Rare earths set to get up to ₹5,000 crore incentive scheme
nerals and derived magnets in the country and could be approved in a fortnight, a top government official said. "The priority is to start domestic-critical mineral production in the shortest time period," the official told ET.
The sops under the proposed scheme will be offered through a reverse auction process, the official said. The decision to offer incentives for rare earths comes after an internal ministerial review flagged the need for diversification in the wake of acute dependence on Chinese imports.
"Fresh steps are being taken to boost domestic availability of critical minerals," he said, adding that at least five large domestic companies had informally expressed keenness to produce these in consultations with the government.
China has a near monopoly of the world's supply of rare earth magnets and has curbs on exports. These critical minerals needed in the manufacture of rare earth magnets are crucial for making cars, electric vehicles (EVs) and the renewable energy infrastructure. Industry, particularly the automobile industry, has flagged the detrimental impact of the Chinese curbs and sought government intervention. Beijing in April made a special export licences mandatory for export of seven rare earth elements and related magnets.
India's EV and wind turbine makers are the largest demand centres for rare earth elements, cornering over half the entire 4010 metric tonne domestic demand in 2025. Overall demand is expected to more than double to 8220 metric tonnes by 2030.
Besides, the government is also planning an amendment to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act to support the critical mineral mission. Besides regulatory tweaks, the Centre is also expecting commercially viable domestic production of rare earth permanent magnets in small quantities later this year.
The ministry of science and technology had sanctioned funding for Midwest Advanced Materials Private Ltd, Hyderabad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Night shifts for women, new layoff rule: Labour department in Delhi gets fresh directions
In a significant measure, the Delhi government has directed the Labour Department to make necessary changes to allow women to work in night shifts, but only with their consent, officials said on Tuesday. The Labour Department has been asked to put in place all safeguards by amending the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act and issuing notifications under the Factories Act, said officials from Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena's office. Officials said that directions were also given to amend the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act to increase the threshold of minimum number of employees from one to 10 for the applicability of the Act and to allow shops and establishments to work 24/7. The government has also given directions to 'increase the threshold of workers from 100 to 200, in the Industrial Dispute Act, for seeking permission for closure.' Explaining this further, a senior official from the Labour department said, 'Currently, if any factory or a company wants to exit the business and do layoffs, they have to seek clearance from the departments concerned and the authority. But now, if a factory has 200 or fewer employees, they don't have to seek permission for the closure of the factory and layoffs. This has been done as part of the ease of doing business…' When asked about the move's likely impact on labourers, the official said, 'The labourers will have options to approach the labour court. At present, if the company wants to exit and they don't have the profit to pay the labourers in future, there is no point. So, this is part of the ease of doing business.' Responding to this, Krishna Yadav, General Secretary of Shramik Vikas Sanghatan, said, 'If the government is allowing a factory or industry to exit the business and do layoffs without seeking permission from any authority. There should also be an act to provide compensation to the workers because they are the ones who will be affected and end up losing jobs without any employee funds or benefits.' The government issued a slew of directions, including these in a high-level meeting held by the L-G, along with Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, to review the status and progress of various aspects related to the BJP government's flagship policies — 'Ease of Doing Business' and 'Maximum Governance – Minimum Government', enunciated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. At the meeting, the L-G also observed that 'restrictive and archaic laws, processes, and regulatory regimes had hampered and discouraged businesses and economic activities', his office underlined in a statement. 'It was underlined by the L-G and the CM that the progress during the last 11 years was far from satisfactory….,' The meeting was also attended by Delhi Home Minister Ashish Sood, Industries Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa, Chief Secretary Dharmendra, top police officers, and heads of all departments concerned. Meanwhile, the Fire department was asked to empanel agencies for a third-party audit. '… so that the large commercial establishments and industrial establishments are allowed to get NOC (no objection certificate) on the audit certificate of empanelled agencies. 