
An empowering tale of two grids
When British documentary director Arthur Jones returned to the Qinghe Power Plant in China's Liaoning province last year, he witnessed a transformation that exceeded his expectations from his last visit in 2021.
During that winter of 2021, while finishing his documentary about the plant, Jones made a promise: 'If this plant survives, I will return.' This simple pledge has now materialised into a new documentary that parallels the industrial transformations of China and the United Kingdom.
Return to Qinghe, a 30-minute Sino-British coproduction featured as a continuation of the stories from China on the Move Season 2, weaves together the story of Li Jia, a 29-year-old power plant employee in northeastern China, with Jones' own family history in Yorkshire. The documentary, produced by Jones, 52, explores how two communities, despite their geographical distance, share similar experiences in navigating energy transition challenges.
The project took shape when Li's lecture at a speech competition accounting the transformation of the power plant, My Appointment with Arthur Jones, reached both Jones and the documentary's Chinese director, Jin Dan. Li's account of the plant's progress towards clean energy drew Jones back to Qinghe.
'I've been interested in environmental issues since my teens,' says Jones, who has lived in China for over two decades. 'When we first filmed at Qinghe, the plant was facing bankruptcy. Coming back in 2024, we found not just survival but transformation as wind turbines now dot the landscape where coal operations once dominated.'
The parallel narratives emerged naturally from Jones' own background. 'I grew up in South Yorkshire, surrounded by coal mines and power plants,' he recalls. 'I was about 8 or 9 when the miners' strike happened in the 1980s. The contexts differ — China's transition is purely environmental, while Britain's was marked by political conflict — these parallel experiences deserve comparison, not for judgment but for understanding.'
The documentary delves into three generations of Li's family, from his grandfather's migration to Liaoning, his father's decades of service with the old energy system, to Li's own experience with the plant's clean energy transition. This generational narrative mirrors Jones' family history of migration from Scotland to England and Yorkshire's transformation.
'People often draw comparisons between different regions, but the shared experiences really matter as they help us recognise we're not entirely different,' Jones reflects.
The human dimension of industrial transformation comes alive through unexpected encounters, according to Jones. During filming in Yorkshire, the director and his mother visited Paul, an old acquaintance and former dance teacher.
'Though not a miner himself, most of his students came from mining families,' Jones shares. 'He broke down while recalling the strike's final day, when workers returned to the pits, knowing it marked the beginning of the end for British coal mining. He even sang folk songs from that era. It was a deeply moving afternoon.'
In Qinghe, the transformation carries its own emotional weight. While acknowledging the environmental toll of coal operations like blackened buildings and polluted air, the workers take deep pride in their profession.
'These workers maintain an incredible sense of unity and have tackled challenges collectively,' Jones observes. 'They take pride in the power plant's resurrection and express genuine love for their town.
'The speed of transformation over three years has been remarkable,' Jones notes. 'Looking at the landscape now, with traditional energy facilities surrounded by wind turbines like flowers, it's hard to tell whether you're in Britain or China. This visual similarity tells a universal story of industrial evolution.'
'We deliberately chose personal narratives over broad policy discussions,' Jin explains. 'Major transitions ultimately come down to individual choices and experiences. These authentic personal stories often resonate more deeply.'
The documentary, which premiered on Shanghai-based Dragon TV, is available in both English and Chinese, with Jones providing Chinese narration for the first time.
The episode follows up on stories from an earlier series about China's ecological governance. Future projects will explore ecological preservation at Poyang Lake in Jiangxi province and Hainan province's gibbon conservation, maintaining the dual-perspective approach to connecting environmental challenges across continents.
