logo
Unlimited but repeated ITR revisions may cause scrutiny, say experts

Unlimited but repeated ITR revisions may cause scrutiny, say experts

Revising income tax returns (ITR) multiple times by taxpayers in case of an error or discrepancy may invite scrutiny. Experts warn that careless or excessive revisions might not go unnoticed by the tax department's AI-driven systems.
No cap on revisions, but a clear deadline
There is no limit to the number of times an ITR can be revised under the Income Tax Act. As long as you're within the time frame, December 31 of the relevant assessment year, or before the assessment is completed, whichever is earlier, one can file multiple revisions.
'Section 139(5) does not limit how many times a return can be revised,' explains Shefali Mundra, chartered accountant and tax expert at ClearTax. 'But each revision must happen within the deadline, else it becomes invalid.'
Niyati Shah, chartered accountant and vertical head of personal tax at 1 Finance, adds, 'Each revised return supersedes the last. So accuracy becomes extremely important, because your final filed version is what matters.'
Frequent changes could raise red flags
While the law allows multiple revisions, experts caution against overuse, especially when the revisions lead to significant changes in reported income, deductions, or tax paid. 'The Income Tax Department uses AI-based anomaly detection,' says Kumarmanglam Vijay, partner and head of practice, direct tax at JSA Advocates & Solicitors. 'Multiple revisions without valid reasons could delay refunds or trigger scrutiny under CASS.'
Sujit Bangar, founder of TaxBuddy.com, adds a caveat: 'If revisions are due to minor issues and don't impact your tax calculations, the number of revisions isn't a concern. But material changes must be justifiable and documented.'
Can you revise after receiving a notice?
It depends on the type of notice.
· Section 143(1) (intimation): A revised return can still be filed, as long as the time limit hasn't lapsed.
· Section 143(2) (scrutiny notice): Opinions vary.
-Mundra says, 'Yes, but only before the assessment is completed.'
-Shah adds: 'After 143(2), the door for revision closes and explanations must be provided during the scrutiny.'
-Vijay, referencing judicial precedent, notes that a revised return is possible if the assessment isn't completed and the statutory deadline hasn't expired.
When should you actually revise?
Revising your return makes sense if:
· You forgot to report income (interest, rent, capital gains)
· You used the wrong ITR form
· You missed claiming deductions (like 80C or HRA)
· There's a mismatch in TDS or Form 26AS data
However, it's not advisable to revise for minor spelling errors or cosmetic details. 'For such cases, it's better to file a rectification under Section 154,' says Mundra.
Updated return option (Section 139-8A)
Taxpayers also have the option to file an updated return within 48 months from the end of the assessment year under Section 139(8A), introduced in the Finance Act, 2022.
'This is useful if you missed filing a return entirely or need to declare additional income later,' says Vijay. 'But remember, it comes with a cost, an additional 25–50 per cent tax over and above your dues.'
Bottom Line: Revise only if there's a genuine error that affects your tax liability. Keep documentation ready, and don't treat the revision window as a casual edit tool. The tax department may be watching
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Filing Income Tax Return? One Wrong Move Could Cost You Rs 1.5 Lakh
Filing Income Tax Return? One Wrong Move Could Cost You Rs 1.5 Lakh

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

Filing Income Tax Return? One Wrong Move Could Cost You Rs 1.5 Lakh

As the income tax filing season approaches, financial experts are warning taxpayers to exercise caution while submitting their returns. Even minor errors in filing can result in hefty penalties, delayed refunds, and notices from the Income Tax Department. One of the most common mistakes taxpayers make is selecting the wrong Income Tax Return (ITR) form. Each form is meant for specific income categories. For instance, ITR-1 (Sahaj) is suitable for salaried individuals earning up to Rs 50 lakh, while ITR-2 is for those with capital gains, multiple properties, or foreign assets. Business owners must opt for ITR-3, and those under presumptive taxation should file ITR-4 (Sugam). Filing with an incorrect form may be treated as a 'Defective Return' and must be rectified within 15 days to avoid invalidation. Failure to verify Form 26AS and the Annual Information Statement (AIS) before filing may result in refund delays or excess tax payments. Salaried individuals should ensure they have Form 16, along with documents related to home loans, capital gains, and dividend income. E-verification is another crucial step. Returns must be verified within 30 days via Aadhaar OTP, net banking, or Demat account. Alternatively, a signed ITR-V must be sent to the CPC office in Bengaluru. Without verification, the filing is considered incomplete. Late filing attracts a penalty of Rs 5,000 for incomes above Rs 5 lakh and Rs 1,000 for incomes below that. Inaccurate information may lead to a 50% penalty on tax dues and up to 200% for wilful misreporting. Businesses failing to maintain books or submit audit reports on time can face fines up to Rs 1.5 lakh. Taxpayers are advised to file early, double-check their details, and choose the correct regime to avoid unnecessary legal and financial trouble.

