The 20 best novels of all time
The attentive reader will immediately spot omissions. There is, for instance, no Austen, no Dickens, no Forster – and that's just some of the British names. Yet no list can be complete – even if we had 30, or 50, or 100 entries. And in order to avoid an arbitrary list of great novels, or of novels that are obviously canonical, I've tried to opt for books that have changed the way we think about the novel form.
Each of the 20 books below, then, has in some way moved the novel forwards, whether stylistically, structurally or politically. The literary tradition would look very different without them.
You may disagree with some of my choices, and some of my reasoning. But that's fine; in fact, I hope you do. Let the conversation commence!
Jump to a particular era:
Middle Ages
17th and 18th centuries
19th century
20th century
21st century
Middle Ages
The Tale of Genji (1021)
by Murasaki Shikibu
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Jane Austen would be annoyed women still do not have equality
Lucy Worsley was speaking at Austen's birthplace in Steventon, Hampshire, at a country fair to mark 250 years since the novelist was born. Austen's novels include Sense And Sensibility, Pride And Prejudice and Emma. Worsley said: 'It's such a special feeling to be on the spot where she herself walked and everybody here agrees with me, everybody here really loves Jane Austen.' The historian said she thinks Austen 'changed the world', adding: 'Although she was a novelist, and she gives entertainment and her books are funny, I think they have a serious message that was very important then and now, which is that women shouldn't have to marry for money. In Jane Austen novels, that's always what happens. 'In the world of Pride And Prejudice, women and men were not equal. In the world of today, women and men are still not equal. 'It's 250 years later but we're still not where we should be with our society. So if Jane Austen were to be here in the world today, I think that she'd say, 'hmm, I thought things would have been better than they are for women'.' Actor Adrian Lukis, who played George Wickham in the BBC's 1995 adaptation of Pride And Prejudice, was also at the event. Lukis said he was offered a different role originally, then Wickham became available, and he screen-tested and got that, which he called a 'wonderful part' in a 'fabulous book'. He added: 'I've just done a Q&A for an hour to the audience, and having people say how much it means to their family that they all sit down at Christmas with their grandparents, and they've watched it for years, and it's just a wonderful series. And I'm very proud to have been a part of it.' Lukis said Austen's novels are 'wonderful stories driven by a compelling narrative' and praised the 'quality of her writing and her observation'. Of Wickham, Lukis said: 'He's not a great guy, but what he is is charming and really good fun. And I always say, if at the end of the evening you spent with Wickham in a bar or a restaurant, you would have had a fantastic time, it's just at the end of the evening, he will say, 'I'm so sorry I forgot my money'. That's what you expect from Wickham. 'Darcy would sit there being all pompous and proud and serious and would pick up the bill, but you'd have a better time with Wickham.'
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Has Stradivarius stolen in WWII been hiding in plain sight?
