Melbourne freight rail infrastructure: How Victoria's failed $6b pitch to Canberra put a new rail line in limbo
That year, the Victorian government lodged a $123.4 million funding submission to Canberra to begin to develop the Outer Metropolitan Ring, beginning with a standard-gauge rail connection from Beveridge to Werribee, connecting to a giant new freight terminal in Truganina.
The Victorian government argued that Canberra should bear the full cost of the project because the line would form part of the national rail network – traditionally a federal responsibility.
It sought to tie the enormous project to Inland Rail, a $31 billion, federally funded freight link between Melbourne and Brisbane, which is under construction.
Had the Commonwealth accepted Victoria's submission, the Inland Rail line would have been extended deep into Melbourne's industrial west, the correspondence reveals.
A new orbital rail line could then have been under construction today, snaking through some of the city's fastest growing suburbs, including Mickleham, Diggers Rest, Aintree, Rockbank and Manor Lakes.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese views construction plans at the Beveridge intermodal precinct. Credit: AAP
But the Albanese government ultimately baulked, anxious to rein in rising costs on Inland Rail.
It chose in 2023 to build Melbourne's Inland Rail terminal in Beveridge, 44 kilometres north of central Melbourne. The decision forced the Allan government to put its preferred terminal location, in Truganina, on ice indefinitely earlier this year.
Building the Truganina terminal would have cost up to $1.9 billion, but could have involved substantial private sector contributions, correspondence states.
Australian Rail Freight Alliance chief executive Reid Mather said the outcome was disappointing.
'The cheapest time to build is today. It won't get any cheaper,' he said.
Mather said the Truganina terminal was more expensive to build than the Beveridge terminal, but better located. The federal government would not get full value out of the enormous investment in Inland Rail until freight trains could reach Truganina, and that required building the Outer Metropolitan Ring, he said.
The terminal in Beveridge was remote from most industrial precincts so would do little to reduce truck traffic on city freeways, he said.
'To be able to pack down a 1.8-kilometre train that would be double-stacked and get it back to do its 24-hour cycle to Brisbane, the most efficient way for that to occur is to unload it as close to the port as possible,' Mather said.
'If we're going to unload trains at Beveridge, the dilemma is … are you going to truck those containers in and cause more congestion?
Rail Freight Alliance chief executive Reid Mather says Inland Rail needs a direct link to the Port of Melbourne via the western suburbs to fulfil its purpose. Credit: Alex Coppel
'None of these things are easy, but the only way you get double-stacked container trains in [to the Port of Melbourne] is to use the outer metro road corridor that has been gazetted for years.'
Melbourne's west is the biggest freight and logistics precinct in Australia, moving about 12 per cent of the nation's total freight, and 37 per cent of Victoria's, according to Port of Melbourne figures.
Confidential correspondence argued Beveridge was an inferior option to Truganina because it was remote from Melbourne's western suburban industrial heartland and its south-eastern population centres, it was a smaller site with less capacity to grow, and was more complex to build.
Victoria's submission proved ill-timed, and too costly. Ballooning costs led the Albanese government to review Inland Rail the year after Victoria lobbied Canberra to inject billions more into the project.
Loading
The 2023 review acknowledged that the Port of Melbourne and the freight and logistics industry unanimously favoured Truganina over Beveridge, but concluded that building a rail line via the Outer Metropolitan Ring 'is likely to be cost prohibitive and not needed for Inland Rail in the near or medium term'.
The Outer Metropolitan Ring is a planned 100-kilometre road and rail line running in an arc around Melbourne's northern and western periphery. The corridor was placed under a public acquisition overlay in 2010.
The Victorian and Commonwealth governments jointly invested $20 million in a preliminary business case for the project in 2021-22.
The business case is being kept secret. A freedom-of-information request was rejected due to cabinet confidentiality, but The Age understands the mega-project was costed at about $31 billion in 2021.
A spokesperson for federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the Albanese government remained supportive of building two terminals for Victoria, at Beveridge and Truganina.
Loading
'Beveridge is being developed first because it can be delivered more quickly and is necessary in order to service Inland Rail's double-stacked freight trains by 2027, while [Truganina] is anticipated to become the larger intermodal terminal over time,' the spokesperson said.
The Australian government has committed $1.72 billion towards the future development of the Outer Metropolitan Ring Rail and the Western Intermodal Freight Terminal in Truganina. Funding for the rail line is contingent on it being matched by Victoria.
Asked on Monday about revelations in The Age that government planners predicted the first road component of the OMR was needed by 2031, acting Premier Jaclyn Symes said the road was 'not a proposal that we're actively considering'.
