
HMRC accused of cutting secret loan charge deal with large companies
A Freedom of Information request has suggested that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) reached generous settlement deals with multi-million pound companies who used payroll loan schemes.
Meanwhile, independent contractors were hit with life-changing bills.
The agreements came to light after a campaigner submitted a Freedom of Information request which was then revealed in Parliament by Conservative MP, Greg Smith, during Treasury Questions on Tuesday.
HMRC said it does not recognise the claims.
MPs said the revelation was 'staggering'.
Sarah Olney, Liberal Democrat MP for Richmond Park, said: 'It is unacceptable that victims have been consistently refused the justice they deserve while large companies received settlements a decade ago.
'This information shows the need for a proper, independent inquiry that looks at the whole loan charge scandal.'
The loan charge is a controversial law that left 50,000 self-employed workers with crippling tax bills and has been linked to 10 suicides.
It was introduced in 2017 to target contractors who were paid through non-taxable loans rather than salaries.
The loan schemes date back to the 1990s, and were often marketed as HMRC-compliant by respected tax advisers.
But HMRC maintains that it never approved the schemes. It used the loan charge to claw back the unpaid tax from the workers, with many facing bills that exceeded their income.
MPs and campaigners have accused HMRC of unfairly targeting and ruthlessly hounding the contractors while failing to go after the scheme promoters.
Now, minutes of a meeting from 2019 between Lord Amyas Morse, who led the 2019 loan charge review, and the leader of the latest review, Ray McCann, reveal that HMRC offered discounts to settle the tax bills of employers who used the schemes.
In the minutes of the meeting, Mr McCann is recorded as saying: 'The earlier settlement opportunity that had been open to large companies had included significant discounts, so that eventually the companies settled for somewhere in the region of 15pc in 2015.'
He went on to say 'the contractors weren't offered these terms', and 'settlement opportunities have always had a discount, and contractor one is the only one that didn't.'
Mr McCann is currently concluding the loan charge review, which was launched in January 2025 after calls from MPs. A former HMRC inspector, he was president of a professional body of tax advisers called the Chartered Institute of Taxation from 2018 to 2019.
According to official figures, 800 companies paid HMRC £1bn through financial settlements related to the schemes between 2011 and 2015. This works out an average tax liability of £1.25m per firm.
In Parliament earlier this week, Mr Smith said: 'A recent Freedom of Information request has revealed that, for a number of schemes, HMRC has settled with large corporations for just 15pc of what was owed.
'With the loan charge review ongoing, does the Chancellor agree with me that individuals should be treated no differently from the large corporations for which this precedent has been set?'
Liberal Democrat MP Angus Macdonald, another APPG member, has tabled an Early Day motion – supported by 18 MPs so far – expressing 'astonishment' about the deals and the fact they have 'never been revealed to Parliament'.
Mike Warburton, The Telegraph's tax columnist and former director at accountants Grant Thornton, said: 'These revelations have shown in stark contrast the way the Treasury and HMRC have treated large corporate taxpayers on the one hand and small contractors on the other.'
Critics of the loan charge argue it retroactively punishes contractors who signed up to the schemes in good faith.
The large timeframes involved create massive tax bills as years' worth of interest has rolled up on the debt. In one case, an individual earning £13,000 a year landed a £250,000 bill, according to the minutes of the meeting between Mr McCann and Lord Morse.
Steve Packham, of the Loan Charge Action Group, said: 'Ten people have killed themselves as a direct result of HMRC's ruthless persecution of people who the Chancellor herself has described as 'victims of mis-selling'.
'Yet we now know that just a year before the loan charge was introduced to Parliament, HMRC agreed a deal with large companies letting them pay just 15pc of what they said they owed.'
MPs and campaigners are now demanding that the Government offer contractors the same 15pc terms given to large corporations and open an inquiry into the scandal.
Mr Smith, co-chairman of the Loan and Taxpayer Fairness APPG, said: 'It's absolutely staggering to discover that just a year before the loan charge was introduced to Parliament, that HMRC agreed a deal allowing large companies to settle for just 15pc of what HMRC said they owed, for use of similar arrangements.'
He continued: 'Regardless of what Ray McCann recommends in his report on settlement terms, all those facing the loan charge and those pushed to settle to avoid it must all be offered no more than 15pc as full and final settlement.'
HMRC said all settlements are agreed after considering the individual facts of each case and made under our published settlement terms.
A spokesman said: 'We don't recognise these claims. We're absolutely committed to ensuring every taxpayer, regardless of size, pays the tax that's legally due.
