Man who pleaded guilty to electoral fraud worked for Healy-Rae company, Fine Gael senator claims
Senator Michael Kennelly said: 'We had voter impersonation at a Kenmare polling station at the local and European elections in June 2024 caught on CCTV.'
Raising the issue in the Upper House, he referred to the case in Kenmare District Court earlier this month.
'A Cahersiveen man pleaded guilty but avoided a conviction for election fraud after he used a polling card not in his name that went missing from a vehicle.
READ MORE
'It is even more extraordinary to learn, as every dog and divil in Kerry knows, that the defendant works for the Healy-Rae Plant Hire company.'
Using Seanad privilege, the Listowel Senator said the defendant was 'cited in court as a farmer and a contractor, but his employer, the Healy-Rae firm, was unusually not identified, even though he has worked for it for years'.
Mr Kennelly said he had called for a 'thorough investigation into the facts of the incident', adding that 'we still need clarity as to how this was quietly hushed up'.
He said the issue 'has made a mockery of our democracy'.
Mr Kennelly added: 'There have been no answers as to how this man got the polling card before he drove 40 miles (64km) from his home to vote in another town. 'He did not acquire it himself, the court was told, so who exactly gave it to him?'
Offering further information, he said: 'This guy was not even asked for identification. To say we are running proper registration on voting day is wrong. We do not know how many of these cases exist.'
The Healy-Rae Plant Hire company is owned by the family of Independent TD Danny Healy-Rae. Contacted for comment, Mr Healy-Rae said: 'I have no comment.'
Mr Healy-Rae is brother of Minister of State for Agriculture, Michael Healy-Rae.
Mr Kennelly, a Senator on the Labour panel, also highlighted another case in Kerry in 2019. A decision is still pending from the Director of Public Prosecutions in relation to that case.
He said: 'This case centres on allegations that, ahead of the May 2019 local elections, a Garda officer, in the Killarney electoral area, stamped hundreds of supplementary voter registration forms without the applicants being physically present, which is a legal requirement.
'An Garda Síochána launched a formal investigation led by a superintendent from outside Kerry and a file was prepared. As of April 2024, GSOC forwarded a file to the DPP, with a decision still pending. This is over six years ago. When will we see this case brought to a conclusion?'
He added that every 'fraudulent vote cancels out the voice of a lawful voter'. He pointed out that he won a seat in the 2014 Listowel local elections by two votes.
Mr Kennelly called on Minister of State for Local Government, Christopher O'Sullivan, 'to clean up the whole voting process, to review the cases I have mentioned and to make sure that everything possible is done to eradicate this kind of behaviour'.
Mr O'Sullivan said he could not comment on individual cases but he agreed 'fraudulent behaviour in the voting process strikes at the core of democracy'.
He added that he does not think it happens widely, but stated: 'Where it is blatant and obvious and someone has been caught red-handed, I agree there should be serious consequences'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
11 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Sinn Féin wants 111 changes to Bill reforming ‘triple lock' Irish troop deployment
The Government is set to square off with Opposition parties over proposed amendments to its plan to reform the 'triple lock' mechanism for deploying Irish troops overseas. Public sessions were held by the Oireachtas defence committee as part of pre-legislative scrutiny of the Government's plan to remove the need for United Nations Security Council approval of Irish peacekeeping missions with more than 12 troops. The Government contends countries like Russia have the power, under the UN Security Council motion requirement, to veto Ireland's participation in missions. The defence committee must publish a report on the proposal before it is sent back to the Dáil and Seanad for further consideration. A draft report has been circulated and amendments have been proposed by Opposition parties. READ MORE Sinn Féin has submitted 111 amendments to the Bill. The committee is due to meet in private this week to discuss its recommendations and conclusions, which have not yet been agreed. While the committee is chaired by Sinn Féin's Rose Conway-Walsh , Government TDs and Senators have a majority of the membership. Sinn Féin's defence spokesman, Cork South Central TD Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire , is seeking to insert a recommendation that the Government must drop the sectionthat would remove the UN mandate requirement. Currently the UN mandate, Government approval and