'But as is appropriate, preserving land for a future decision is an appropriate course of action,' she said.
An Allan government spokesperson said the ring was a crucial future transport corridor, but did not answer questions on when it was scheduled to be built, given the state's failure to secure full federal funding for it.
Start the day with a summary of the day's most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
House-sitting saved me enough to buy my own home
I'm a 42-year-old divorced stand-up comic. This isn't a cry for help — I'm merely putting my life in context. I'm allergic to working in the corporate world despite an MBA and multiple burnouts to prove my eligibility as a capitalist stooge. And I'm also approaching one of the most vulnerable groups of people at risk of homelessness: single women over the age of 45. After my favourite uncle passed away in Pakistan, I was forced to confront the fragility of life and how I want to live; that I want to be of service while also being a creative. And lay down my roots, find my ground. At the time I was bouncing between sublets because I didn't want to rent a shoebox for $2,000 a month, nor live in a share house. It's bad enough doing stand-up comedy in my middle ages, let alone being part of a share-house gang. I don't like chore charts. Property ownership has always been a strange concept to me, but the older I get, the more I understand that without it, I'm at the mercy of others to not evict me. But there's the catch-22 of trying to save money while renting in the current market. A friend told me about a Victorian housing scheme where the government contributes up to 25 per cent of the property price for a share of the property — which you buy back over time. But first I'd need to qualify for this scheme and a bank loan. So my task became finding a meaningful, stable job, saving a deposit — and not living in a share house until I had bought my own place. In my previous life I was a market research consultant in the corporate sector. That was until I couldn't take the soul-crushing, profits-focused approach anymore. Then I tried surviving on an array of casual gigs: Urdu translator, mental health support provider, medical typist. Going back to a more stable role, I wanted to have an actual career that worked for me. Luckily, after a few months of job hunting I landed a social policy adviser role at a not-for-profit that I genuinely love. It's not as lucrative as my former corporate roles but it's fulfilling and it's sustainable. To avoid living in a share house as I waited to buy my own place, I turned to house-sitting. I'd previously forayed into this nomadic lifestyle when I'd quit a high paying corporate job to do my personal Eat Pray Love journey around Australia. This time, in Melbourne, I started with looking after a friend's three cats for a month. It was lovely until the fattest jumped on my bare back and dug it's claws in for grip.' Then I minded another friend's cat for a couple of weeks whose sweetness restored my faith in the feline race. And so it continued. I joined some house-sitting Facebook groups, which led to more gigs. Pretty soon I was going from house-sit to house-sit; cat to dog. My house-sits ranged from a week to several months. In between, I stayed with generous friends and was able to line up house-sits in a way that I didn't overstay my welcome with them. Most people upon finding out I house-sat for 18 months express awe, bordering on disbelief. No-one was more surprised than my family in Pakistan, where you have security guards to make sure no-one gets inside your house, while in Australia people freely give you their key. Over the 18 months I sampled a buffet of accommodation types and suburbs: from CBD flats to suburban homes. The collection of books and music were varied from place to place, as was the spice collection; some people don't even have salt while others have imported saffron. It helped me discover the kind of place I wanted to live in; the type of suburb that was right for me and the kitchen gadgets I could no longer live without (hello air fryer!). The main challenge was the lack of stability and not knowing where I'd live next. The memory foam pillow in a new home would take a couple of days to take note of my skull and I'd get used to the animals, only to repeat this cycle in a few weeks. Not to mention there are only so many wardrobe combinations of three pants and five tops that come with this lifestyle. Was it better than sharing? Having a place to myself was helpful as a creative introvert and it never got isolating because of the cute pets. Plus, house-sitting and a frugal lifestyle allowed me to save almost $60,000. Have you chosen a particular lifestyle as a way to save money or make life more affordable? We'd love to hear from you. Share with us here. When I qualified for the housing scheme, I started property hunting. After six weeks of crowded inspections, I viewed a sunny two-bedroom unit with a courtyard and decided this was it. Good location, good size, good price. I promptly sent my offer and fortunately the owner accepted. Now I've a job I love — that I would probably never have found had I not decided on this goal — and a property I'm stoked about. And thanks to saving on rent for 18 months, even after the deposit I have a healthy offset account that I hope will allow me to pay off my mortgage by retirement age, despite buying at 42. Would I house-sit again? Yes, but just on holidays and in the meantime, I'll get a cat — and a house-sitter when I go away. Amna Bakhtiar is a stand-up comic and writer from Pakistan living in Naarm/ can find her on Instagram.