A mystery surrounds whether the Stradivarius played by a Japanese virtuoso is the same instrument that disappeared in the chaos of the Nazi collapse in 1945 Berlin or a different violin crafted by the same Italian luthier that suddenly appeared 30 years ago. It is a puzzle worthy of an art history whodunnit that began during the Second World War and involves competing claims over the provenance of two violins — one missing for 80 years — made by Antonio Stradivari (1644-1737) in his 'golden years'. One violin, known as the 'small Mendelssohn' vanished in 1945 after the bank vault it was held in was broken into in the chaos at the end of the war as Hitler committed suicide in his bunker and fierce fighting raged as the Soviet army took Berlin. This instrument was registered and photographed in the 1930s, recognised as the work of Stradivari from his Cremona workshop in 1709. The other violin, known as 'Stella', dated two years earlier in 1707, is today a well-known and celebrated instrument played by Eijin Nimura, 54, a renowned Japanese violinist. It can be traced back to 1995 when it was sold in Paris by an unnamed Russian violinist, who said he had purchased the instrument in 1953. In 2000 the 'Stella' was photographed by the Tarisio auction house but was not sold at that time. It was then listed in 2005 as Nimura's property. Photographic analysis of the scratches and dents, caused as the violin was played, as well as the grain of the wood used to make it have convinced experts that the two violins are, in fact, the same. 'It is one and the same violin,' David Rosenthal, the great-grandson of Franz von Mendelssohn, the German banker, who stored it in a Berlin vault before the war, told the Le Monde newspaper. 'The same dimensions, the same wood grain, dozens of tiny scratches that are exactly identical.' Stradivari, who sometimes worked with his sons, made more than 1,000 stringed instruments, about 500 of which survive today. The violins are surrounded by mystique and were prized for their sound and beauty by virtuosos such as Yehudi Menuhin. They are highly valued and earlier this year a Stradivarius know as 'Baron Knoop', made in 1715, sold for $23 million. Carla Shapreau, an academic and cultural property scholar, noticed the similarity between the images of the missing violin and photographs of 'Stella' displayed in a 2018 exhibition in Tokyo. 'My jaw dropped,' she told the New York Times. Shapreau has a background in violin-making and runs the Lost Music Project which traces instruments, manuscripts, books and other cultural objects looted, confiscated and displaced in Nazi-era Germany. 'I was aghast because it had been renamed, re-dated and was in private ownership,' she said. Jason Price, the founder of the auction house Tarisio that photographed the violin in 2000, agreed with her analysis. 'They obviously are the same,' he said. 'When you look at the photographs side by side, you see the peculiarities of the wear patterns, the dings, the dents, the scratches. It is the same violin.' When contacted by Shapreau, Nimura refused to discuss the violin. His lawyer Yoshie Tsuruta told her: 'We have no information regarding this, including any factual basis that any of your allegations would have any merit.' There has been no suggestion of wrongdoing by Nimura. Rosenthal, a former musician in the San Francisco Ballet Orchestra, said that the family had always known of the violin, once played by his grandmother Lilli, and its wartime theft. 'My reaction was one of utter disbelief and shock,' he said. 'It was hiding in plain sight.'
North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Jane Austen would be annoyed women still do not have equality
Lucy Worsley was speaking at Austen's birthplace in Steventon, Hampshire, at a country fair to mark 250 years since the novelist was born. Austen's novels include Sense And Sensibility, Pride And Prejudice and Emma. Worsley said: 'It's such a special feeling to be on the spot where she herself walked and everybody here agrees with me, everybody here really loves Jane Austen.' The historian said she thinks Austen 'changed the world', adding: 'Although she was a novelist, and she gives entertainment and her books are funny, I think they have a serious message that was very important then and now, which is that women shouldn't have to marry for money. In Jane Austen novels, that's always what happens. 'In the world of Pride And Prejudice, women and men were not equal. In the world of today, women and men are still not equal. 'It's 250 years later but we're still not where we should be with our society. So if Jane Austen were to be here in the world today, I think that she'd say, 'hmm, I thought things would have been better than they are for women'.' Actor Adrian Lukis, who played George Wickham in the BBC's 1995 adaptation of Pride And Prejudice, was also at the event. Lukis said he was offered a different role originally, then Wickham became available, and he screen-tested and got that, which he called a 'wonderful part' in a 'fabulous book'. He added: 'I've just done a Q&A for an hour to the audience, and having people say how much it means to their family that they all sit down at Christmas with their grandparents, and they've watched it for years, and it's just a wonderful series. And I'm very proud to have been a part of it.' Lukis said Austen's novels are 'wonderful stories driven by a compelling narrative' and praised the 'quality of her writing and her observation'. Of Wickham, Lukis said: 'He's not a great guy, but what he is is charming and really good fun. And I always say, if at the end of the evening you spent with Wickham in a bar or a restaurant, you would have had a fantastic time, it's just at the end of the evening, he will say, 'I'm so sorry I forgot my money'. That's what you expect from Wickham. 'Darcy would sit there being all pompous and proud and serious and would pick up the bill, but you'd have a better time with Wickham.'