'Small establishments may be given an option for a third-party audit. An expression of interest can be floated immediately,' said an official. The department was also asked to revisit its regulations in view of technological advancements and availability of small, drone-based and robotic firefighting equipment, which had made the existing regulations vis-à-vis the breadth of approach roads for access of fire tenders, redundant. Furthermore, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) has been directed to reduce the time to give 'consent to operate to 20 days, after which it should be a deemed approval'. It has also been directed to allow self-certification for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in both green and white industries and to empanel a third-party agency for certifications. Officials said that the IT Department will make a single window portal for all kinds of NOCs.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
What India is hoping for on US deal: Up to 20% tariff differential vis-a-vis China rate
AS THE India–US trade talks enter their final decisive phase in Washington DC, policy makers here hope that three implicit assumptions of New Delhi materialise, the most important being a steady differential between the US tariffs on China and India. Despite US President Donald Trump's vacillations on trade policy, the government is confident that the administration in Washington DC will maintain a differential of 10-20 per cent in tariffs between China and countries such as India. 'The deal needs to be clinched precisely for this gap to be maintained,' an official said. The official said the US is driving hard for market access in politically sensitive sectors such as agriculture and dairy, and there are strong red lines here. But a section of officials also reckon it is important to ensure a good differential between the US tariffs on India and China, for which a deal is vital. 'The question is whether the Indian negotiators would have to settle for a limited early- harvest type of deal, or would they have to turn away from the negotiations for now, let the July 9 deadline pass, and then rebuild efforts to bridge the gaps. A full-scale deal looks out of the question for now,' another official with experience of trade negotiations said. Second, there is now a realisation that cutting tariffs across segments, especially intermediate goods, might be a net positive for India. New Delhi did back out at the last minute from signing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (a trade deal among Asia-Pacific countries including China) given the sensitivities of agri livelihoods. But there is greater receptiveness now within India's policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, including automobiles, and some agri products of interest to the Americans such as apples, almonds, walnuts, avocados and spirits. There is also more openness on the GM (genetically modified) foods issue too. Also, India has headroom to import more from the US, especially in three sectors – crude, defence equipment and nuclear, to manage Trump's constant references to the trade gap. Third, there is a growing view that the baseline tariffs are here to stay. So, effectively, what India would be negotiating for is a rate between 10 per cent and 26 per cent. Prior to Trump's taking over in January, the effective US duty on India was just 4 per cent, and there were virtually no non-tariff barriers. What is more consequential today is the effective duty on Chinese products on a landed basis across US ports in commodity categories where Indian producers are reasonably competitive. The net tariff differential with India, and how that curve continues to move, is of particular interest here, given the belief that Washington DC would ensure a reasonable tariff differential between China and India. Officials said a 20 per cent differential is expected to tide over some of India's structural downsides — infrastructural bottlenecks, logistics woes, high interest cost, the cost of doing business, corruption, etc. On the face of it, Trump's announcement of 55 per cent tariffs on China on June 14 could theoretically mean a nearly 30 percentage point difference with respect to the 26 per cent on India. But there are a few caveats: for the Trump administration, whose tariff proposals generally have had a half life of less than 10 days, it is not clear how long the new tariffs announced on China after the latest round of talks between the two sides in London would last. Also, in the talks earlier in Geneva in May that led to a temporary truce, US tariffs on Chinese products were brought down to 30 per cent from 145 per cent and Beijing slashed levies on US imports to 10 per cent, while promising to lift barriers on critical mineral exports. While in a social media post, Trump claimed the US would impose tariffs on Chinese goods of 55 per cent, the catch here is that the figure included tariffs put in place during Trump's first term. So, while the 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods might seem to retain a reasonable differential over the tariffs imposed by the US on India, this figure of 55 per cent crucially, includes a 25 per cent pre-existing tariff that was imposed by Trump in his first term, and that the Biden administration persisted with. The remaining components of this 55 per cent tariff are the 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff and the 20 per cent tariff imposed initially by the Trump administration on China citing fentanyl trafficking. So, the