
25 million Americans at risk? Trump's most shocking deportation call targets US citizens as he sets bizarre conditions
Alligator Alcatraz
", where around 3,000 migrants are expected to be held as part of his crackdown on illegal immigration. While touring the facility in the Florida Everglades, Trump said it will soon hold the most "menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet".
He again floated the idea of deporting US citizens who commit crimes, which legal experts say is "unconstitutional". Speaking to the press during a tour of a migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades, Trump repeated claims that there are many immigrants who are now citizens and have been committing serious crimes.
ALSO READ:
Elon Musk to be deported? Trump's bold warning raises explosive questions about Tesla CEO's future
Trump to deport US citizens?
The US President called for the deportation of some US citizens who have committed crimes, like 'hitting people with a baseball bat.' "They're not new to our country. They're old to our country. Many of them were born in our country. I think we ought to get them the hell out of here, too, if you want to know the truth," he said. "So maybe that will be the next job."
He said that people who kill others by wacking a baseball bat on their head or knifing needed to be thrown out of the US, even though they were citizens, and called it his administration's 'next job'.
Live Events
'I think we ought to get them the hell out of here, too, if you want to know the truth. So maybe that will be the next job,' Trump added.
ALSO READ:
US rapper Kanye West's WW3 album crosses line? 'Heil Hitler' track title sends global shockwaves
The President also mentioned New York, adding that the city had seen many such incidents, which, he said, weren't accidents. 'Even if we forget about them, we've had some very bad accidents in New York. They were not accidents,' he said.
Trump acknowledged that he didn't know if deporting US citizens who are convicted of crimes is legal.
"We'll have to find that out legally. I'm just saying if we had the legal right to do it, I would do it in a heartbeat," he added. "I don't know if we do or not, we're looking at that right now."
Trump's proposals 'unconstitutional'
Trump's proposal came weeks after Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate released a memo giving US attorneys wide discretion to decide when to pursue the denaturalization process to "advance the Administration's policy objectives", reported ABC News. Individuals who have engaged in torture, war crimes, human trafficking and human rights violations are some of the cases US attorney should pursue, the memo says.
ALSO READ:
Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill unveiled: Tax cuts, mass deportations, child credit and more
Legal experts have flagged that Trump's proposals are unconstitutional claiming they violate the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The issue has not come before the courts yet.
Amanda Frost, a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, told ABC News in April that the administration could try to target naturalized US citizens, who can lose their immigration status if they've committed treason or falsified information during their naturalization process. However, she said those instances are rare.
"If someone's a naturalized citizen, there could be an effort to denaturalize that person and deport them," Frost said. "But then it would have to be that they committed some sort of fraud or error in their naturalization process. An unrelated crime could not be the basis for denaturalizing and deporting somebody."
ALSO READ:
Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill could leave 12 million without healthcare and America drowning in debt
Last month, the US Justice Department issued a memo stating it will revoke citizenship of certain people, including those who committed crimes, espionage, or concealed material facts by wilful misrepresentation. The report also stated that if implemented, the Donald Trump administration's move will impact as many as 25 million US citizens.
