Man kidnapped by Argentina's military regime as baby is reunited with relatives
The man, 49, whose identity was not disclosed for privacy reasons, was identified after he took a DNA test.
He is the 140th child found by the group Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, who campaign for their relatives who were murdered and disappeared during political repression and state-sponsored violence in Argentina between 1976 and 1983.
The man is the son of Graciela Alicia Romero and Raul Eugenio Metz, both kidnapped by the military on 16 December 1976 in Cutral Có, a city in Province of Neuquén, and disappeared. Romero was five months pregnant when a taskforce of army personnel raided the home where the couple lived with their one-year-old daughter. Romero was killed after she gave birth.
After the 1976 coup, Argentina's military set about crushing potential opposition and eventually 30,000 people were killed or disappeared, almost all of them civilians. Pregnant prisoners were kept alive until they gave birth and then murdered. At least 500 newborns were taken from their parents while in captivity and given to military couples to raise as their own.
The man, who has not been named, was reunited with his sister, Adriana Metz, who was just a year-and-a-half old when their parents were abducted. Metz, now a member of the Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo's executive committee, was raised by her grandparents and never stopped hoping that her brother might still be alive. Their grandmother died in 1992 without having met her grandson.
During a press conference in Buenos Aires, Metz said that during her first conversation with her brother, she learned that he had been raised as an only child. She celebrated their reunion as the beginning of a new chapter for their family.
'From here on out, everything is a gain for the Metz-Romero family,' she said.
'Thank you to the Grandmothers for teaching us that this search is a collective one, and that we must continue on behalf of the 300 grandchildren who are still missing,' Metz said.
'With the restitution of grandchild 140, we confirm once again that our grandchildren are among us – and that thanks to the perseverance and tireless work of 47 years of struggle, more will continue to appear. This fight cannot be carried out in solitude,' said Estela de Carlotto, 94, president of the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo.
According to the group, there are still hundreds of people aged between 45 and 49 years old who could be anywhere in the world and who have no idea they were kidnapped as children.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
By 1983, hundreds of these 'adoptions' were coming to light. But it was not until 2021 that large-scale efforts were made to trace the children, when the Argentinian government sent hundreds of DNA testing kits to its consulates around the world in an effort to put names to unidentified victims and to find the children of the disappeared, many of whom are unaware of their true identity.
However, that changed in 2023, when the far-right president Javier Milei took office in Argentina, with human rights groups raising the alarm over his attempts to rewrite history and overturn the longstanding consensus over the dictatorship's crimes.
In May, a delegation from the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo met EU officials in Brussels to seek support for expanded DNA testing to identify missing children and denounce efforts by Milei to dismantle the search for missing people.
Since he took power, Milei has ordered the closure of the special investigation unit of the National Commission for the Right to Identity; defunded the national genetic data bank; dissolved the survey and analysis team of the armed forces archives; and restricted access to official documentation at the ministries of defence and security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Sheikh Hasina authorised deadly Bangladesh crackdown, leaked audio suggests
A deadly crackdown on student-led protests in Bangladesh last year was authorised by then prime minister Sheikh Hasina, according to audio of one of her phone calls verified by BBC the audio, which was leaked online in March, Hasina says she authorised her security forces to "use lethal weapons" against protesters and that "wherever they find [them], they will shoot".Prosecutors in Bangladesh plan to use the recording as crucial evidence against Hasina, who is being tried in absentia at a special tribunal for crimes against to 1,400 people died in last summer's unrest, according to UN investigators. Hasina, who fled to India, and her party reject all charges against her. A spokesperson for her Awami League party denied the tape showed any "unlawful intention" of "disproportionate response". The leaked audio of Hasina's conversation with an unidentified senior government official is the most significant evidence yet that she gave direct authorisation to shoot anti-government protesters, tens of thousands of whom had taken to the streets by last protests began against civil service job quotas for relatives of those who fought in the 1971 war of independence and escalated into a mass movement that ousted Hasina, who had been in power for 15 years. It the worst violence Bangladesh had seen since the 1971 of the bloodiest scenes occurred on 5 August, the day Hasina fled by helicopter before crowds stormed her residence in Dhaka. The BBC World Service investigation established previously unreported details about a police massacre of protesters in the capital - including a much higher death toll. Hasina was at her residence in Dhaka, known as the Ganabhaban, for the duration of the call which took place on 18 July, a source with knowledge of the leaked audio told the was a crucial moment in the demonstrations. Security officials were responding to public outrage at police killings of protesters captured on video and shared across social media. In the days following the call, military-grade rifles were deployed and used across Dhaka, according to police documents seen by the recording the BBC examined is one of numerous calls involving Sheikh Hasina that were made by the National Telecommunications Monitoring Centre (NTMC), a Bangladeshi government body responsible for monitoring audio of the call was leaked in early March this year - it's unclear by whom. Since the protests, numerous clips of Hasina's calls have appeared online, many of them leaked 18 July recording was voice matched by the Criminal Investigation Department in the Bangladesh Police with known audio of Sheikh Hasina's BBC conducted its own independent verification by sharing the recording with audio forensics experts Earshot, who found no evidence the speech had been edited or manipulated and said it was highly unlikely to have been synthetically said the leaked recording was likely to have been taken in a room with the phone call played back on a speaker, due to the presence of distinctive telephonic frequencies and background sounds. Earshot identified Electric Network Frequency (ENF) throughout the recording, a frequency that's often present in audio recordings due to interference between a recording device and mains-powered equipment, an indicator that the audio has not been also analysed Sheikh Hasina's speech – the rhythm, intonation and breath sounds - and identified consistent noise floor levels, finding no evidence of synthetic artefacts in the audio."The recordings are critical for establishing her role, they are clear and have been properly authenticated, and are supported by other evidence," British international human rights barrister Toby Cadman told the BBC. He is advising Bangladesh's International Criminal Tribunal (ICT), the court hearing cases against Hasina and Awami League spokesperson said: "We cannot confirm whether the tape recording referenced by the BBC is authentic." Alongside Sheikh Hasina, former government and police officials have been implicated in the killings of protesters. A total of 203 individuals have been indicted by the ICT, of whom 73 are in Eye analysed and verified hundreds of videos, images and documents detailing police attacks against demonstrators across 36 investigation found that in one incident on 5 August in Jatrabari, a busy Dhaka neighbourhood, at least 52 people were killed by police, making it one of the worst incidents of police violence in Bangladesh's history. Initial reports at the time suggested 30 dead in Jatrabari on that day. Outside the UK, watch on YouTube The BBC investigation uncovered new details about how the massacre started and eyewitness footage, CCTV and drone imagery, BBC Eye established that police opened fire indiscriminately on protesters immediately after army personnel, who were separating the police from the protesters, vacated the more than 30 minutes the police shot at fleeing protesters as they tried to escape down alleyways and on the highway, before the police officers sought shelter in a nearby army camp. At least six police officers were also killed as protesters retaliated hours later, setting fire to the Jatrabari police station.A spokesperson for the Bangladesh Police told the BBC that 60 police officers had been arrested for their role in the violence in July and August last year."There were regrettable incidents in which certain members of the then police force engaged in excessive use of force," said the spokesperson. "Bangladesh Police has launched thorough and impartial investigations." Sheikh Hasina's trial began last month. She has been charged with committing crimes against humanity, including issuing orders that led to mass killings and targeted violence against civilians, as well as incitement, conspiracy and failure to prevent mass has so far failed to comply with a Bangladeshi request for her extradition. It is unlikely that Hasina will return to the country for the trial, Mr Cadman Awami League maintains that its leaders are not liable for the force used against protesters."The Awami League categorically denies and rejects claims that some of its senior leaders, including the prime minister herself, were personally responsible for or directed the use of lethal force against crowds," a spokesperson for the party said."The decisions made by senior government officials were proportionate in nature, made in good faith and intended to minimise the loss of life."The party has rejected the findings of United Nations investigators, who said they had found reasonable grounds to believe the actions of Hasina and her government could amount to crimes against BBC approached the Bangladesh army for comment but did not receive a Hasina's fall, Bangladesh has been ruled by an interim government led by Nobel Prize winner Muhammad government is preparing for national elections. It's unclear if the Awami League will be allowed to contest the vote.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
UN passes climate change motion after Marshall Islands drops fossil fuels focus
GENEVA, July 8 (Reuters) - The U.N. Human Rights Council passed a motion on climate change and human rights on Tuesday after the Marshall Islands withdrew a divisive amendment that called on states to recommit to a phase-out of fossil fuels. The motion calling on countries "to contribute to the global efforts" against climate change passed by consensus and follows the council in 2021 recognising access to a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right. The original language of the motion had exposed divisions among the 47 members after the Marshall Islands, one of the countries most vulnerable to rising sea levels, made an amendment to the motion to mention exiting fossil fuels as agreed by states at the COP28 climate summit in December 2023. "My country - like many of our Pacific neighbours - places a high premium on collaboration, dialogue and consensus and we were willing to recognise this by withdrawing our amendment," Doreen Debrum, ambassador of the Marshall Islands to the U.N. in Geneva, told the council. Instead, the motion referred to "the imperative of defossilizing our economies" in a footnote - allowing