Scientists hit back over Prime Minister's 'worthies' insult
Photo:
Marika Khabazi
A British scientist says it's concerning Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has
dismissed him and other climate scientists as "worthies"
for raising concerns about plans to lower the country's methane emissions target.
Global professor of environmental change at Oxford University Paul Behrens said the government appeared to be trying to deflect attention from questions about the country's agricultural greenhouse gases.
"I think the characterisation of climate scientists as 'worthies' reflects a really concerning dismissal of evidence-based policy making," he said.
"While the Prime Minister's remarks may aim to deflect criticism of New Zealand's agricultural emissions profile they overlook the clear global consensus that methane reductions are critical to limiting near term warming."
Luxon denied he was dismissing science or deflecting attention from this country's farming emissions.
"What a load of rubbish, my point was very clear, those scientists can write to leaders of 194 countries before they send it to me," he said.
Christopher Luxon says New Zealand is already managing methane emissions better than "every other country on the planet".
Photo:
Gianina Schwanecke / Country Life
Though a decision is yet to be revealed, farming groups appear have swayed the government to reduce the current target, which is shrinking emissions somewhere between 24 and 47 per cent by 2050.
Several climate experts say the country will set a dangerous precedent for Ireland and other big methane emitters if it aims too low.
When 26 international climate change scientists wrote to Luxon accusing him of "ignoring scientific evidence" showing global heating caused by methane has to reduce, the prime minister said it was lovely if "worthies" wanted to write him letters but New Zealand was already managing methane emissions better than "every other country on the planet".
The scientists were worried that the government might be about to adopt a target that lets heating caused by methane emissions stay the same, rather than turning down the thermostat on the country's cows and sheep.
That is because the government asked a scientific panel to tell it how much methane emissions would need to drop to just level off global heating from methane, not reduce it.
The answer was 14 to 24 per cent by 2050, about half the current target.
The debate is whether that is enough.
Federated Farmers and Beef + Lamb says yes, because methane is much shorter lived than the other main heating gases, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide.
One of the members of the government's panel, climate scientist Dave Frame, said New Zealand should lower its target unless other countries commit to bigger cuts to methane from farming than they have currently. He said the planet was not on track to limit heating inside 1.5C hotter than pre-industrial times, despite countries' promises.
"If the world really did cut emissions in line with what those kind of guys are talking about, then I think we should absolutely be part of it.
"In the absence of that action, I think a 'no additional warming target' is a reasonable fall back position."
Victoria University Professor of Climate Change Dave Frame.
Photo:
RNZ / Chris Bramwell
Dr Frame said unlike more profitable dairy farming, sheep and beef farms could not absorb the cost of methane-cutting technologies.
Another member of the government's panel atmospheric scientist Laura Revell said it was a tricky call for the government.
"Everyone is in agreement - those on the panel, those who wrote the letter - that methane is a greenhouse gas which global action is needed to address," she said.
"We know that the consequences of climate change are severe, we are seeing it already and every bit of warming we can avoid helps.
"On the other hand, farming is a big part of the New Zealand economy and these emissions are associated with feeding people."
The Climate Change Commission said the country should aim for a cut of at least 35 percent, because the costs and impacts of global heating are turning out worse than expected.
It said there is no reasonable excuse to do less on methane, under New Zealand's climate commitments.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government has 'no intention whatsoever' to close NorthTec, Northland MP promises
NorthTec has campuses in Whangārei, Auckland, Kaitāia, Kerikeri and Ngāwhā, near Kaikohe (pictured). Photo: Peter de Graaf Northland MP Grant McCallum says the government has "no intention whatsoever" of closing down the region's polytechnic - despite being listed among institutes facing potential closure or merger as part of the break-up of mega-polytech Te Pūkenga . Revelations last week about NorthTec's uncertain future, as well as a fresh round of course and staff cuts, sparked concerns among tutors, students and industry. The news also drew more than 100 people to a public meeting at the main campus in Whangārei, but McCallum told RNZ closure of NorthTec was not on the cards. "Northland needs vocational training and NorthTec's got an important part to play in that, but it's got to be able to stand up on its own two feet and be credible," he said. "That's our goal. "It's just taking a bit longer, because it's got a chequered past and we've got to work through all that." McCallum said the exact form NorthTec would take was not yet clear, but it would still include satellite campuses in places such as Kaitāia and Kaikohe, which were essential for the widely dispersed Northland region. Northland MP Grant McCallum says he will fight to keep NorthTec open. Photo: RNZ / Peter de Graaf He said Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds understood the importance of regional training facilities such as NorthTec, because of her long association with the Southern Institute of Technology. NorthTec would not say how many courses and jobs were included in the restructuring proposal, saying the final numbers had yet to be determined. However, according to the Tertiary Education Union, courses facing the chop included forestry, primary industries, pest control and apiculture (beekeeping). McCallum said that was an operational decision for NorthTec management. "As a local MP, what I would be expecting is sectors like the primary sector, which is one of our biggest in Northland, will have courses available. We just have to make sure they're the right ones." At the public hui, it was claimed the forestry industry had been blindsided by the proposal to drop forestry courses. McCallum said the government was conscious of those claims and NorthTec would be in touch with the affected sectors. While the final decision was the minister's, McCallum said he would fight to keep NorthTec open. "What it looks like going