'The citizenship of individuals will be revoked if they engage in the commission of war crimes, extrajudicial killings, or other serious human rights abuses; to remove naturalized criminals, gang members, or, indeed, any individuals convicted of crimes who pose an ongoing threat to the United States; and to prevent convicted terrorists from returning to US soil or traveling internationally on a US passport,' the memo read.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Want Gazans To Be Safe': Donald Trump Hints At Ceasefire Announcement; Dodges Question On Enclave's Takeover
US President Donald Trump has expressed sympathy for the people of Gaza, describing their suffering as 'hell,' while sidestepping questions about US involvement in the territory. Speaking en route to a rally, Trump also mentioned Iran's desire to engage in talks and stated he would meet with them if necessary. Meanwhile, Trump is preparing to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, where he expects to push for a Gaza ceasefire and a hostage-release deal. Hamas is reviewing a new proposal, while mediators from Egypt and Qatar work intensively to bridge gaps between the parties. Israeli officials anticipate a major breakthrough during the upcoming visit.#trump #netanyahu #hamas #gazastrip #GazaCeasefire #GazaWar #Israel Read More


The Print
25 minutes ago
- The Print
Why do we pretend SCO still works? China runs it, shields Pakistan, sidelines India
The SCO has two key units: the Secretariat in Beijing, and the Executive Committee of the Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) in Tashkent. The SCO Secretary General and the Director of the RATS Executive Committee are appointed by the Council of Heads of State (CHS) for a three-year term. Zhang Ming of China and RE Mirzaev of Uzbekistan assumed office in January 2022. It is strange, if not ironic, that neither the RATS Director (Mirzaev) nor any other member intervened in India's favour to redraft the resolution in a way that respected New Delhi's concerns and sentiments. Singh's remarks on the importance of countering terrorist technologies, including the use of drones for cross-border smuggling of weapons and drugs, and his warning that traditional borders are no longer sufficient to guard against threats in an interconnected world, appeared to fall on deaf ears among the 10-member group, led by Beijing. His reminder of the joint statement on 'Countering Radicalisation leading to Terrorism, Separatism, and Extremism', issued during India's Chairmanship of the SCO, also failed to evoke any positive response or change of heart. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's Defence Ministers' meeting, held in Qingdao last week, ended without adopting a joint statement. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to sign the communique, as it made no mention of the Pahalgam terror attack, nor included any condemnation of Pakistan, the country from where the attack was sponsored. Also read: SCO is not an anti-Western club. India's presence is a guarantee against it India's blind spot at SCO India should perhaps have anticipated the outcome of the SCO meeting, considering recent developments and its own positioning in UN bodies. After the heinous Pahalgam attack by the 'Resistance Front', a proxy of the UN-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) — in which, as the Defence Minister mentioned, victims were profiled based on religious identity and shot, China offered diplomatic support to Pakistan. It neither condemned the attack in 'Srinagar city, the summer capital of Indian-controlled Kashmir' (as China referred to it), nor acknowledged India's position, instead calling for an 'impartial probe'. The initial report from Xinhua ended with a terse line: 'A guerilla war has been going on between militants and Indian troops stationed in the region since 1989.' After India's 'pause' in military action against terror bases in Pakistan, China was among the first to praise Pakistan's so-called peace efforts. In a phone call with his Pakistani counterpart Ishaq Dar, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi described Pakistan as an 'iron-clad friend', and reaffirmed support for its 'sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national independence.' In this background, it was likely futile to expect the China-led SCO to condemn Pakistan for its role in terror attacks on India. India should have also taken note of Iran's presence at the SCO meeting, considering Tehran is not happy with New Delhi's position on the Iran-Israel conflict. In June this year, India distanced itself from an SCO statement condemning Israel's 'aggressive actions against civilian targets [in Iran], including energy and transport infrastructure, which have resulted in civilian casualties, [and] are a gross violation of international law and the United Nations Charter.' India had communicated its concerns to Tehran and other SCO members but did not participate in the discussions or consent to the statement. Although Iran became a member of the SCO during India's Chairmanship in 2023, China's economic engagement in Chabahar and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) gives Beijing greater leverage with SCO members. Also read: PM Modi didn't skip SCO due to US influence. India has its own independent agenda An alternative to SCO India must now seriously reconsider its involvement in the SCO, where China's writ runs large, Russia's interests are protected, Pakistan's terror networks are never condemned, and India's legitimate interests and concerns are consistently ignored. Even when India was admitted to the SCO at Russia's insistence, China ensured that Pakistan joined simultaneously, serving as a counterweight to India. Founded in 1996, the Shanghai Five began as a forum for political and economic dialogue