Despite pipeline talk, Enbridge, TC Energy see strong demand in U.S., hurdles in Canada
Calgary pipeline giants Enbridge Inc. and TC Energy Corp. say they're seeing stronger customer demand in the United States, even as Canadian politicians push for nation-building infrastructure north of the border.
Article content
François Poirier, the chief executive of TC Energy, said the company's returns in the U.S. 'are meaningfully higher than in Canada,' which means it will focus on the much larger market, despite hopes for a pipeline project on its home turf.
Article content
Article content
'Canada gas has to compete for capital with the other business units in the company,' Poirier said this week during a conference call on quarterly earnings.
Article content
Article content
'We are going to be allocating capital predominantly in the U.S. until competitive projects in other jurisdictions present themselves that compel us to allocate capital elsewhere.'
Article content
For its part, Enbridge says federal energy policies are still standing in the way of a possible major new pipeline in Canada, while its customers are looking for relatively smaller and faster projects in the United States.
Article content
The pipeline operator, which was behind the ill-fated Northern Gateway project that would have taken Alberta oil to British Columbia's northern coast, said Friday policies such as a tanker ban are holding back investment.
Article content
'We have been a proponent of such a project in the past and, in fact, invested several $100 million dollars to get there,' Enbridge CEO Greg Ebel told analysts in a conference call.
Article content
Article content
'So the issue is not one of there being a proponent. The issue is one of government policy setting the conditions for that to get investment to occur. Let's be honest, the government has not done that yet, and it's not clear they intend to, at least from our perspective.'
Article content
Article content
The Carney government's recent Bill C-5 gives Ottawa the ability to fast-track infrastructure projects it deems vital for the national economy, but has yet to announce a list of projects.
Article content
In the absence of any action from the government, Ebel said any line to the west coast would effectively be a 'pipeline to nowhere.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
7 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
3 Energy Stocks to Buy With $500 and Hold Forever
Key Points ExxonMobil combines low-cost oil production with growing investments in carbon capture, lithium, and clean tech. Enbridge offers a 6% dividend yield, a 30-year dividend streak, and new projects like a solar deal with Meta Platforms. NextEra has a high valuation, but its cash flow and growth make it a durable energy stock. 10 stocks we like better than ExxonMobil › Old-school energy sources aren't going anywhere. Even as the world transitions to cleaner power, oil and gas (and the infrastructure behind them) remain integral to the global economy. Add in rising electricity demand from AI and data centers, and you have a sector where both old-school titans and new-age renewables can thrive. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » If you have $500 and want to build a long-term, diversified position in energy, the goal is pretty simple: Find companies with strong balance sheets, steady dividends, and exposure to both sides of the energy transition. The following three energy stocks fit that bill precisely. 1. ExxonMobil: old-school energy with new ambitions ExxonMobil(NYSE: XOM) is a titan of traditional energy. With operations spanning oil fields, gas stations, and refineries, the oil stock is built to weather just about any price cycle. It's a fossil fuel giant, but Exxon isn't acting like a dinosaur. In December 2024, the company unveiled a bold 2030 plan to generate $20 billion in new earnings and $30 billion in added cash flow, all while deploying $140 billion to major projects and boosting shareholder returns. About $30 billion of that is earmarked for carbon capture, hydrogen, and lithium developments. That's not a plan to pivot away from oil per se, but it is one to stay relevant no matter where energy goes next. More to the present, Exxon has a fortress of a balance sheet, with $18.5 billion in cash at the end of the first quarter and an industry-leading debt-to-capital ratio of about 12%. As the chart below shows, both of these put Exxon in a favorable position in respect to its biggest competitor, Chevron. And perhaps most important of all, Exxon pays investors to wait. The company has raised its dividend for 42 consecutive years, with a current yield near 3.5% and plenty of free cash flow to support future increases. Add in that strong balance sheet, ongoing share buybacks, and one of the lowest break-even oil prices in the industry, and you have a cash machine with staying power. 2. Enbridge: a dividend pipeline that's going solar Enbridge(NYSE: ENB) is Canada's energy highway. It transports about 30% of North America's crude oil and 20% of the U.S. natural gas supply. Fun fact: Its oil pipeline network stretches more than 18,000 miles, long enough to wrap around three-quarters of the Equator. With a dividend north of 6% and three decades of consecutive hikes, Enbridge has become a go-to for income investors. What really sets it apart, however, is how it is building a dual engine for growth. The company is investing billions annually not just into pipeline expansions, but also offshore, wind, solar, and renewable natural gas. The strategy is already in motion. Enbridge recently broke ground on Clear Fork, a 600-megawatt solar project near San Antonio, Texas, backed by a long-term power purchase agreement with Meta Platforms. The $900 million facility is expected to come on line in 2027 and start adding cash flow and earnings right away. It's a clear sign that the company isn't just moving energy anymore but helping to build infrastructure that will power tech giants and data centers. 