
Sweeping policy reset needed to reconnect with voters, senior Liberals say – as others call for lurch further right
As remaining MPs and party strategists begin to consider the scale of the loss under the outgoing opposition leader, Peter Dutton, most agree that a major policy and messaging reset is needed to return the party to its roots under its founder, Robert Menzies. But, in a sign of the fight to come, some leading Liberal figures are pushing for a move to the right, arguing that the party has not been conservative enough.
The senior moderate and former finance minister Simon Birmingham said on Sunday that the melding of liberal and conservative thinking within the party had been lost.
'The Liberal party has failed to learn lessons from the past and if it fails to do so in the face of this result then its future viability to govern will be questioned,' he said.
Birmingham used a lengthy reflection on the result to call for quotas for women in party preselection, saying they should be 'hard, fast and ambitious'. Liberals have resisted quotas for decades, while Labor has reached gender parity in its caucus since implementing them in 1994.
'The Liberal party is not seen as remotely liberal and the brand of conservatism projected is clearly perceived as too harsh and out of touch,' Birmingham said.
'A Liberal party fit for the future will need to reconnect with and represent liberal ideology, belief and thinking in a new and modern context.'
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Early discussions about the leadership took place in private on Sunday, even as a slew of seats remained too close to call. Most MPs contacted by Guardian Australia agreed that a root-and-branch policy review was needed, with some pointing to Dutton's plan for nuclear power and divisive rhetoric on Indigenous welcome to country ceremonies.
The New South Wales senator Dave Sharma said the Liberals had suffered a devastating loss due to a failure of strategy and campaign management.
'It is clear we failed to convince the public that we would be a better government, even if they had misgivings about Labor,' he said.
'A loss of this magnitude demands a serious set of reflections, reviews, and internal conversations about our policies and direction. That will take some time.
'The nation is best served by a strong opposition. We need to ensure the Liberals can provide this.'
Internal party polling put the Liberals ahead in a series of Labor-held seats in the final days of the campaign, including Werriwa, Whitlam and Gilmore in NSW. The results gave false hope to the Dutton camp, even as published polls showed Labor on track to win.
Some party figures blamed key strategists in the campaign, including the former minister turned Dutton adviser Jamie Briggs. Some Liberals said Dutton's efforts to promote party unity after the Coalition's 2022 election loss meant not enough policy fights had taken place.
Others said the Coalition had drawn the wrong lessons from the no vote in the voice to parliament referendum, believing it was a sign of a rightwards shift in the electorate.
The Liberal grandee and former Howard government minister Philip Ruddock said party MPs elected on Saturday were responsible for charting a course back to power.
'My father said the Liberal party always knows how to bake a bigger cake, and the Labor party only know how to cut it up,' he said.
'If you're looking at the way forward, you need to be very focused on how you're going to create wealth and opportunities. The Liberal party of the future has to be very focused on building a bigger economy, creating the opportunities, and then later deciding on how you might better apportion the gains.'
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
MPs said more checks and balances were needed to the new party leader's authority.
'We lost the trust of metropolitan voters and need to urgently work out how to get it back again,' said one MP, who was narrowly re-elected.
The re-elected NSW moderate Andrew Bragg said Australia was 'drifting' under Labor. 'It was the toughest night for the Liberals ever,' he said.
'The message from the electorate is clear. For the Liberal party, the road back starts with a deeper understanding of modern Australia.
'We must offer an ambitious economic agenda and a centrist, inclusive social vision. Reclaiming enterprise and the centre is not a departure from our values – it is a return to them.'
The former senator and party strategist Arthur Sinodinos said the Liberals needed to return to first principles and rebuild Howard's broad church.
'Grievance politics was not enough to win,' he wrote in an opinion piece for Guardian Australia. 'An opposition must have a clear and coherent plan that demonstrates they are ready to govern.
'Listening to our fellow Australians, grappling with the complexity of demographic and social change in a way consistent with Menzian values will succeed if we do the hard work.'
The former deputy prime minister and Nationals frontbencher Barnaby Joyce declined to say who should lead the Liberals. While the junior Coalition partner will have a stronger presence in the joint party room due to fewer Liberals winning their seats, Joyce said there was little room for celebration.
'It is a wake-up call. There is no winner in our loss but you can't turn yourself into another party. You have to do what you're meant to do better.'
The rightwing South Australian Liberal Alex Antic blamed policies which did not resonate with voters. 'Unfortunately, we've sent the troops into battle without ammunition,' he said.