a Dáil vote make up a triumvirate of pre-deployment sanctions that have come to be known as the triple lock. [ The triple lock - a guardrail of neutrality, or an abandonment of sovereignty? Opens in new window ] The Bill, as proposed by Government, envisages just Government and Dáil approval would be needed in future. The vast majority of the evidence heard by the committee during the pre-legislative scrutiny stage relates to this aspect, which is by far the most contentious part of the Bill. The draft report outlines that the committee heard Ireland 'appears to be in a unique position globally' in explicitly requiring a UN mandate for the overseas deployment of military personnel as part of an international force. It outlines that some witnesses and contributors - and a majority of public submissions received - 'were clear in their view that neutrality is a key consideration which is central to the proposed legislation'. Sinn Féin is further arguing that the proposed legislation should be modified to recommend the convening of a citizens assembly to consider potential wording for a constitutional provision outlining and protecting Ireland's neutrality. The party wants a referendum to be held thereafter to 'definitively enshrine neutrality in the Constitution'. The Labour Party has also sought changes, including in connection with its concern that each overseas mission could end up being litigated to ensure it is consistent with UN Charter principles. It wants to an amendment calling on the Minister for Defence to publish details about how the new arrangements will work. It also wants safeguards against the dispatch of the Defence Forces in circumstances where it could give rise to liability for the crime of aggression before the International Criminal Court. The party also wants a change to the Bill to the effect that the triple lock would only be lifted if a proposed mission was denied UN Security Council approval due to a veto from a permanent member. It is asking for specific circumstances to be set out in the legislation where troops might be deployed under the new system and seeks for troops to remain under Irish command.
Irish Examiner
41 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Former Clare hurler Niall Gilligan 'lost it' and hit boy, 12, 'multiple times' with stick, court told
Former All-Star and Clare All-Ireland winning hurler, Niall Gilligan 'lost it' when he hit a then 12-year-old child 'multiple times' with a stick, according to counsel for the State, Sarah Jane Comerford BL. Ms Comerford told a jury at Ennis Circuit Court on Monday that Mr Gilligan 'lost control' on October 5, 2023, when he punished the boy for the damage being caused at the time to his Jamaica Inn hostel property in Sixmilebridge. Ms Comerford was making her closing speech in the case where Mr Gilligan, aged 48 of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge, denies the assault causing harm with a stick of the boy at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5, 2023. Defence closing speech In his own closing speech, counsel for Mr Gilligan, Patrick Whyms BL said in no way is Mr Gilligan trying to suggest that he was entitled to punish the boy as was suggested and said that the injuries sustained by the boy 'are clearly regrettable'. Mr Whyms said that on the evening at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Mr Gilligan 'didn't know that he was dealing with a child and did not create this situation'. He said that Mr Gilligan "was at the end of his tether" by the vandalism being done to a vacant property he was trying to sell. Putting forward the defence of reasonable force against the charge of assault causing harm, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan was at the Jamaica Inn hostel on the night of October 5 'in the dark and believed that he was under siege'. He said: 'Believing himself under threat and needing to protect himself and his property, Niall Gilligan needs to make an instant decision and so we are here." Mr Whyms, instructed by solicitor, Daragh Hassett, said: 'And Mr Gilligan, a family man who has young children and no previous convictions gives a clear story which hasn't changed and an entirely credible, fulsome account of what happened." 'Did Niall Gilligan use such force as was reasonable in the circumstances as he believed them to be and if he did then no offence was committed.' In his prepared statement at Shannon Garda Station in February 2024 on the alleged assault, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan 'has given a perfectly plausible account in an otherwise impeccably accurate description of what occurred which placed the boys inside the building when he met them'. On the medical evidence, Mr Whyms said: 'Nobody wants to see a child being injured and it would be much better if that didn't happen and the boy was injured in this case. There doesn't seem to be much room for argument that he was injured from the actions of Niall Gilligan. Mr Whyms said that a displaced fracture of a finger on the boy's left hand 'is the only fracture in this case'. He said 'There was mention of dislocated shoulders, broken tibias and broken wrists all over the evidence but none of those things happened." 