'We're in a middle ground,' Jones says. 'These aren't simple black-and-white situations. Our responsibility as documentarians is to faithfully record these transitions, showing how different communities face similar challenges, and how they find their way forward.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
US attacks on Iran redraw calculus of use of force for allies and rivals around globe
For US allies and rivals around the world, Donald Trump's strikes on Iran have redrawn the calculus of the White House's readiness to use force in the kind of direct interventions that the president said he would make a thing of the past under his isolationist 'America First' foreign policy. From Russia and China to Europe and across the global south, the president's decision to launch the largest strategic bombing strike in US history indicates a White House that is ready to employ force abroad – but reluctantly and under the extremely temperamental and unpredictable leadership of the president. 'Trump being able to act and being willing to act when he saw an opportunity will definitely give [Vladimir] Putin pause,' said Fiona Hill, a former Trump national security adviser and one of the principal authors of the UK's strategic defence review. While Trump has pulled back from his earlier warnings about potential regime change in Iran, going from tweeting 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' to 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' within 72 hours, he has nonetheless reinforced Russian perceptions of the United States as an unpredictable and aggressive rival that will not unilaterally abandon its ability to use force abroad. 'It has some pretty dire warnings for Putin himself about what could happen at a time of weakness,' Hill said. 'It will just convince Putin even more that no matter what the intent of a US president, the capability to destroy is something that has to be taken seriously.' It also shows a shift in the calculus in Washington DC, where hawks – along with Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu – were able to convince Trump that launching a strike on Iran was preferable to pursuing negotiations that had not yet failed. That could have knock-on effects for the war in Ukraine, where Republicans and foreign policy hardliners have grown more vocal about Putin's attacks on cities and the need for a tougher sanctions strategy. Although he hasn't changed his policy on resuming military support to Ukraine, Trump is publicly more exasperated with Putin. When Putin offered Trump to mediate between Israel and Iran, Trump said he responded: 'No, I don't need help with Iran. I need help with you.' In the immediate term, however, the strikes on Iran are unlikely to have an impact on Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I don't see it as having a big impact on the Ukraine war, because although Iran was very helpful at the beginning stages in providing Russia with [Shahed] drones, Russia has now started manufacturing their own version and have actually souped them up,' said Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, during a roundtable discussion. More broadly, Trump's attacks could undermine a growing 'axis of resistance' including Russia and China, given the pair's reluctance to come to Iran's aid beyond issuing strong condemnations of the attacks during security discussions under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) being held in China this week. 'It also shows that Russia is not a very valuable friend, because they're not really lifting a finger to help their allies in Iran and returning all the help that they've received,' Boot added. The strike could also have implications for China, which has escalated military pressure around Taiwan in recent months and has been holding 'dress rehearsals' for a forced reunification despite US support for the island, according to testimony from Adm Samuel Paparo, the commander of US Indo-Pacific Command. Trump had promised a tough line on China, and many of his top advisers are either China hawks or believe that the US military should reposition its forces and focus from Europe and the Middle East to Asia in order to manage China as a 'pacing threat'. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Yet his previous hesitancy to use US force abroad could have emboldened Beijing to believe that the US would not come to the direct aid of Taiwan if a military conflict would break out – the one wild card in what would otherwise probably be a lopsided conflict between China and Taiwan. Experts cautioned that the stakes were far different, and the conflicts too far removed, to draw direct conclusions about Trump's readiness to intervene if a conflict broke out between China and Taiwan. Trump's administration appears further embroiled in Middle East diplomacy than it wanted and its pivot to focus on China has been delayed as well. And while some close to the military say the strikes have regained credibility lost after some recent setbacks, including the withdrawal from Afghanistan, others have said that it won't send the same message for military planners in Moscow or Beijing. 'We shouldn't conflate willingness to use force in a very low risk situation with deterring other types of conflicts or using force when it's going to be incredibly costly – which is what it would be if we were to come to the defence of Taiwan,' said Dr Stacie Pettyjohn of the Center for a New American Security during an episode of the Defense & Aerospace Air Power podcast. Around the world, US rivals may use the strikes to reinforce the image of the US as an aggressive power that prefers to use force rather than negotiate – a message that may break through with countries already exhausted with a temperamental White House. 'The fact that it all happened so fast, there wasn't much multilateral involvement or chance for diplomacy, I think, is something Russians can point to as an indication of, you know, imperialism to the global south,' said Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, a fellow in the Center on the United States and Europe at Brookings during a conference call. 'But also in their talking points to United States and western allies, they will definitely make a point of highlighting this as something great powers do, and in a way that normalizes Russia's language on its own [conflicts].


The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
World Health Organisation admits they STILL have no idea what caused Covid pandemic – but refuses to rule out lab leak
A LEADING theory that the Covid pandemic originated from a lab leak in China cannot be ruled out, the World Health Organisation said. A team of experts set up by the WHO in 2021 to investigate Covid's origins said 'all hypotheses remain on the table' - while also accusing Beijing of not giving up critical information. 7 7 7 The Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (Sago) said on Friday that most data suggests the idea that the virus jumped from animals to humans. This is the same conclusion the WHO came to in 2021. Watch the documentary in full on our YouTube channel here Their new report made the bombshell claim that a lab leak theory should "not be ruled out". But they added: "Nor can it be proven until more information is provided." Group chair Marietjie Venter said after three years of investigating, they were unable to come to a certain conclusion of the pandemic's origins. They blasted China for not releasing all necessary data to determine Covid's creation - despite hundreds of requests for genetic sequences and biosecurity information to the government. She Venter: "Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded. "It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science." Venter said the 27-member group could not reach a unanimous conclusion on Covid's origins, following one member's resignation earlier this week. Three other scientists also asked for their names to be removed from the new report. I was in Oval Office with Trump at start of pandemic - no one was closer to Chinese officials than me & I believe Covid was engineered in lab Covid-19 emerged just eight miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Scientists there had been importing and manipulating bat coronaviruses and had been filmed handling animals with inadequate protection. Venter added that there was no evidence proving Covid was created in a lab, nor was there any indication it was spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China. She said: "Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive." Beijing has consistently refused to release full details about the lab in Wuhan, despite repeated requests for information from multiple countries. 7 7 7 It comes after The Sun's explosive Covid lab leak documentary laid bare the mounting evidence and disturbing questions surrounding the virus's emergence in Wuhan - home to China's most secretive bio-research facility. In April, the US unveiled a bombshell new web page on the origins of Covid, blaming the Wuhan Institute of Virology for unleashing the killer virus. And in a fresh propaganda push, Beijing insisted "substantial evidence" showed Covid "might have emerged in the United States earlier than its officially-claimed timeline, and earlier than the outbreak in China". The document - titled Covid-19 Prevention, Control and Origins Tracing: China's Actions and Stance - was released via China's official Xinhua news agency. It unashamedly accused the US of "indifference and delayed actions" during the global Covid fight - and of scapegoating China to deflect from its own "mismanaged" response. It wrote: "The US has made China the primary scapegoat for its own mismanaged COVID-19 response." The report added that America was 'spreading misinformation' and wasted 'precious time China had secured for the global fight against the pandemic". It revived Beijing's long-standing claims that it shared information with the world in a "timely manner". The paper added: 'The US should not continue to 'pretend to be deaf and dumb', but should respond to the legitimate concerns of the international community.' In May Donald Trump banned all US funding for risky virus research in China and beyond, five years after Covid-19 upended the planet. The US President said in the Oval Office last month: 'I said that right from day one it leaked out — whether it was to the girlfriend or somebody else, [a] scientist walked outside to have lunch with the girlfriend or was together with a lot of people — but that's how it leaked out in my opinion." The Sun's investigation into the origins of Covid 'Smoking gun' docs show US scientists planned to make viruses in Wuhan with SAME features of Covid year before outbreak Pentagon was told SIX times that Covid was lab leak at start of pandemic – but buried the truth, ex-intel official says US government backed shock Wuhan lab plan to collect 500,000 viruses months before Covid… and KNEW it was dangerous Wuhan Covid 'lab leak' firm given $60m US taxpayer funding for MORE virus tests Covid was 'perfectly adapted' to infect humans when virus emerged in Wuhan which 'proves' lab leak Bombshell clues that 'prove' China hid Covid lab leak in 'cover up of the century worse than Watergate' Crumbling sewers, no PPE, & filthy cages – Inside 'chaotic & crowded' Wuhan labs which may have unleashed Covid Wuhan Covid 'lab leak' scientists were 'bitten by bats & sprayed with blood' China's OWN scientists discussed 'problems' with Wuhan lab days after Covid outbreak Secret memo shows how panicked China ordered labs to destroy Covid samples Wuhan lab chief 'ordered scientists not to talk about Covid origins ' in leaked email France 'warned Wuhan lab could be turned into a 'biological arsenal' by Chinese military four years before Covid 'leak'


The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Your Nike shoes are about to cost a whole lot more thanks to Donald Trump, company warns
Nike warned that tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump will cost the company about $1 billion as it looks to make 'surgical' price increases in the fall. The company is shifting production away from China, where Nike makes about 16 percent of the footwear it imports into the U.S., Chief Financial Officer Matthew Friend told investors Thursday. 'We will optimize our sourcing mix and allocate production differently across countries to mitigate the new cost headwind into the United States,' Friend said on the call. The sports giant appears to be unloading some of the burden of the tariffs onto customers. Last month Nike announced it was increasing prices for adult apparel and equipment by $2 to $10 from June 1. It forecast that footwear costing between $100 to $150 would rise by $5, while shoes costing above $150 would increase by $10. There were some exceptions — the price of children's products, Nike Air Force 1s or Jordan products would not rise. 'We regularly evaluate our business and make pricing adjustments as part of our seasonal planning,' Nike previously said in a statement, without mention of the tariffs. Nike also reported a quarterly profit of $211 million, or 14 cents per share. Revenue totaled $11.1 billion. Both edged out Wall Street projections. Nike, Adidas, Under Armour and Puma were among 76 companies that signed a letter in April addressed to Trump, asking for a footwear exemption from reciprocal tariffs. The letter warned tariffs would 'become a major impact at the cash register for every family.' The potential for higher prices from Trump's tariffs have raised alarms for families, notably those who already spend a good chunk of money on equipment needed to participate in sports. Trump and his Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said late Thursday that the U.S. and China have signed an agreement on trade, but provided no details. Elsewhere, Trump on Friday said he was suspending all trade talks with Canada — and making plans to force Americans to pay high import taxes on its goods — after the northern ally's finance department confirmed plans to collect a digital services tax.