&w=3840&q=100)
India seeks to avoid Trump's Brics wrath as it pursues US trade deal
Bloomberg
By Ruchi Bhatia, Sudhi Ranjan Sen and Shruti Srivastava
India is trying to shield itself from President Donald Trump 's backlash against Brics by stressing it has no plans to challenge the US dollar's global dominance, according to people familiar with the matter.
The US leader has labeled the Brics group of developing nations 'anti-American' and accused it of trying to undermine the dollar's role as the world's key currency. He has repeatedly warned of a 10 per cent tariff on all 10 Brics members, including India — even as he says a trade deal with New Delhi is near.
On Wednesday, Trump followed through with a new round of levies, including a 50 per cent tariff on Brazil, one of the highest so far announced for the tariffs which are set to hit in August. The letter to Brazil comes just after a two-day Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro, in which leaders agreed on a joint statement that criticized trade-distorting tariffs.
Officials in New Delhi say they are watching Trump's latest tariff threats closely, but see no immediate cause for alarm. The US leader's view is that Brics is seeking to undermine the dominance of the US dollar, which is not India's goal, the officials said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private. India doesn't support moves for a single Brics currency, and any participation in local currency trade arrangements is aimed solely at reducing risks, they said.
'Trump is unhappy with some Brics members who have been talking about an alternate reserve currency,' said Mohan Kumar, a former Indian envoy and lead negotiator at the World Trade Organization, who now teaches at OP Jindal Global University. 'India has time and again differentiated between local currency trade and de-dollarization and therefore doesn't fall in that category.'
With New Delhi set to assume the Brics chairmanship in 2026, it will need to differentiate itself from members like China and Russia, who are seeking to build the bloc as a stronger opposition voice to the US. India is betting that its strategic value to the US and its neutral currency stance will give the US reason to treat it differently than other Brics members.
India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Senior Indian diplomat P Kumaran said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had 'no discussion' on Trump's tariff threats during the Indian leader's state visit there. 'We didn't have an opportunity to discuss that.'
India has been cultivated by several US administrations over the years as a strategic partner and key regional counterweight to an increasingly assertive China. As recently as April, US Vice President JD Vance remarked that the fate of the 21st century 'is going to be determined by the strength of the United States and India partnership.'
Those ties have recently come under strain, though, after Trump took credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May. Modi has pushed back at Trump's claims he used trade as a bargaining tool to secure a truce. The Trump administration has also made overtures to Islamabad, including its powerful army chief, in the aftermath of the conflict, a source of concern in New Delhi.
Much is riding on the success of the India-US trade deal, which both countries have pledged to finalize by the fall of this year. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition lawmaker who has led India's diplomatic outreach since the Pakistan conflict, said a trade deal would signify the strong ties between the two countries.
'The relationship with the US is in a good shape,' he said in an interview in London on Tuesday. If the terms of the trade deal are agreed, 'that will be a very, very healthy sign.'
After months of talks, Indian trade negotiators have put forward their best offer to the Trump administration and are now awaiting a response.