'There is an undisplaced fracture of a finger - that is not a good thing to happen but that it is what happened. There were injuries and these were sustained in the incident but by and large, most were cleared up in the week and the last one was pretty well cleared up in two weeks." Mr Whyms said that the injuries 'don't look nice on the photographs - there is no getting away from that and injuries that are photographed immediately after don't look nice'. Prosecution closing speech Earlier in her closing speech Ms Comerford, instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey, told the jury: 'This is a story of a man who lost his cool.' She said: 'Instead of picking up the boy after he slipped and bringing him out to his car and driving him home and telling his parents, he hit him and lost it and he was angry and frustrated.' Ms Comerford said that the alleged assault in broad daylight 'is the action of a man who took out his anger and frustration on a child. There is no evidence that his injuries were caused by anything other than his interactions with Niall Gilligan.' She said that Niall Gilligan 'lost control and punished the boy for the damage and inconvenience caused to his property on a morning when he had to clean up human faeces and urine from his property'. Ms Comerford said that the evidence of the then 12-year-old boy and his friend 'is credible and can be relied upon to the high standard beyond reasonable doubt'. She said that the boy 'of course he knew that it's not okay to explore a building without permission, to let off fire extinguishers, to remove keys so he would have access to the building again, but he was a 12-year-old child and he was exploring and knew that others had been there before'. Ms Comerford said that the boy "thought Niall Gilligan would threaten him with a stick. He didn't think he was actually going to hit him, but he did and he kept hitting him'. She told the jury: 'I would suggest to you that the boy was shocked and in disbelief that this could happen - that a grown man would hit a child and not once and not a clip around the ear and a kick up the backside followed by a drive home to tell his parents to say what the child had been up to.' Ms Comerford said that the boy knew that Mr Gilligan 'was a big strong man who he never thought would viciously assault him. You will recall him saying 'he was so big and I was so little' and Mr Gilligan was so big and the boy was so little.' Highlighting the medical evidence, Ms Comerford said that the first medical report stated: 'Head injury, loss of consciousness, bowel incontinence, right shoulder injury query, right posterior elbow wound? left hand and wrist injury, left tibia wound exposure and maybe fracture.' She said: 'In the later reports, there is a reference to an x-ray to his tibia and fibula which was suggestive of a non-displaced fracture and ultimately it doesn't appear that this was a fracture." Ms Comerford said that 'it is understandable when you look at the photos why there may have been a query on fractures when you look at the level of bruising sustained by the body of the boy'. She said that the boy slipped outside the Jamaica Inn and was lying on his stomach 'and you can see clearly the marks on both buttocks, the wrist injury, the shoulder bruising, the arm injury and the bruising around the ribs and the gash to his shin bone when he was hit over and over again". She said: 'He lost consciousness for a while. He must have been hit multiple times in order to have sustained as many injuries as he did in the various locations you can see in the photos taken on the night and following day. 'The only evidence you have on how those injuries were caused is the boy's video statement who said that he was hit with a stick a number of times before he was knocked out. 