3. NextEra Energy: the clean energy leader NextEra Energy(NYSE: NEE), the lone renewables stock on this list, brings something the other two can't: long-term growth without the fossil fuel baggage. It's the world's largest producer of wind and solar power, and it runs Florida Power & Light, the biggest regulated utility in the country. In the second quarter, NextEra added 3.2 gigawatts of new clean-energy projects, lifting its total backlog to 30 gigawatts, roughly the size of 30 nuclear reactors. That pipeline gives the company visibility into future earnings, which it expects to grow 6% to 8% annually through 2027. It's also targeting 10% dividend growth through at least 2026, building on 29 straight years of increases . Today's 3% yield may not scream high income, but it's backed by strong free cash flow and one of the safest payout ratios in the industry. One caveat is that the company trades at a premium: about 20 times forward earnings. But with projected earnings per share (EPS) of $3.45 to $3.70 this year and unmatched leadership in the renewables race, that premium isn't empty air. For investors looking to own a piece of the clean energy sector, NextEra Energy seems about as "forever" as it gets. Powering your portfolio for the long haul With Exxon's oil empire, Enbridge's pipelines, and NextEra's clean energy runway, investors have options that span the full energy spectrum. Each company brings something different to the table, but all three are built to endure. Whether you're looking for dividends or stability, these three offer a balanced way to invest in the future of energy. Should you invest $1,000 in ExxonMobil right now? Before you buy stock in ExxonMobil, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and ExxonMobil wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Steven Porrello has positions in Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron, Enbridge, Meta Platforms, and NextEra Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump slaps tariffs on key allies as global trade talks intensify
WASHINGTON, D.C.: With the clock ticking toward a self-imposed trade deal deadline, U.S. President Donald Trump has announced steep tariffs on dozens of countries, escalating his efforts to reshape the global trade landscape. Through an executive order issued this week, Trump imposed new import duties ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent on goods from 69 trading partners, including Canada, Brazil, India, Taiwan, and Switzerland. The tariffs will take effect in seven days, just ahead of the August 1 deadline. The measures include a 35 percent tariff on many Canadian goods, 50 percent for Brazil, 25 percent for India, and 20 percent for Taiwan. An exception has been granted for shipments already in transit. Goods from countries not listed will face a blanket 10 percent U.S. import tax, potentially more in the future, Trump indicated. "Some trading partners, despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances," the executive order stated, adding some also failed to align with U.S. economic and national-security priorities. Markets reacted with relative calm, a contrast to the selloff that followed Trump's earlier tariff threats in April. Still, stocks and equity futures edged lower in Asian trading. The administration says additional trade deals are in the works as part of a broader strategy to close trade deficits and support U.S. manufacturing. Canada was hit particularly hard. Trump raised tariffs on Canadian goods tied to fentanyl-related enforcement to 35 percent, up from 25 percent, claiming Ottawa had "failed to cooperate" on narcotics enforcement. "Canada has been very poorly led," Trump told reporters. Canada's government has not yet responded, but it previously contested the basis for such tariffs. Mexico, meanwhile, received a reprieve. Trump granted a 90-day delay on new 30 percent tariffs for most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), following a call with President Claudia Sheinbaum. "We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum posted on X, calling the call with Trump "very good." However, U.S. tariffs on Mexican steel, aluminum, copper, and non-USMCA-compliant autos remain in place. India now faces a 25 percent tariff following stalled negotiations over agricultural market access. Trump also raised concerns about India's purchases of Russian oil. Talks are ongoing, but New Delhi has pledged to protect its farm sector. The news triggered backlash from India's opposition and a drop in the rupee. Brazil was hit with a 50 percent tariff amid tensions over the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. Still, specific sectors such as energy, aircraft, and orange juice were spared. Commerce Department data showed that tariffs may already be driving up prices: home furnishings rose 1.3 percent in June, recreational goods 0.9 percent, and clothing and footwear 0.4 percent. Meanwhile, Trump's legal justification, using the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, faced tough questioning in federal court. Judges appeared skeptical that trade deficits and fentanyl enforcement constitute emergencies under the law. Following preliminary progress in earlier talks, China now has until August 12 to finalize a broader tariff agreement with Washington.
Toronto Sun
8 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism
The exterior of the Ontario Court of Justice in downtown Windsor is shown on April 22, 2021. Photo by Dan Janisse / Windsor Star A country where the decisions of judges and prosecutors can never be criticized is a country that is not a democracy. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Every Canadian citizen — not just politicians and media commentators — has the right to publicly agree or disagree with decisions made by judges and prosecutors. As long as they do not threaten their safety and are critical of their decisions, as opposed to personal attacks on those delivering them, they are legitimate forms of public expression and debate. Last week, the president of the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association said 'attacks' by 'politicians, media and members of the public' in the context of two high-profile criminal cases were 'affronts to the rule of law.' This was in reference to the Crown's submissions for sentences for Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on mischief charges, and the fallout from the acquittal of five former junior hockey players on charges of sexual assault. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. No doubt many agreed with Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who tweeted on X in response to the Crown's submission to sentence Lich and Barber to seven and eight years respectively: 'Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges and antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares and block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants seven years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich and Barber.' Poilievre's tweet failed to note the final decision on sentencing will be made by a judge. Others will argue his argument is misguided. But it was hardly an attack on the rule of law. A similar controversy erupted in the wake of the decision by Ontario Superior Court Judge Maria Carroccia to acquit five former junior hockey plays of sexual assault in the Hockey Canada trial. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Her ruling prompted public reactions from high praise to scathing criticism for the judge — much of it from lawyers — but all of it fair comment, as long as it did not stoop to threats or attacks on the judge's character. In our view, robust public debates about the decisions made in our courtrooms do not undermine the rule of law in Canada. To the contrary, they contribute to how our laws evolve over time and are a measure of our commitment to democracy. Read More Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists
