
Nigel Farage's political personality disorder
So when Reform UK selected the Club as the venue for its agenda-seizing press conference today, the symbolism was clear. Nigel Farage was making the sarcophagus of a fallen political movement into the rostrum for his new one, dancing on a grave. Today he promised a political 'revolution' on the scale of that which buried the Liberals, led by an increasingly professional Reform vanguard (in a great show of media coordination, almost the entire contents of Farage's speech were briefed to the media over the last two days). But this project goes beyond even that which destroyed the Liberals: Farage is promising to destroy not only the Conservative party, but Labour as well.
Beneath the chandeliers of a colonnaded library, Farage had summoned the nation's media to witness the closest he's come to a programme for government. Indeed, as Farage claimed, Reform are already in government. Behind the podium, he was backed by a seated tableau of his newly elected local mayors and council leaders, the latter of which he boasted now control a combined budget of £10 billion.
But Farage promised the prize of central government is now his for the taking. Whether led by Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick (whose Ozempic-enabled health kick, tailored suits and dental work Farage speculated upon sneeringly), the Conservative party is finished. 'It's over. It is done.' And even should he shrug off his 'heavy domestic duties', Boris Johnson isn't coming to save it. Its connection to the nation is severed, Farage told us, the culmination of a terminal rot between leadership and base.
Farage has spent his political career stealing the Tories' lunch. But now, like an enterprising school bully, he has spied a new victim. He had much the same to say about the Labour party, which has 'no connection with working people' or 'with what we used to call working-class communities'. And despite appearances – the public-school bark and impeccably shiny shoes – Farage is keen to display his own credentials on this score.
His is the party of people whose alarms go off at five in the morning, he told us, the grafters and entrepreneurs. These people are the opposite of the present Cabinet, he said, none of whom have run successful businesses, despite their combined experience in the realm of 'international law'. He invited Keir Starmer to debate him head-to-head at a working men's club, though doubted the Prime Minister could stomach an afternoon of 'beers with the lads' and 'Channel 4 racing'.
This easy demotic, this dialect of 'fluent human', is classic Farage. We also had the standard reel of 'King and country', 'Britain has nothing to be ashamed of,' patriotism. What was new is his fighting this battle at a policy level, well beyond the broad gestures of his usual rhetorical style. Today, in a direct attack upon the Labour government, Farage promised to reverse the winter fuel cuts and to remove the two-child benefit cap, not because he tolerated a 'benefits culture', but to promote the growth of traditional families. (Farage pre-empted any criticism of his own record on family values, joking about his 'track record' in divorce and adultery.) And this wasn't all. He went on to introduce a slew of other economic policies: raising the personal income tax allowance to £20,000 and introducing a transferrable tax allowance for married couples.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
It's clear that he isn't really enjoying all this, all these sums. Nigel Farage doesn't like being bored, and perhaps no press conference he's ever given has involved so much arithmetic. Pressed on funding these promises, he snapped on a pair of reading glasses and scanned down a ledger of savings. Net zero – which he amorphously claimed was costing us £45 billion – would be scrapped, as would migrant hotels (the migrants in question would not be rehoused in tents as Andrea Jenkyns has suggested – they would be 'gone', Farage promised). DEI policies are also out (they were said to cost government £7 billion). There is a distinctly American attempt here to merge fiscal policy with the culture wars, which is striking but distinctly unserious.
And, of course, none of it adds up. Speaking on the Today programme this morning, Reform hype-man and ConservativeHome founder Tim Montgomerie admitted as much, and the IFS have since said Reform's income tax plan would cost up to £80 billion. But Farage can skate over the accusations about 'costings' that felled lesser politicians in the 2010s (when one questioner brought up the 'magic money tree', Farage simply grinned through the spotlight). Because, as ever with Farage, this conference was far more about projection than substance. 'Small-state, low tax, up-by-your-bootstraps' might serve as the motto not only of Reform UK, but its constituency, the provincial English petit-bourgeoisie. And for all his talk of 'workers' and 'working people', this is an appeal to a slightly more specific class, the same one first courted on the right by Margaret Thatcher.
I was sat next to one of its exemplary members. Joseph Boam, who at 22 years old is the deputy leader of the Reform administration of Leicestershire county council, has a 'working-class' background, and this press conference represented only his second ever visit to London. But this wasn't incompatible with his various business dealings: he has his own ice cream company and property portfolio, despite not yet owning his own home. In a perfect encapsulation of Thatcherite exile, his branch of Reform have been holding their meetings in an old Conservative club house.
It might sound strange to say, but no other British politician is as fashion-conscious as Nigel Farage. And so far his conversion to working-class champion has formed a strenuous theatrical exercise. Like a political Action Man, so far this year he has launched a variety of new outfits. We've had steelworker Nige (hard hat and protective glasses included). We've had farmer Farage, all Harris tweed and heavy Barbour. And we've had the working men's club compere (the purple trousers say it all). But for all his talk of circling the political horseshoe, this agenda of patriotic small-statism, of what Stuart Hall in 1979 called 'authoritarian populism', is not unfamiliar. So far he has moved too fast for these inconsistencies to clarify, hiding from proper scrutiny behind a blur of costume changes. But even he cannot combine book-keeper and sans-culotte forever.