'The reason why he knew he was knocked out is that he didn't remember that he was dragged and also had incontinence… He can be forgiven for thinking that he disclosed his shoulder when you see the extensive bruising all around his shoulder.' Ms Comerford described Ms Gilligan's prepared statement given to gardaí at Shannon Garda Station in February 2024 as 'a self-serving fabricated story to justify an encounter with a 12-year-old child'. She said that the account 'is purposefully vague' and 'I don't think you can believe anything that Niall Gilligan says about how he came to assault the young boy'. Ms Comerford said in his statement Mr Gilligan says he got 'entangled in the dark and they fell on top of each other'. She said: Mr Gilligan didn't fall and get entangled with the boy. He beat him there and he knew it. He lost control, he was angry and frustrated and he needed to cover all angles and that is why he said that to the gardaí. Ms Comerford told the jury that they should give greater weight to the evidence of the 12-year-old boy and his friend who allowed themselves to be subject to cross-examination from Mr Whyms on their evidence and 'withstood the cross-examination'. Ms Comerford said that due to the level of force used by Mr Gilligan in the assault, the defence of self-defence should not be available to him. At the conclusion of the closing speeches Judge Francis Comerford commenced his charge to the jury. Judge Comerford said that he will continue his charge to the jury on Tuesday. When Judge Comerford completes his charge, the jury will then commence their deliberations. Read More Former Clare hurler Niall Gilligan accused of repeatedly beating 12-year-old boy with stick
Irish Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Ex All-Star hurler accused of 'fabricated story' over alleged assault of boy, 12
Former All-Star and Clare All-Ireland winning hurler Niall Gilligan 'lost it' when he hit a then 12-year-old child 'multiple times' with a stick. That is according to counsel for the State, Sarah Jane Comerford BL, who told a jury at Ennis Circuit Court on Monday that Mr Gilligan 'lost control' on October 5, 2023 when he punished the boy for the damage being caused at the time to his Jamaica Inn hostel property in Sixmilebridge. Ms Comerford was making her closing speech in the case where Mr Gilligan, 48, of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge, denies the assault causing harm with a stick of the then 12-year-old at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5, 2023. In his own closing speech, counsel for Mr Gilligan, Patrick Whyms BL, said in no way is Mr Gilligan trying to suggest that he was entitled to punish the boy as was suggested and said that the injuries sustained by the boy 'are clearly regrettable'. Mr Whyms said that on the evening at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Mr Gilligan 'didn't know that he was dealing with a child and did not create this situation'. Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan "was at the end of his tether" by the vandalism being done to a vacant property he was trying to sell. Putting forward the defence of reasonable force against the charge of assault causing harm, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan was at the Jamaica Inn hostel on the night of October 5 'in the dark and believed that he was under siege'. He said: 'Believing himself under threat and needing to protect himself and his property, Niall Gilligan needs to make an instant decision and so we are here." Mr Whyms, instructed by solicitor, Daragh Hassett, said: 'And Mr Gilligan, a family man who has young children and no previous convictions, gives a clear story which has't changed and an entirely credible, fulsome account of what happened." Mr Whyms said to the jury: 'Did Niall Gilligan use such force as was reasonable in the circumstances as he believed them to be and if he did then no offence was committed.' In his prepared statement at Shannon Garda Station in February 2024 on the alleged assault, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan 'has given a perfectly plausible account in an otherwise impeccably accurate description of what occurred which placed the boys inside the building when he met them'. On the medical evidence, Mr Whyms said: 'Nobody wants to see a child being injured and it would be much better if that didn't happen and the boy was injured in this case." He said: 'There doesn't seem to be much room for argument that he was injured from the actions of Niall Gilligan.' Mr Whyms said that a displaced fracture of a finger on the boy's left hand 'is the only fracture in this case'. He said: 'There was mention of dislocated shoulders, broken tibias and broken wrists all over the evidence but none of those things happened." 'There is an un-displaced fracture of a finger - that is not a good thing to happen but that it is what happened' He said: 'There were injuries and there were sustained in the incident but by and large, most were cleared up in the week and the last one was pretty well cleared up in two weeks." Mr Whyms said that the injuries 'don't look nice on the photographs - there is no getting away from that and injuries that are photographed immediately after don't look nice'. Earlier in her closing speech, Ms Comerford, instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey, told the jury: 'This is a story of a man who lost his cool.' She said: 'Instead of picking up the boy after he slipped and bringing him out to his car and driving him home