Antic told Sky it was time to 'make the Liberal party great again', echoing Trump's campaign slogan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
12 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour is no longer the party of labour: the Rayner/Unite row proves it
It's hardly a throwback to the days when the General Secretary of the Transport and General Workers Union was one of the biggest beasts in the land, when the likes of Frank Cousins, Jack Jones and Ron Todd would speak and the Labour Party – and the country – would have to listen. But the message on Friday from Sharon Graham, general secretary of Unite, the successor to the TGWU, was intended as a shot across the bows of the Labour Party. First, and least significantly, it was suspending deputy prime minister Angela Rayner for 'bringing the union into disrepute', having had the audacity to support Labour-run Birmingham City Council in its seemingly never-ending dispute with bin men. Of more consequence was the union's vote at its annual conference to 'discuss our relationship with Labour' – a discussion in the same fashion as when the Kray brothers would discuss their relationship with other gangland bosses. Destroy, in other words. Severing the relationship between Labour and its union funders has been a perennial of politics for decades. Sometimes it's used as a threat, as now, by a union which feels it's not getting value for money from its creature. Other times, as in the heyday of New Labour, it comes from party thinkers as a demonstration of how Labour is no longer the creature of the unions. Labour has itself changed its relationship with the unions, most importantly when it introduced One Member, One Vote (OMOV) in 1993 under John Smith, which removed the union block vote in leadership elections and candidate selections and then by Ed Miliband abolishing the old electoral college in 2014, handing the leadership to Jeremy Corbyn. But while there has been no formal severing of the link between the unions and Labour, many individual unions have stopped affiliating to the party. Today there are just eleven which still affiliate: rail union ASLEF, general union Community, the Communication Workers Union, the Fire Brigades Union, general union the GMB, the Musicians Union, the National Union of Mineworkers, transport union TSSA, public sector union Unison, Unite and the shopworkers' union USDAW. For decades Labour was effectively bought and paid for by the unions, which were the party's only significant source of funding. That led to the old tensions when the party didn't act as its paymasters demanded. Things are very different today, with consequently different tensions. Labour's income in 2023 was £21.5 million, of which just £5.9 million came from unions. £14.5 million came from companies and individuals. That's a pattern. In 2020 and 2021 unions gave £6.9 million, in 2022 it was £5.3 million, while funding from businesses and individual donations have risen from £2.3 million in 2020 to £3 million in 2021, £7.6 million in 2022 and nearly £14 million in 2023. Of that £14m, £10m was from four individuals, Gary Lubner (£4.6 million), David Sainsbury (£3.1 million), Fran Perrin (£1 million – Perrin is David Sainsbury's daughter) and eco-activist Dale Vince' Ecotricity (£1m). In other words, two people gave Labour more money than all trade unions combined. This tells its own political story about how Labour is no longer the party of labour. The 2019 Conservative red wall success was built on this, just as the current support for Reform is in part based on voters who would once have seen Labour as their natural party. But instead of funding the party, unions have moved to individual MPs. In 2023 212 Labour MPs and received more than £2m in donations and support. And of those unions, Unite provided by far the most money, totalling £553,900 given to 86 MPs. So Labour MPs still need their union funding – as does the party itself. It may now be a fraction of the levels of old, but £5.9 million is a huge sum the party will not have if unions take their money elsewhere. Sharon Graham may not be Frank Cousins, but she has her own cards to play.


The Independent
12 hours ago
- The Independent
Labour must stand firm and resist trade union pressure
The government clashed twice with trade unions in the past week and demonstrated its independence from the movement from which the Labour Party arose but to which it must never be beholden. Activists attending the 'policy' conference of Unite, the trade union, voted to suspend Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, from membership of the union, because they blame her for failing to settle the Birmingham bins dispute. By seeking to use the leverage of a personal attack, they undermined their comrades' cause. Ms Rayner is a proud trade unionist who owes her start in politics to the success she made of her role as a Unison union representative of care workers. Her Unite membership was a paper one, and she says she had already given it up. She was rightly disdainful of Unite's pettiness and the Birmingham dispute is probably further from resolution as a result. If the case against the workforce changes in Birmingham is as strong as Sharon Graham, the general secretary of Unite, says it is, it should not need the attempted intimidation of government ministers to fight it. Meanwhile, Ms Rayner's cabinet colleague Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is engaged in a different disagreement with another trade union, and one of national significance. He settled the dispute with junior hospital doctors, now called resident doctors, when Labour took office last year. The doctors secured a bigger pay rise than other public sector employees. It was a generous deal, which The Independent criticised because it did not include any commitment on the part of doctors to more efficient ways of working. Doctors could look forward to several years of favourable treatment, by which their pay would continue to catch up after the real-terms decline of the Conservative years. Instead, the British Medical Association has balloted its members on strike action in pursuit of a 'non-negotiable' demand for a 29 per cent pay rise. In that ballot an overwhelming majority of those voting supported strikes, but the strike option still failed to secure the support of a majority of those entitled to vote. As a result, public opinion is opposed to the strikes, in contrast to last year's dispute when the doctors' case was supported. Alan Johnson, the former health secretary and a former union leader himself, tells The Independent: 'This has all the signs of the BMA leading their troops into a battle they can't win – nor should they, given that government has honoured the pay review recommendations in full having settled last year's dispute immediately on taking office.' Mr Johnson is right when he says: 'This is a battle Wes Streeting has to win.' The Independent is not anti-union, despite the circumstances of its birth in the 1980s, which was enabled by the breaking of the power of the print unions in the newspaper industry. We believe that unions have a valuable role in supporting and defending their members. We have our reservations about some of the measures in Ms Rayner's Employment Rights Bill, and think it was right to postpone implementation of some of the most contentious of them until at least 2027. But there is nothing wrong with unions seeking to influence that legislation and calling on the common bonds of history to persuade Labour ministers of their arguments. But in the end, ministers must decide. They can take account of representations made by trade unions, but they should not be bullied, either by personal gestures or by industrial action. Ms Rayner and Mr Streeting must stand firm.


The Independent
16 hours ago
- The Independent
Tensions escalate between Labour and major financial backer
Unite General Secretary Sharon Graham criticised Angela Rayner 's "utterly abhorrent" conduct regarding the Birmingham bin strike, accusing her of aiding "fire and rehire" tactics. Unite is considering ending its long affiliation with the Labour Party, with Graham stating the £1.5m annual payment is "hard to justify" and members voted to re-examine their relationship. Rayner's allies countered that she resigned from Unite in April and would not be "pushed around," with a Labour source adding Unite rejected a deal that would have undermined equal pay. Graham disputed Rayner's resignation timeline, suggesting she was still a member when seeking election funds and may have recently tried to leave the union. The bin strike began over Birmingham City Council's plan to remove waste recycling roles, potentially costing 170 workers up to £8,000 annually, with talks to resolve the dispute having broken down.