LTCG exemption: Key rulings that clarify grey areas in Sections 54 and 54F
LTCG exemption: Key rulings that clarify grey areas in Sections 54 and 54F

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

LTCG exemption: Key rulings that clarify grey areas in Sections 54 and 54F

The Income Tax Act, 1961, provides strategic reliefs to taxpayers aiming to reinvest their long-term capital gains into residential properties. Two critical provisions that govern such exemptions are Section 54 and Section 54F. Understanding the nuances of these provisions is essential, particularly in light of recent amendments and judicial rulings that continue to shape their interpretation. The core difference: Section 54 vs Section 54F Section 54 applies when the capital gain arises from the sale of a residential house, whereas Section 54F is available on the sale of any long-term capital asset ('LTCG") other than a residential house (e.g., shares, land, gold, etc.). In both cases, the reinvestment must be made in residential house property situated in India to avail exemption. Sections 54 and 54F can also be claimed simultaneously, provided the respective conditions are fulfilled. Also Read: How to calculate tax if capital gains are your sole income in FY25 From 2023-24, the maximum exemption is capped at ₹10 crore. This move aims to curb the misuse of exemptions by ultra-high-net-worth individuals. Investment criteria and conditions: Time limits Purchase: Within one year before or two years from the date of transfer. Construction: Within three years from the date of transfer. Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS): If the amount is not immediately reinvested, it must be deposited in a CGAS before the due date for filing the income tax return. Transfer of new assets: This exemption is maintained by requiring that the new asset not be transferred within three years of its acquisition or construction. Exemption limits Under Section 54: The exemption is the lesser of the capital gain or the amount invested. Under Section 54F: The exemption is proportional, based on the net consideration reinvested: Exemption = Capital Gain × (Amount Invested ÷ Net Sale Consideration) Also Read: Capital gains on equities: Here's all you need to know when filing tax returns this year Judicial rulings: Clarifying the grey areas While the legal provisions appear straightforward, their implementation has often required judicial intervention. Key rulings include: Purchase in spouse's name: Eligible for exemption. In CIT v. Kamal Wahal, the Delhi high court held that the exemption cannot be denied merely because the legal title of the new residential property is in the spouse's name, as long as the funds belong to the assessee. Investment in children's name: Exemption is not allowed. In Prakash v. ITO, the Bombay high court denied the exemption as the beneficial ownership was considered to have passed to the children, defeating the legislative intent of the provision. Property outside India: Exemption is not available if the new asset is located outside India. Incomplete construction: Still eligible for exemption. In CIT v. Sardarmal Kothari, the Madras high court clarified that completion of construction is not mandatory; timely investment is the critical requirement under Section 54F. Multiple flats as one residential house: Allowed, if used as a single home. In CIT v. Gita Duggal, the Delhi high court ruled that where multiple units are part of a common structure and serve a unified residential purpose, they qualify as 'a residential house" for the purpose of exemption. Repayment of housing loan for new residential house: Treated as valid investment for exemption purposes. Delay in registration: Exemption is allowed. In Siva Jyothi Palam v. ACIT, the ITAT Visakhapatnam ruled that procedural delays in registration should not defeat substantive compliance with the law. Exemption cannot be denied if payment and possession are within time, even if registration is delayed. Conclusion Sections 54 and 54F continue to be vital planning avenues for taxpayers liquidating long-term assets. However, these provisions demand timely execution, accurate documentation, and sometimes even judicial guidance for interpretation. Also Read: Who can avail the indexation benefit on property sale and is it even worth it? The judiciary has repeatedly favoured substance over form, focusing on the taxpayer's intent and adherence to time limits rather than procedural lapses. However, caution is warranted. With increased scrutiny and potential litigation, aligning the declared sale consideration with the stamp duty value is critical to avoid tax litigation. With growing litigation around capital gains exemptions, professional advice is strongly recommended. Hitesh Kumar and Deepak Kapoor are chartered accountants. The article reflects the authors' views based on current tax laws and judicial precedents as of the date of publication. Readers are advised to consult with tax professionals before taking any action.

Cost inflation index notified at 376 for FY26 compared to 363 in previous year
Cost inflation index notified at 376 for FY26 compared to 363 in previous year

Business Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Cost inflation index notified at 376 for FY26 compared to 363 in previous year

The Income Tax Department has notified the Cost Inflation Index or CII for the current financial year 2025-26 (for assessment year 2026-27). The CII for the financial year 2025-26 has been notified at 376 and will be used to compute the indexed cost of acquisition for assets sold in FY 2025-26. This new index number will take effect on April 1, 2026. The CII stood at 363 in previous year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store