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
Climate justice push turns to leaders after court loss
Political leadership is needed on climate change, experts say following the rejection of a landmark case in the Federal Court. On Tuesday, the court rejected the case led by Uncle Pabai Pabai and Uncle Paul Kabai, which argued the Commonwealth owed a duty of care to protect their Torres Strait homelands from the impacts of climate change. The uncles filed the landmark case against the government in the Federal Court in 2021, seeking orders from the court that would require the government to take steps to prevent harm to their communities, including cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. In handing down his decision, Federal Court Justice Wigney Michael accepted many of the key factual elements of the case, including the impacts of climate change on the islands. The case failed, Justice Wigney said, because negligence law does not allow compensation when it comes to government policy decisions. "That will remain the case unless and until the law in Australia changes, either by the incremental development or expansion of the common law by appellant courts or by the enactment of legislation," Justice Wigney said. "Until then, the only real avenue available to those in the position of the applicants and other Torres Strait Islanders, involves public advocacy and protest and ultimately recourse via the ballot box." La Trobe University anthropology lecturer Aidan Craney, whose work is focused on understanding social change in the Pacific Islands region, said the decision shows the need for political leadership on climate justice. Dr Craney said the government's reaction to the case could influence Australia's relationships in the Pacific. "How the Australian government responds to this decision may influence the levels of support it receives from the region," he said. "Current sentiment is broadly positive. However, dissent has come from respected sources, such as the Pacific Elders Voice." Uncle Pabai Pabai and Uncle Paul Kabai said they were shocked and heartbroken after the decision, but vowed to continue pushing to protect their islands. "I'm feeling very emotional," Uncle Pabai Pabai told AAP after the decision. "I wasn't thinking we'd lose this case ... I'm very heartbroken." Griffith University Law School professor Susan Harris Rimmer said the decision was indeed a heartbreaking outcome. She urged the federal government to pass human rights legislation that would allow for the right to a clean, healthy and safe environment. "The United Nations Human Rights Committee has already ruled that rights have been breached by Australia in relation to climate impacts in the Torres Strait," she said."Australia is running out of time for the kind of incremental advocacy and protest that Justice Wigney noted was the only current avenue for reform."
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Tibetans raise rights abuses as PM meets Chinese leader
Tibet's president in exile has cautioned Australia about appeasing China for economic gain as he warns about Beijing's repression stretching into Australia. Penpa Tsering has urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to use his trip to China, which coincides with his own to Australia, to call out Chinese human rights abuses, including in Tibet. Mr Albanese met Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Tuesday, where he said he discussed several issues but did not refer to human rights in his opening remarks or the subsequent press conference with Australian media. Mr Tsering said it was important human rights issues were raised as more than just a box-checking exercise at the start of meetings, as the Chinese government would brush off timid remarks knowing there would be no follow-through. He said most Tibetans in Australia were former political prisoners and needed to self-censor criticisms of China if they wanted to get a visa to go back to the autonomous region to visit family. "I would like to believe that Australia is concerned about human rights situations, religious freedoms in every part of the world because that's a value that Australians cherish as a democratic, free country," he told AAP. Human Rights Watch's Australia director Daniela Gavshon said vague statements by the prime minister minimised the seriousness of China's abuses. Mr Albanese said Australia would "disagree where we must" when asked about China's human rights record in Shanghai. "By glossing over human rights as a difference of opinion, the Australian government risks undermining the very system that was established to protect and promote people's rights all over the world," she told AAP. As Mr Albanese promotes greater trade between Australia and China during his trip, Mr Tsering encouraged Canberra to reverse course and give China less business. This would deprive it of the economic benefits it then uses to prop up the very military build-up and human rights abuses Canberra then criticises, he said. "People look for material benefit more than moral values, unfortunately," the president in exile said. "As long as you have business, economic development, everybody feels comfortable and they don't talk about human rights - everything goes under the carpet, that's very sad." Mr Tsering is using his week-long tour in Australia to meet with the Tibetan community rather than political meetings, but will return for a second trip in February on a more diplomatic mission. China tightly controls Tibet and has been widely accused of severe human rights violations including torture, arbitrary detention and forced labour. Mr Tsering said Tibet was autonomous in name only as Beijing cracks down on freedoms and suppresses local culture. A major point of contention is religious freedoms, with China demanding the authority to determine the next Dalai Lama, Tibetan Buddhism's spiritual leader. The Dalai Lama has just turned 90 and followers believe His Holiness is reincarnated upon his death and China should have no say in the religious process.
