Hawke's Bay to get 150 new social homes in community-led initiative
Today Bishop met with representatives from the Hawke's Bay Matariki Housing Leadership Group, who he said are 'taking the lead in the Hawke's Bay community-led delivery approach'.
'I endorsed the group's efforts to bring together many different parts of the community, alongside HUD, to deliver 150 social homes in the region. The Government is looking forward to working collaboratively with them to get these homes built.'
Bishop said to make the contracting process more efficient, the Government is delivering many of the 1500 social homes across New Zealand through strategic partnership agreements with community housing providers. Hawke's Bay's strategic partner Emerge Aotearoa Housing Trust is already committed to delivering 24 homes in the district.
'Our Government is committed to delivering social homes in the communities that need them most, alongside the organisations who know the communities best, using community housing providers who have a track record of delivery,' Bishop said.
Tukituki MP Catherine Wedd said there is a significant pipeline of housing being built in Flaxmere and it is good to see a mix of social housing and affordable homes for those wanting to purchase a home, too.
'It is certainly Flaxmere's time and I am excited to see it flourish,' she said.
'There is also an explosion of development happening with a supermarket, senior housing, other developments and now a pipeline of social housing.
'Flaxmere is an example of the progress we can make if we take a community-led delivery approach, and work with community organisations to understand the greatest need to achieve the best outcomes.'
Bishop also announced the priority locations for social housing delivery for the five strategic partners announced by the Government in April.
'These locations are Auckland, Tauranga, Hamilton, Porirua, Nelson/Tasman and Rotorua,' he said.
'They have been identified based on social housing need and emergency housing use in each area, along with housing market performance and CHP capacity and capability to deliver.
'I look forward to seeing construction of these social homes under way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Same-day election enrolments scrapped in electoral law overhaul
Same-day enrolment for elections is set to be scrapped, with the Government announcing legislation to overhaul electoral laws it says have become unsustainable. Previously, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said late enrolments, while well intentioned, were resource intensive and had placed too much strain on the system. Ballot boxes (file image). (Source: "The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," he said. ADVERTISEMENT "If we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections. The 20-day timeframe for a final result will likely already be challenging to achieve at the next election without changes." The Government has agreed to close enrolment before advance voting begins, with people needing to enrol or update their details by midnight on the Sunday before advance voting started on the Monday morning (in other words, 13 days before election day). The legislation set a requirement of 12 days advance voting at each election, and the changes would mean special vote processing could get underway sooner. Justice minister Paul Goldsmith says late enrolments, while well intentioned, are resource intensive and has placed too much strain on the system. (Source: The Electoral Amendment Bill contained some other changes, including the introduction of automatic enrolment updates so the Electoral Commission could update a person's address directly following a data match. The process would not be used for new enrolments, to allow for Māori to choose whether to enrol on the general roll or Māori roll when they first enrolled. Postal requirements for enrolment would be removed, to acknowledge the decline of postal services. ADVERTISEMENT Free food, drink or entertainment within 100m of a voting place would be made an offence, punishable with a fine of $10,000. "There has been some confusion in the past around what is and isn't treating. This will make the rules crystal clear," Goldsmith said. The ban on prisoner voting, which the Government had already announced, would also be included in the bill. In addition, the donation threshold for reporting the names of donors would be adjusted from $5000 to $6000 to account for inflation.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: Political interference in commodity prices is never a good look
Trump-like economic interventions such as tariffs will eventually end badly for domestic consumers. Bruce Eliott, St Heliers. NCEA concerns The recent Government briefing highlighting significant concerns about the credibility of NCEA is yet another damning indictment of our education system. However, just as disturbing is Erica Stanford's comment about the confusion among parents about how NCEA works and that 'parents struggle to guide their children on the right pathways'. Taking a quick look at some of the subjects' explanatory notes on the NCEA website, one is confronted with what amounts to a word salad that would confound a lawyer. No wonder parents are confused. This should not be the case. Students and parents should be able to understand what is going on with their children's education. This would ensure parents have consistent lines of communication with teachers and are aware of their child's progress, challenges and needs. Parents and teachers need to work together to achieve this. A strong partnership between both parties benefits everyone but this will not be achieved if parents don't know what is going on. Bernard Walker, Mt Maunganui. Auckland's troubles Your correspondent Gary Hollis (letters, July 24) sees a glimmer of hope from Chris Luxon and Simeon Brown as Auckland MPs, regarding the preservation of what's left of Auckland's once-pristine suburbs. Unfortunately, the destruction of these suburbs is being driven by their colleague Chris Bishop (from Lower Hutt), and Luxon and Brown, together with the Government's other Auckland MPs, have been noticeably silent about it. Perhaps it is time they stood up for Auckland and restrained him? John Burns, Mt Eden. Transgender sport How very sensible that the Government has told Sport NZ to abandon its transgender guidelines even for community sport. Where males identifying as females competed in female sports, this not only compromised fair competition, but was at times very dangerous. Fair and equal competition in New Zealand must always be the accepted benchmark. Dr Hylton Le Grice, Remuera.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Signs of a brewing building crisis cannot be ignored
OneRoof reported this week that building inspectors are warning they are seeing more low-quality and non-compliant work. More than a third of residential new builds in greater Auckland failed their final inspection in the year to May. The OneRoof investigation also found fears about 'cowboy' builders, consent-free granny flats becoming future 'slums', a string of apartment projects failures and home owners' lives ruined by defective dwellings. It comes amid an ambitious Government reform programme aiming to make building easier and more affordable. Changes include removing the building consent requirement for dwellings up to 70sq m, allowing 'trusted professionals' to sign off their own work, axing 'overly rigid' insulation rules and making it easier to use thousands of foreign building products. The cowboys are also in the reform crosshairs, with plans for stronger disciplinary powers, new waterproofing licences and an improved complaints process. The Government will review liability rules for bad builds that have often left ratepayers footing the bill, penalties for practitioners responsible for poor workmanship and company rules that enable directors to shut up one failed shop and start over with barely a trace. Building sector leaders emphasise that the vast majority of practitioners in New Zealand are skilled, trustworthy and unfairly tarred by a few shoddy brushes. That's of little comfort, however, for people whose lives have been ruined by a tricky tradie or dodgy development. Tens of thousands of Kiwis embark on new builds each year. They deserve a trustworthy system that arms them with the information they need to protect their biggest asset, and the confidence that if something goes wrong, those responsible will be held to account. Like moisture trapped in a wall, the scale of a construction disaster may not initially be outwardly obvious, but could lead to an enormous fallout. New Zealand is still recovering from the financial, emotional and reputational devastation of the leaky homes saga. Signs suggesting issues of similar scale could be developing again must be addressed before the rot sets in. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