forward and the courses it offers, that has yet to be determined, because it has to be a sustainable, credible organisation." NorthTec operations lead Derek Slatter said the organisation was currently consulting staff over proposed changes to teaching and support roles. "The number of positions impacted will be dependent on the final decisions made following the full consultation process," he said. "The proposed changes are designed to address issues of financial sustainability and to forge a pathway towards financial viability for NorthTec, enabling us to continue delivering high-quality education and training." Slatter acknowledged staff had been through a prolonged period of change and uncertainty, and that would continue, as NorthTec became financially viable. "However, I am confident that viability is within our reach," he said. Slatter said enrolments for semester two were higher than this time last year and applications for 2026 were also up. Earlier, Minister Penny Simmonds said the government's aim was to build a vocational education system that was "locally led, regionally responsive and financially sustainable, including for Northland". Ten of the institutes merged by the previous government into Te Pūkenga would be returned to standalone, regionally-governed polytechnics. The future of polytechnics in four regions - Northland, Taranaki, Wellington and the West Coast - would be decided in the first half of 2026. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Two former Labour MPs vie for seats on Hamilton City Council
Photo: RNZ / Isra'a Emhail Two former Labour MPs will vie for a seat on the Hamilton City Council at the local body elections in October. Sue Moroney and Jamie Strange will run against a field of 26 candidates , including former National MP Tim Macindoe, in the East Ward. Six seats available in each of Hamiltons East and West wards. Macindoe, an incumbent councillor, is also standing for mayor. Moroney left Parliament in 2017 and has been the chief executive of the Community Law centres for the past seven years. Strange, a former school music teacher and church minister, exited Parliament in 2023. In total there were 51 candidates vying for a place on the council, including 12 for mayor. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Forest & Bird slams reform as 'conservation retreat', but minister defends economic push
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon wants to make concessions easier to obtain. Photo: RNZ / Giles Dexter A major overhaul of conservation land law has sparked sharp criticism, with Forest & Bird accusing the government of gutting longstanding protections in favour of commercial interests. The government's intended changes to the Conservation Act , unveiled at the National Party conference in Christchurch on Saturday, aims to "unleash growth" by increasing the number of concessions - or permissions - granted to businesses wishing to operate on conservation land. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said many businesses already run on conservation land, but the current regime was "totally broken", with concessions "often taking years to obtain or renew". However, Forest & Bird said the Bill's changes will shift the focus of conservation law "from protection to exploitation". "This is not conservation reform, it's conservation retreat," said chief executive Nicola Toki. "We should not be making it easier to sell off conservation land for commercial gain. "Our laws should uphold the promise to protect nature for its own sake, for future generations and for all those who hold these places dear." She said the consultation document proposed making about five million hectares of public conservation land available for exchange or disposal, if deemed "surplus" or to "support other government priorities". Toki said this represented "the most significant weakening of conservation law in a generation", warning it would increase pressure on native species and transform the Department of Conservation (DOC) from a protector of biodiversity into a land-use manager. "They dismantle the very purpose of our national parks and conservation lands," she said. "Our national parks are not theme parks - they are taonga with deep cultural and ecological significance. "This feels less like policy and more like an international online auction of the very places that define who we are." Conservation Minister Tama Potaka pushed back on claims the government was selling off conservation land. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka has pushed back on Forest & Bird claims. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii He said the changes were about creating a clearer, faster and more consistent concessions process for a wide range of land uses. "There's a huge backlog - some concessions were taking five-six years," Potaka said. "We've already halved that backlog in the last six months, but we need to change the system, so those backlogs don't build up again." Potaka highlighted that DOC land was already used for various infrastructure and business purposes, including cellphone towers, bridges, guided walks and concerts. He said the government's reforms aimed to bring more transparency and efficiency to how those uses are managed, and to re-invest revenue into biodiversity protection and pest control. "We're trying to get the right balance between the environment and nature, and the economy, but we do need to drive more economic outcomes out of the things we do own as a country," Potaka said. "That land [currently] makes about $50-60 million [annually]. In anyone's language, that might not be enough, especially if we want to re-invest into biodiversity, and ensure more jobs and high wages." Potaka rejected the notion that the reforms shifted DOC from its ecological mission. He said the changes would actually improve conservation outcomes by making the system more navigable for all types of users, including environmental educators and community groups. "People who host outdoor education camps need concessions too," he said. "Often they're more about community and kids than making money." Potaka also pointed to recent funding announcements - including $30m for weed and pest control, and heritage site upgrades - as evidence of the government's commitment to conservation. In addition to changes to land management, the government has proposed charging international visitors between $20-$40 to access four of the country's most popular natural attractions - Cathedral Cove, the Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound and Aoraki/Mount Cook. New Zealanders would not be charged. The prime minister said the new charges could generate an estimated $62m annually, all of which would be re-invested in the same areas. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