The latest tariff threats from Trump may also be a bargaining tool to secure more concessions from New Delhi. Trump has previously threatened to slap 100 per cent levies on Brics if they ditch the dollar in bilateral trade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Epstein Files Fallout: Kash Patel considers resignation; Pam Bondi vs Dan Bongino - the story so far
The Trump administration is facing its most volatile internal crisis yet, as FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino edges closer to resignation over Attorney General Pam Bondi's mishandling of the long-anticipated Epstein files. The fallout, driven by Bondi's broken promises and growing public outrage, has FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly prepared to follow Bongino out the door—setting the stage for a possible leadership implosion at the heart of American law enforcement. This internal war—once quietly brewing—is now on full display, with recriminations flying, alliances shifting, and MAGA loyalists turning on their own. The Flashpoint: DOJ Memo Torches 'Client List' Hopes On July 7, the Department of Justice issued a memo that decisively undercut the narrative Bondi had been peddling for months. The two-page document concluded there was no evidence of a 'client list,' no credible signs of blackmail, and reaffirmed the long-standing official position that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in a federal jail cell in 2019. The memo, signed off by both DOJ and FBI leadership, included surveillance footage and investigative summaries that contradicted Bondi's earlier statements. For months, she had claimed the FBI was in possession of tens of thousands of hours of disturbing video footage, and had repeatedly promised bombshell disclosures. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Upto 15% Discount for Salaried Individuals ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Get Quote Undo Those promises now appear to have been hollow. Conservative influencers, who had banked on explosive revelations implicating elites, were incensed. Bondi's office had built expectations with Phase 1 of the 'Epstein Files' back in February—a series of binders handed out to right-wing media figures that mostly repackaged previously leaked information. With the July memo's flat conclusions, fury erupted. Bongino vs Bondi: The Internal Explosion The conflict between Bongino and Bondi came to a head on July 9 during a closed-door White House meeting. Bondi accused Bongino of leaking frustrations to the press, an allegation he denied. Witnesses described the exchange as heated and personal, with Bongino storming out of the room. Two days later, Bongino took a personal day and has not returned. Multiple administration sources now say his resignation is imminent. One source described him as 'done,' and unwilling to work another day under Bondi's leadership. Bongino, a former Secret Service agent and a fixture in conservative media, had reluctantly endorsed the DOJ memo's suicide conclusion, only to be caught in the backlash from MAGA influencers who accused him of selling out. Kash Patel: Torn Between Loyalty and Fallout FBI Director Kash Patel is also said to be considering resignation. Once a key proponent of theories questioning Epstein's death, Patel has since aligned with the suicide explanation in his official capacity. However, insiders say he is privately furious at Bondi for damaging the Bureau's credibility and igniting a crisis within the administration. Patel's calculus is reportedly tied to Bongino's fate. If his deputy resigns, Patel may follow, seeing little institutional value in continuing under Bondi's divisive leadership. One aide close to the director said, 'He doesn't want to be left holding the bag. If Bongino goes, Kash walks too.' MAGA Mutiny: The Base Turns on Bondi Bondi, once lionised by MAGA world as a crusading truth-teller, now finds herself isolated. Online, influencers and activists who once supported her are accusing her of deceit. Hashtags attacking her flooded conservative corners of social media in the days following the memo's release. Even voices that typically defend the Trump administration have begun to call for her resignation. What makes the backlash particularly potent is that Bondi had personally staked her reputation on the idea that the Epstein files contained smoking guns. Now that official documentation has concluded otherwise, she has lost the confidence of both the public and senior officials inside the administration. Trump's Calculated Distance Donald Trump has so far refused to intervene. During a cabinet meeting on July 8, he reportedly urged his team to 'move on' from the Epstein issue, calling it a distraction from his legislative agenda. While the president continues to publicly back Bondi, insiders say he's well aware of her declining utility. Trump's political instincts have always been sharper than his personal loyalties—and Bondi may soon find herself on the wrong side of that calculation. Timeline of the Fallout February 2025: Bondi distributes 'Epstein Files: Phase 1' to influencers—mostly rehashed content May 2025: Bongino and Patel publicly align with suicide ruling July 7, 2025: DOJ memo affirms suicide, no client list, no charges pending July 9, 2025: Bondi and Bongino clash during White House meeting July 11, 2025: Bongino takes leave; resignation imminent July 12, 2025: Patel signals he may leave if Bongino quits The Big Picture This isn't just about Epstein. It's about trust, credibility, and the fault lines within the Trump-era security state. Bondi's promise of transparency has backfired, alienating the very audience it was meant to appease. Bongino's looming exit and Patel's wavering loyalty signal a broader collapse of cohesion at the top. With two of the administration's most prominent law enforcement figures ready to walk and the base in open revolt, Pam Bondi's position may no longer be tenable. And while the Epstein case may be officially closed, the political aftershocks are far from over.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries
This is an AI image. United States is working toward an interim trade agreement with India that could reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, giving the country a more favorable position compared to other countries in the region. Unlike many nations, India is not expected to receive a formal tariff hike notice this week, and the agreement may be announced through an official statement, Bloomberg reported, quoting sources. The proposed interim trade deal between the two nations would allow both the sides to continue negotiations, giving India time to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement expected later this year, the source added. India, US near trade deal. What happens next if New Delhi joins Trump's shortlist? The planned agreement is likely to set a baseline tariff of under 20%, down from the 26% initially proposed, with provisions to allow further adjustments as part of a final pact. However, the exact timeline for the interim deal remains uncertain. If finalised, India would likely join a select group of nations that have reached trade arrangements with the Trump administration. In contrast, several other countries were hit with surprise tariff hikes of up to 50% this week, ahead of the August 1 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 기미, 레이저말고 이렇게 해보세요 에스테틱최원장 Undo India is pushing for a more favourable deal than the one signed with Vietnam, which included 20% tariffs. Vietnam, caught off guard by the high rate, is now seeking a revision. So far, only the UK has officially signed trade deals with the Trump administration. Earlier on Thursday, Trump told NBC News that he is considering imposing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't yet received specific rates. Currently, the baseline tariff for most US trade partners stands at 10%. For Asian countries, announced rates so far include 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines, and as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar. Despite being among the earliest to initiate trade discussions this year, India-US relations have shown recent tensions. While Trump indicates an imminent agreement, he has also suggested additional tariffs regarding India's BRICS membership. An Indian negotiation team is expected to visit Washington soon to push forward trade talks. India has already made its final offer to the Trump administration and outlined its non-negotiable positions. The key sticking points remain, including the US demand for India to allow genetically modified (GM) crops, something New Delhi has firmly opposed, citing concerns for farmers, while the other unresolved issues include agricultural non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles in the pharmaceutical sector, the source added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
India can deliver 52 GW RTC clean power by 2030, save ₹9,000 crore annually: Report
New Delhi: India can deliver 52 gigawatts (GW) of round-the-clock (RTC) clean electricity by 2030 at a lower cost compared to annually matched clean energy, according to a new analysis by climate think tank TransitionZero. The 52 GW capacity would account for 70 per cent of a hypothetical RTC electricity portfolio designed to meet five per cent of India's national electricity demand. This shift to RTC procurement could result in annual savings of USD 1 billion (approximately ₹9,000 crore) for grid operators by 2030 due to avoided overbuild of generation capacity. According to the report, carbon emissions could be reduced by 2.4 per cent at the system level, with the cost of carbon abatement three times lower than annual matching of clean energy. At full 100 per cent RTC matching, India-wide emissions could be reduced by seven per cent compared to annual matching. RTC clean electricity, or 24/7 carbon-free energy (CFE), matches every hour of electricity consumption with supply from clean sources. The report noted that unlike annual renewable energy certificates, RTC ensures clean power is available consistently across all hours. This is particularly relevant for sectors like heavy industry and data centres, where electricity demand is continuous. 'Our model shows that in India commercial and industrial customers can meet 70 per cent of their hourly electricity demand with carbon-free electricity at a cost below that of annual renewable energy matching, while driving greater levels of decarbonisation and providing significant benefits to the Indian electricity system,' said Irfan Mohamed, South Asia Analyst at TransitionZero. The report highlighted that incentivising RTC electricity procurement is critical for least-cost grid planning. It noted that India can avoid issues being experienced in Europe, where excess solar capacity has contributed to a decline in power purchase agreement (PPA) capture rates, particularly in Spain. 'Round-the-clock clean electricity planning and procurement is a 'no regrets' option for India's energy planners, grid operators, and large corporations,' said Matt Gray, Co-founder and CEO at TransitionZero. 'It shows that companies can procure hourly-matched clean electricity at minimal extra cost, and grid operators can save money through least-cost grid planning. In doing so, governments can help deliver the energy transition at the lowest cost.' The findings come as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) undergoes a multi-year revision, with updates to Scope 2 guidance being considered. Hourly emissions accounting is emerging as a preferred method, though the GHGP does not set targets or rank performance levels.
