the Trump tariff deadline," Gandhi wrote on X. The Congerss leader's post on X India will enter into a trade agreement with the US only if its interests are protected and it is able to sustain a tariff advantage over its competitors, while prioritising the interests of farmers, commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal said Friday. Trump had imposed reciprocal tariffs on nearly 100 countries but agreed to a 90-day pause that is to end Tuesday. India was slapped with 26 per cent reciprocal tariffs. There is uncertainty over whether India and US can agree to an early tranche or a mini deal before that even as a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement is negotiated by Fall (Sept-Oct) after a meeting between Trump and PM Modi. For India, lowering tariffs on farm products, such as maize and soybean, as well as dairy products is a concern. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is your tinnitus getting worse? Do this immediately (Watch) Hearing Magazine Undo While Goyal did not get into the specifics, he said India will not compromise the interests of farm and dairy sectors. "Farmers' interest is always paramount for Modi government. In any negotiation we have done, you have seen UK, Australia, Mauritius, EFTA and UAE agreements, India's farmers have been protected." The government has refrained from offering concessions in major agricultural products, but for US, it is the main focus. While some government officials said US demands were not very clear, for India, Goyal said Indian expectations for duty concessions in labour-intensive sectors were the focus of the trade deal. India was hoping for duty concessions in leather, footwear, textiles and some auto parts in return for reducing levies on automobiles and American whiskey.

‘National Herald' case: Congress hits back at ED over allegations
‘National Herald' case: Congress hits back at ED over allegations

Hans India

time31 minutes ago

  • Hans India

‘National Herald' case: Congress hits back at ED over allegations

New Delhi: Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Congress leader Sonia Gandhi, raised serious questions over the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) probe into the 'National Herald' case. Arguing before a Delhi court on Friday, Singhvi described the case as 'really strange' and 'unprecedented,' claiming that it involves allegations of money laundering without any tangible assets involved. 'This is an alleged case of money laundering without any property, without any use or projection of property. It is really strange—more than strange,' Singhvi told the court, criticizing the foundation of the ED's accusations. His remarks followed arguments made by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, who presented the charge-sheet on behalf of the ED. Raju had claimed that the Gandhi family were the "beneficial owners" of the company Young Indian and accused them of conspiracy and money laundering in connection with the alleged fraudulent acquisition of assets worth over ₹2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL). The ED has named Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, the late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, as well as Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and private companies Young Indian and Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd in the case. The charges are filed under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which deal with money laundering and its punishment. According to the ED, the Gandhi family held 76% shares in Young Indian and used a ₹90 crore loan to fraudulently take control of AJL's vast assets. However, Singhvi rebutted this, claiming the transaction was a legitimate move to make AJL debt-free. 'Every company has the right under the law to clear its debts through various methods,' Singhvi argued. 'You take a loan and transfer it to another entity, thereby making the original company debt-free.' He also emphasized that Young Indian is a not-for-profit company, which, by law, cannot distribute dividends, salaries, bonuses, or any other financial benefits to its shareholders. 'This is a key point that contradicts the ED's narrative of personal enrichment,' Singhvi noted. Furthermore, Singhvi accused the ED of acting on political motivations. He alleged that the agency had remained inactive for years and only revived the probe based on a private complaint driven by political interests. Earlier, on July 3, Raju argued that the Gandhi family had acquired full control of Young Indian after the passing of other shareholders, making them the ultimate beneficiaries. The ED's charge-sheet names multiple individuals and entities, including Sunil Bhandari and Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd, apart from the Gandhis and senior Congress figures. The case remains under judicial review, with the court yet to decide on the cognizance of the charge-sheet.

Bank fraud case: Fresh ED summons to Tollywood producer Allu Aravind in Rs 101 crore; land deal with prime accused under probe
Bank fraud case: Fresh ED summons to Tollywood producer Allu Aravind in Rs 101 crore; land deal with prime accused under probe

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Bank fraud case: Fresh ED summons to Tollywood producer Allu Aravind in Rs 101 crore; land deal with prime accused under probe

HYDERABAD: In a major development in the Rs 101.4 crore Ramakrishna Electronics bank fraud case, the Enforcement Directorate has summoned prominent Tollywood film producer Allu Aravind to appear next week. The move comes after Aravind reportedly failed to submit key financial documents during his earlier appearance before the agency. Aravind was first questioned by the ED on June 2 regarding suspicious financial links to Ravi Kumar Vemula, a director in Ramakrishna Electronics and Ramakrishna Teletronics Private Ltd (RTPL) and prime accused in the case. According to sources, investigators are still determining whether Aravind's involvement in land and financial transactions with the accused was deliberate or incidental. Allu Arvind told TOI that the transaction under scrutiny was minor and that he is fully cooperating with the ED by providing all necessary information. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad "Back in 2017, I purchased a property, and a small portion of it was acquired from Ravi Vemula. He was reportedly unable to repay his loans, which led to the ED launching a probe," he said. He further said, "The agency asked me for details regarding the land transaction. The payment was made through proper banking channels. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like A Apple Recomenda o Blinkist, O Melhor App Para Intelectuais Ao Redor do Mundo Blinkist Undo When I appeared before the ED on July 2, they asked for transaction-related documents. Since the books of accounts weren't readily accessible, I requested a week's time. I will submit all the required details on the next date." Financial irregularities The ED's probe was based on an FIR filed by the CBI, Special Bureau of Forensic Science, Bengaluru, following a complaint from the Union Bank of India. The CBI alleged that directors, V Raghavendra and Ravi Vemula, fraudulently diverted loan funds sanctioned to their companies under overdraft and cash credit (OCC) facilities. In June 2024, ED teams conducted coordinated search operations and also froze Rs 1.45 crore .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store