Labour's 'minor' U-turn will leave benefits system 'woefully inadequate'

The National

a day ago

Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, has hit out at Labour figures and the mainstream media for branding the climbdown 'massive' when the concessions are 'minor and technical'.
After more than 100 Labour MPs threatened to rebel against the government on cuts to disability benefits, the Labour UK Government has performed a partial U-turn on its proposals.
People who currently receive Personal Independence Payments (PIP), or the health element of Universal Credit, will continue to do so.
READ MORE: We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series
But planned cuts will still hit future claimants from November next year. It means anyone who does not score four or more points in one of the activities assessed for the PIP daily living component will not receive it if they apply after November 2026.
Staggering statistics supplied by the DWP show this would leave almost half of claimants who suffer with multiple sclerosis ineligible.
Greaves told The National he was expecting much more significant changes to be proposed and is surprised MPs like Meg Hillier (below) – whose amendment against the cuts was signed by almost 130 Labour MPs – are now suggesting the changes are a 'real breakthrough' and a 'good step forward'.
(Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) 'I'm surprised that the concessions have been so limited, I was genuinely expecting something more substantial,' he said.
'I thought they'd move on the points. I thought the kind of concession they would make is to say if you get 10 or 12 points or more, that four-point rule doesn't apply to you anymore.
'It had been indicated to us they might be considering something like that and that would have been a significant concession.'
Asked if he would urge Labour MPs to still reject the legislation next week, he said: 'Absolutely. I would urge them to look at the reasons they rejected it in the first place.
'These are not concessions of any significance.
READ MORE: Will changes on disability benefit cuts affect Scotland?
'Fundamentally it is not fair and immoral to reduce the health-related support in Universal Credit by 50%. Already people with disabilities on Universal Credit are struggling to pay for their basic needs.
'Their debt is going to increase. How can you possibly justify doing that?'
Greaves, who is based in Edinburgh, said it was 'laudable' the Scottish Government has pledged not to replicate the cuts to PIP in its own Adult Disability Payment.
While the changes made by Labour will not affect ADP directly, they will impact on the Scottish Government budget and Scots will still be impacted by proposals to reduce the health-element of Universal Credit, which is reserved.
Greaves said the latest changes by Labour will create a 'two-tier system' which will make it more difficult for disabled people to get into work – the opposite to what Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has been claiming.
Greaves said: 'They [Labour] have fiddled around the edges.
'To say to someone who, let's say, in four years time has a stroke, and consequently has mobility problems, that a benefit that has been afforded to someone in their position before, has been pulled away, is completely unfair.
'For new claimants, the new system will be woefully inadequate.'
He added: 'What Liz Kendall is saying about getting people back into work is disingenuous. Personal Independence Payments is not a benefit that's paid because you cannot work.
'Moreover, because of that, it's an extremely helpful benefit if you have a disability and you want to move into work. It's going to make it a lot more difficult for people to move into work.'