among select Eurasian countries, especially China and Russia. One could argue that China, uncomfortable being seen as a mere Asian power, expanded the SCO to include newly independent post-Soviet states to broaden its geopolitical reach. There is no denying that a new and resurgent Russia may want to regain its strategic footprints in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and other former Soviet territories. India and Russia could independently explore the creation of an alternative economic platform, comprising Central Asian countries, Afghanistan and Iran, with BIMSTEC and IBSA as observers, to tap into energy and mineral resources and a counter-terrorism network. Meanwhile, India should suspend border talks with China and demand political representation from Tibet, which remains under Chinese occupation. Given the Dalai Lama's recent statements that his successor will be chosen through traditional religious norms, China has no role in the spiritual or political future of Tibet. The Tibetan people, many of whom live in exile in India, cannot remain displaced indefinitely and must return to their cultural homeland. If China continues referring to Kashmir as 'India-controlled Kashmir,' there is no reason India should not assertively refer to Tibet as 'China-controlled Tibet.' Furthermore, if the conflict in Kashmir is described as a guerilla war since 1989, then the ongoing struggles in Balochistan and Xinjiang, which were forcibly annexed by Pakistan in 1948 and by China in 1949, can also be termed guerilla wars for liberation. There are also reports of a China-Pakistan tie-up to form a new South Asian regional bloc to replace SAARC. If that materialises, India must launch its own alternative to SCO, one that is more inclusive and economically credible, and offers genuine cooperation on terrorism. Seshadri Chari is the former editor of 'Organiser'. He tweets @seshadrichari. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
Qatar-Saudi boost to US proposal drives Israel-Hamas ceasefire, hostage talks to a breakthrough
The latest ceasefire proposal is a joint diplomatic effort by the US, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. While mediators from Qatar and Egypt are central to the talks, Hamas is expected to deliver its official response on the ceasefire deal soon read more Relatives and supporters of hostages held in Gaza since the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas protest for the release of all hostages outside the headquarters of the Likud Party, in Tel Aviv, Israel. Reuters As US President Donald Trump declared a breakthrough in Gaza ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas earlier this week, Qatar and Saudi Arabia worked behind the scenes to chart out the deal. The two Gulf countries have been wearing the mediator hat since the war began in 2023 and were behind the successful execution of the temporary truce in January. Now, as another ceasefire proposal gains momentum, focus is back on Qatar, Saudi and the US on how soon it can be implemented. It's a race against time as more and more people lose their lives in Gaza. Yesterday, at least 70 people died as a result of Israeli airstrikes in the Palestinian region. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The latest ceasefire proposal is a joint diplomatic effort by the US, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. While mediators from Qatar and Egypt are central to the talks, Hamas is expected to deliver its official response on the ceasefire deal soon. What would the truce entail? A Palestinian source familiar with the mediated negotiations told AFP that 'there are no fundamental changes in the new proposal' under discussion compared to previous terms presented by the United States. The source said that the new proposal 'includes a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release half of the living Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip, in exchange for Israel releasing a number of Palestinian prisoners and detainees'. Out of 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants in October 2023, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27, the Israeli military says, are dead. Hamas has also promised not to hold public hostage handover ceremonies, a major demand from Israel and the US after the events drew widespread condemnation from observers across the world. Hamas considers truce deal Hamas is reportedly satisfied with the plan's language, especially US guarantees about continued negotiations to end the war. It said that it was 'conducting national consultations to discuss' the proposals submitted in negotiations mediated by Qatar and Egypt. Trump on Tuesday urged Hamas to accept a 60-day ceasefire, saying that Israel had agreed to finalise such a deal. Hamas said in a statement that it was studying the latest proposals and aiming 'to reach an agreement that guarantees ending the aggression, achieving the withdrawal (of Israeli forces from Gaza) and urgently aiding our people in the Gaza Strip'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Netanyahu vows to uproot Hamas On the other hand, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to eradicate Hamas if talks fail. Israel has agreed to a partial withdrawal and increased humanitarian aid, but is not committing to a permanent end to the conflict. Netanyahu has come under strong pressure to get the hostages back after US President Donald Trump said Israel had agreed to a 60-day ceasefire with Palestinian militant group Hamas that could lead to their release. 'I feel a deep commitment, first and foremost, to ensure the return of all our abductees, all of them,' Netanyahu told inhabitants of the Nir Oz kibbutz, the community that saw the most hostages seized in the 2023 Hamas attacks that sparked the war. With inputs from agencies