the motion to pass without being put to a vote in which the outcome had not been certain. The council's decisions are not legally binding but help shape global standards. Oil producing countries including Saudi Arabia and voting member Kuwait had earlier voiced opposition to the phrasing in negotiations, according to three diplomats. Riyadh called instead for "multiple pathways" to reduce emissions. There was no immediate response to Reuters' requests for comment from Saudi Arabia's international media offices or the foreign ministry of Kuwait. Their diplomatic missions in Geneva did not immediately respond. Sébastien Duyck, human rights and climate campaign manager at the Center for International Environmental Law, said: "We deeply regret its (the council's) continued failure to explicitly call for an equitable phase-out of fossil fuels — the root cause of the crisis." The move comes as leaders on climate action, such as the European Union, face criticism from campaigners that they are scaling back policies even as they deal with the consequences of a blistering early summer heatwave. The U.S., which has withdrawn from climate action, opens new tab under President Donald Trump, did not participate formally in the vote after disengaging with the council this year.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Leaving ECHR ‘will stop judges making political decisions'
Britain should leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in order to stop judges making political decisions, a Tory grandee has said. Lord Lilley, a former Cabinet minister, said the 'vague' terms in which the ECHR was drafted had enabled courts to extend their reach into the political sphere and override parliamentary decisions. In a report for the Centre for Policy Studies, a think tank, he said the most 'egregious' example was the decision by the European Court of Human Rights to back claims that people should be able to seek redress and compensation if their governments failed to take sufficient measures to protect them from climate change. He said this extended the reach of the court to environmental matters, which did not feature in the ECHR at all. This was a consequence of treating the ECHR as a 'living instrument', which enabled the European Court of Human Rights to create new laws in areas never envisaged by original signatory states to the convention, he said. By giving courts power to interpret vague ECHR rights and override parliamentary decisions, the ECHR transferred law-making authority from elected representatives to unaccountable judges, said Lord Lilley. 'This unavoidably politicises judicial decisions and undermines the rule of law,' he added. He said he believed the option of leaving should be considered because there was no consensus or appetite for reform, noting that quitting the ECHR or some of its specific clauses had been considered by successive prime ministers, irrespective of party affiliations. Despite having written the ECHR into British law in the form of the Human Rights Act, Sir Tony Blair asked John Reid, his then home secretary, to consider 'withdrawing from specific clauses' if they led to court rulings that put community safety at risk. 'During his campaign for Tory leader, David Cameron raised the possibility of leaving the ECHR entirely – possibly temporarily – to provoke a renegotiation that, if successful, would enable Britain to rejoin,' said Lord Lilley. ' Theresa May, as home secretary, faced major problems in deporting suspected terrorists and advocated leaving the ECHR.' Lord Lilley said the UK's withdrawal from the convention would not damage its international reputation or weaken its influence. 'The claim that the UK would become a 'pariah' if we leave the ECHR is a baseless nonsense. No one suggests that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are pariah states, even though they rely on parliamentary sovereignty, common law and domestic courts to maintain their freedoms,' he said. 'On the contrary, they are respected as epitomes of freedom. We would be in the same position as them.' He said countries would be unlikely to refuse to co-operate with the UK in tackling cross border crime or people smuggling if it quit the ECHR. 'The EU currently works on these issues with states who are not members of the ECHR or any equivalent international treaty covering human rights. It is inconceivable that the EU would spurn such mutually beneficial co-operation with us if we left the ECHR,' he said. He argued that it would also give the UK greater freedom to reduce the number successfully claiming asylum or refugee status and increase the number of illegal migrants or foreign criminals who could be deported. 'Undermining respect for rule of law' Home Office data show the proportion of asylum claims resulting in positive approval at first instance in the UK had risen from 25 per cent in 2010 to 67 per cent in 2023. Although this was partly explained by the higher proportion of applicants from countries like Afghanistan and Iran, 'it may also reflect the increasingly generous interpretation of human rights legislation in the UK which has been incorporated in guidance to officials', said Lord Lilley. By the end of last year, 42,000 asylum seekers were awaiting the outcome of their appeals, of which around 40 per cent specifically cited human rights. 'This has given rise to suggestions that human rights claims are being made almost automatically in the hope of striking lucky or to delay the process,' said Lord Lilley. 'It is not the fault of judges themselves, but the role imposed on them by the convention to make inherently political decisions, that is politicising our courts and undermining respect for the rule of law itself. I instinctively prefer reform, but that is inconceivable unless Britain is prepared to withdraw until meaningful change is agreed,' he said. 'Leaving would simply mean the UK joining other respected democracies like Australia and Canada that successfully protect human rights through parliamentary accountability without depending on an international court.'