'Given an independent review is under way it would be inappropriate for us to comment further.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
9 minutes ago
- Times
Airport staff paid bonuses to catch passengers with oversized cabin bags
Airport staff are earning cash bonuses for catching out easyJet passengers travelling with oversized bags, a leaked email has revealed. An internal email has revealed that staff at Swissport, an aviation company that runs passenger gates at airports, were notified they were 'eligible to receive £1.20 (£1 after tax) for every gate bag taken, effective immediately'. The email, seen by The Sunday Times, was sent to Swissport employees working at seven UK airports in Belfast, Birmingham, Glasgow, Jersey, Liverpool and Newcastle. It introduced them to 'the easyJet gate bag revenue incentive', which is 'intended to reward agents doing the right thing' and would result in 'payments made directly to employees'. The email was sent in November 2023, and the policy is still in force. For staff concerned about meeting targets, 'internal tracking will be used to identify opportunities for further support and training for individual agents, but will not be used negatively'. It was signed — with a 'Thank you for your ongoing contribution to the success of easyJet' — by Dean Martin, a Swissport station manager at Glasgow airport. The email and its contents was first reported by the Jersey Evening Post. Ground handlers employed by another aviation company, DHL Supply Chain, at Gatwick, Bristol and Manchester airports also have a remuneration package for identifying non-compliant easyJet bags. The employees receive 'a nominal amount' per bag. EasyJet, which last year made £9 billion in revenue, allows passengers to take a small bag that fits under their seat for free. Larger bags can be put in the overhead lockers for prices starting at £5.99. For a one-way flight this week from Gatwick to Palma, Mallorca, the cost is £32.99. The financial incentive for boarding-gate staff applies if they catch a passenger whose bag is deemed too big to be taken into the cabin, either because they have not paid to take a larger suitcase on board or because their free hand luggage is too large. Boarding gates at airports usually have a metal box with the dimensions of baggage allowed on the plane. Passengers boarding flights are asked to check their bags in the box. Many travellers complain that they have been forced to pay an additional fee for their bags, and sometimes put their bags in the hold, despite their luggage seeming to meet the correct dimensions. In some cases it has led to furious rows at the boarding gate. EasyJet charges £48 at the gate — £1.20 of which is paid to the ground handler. The airline does not have oversight on the commission paid to DHL Supply Chain or Swissport staff because both companies manage the payments directly with their employees. Emily Thomas Adderson, 44, flew with easyJet from Gatwick to Athens with her husband David, 44, and their three daughters, Lily, 8, Poppy, 10, and Daisy, 12, for a half-term holiday. But the family holiday got off to a bad start after all five of their bags were seized by boarding gate staff for being too big to fit beneath an airplane seat. The family, who live in Guernsey, had to pay £240 to take the bags on board. Thomas Adderson said this was despite their bags being within the free hand baggage size and fitting inside the measurement box by the gate. When on board the plane, Thomas Adderson said she put her bag under her seat anyway. 'There is no rhyme or reason for why you get singled out,' said Thomas Adderson, who works in finance. 'They are so aggressive and then say you can join the back of the queue and not board the plane if you want, so you have to just give in and pay. 'I don't know what the secret is but I am sure there must be an incentive to get people to pay extra. There is never any kindness or human approach to the process, you just get targeted in the queue. 'It is hard enough to travel now and it has just made us really question doing that sort of thing. We haven't been away since.' On the last day of the holiday, the family's hire car was broken into while they were sightseeing at the Acropolis and all their bags were stolen. 'So we didn't have to fight the flight attendants on the way home,' Thomas Adderson said. A spokesman for easyJet said the bags were 'marginally outside the gauge' but apologised to the family and refunded the extra charges. Swissport has passenger services at 17 airports in the UK and its staff are stationed at more than 200 airports worldwide. The aviation company also provides ground handling services for Ryanair, Tui, Lufthansa and Vueling. Ryanair said it did not offer a financial incentive to Swissport staff at its gates, but did not respond to multiple requests for comment on whether it has an agreement with other third parties to which it contracts ground handling services. Lufthansa said it did not offer financial incentives to its boarding gate staff. Tui and Vueling have not yet responded to requests for a comment. Swissport ground handlers earn about £12 per hour. One former Swissport passenger service manager, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he and his colleagues had no choice but to police the line on oversized baggage. 'Confronting people with excess baggage is like taking on fare dodgers,' he said. 'You risk abuse or worse — imagine stopping a group of lads on a stag weekend and telling them, 'I'm going to have to charge you more than you paid for your tickets to check those bags into the hold'.' • Hand luggage: Ryanair, easyJet and British Airways policies explained Luggage has become a lucrative tool for airlines and bags can now cost more than the plane seat. Size allowances differ, depending on the airline, and several have shrunk in recent years. However, last week, Ryanair announced it is increasing its allowance from 40cm x 25cm x 20cm to 40cm x 30cm x 20cm, which equates to 24 litres. Last month, the EU proposed new rules that would allow passengers to bring one personal item, such as a handbag, backpack or laptop, and one item of cabin baggage weighing up to 7kg on board free of charge. The change, which would apply to any flight taking off or landing in the EU, still needs approval from 55 per cent of member nations. Coby Benson, a solicitor at the consumer law firm Bott and Co, said he welcomed the proposals because 'transparency and fairness in airline pricing must be the priority'. He added: 'For years, passengers have faced premium charges simply for bringing a carry-on bag on board. Baggage charges have quietly become a major source of revenue for airlines, often catching passengers off-guard. 'The revelation that airport staff are receiving financial incentives for seizing non-compliant cabin bags only adds to the perception that the system is stacked against consumers.' Swissport, which also offers cargo handling services, is owned by various private investors. It revenue last year was €3.7 billion, an 11 per cent increase on the previous year. Its head offices are in Zurich, Switzerland. A spokesman for Swissport said: 'We serve our airline customers and apply their policies under terms and conditions for managing their operation. We're highly professional and our focus is on delivering safe and efficient operations, which we do day in and day out for four million flights per year.' A spokeswoman for DHL Supply Chain said the company requires 'all colleagues to consistently adhere to [the easyJet baggage policy] and this is recognised as part of their remuneration'. She added: 'Doing so ensures we provide a smooth travel experience for every passenger.' A spokesman for easyJet said: 'EasyJet is focused on ensuring our ground handling partners apply our policies correctly and consistently in fairness to all our customers. 'Our bag policies and options are well understood and we remind customers of this when booking, before they travel and on their boarding pass, which means a very small proportion of customers who don't comply will be charged at the airport.'


Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Thousands in Zagreb for Croatian nationalist singer's 'record breaking' concert
ZAGREB, July 5 (Reuters) - Tens of thousands of people flocked to Zagreb of Saturday to attend a show by controversial Croatian nationalist rock singer Marko Perkovic Thompson, which was being billed as the world's largest-ever paid concert. Police said more than 450,000 tickets had been sold for the concert at the Zagreb Hippodrome. Most of the streets in the Zagreb city centre were closed for traffic and some 6,523 policemen had been deployed. Thompson, who has had concerts banned in several European countries including the Netherlands, Switzerland and Bosnia, is accused by critics of flirting with the ideology and iconography of Croatia's Nazi-backed World War Two Ustashe government. The singer, who takes his nickname from the U.S. Thompson submachine gun and rose to popularity in the 1990s during and after the war that followed break-up of Yugoslavia, rejects accusations that his songs glorify the Nazi-backed state. Historians say the Ustashe systematically persecuted and murdered Jews, Serbs and Roma between 1941 and 1945. Thompson has previously said that his songs simply represent a love of God, family, homeland and people. His fans, many young and carrying or wearing Croatian flags, agreed. "I expect it to be good, great fun, lots of people and an unforgettable experience," said concert-goer Josip Gelenger.


The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump rages Putin ‘just wants to keep killing people' in Ukraine & says he is ‘very unhappy' after 60min call with Vlad
DONALD Trump issued a bleak warning that Putin wants to "keep killing people" after Russia launched its largest-yet barrage of drones and missiles at Ukraine. In a middle finger to the US, the onslaught hit just hours after Putin and Trump had a fruitless 60-minute phone call - which touched on the possibility of fresh American sanctions. 5 5 5 Trump fumed on Friday that he was "very unhappy" about the phone call with Putin and ensuing strikes. He said: "[Putin] wants to go all the way, just keep killing people, it's no good." Trump revealed the two leaders had spoken "a lot" about sanctions, adding: "He understands that it may be coming." The Kremlin said on Friday it was "preferable" to reach its goals of its invasion through political and diplomatic means - despite having just blitzed Ukraine with masses of explosives. Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov continued: "But as long as that is not possible, we are continuing the special operation." Hours after hanging up on Thursday night, Vlad green-lighted the largest volley of missiles and drones since the start of the war. Fires broke out in multiple locations as almost every district in the capital city was struck, according to Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration. Dozens of Ukrainians were injured as toxic smoke engulfed the city. The Svyatoshynskyi and Solomanskyi districts were among the hardest hit, with blazes on rooftops and in courtyards. Short on air defence systems, Ukraine could only down two of 11 missiles. Russia pounds Kyiv with ballistic missile and drone attack in 'terror and murder' blitz hours after Trump said he made 'no progress' on Putin call Another nine missiles - one Kinzhal [Dagger], two Iskander-K, and six Iskander-M - wreaked havoc in the city. Trump also spoke to Ukraine's President Zelensky on Friday - and their chat was much more productive. The President said: "We talked about different things [...] I think it was a very, very strategic call." Asked about resuming supplying Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine, he said: "Yeah, we might. "They're going to need something because they're being hit pretty hard." Zelensky said: "We spoke about opportunities in air defence and agreed that we will work together to strengthen protection of our skies." The US Defense Department earlier this week paused deliveries of several critical weapons systems - including Patriot missiles and precision-guided munitions. Trump has insisted he wants to help Ukraine, but has has not imposed any new sanctions on Russia since taking office. He also has not approved additional aid packages. 5 5