and telling his parents, he hit him and lost it and he was angry and frustrated.' Niall Gilligan in action during his career with Clare (Image: ©INPHO/Donall Farmer) Ms Comerford said that the alleged assault in broad daylight 'is the action of a man who took out his anger and frustration on a child. There is no evidence that his injuries were caused by anything other than his interactions with Niall Gilligan'. Ms Comerford said that Niall Gilligan 'lost control and punished the boy for the damage and inconvenience caused to his property on a morning when he had to clean up human faeces and urine from his property'. Ms Comerford said that the evidence of the then 12-year-old boy and his friend 'is credible and can be relied upon to the high standard beyond reasonable doubt'. Ms Comerford said that the then 12-year-old 'of course he knew that it not okay to explore a building without permission, to let off fire extinguishers, to remove keys so he would have access to the building again, but he was a 12-year-old child and he was exploring and knew that others had been there before'. Ms Comerford said that the boy "thought Niall Gilligan would threaten him with a stick. He didn't think he was actually going to hit him, but he did and he kept hitting him'. She told the jury: 'I would suggest to you that the boy was shocked and in disbelief that this could happen - that a grown man would hit a child and not once and not a clip around the ear and a kick up the backside followed by a drive home to tell his parents to say what the child had been up to.' Ms Comerford said that the boy knew that Mr Gilligan 'was a big strong man who he never thought would viciously assault him'. She said: 'You will recall him saying 'he was so big and I was so little' and Mr Gilligan was so big and the boy was so little.' Highlighting the medical evidence, Ms Comerford said that the first medical report stated: 'Head injury, loss of consciousness, bowel incontinence, right shoulder injury query, right posterior elbow wound? left hand and wrist injury, left tibia wound exposure and maybe fracture.' She said: 'In the later reports, there is a reference to an X-ray to his tibia and fibula which was suggestive of a non-displaced fracture and ultimately it doesn't appear that this was a fracture." Ms Comerford said that 'it is understandable when you look at the photos why there may have been a query on fractures when you look at the level of bruising sustained by the body of the boy'. She said that the boy slipped outside the Jamaica Inn and was lying on his stomach 'and you can see clearly the marks on both buttocks, the wrist injury, the shoulder bruising, the arm injury and the bruising around the ribs and the gash to his shin bone when he was hit over and over again". She said: 'He lost consciousness for a while. He must have been hit multiple times in order to have sustained as many injuries as he did in the various locations you can see in the photos taken on the night and following day.' She said: 'The only evidence you have on how those injuries were caused is the boy's video statement who said that he was hit with a stick a number of times before he was knocked out. 'The reason why he knew he was knocked out is that he didn't remember that he was dragged and also had incontinence… He can be forgiven for thinking that he dislocated his shoulder when you see the extensive bruising all around his shoulder.' Ms Comerford described Ms Gilligan's prepared statement given to Gardaí at Shannon Garda Station in February 2024 as 'a self-serving, fabricated story to justify an encounter with a 12-year-old child'. Ms Comerford said that the account 'is purposefully vague' and 'I don't think you can believe anything that Niall Gilligan says about how he came to assault the young boy'. Ms Comerford said in his statement Mr Gilligan says he got 'entangled in the dark and they fell on top of each other'. Ms Comerford said: 'Mr Gilligan didn't fall and get entangled with the boy. He beat him there and he knew it. He lost control, he was angry and frustrated and he needed to cover all angles and that is why he said that to the Gardaí.' Ms Comerford told the jury that they should give greater weight to the evidence of the 12-year-old boy and his friend, who allowed themselves to be subject to cross examination from Mr Whyms on their evidence and 'withstood the cross examination'. Ms Comerford said that due to the level of force used by Mr Gilligan in the assault, the defence of self-defence should not be available to him. At the conclusion of the closing speeches, Judge Francis Comerford commenced his charge to the jury. Judge Comerford said that he will continue his charge to the jury on Tuesday. When Judge Comerford completes his charge, the jury will then commence their deliberations. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