real tariff calculation on China should ideally exclude the 25 per cent pre-existing tariff, which pretty much negates the impression of a big tariff difference with India; at least for now. The upside for India is that the trade deal under discussion with the US, which New Delhi is working to clinch before July 19, could see a further drop in tariffs from the current 26 per cent to closer to 10 per cent. The problem, though, is that China's leverage in its trade discussions with the US could mean a further downward revision in tariffs from the effective 30 per cent that was arrived upon at the Geneva talks. Though the details of the deal were still unclear, analysts predicted China seems to have gained the upper-hand after China's rare earth restrictions prompted US carmakers, including Ford Motor and Chrysler, to cut production. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
The US-China dispute over fentanyl drug & why Japan is caught in the crossfire
Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, is a major driver of the US opioid crisis, contributing to tens of thousands of overdose deaths annually. The US-China fentanyl conflict stems from allegations that Beijing insufficiently regulates exports of precursor chemicals for fentanyl, with US officials claiming Chinese firms knowingly sell these precursors to drug cartels. He emphasised that the issue will not 'impact Japan-US relations or trade talks'. New Delhi: Japan's Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya has dismissed a report linking Japan to trafficking of fentanyl to the US amid ongoing tensions between Beijing and Washington over the fentanyl crisis. A Japan-based news platform, Nikkei Asia, in a June report, raised concerns about Firsky KK, a company registered in the Japanese city of Nagoya, allegedly linked to a Chinese trafficking network. The report suggests that fentanyl precursors were likely shipped through this base to the US. However, at a press conference on 27 June, 2025, Takeshi Iwaya dismissed the Nikkei report's implications, stating, 'Japan will never tolerate the manufacture, sale, possession, use, or unauthorised import and export of illegal drugs, including synthetic drugs.' He added, 'At this stage, I do not think this will have any impact on Japan-US relations or talks.' Japan's Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato similarly denied any significant connection to fentanyl trafficking, stating, 'No fentanyl has been seized at Japan's borders in the 6 years through 2024.' Kato clarified that this includes both finished fentanyl and precursor chemicals. According to the Nikkei report, Firsky KK, registered by Chinese national Xia Fengzhi, was linked to Hubei Amarvel Biotech, a Wuhan-based chemical producer flagged by US authorities in 2023 and January 2025 for the production of fentanyl precursors. A New York federal court convicted two of Hubei's executives in January 2025 for conspiring to smuggle fentanyl precursors into the US. The indictment revealed that Hubei advertised and sold precursor chemicals, disguising shipments as legal products, such as dog food, nuts, or motor oil. Also read: Fentanyl precursors labelled as Vit C, shipped to US, then Mexico. Inside US indictment of 2 Surat firms US response On 26 June, US Ambassador to Japan George Glass posted on X, accusing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) of deliberately fueling the fentanyl crisis and emphasising the need for international cooperation to curb the trafficking of fentanyl and its precursor chemicals from China. The post suggested collaboration with Japan to halt the trans-shipment of these precursors to protect both nations. In response, Chinese Ambassador to Japan Wu Jianghao defended his country's stance Friday, stating that China maintains the world's 'strictest rules' and the 'largest number of controlled substances'. Wu questioned the US approach, asking, 'If the US cares about the fentanyl problem, why doesn't it formally regulate all fentanyl-like substances?' The Trump administration imposed a 20 percent tariff specifically to address the fentanyl crisis, alongside other tariffs, including a 125 percent reciprocal tariff and tariffs ranging from 7.5 percent to 100 percent on Chinese imports. The total tariff rate on China reached 145 percent in some cases due to retaliatory measures. On 2 April, Trump announced a 24 percent 'reciprocal' tariff on Japanese goods—paused for 90 days to allow negotiations—alongside a baseline 10 percent tariff and a 25 percent tariff on automobiles and other goods that have remained in place. Expressing his frustration at the difficulty of penetrating Japan's auto market, Trump said in a Fox Business interview aired Sunday, 'We give Japan no cars. They won't take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It's not fair. And I explained that to Japan, and they understood it. And we have a big deficit with Japan, and they understand that, too.' Japanese trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa has been making frequent trips to Washington, pushing for the removal of all tariffs, including on cars. After Trump's Friday interview, Akazawa posted on X early Monday (Tokyo time) that both sides had agreed to meet again, indicating it was time for more trade negotiations. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also read: Over 560 kg cocaine seized. What we know so far about one of Delhi police's biggest drug busts