[See also: Reform UK's taproom revolutionaries]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jess Phillips: Nigel Farage would enable ‘modern day Jimmy Saviles'
Jess Phillips has joined criticism of Reform UK's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act, suggesting such a move would empower 'modern-day Jimmy Saviles'. Ms Phillips, the Home Office minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, appeared to accuse Nigel Farage of being more concerned about 'clicks for his monetised social media accounts' than children's safety online. She backed her colleague Peter Kyle after his row with the Reform UK leader last week. The Technology Secretary said Mr Farage was putting himself on the side of 'extreme pornographers' and people like Savile by opposing the law. Under rules that came into effect on July 25 as part of the act, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Mr Farage has said the legislation threatens freedom of speech and open debate. Writing in The Times, Ms Phillips said: 'Farage said it's the biggest threat to freedom of speech in our lifetimes. 'My colleague Peter Kyle said he was siding with modern-day Jimmy Saviles preying on children online.' She said she would like to speak to Mr Farage about 'one of those modern-day Saviles, Alexander McCartney'. McCartney, who posed as a teenage girl to befriend young females from across the globe on Snapchat and other platforms before blackmailing them, 'just needed a computer' to reach his targets, Ms Phillips wrote. Believed to be one of the world's most prolific online offenders, McCartney abused at least 70 children online and drove one girl to suicide. Ms Phillips said the Online Safety Act exists to try to provide a 'basic minimum of protection, and make it harder for paedophiles to prey on children at will'. She said police have told her that paedophile networks use 'normal websites where their parents assume they're safe' to coerce and blackmail young people. 'Perhaps Nigel Farage doesn't worry about that — there's no political advantage in it, and no clicks for his monetised social media accounts. But I do. 'I worry about what it means now and what it will mean when boys reared on a diet of ultraviolent online child abuse are adult men having children of their own. I can't ignore that, neither can Peter Kyle, and, most importantly, nor can millions of parents across the country. 'I defy Nigel Farage to tell me what any of that has to do with free speech. 'I defy him to meet even one parent who has lost a daughter to suicide because she was being blackmailed online and tell them that is just the price of civil liberties. Maybe he'd feel differently after that kind of meeting, or maybe he wouldn't care.' Her comments echo those of Mr Kyle, who said last week: 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Mr Farage demanded an apology from the Technology Secretary, who refused to withdraw the remarks.


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Phillips hits out at Farage over children's safety online
Ms Phillips, the Home Office minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, appeared to accuse Nigel Farage of being more concerned about 'clicks for his monetised social media accounts' than children's safety online. She backed her colleague Peter Kyle after his row with the Reform UK leader last week. The Technology Secretary said Mr Farage was putting himself on the side of 'extreme pornographers' and people like Savile by opposing the law. Under rules that came into effect on July 25 as part of the act, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has been criticised (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Mr Farage has said the legislation threatens freedom of speech and open debate. Writing in The Times, Ms Phillips said: 'Farage said it's the biggest threat to freedom of speech in our lifetimes. 'My colleague Peter Kyle said he was siding with modern-day Jimmy Saviles preying on children online.' She said she would like to speak to Mr Farage about 'one of those modern-day Saviles, Alexander McCartney'. McCartney, who posed as a teenage girl to befriend young females from across the globe on Snapchat and other platforms before blackmailing them, 'just needed a computer' to reach his targets, Ms Phillips wrote. Believed to be one of the world's most prolific online offenders, McCartney abused at least 70 children online and drove one girl to suicide. Ms Phillips said the Online Safety Act exists to try to provide a 'basic minimum of protection, and make it harder for paedophiles to prey on children at will'. She said police have told her that paedophile networks use 'normal websites where their parents assume they're safe' to coerce and blackmail young people. 'Perhaps Nigel Farage doesn't worry about that — there's no political advantage in it, and no clicks for his monetised social media accounts. But I do. 'I worry about what it means now and what it will mean when boys reared on a diet of ultraviolent online child abuse are adult men having children of their own. I can't ignore that, neither can Peter Kyle, and, most importantly, nor can millions of parents across the country. 'I defy Nigel Farage to tell me what any of that has to do with free speech. 'I defy him to meet even one parent who has lost a daughter to suicide because she was being blackmailed online and tell them that is just the price of civil liberties. Maybe he'd feel differently after that kind of meeting, or maybe he wouldn't care.' Her comments echo those of Mr Kyle, who said last week: 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Mr Farage demanded an apology from the Technology Secretary, who refused to withdraw the remarks.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
More than fifty private schools shut since Labour put VAT on fees
More than 50 independent schools have closed or announced plans to shut since Labour imposed VAT on private school fees. Sector leaders said the policy was already driving out pupils and putting more schools at risk of collapse. At least 54 private schools — including top prep schools, sixth-form colleges and specialist provision for children with additional needs — have shut or announced plans to close since VAT was added to fees on January 1. Labour promised in its general election manifesto to introduce VAT on private school fees, a move the Treasury has described as a 'revenue-raising' measure. The mid-year policy change is expected to generate around £1.6 billion a year. Labour says the money will be used to support state education, including paying for 6,500 new teachers. • Labour's VAT plans blamed for fall in private school entries On average, approximately 50 mainstream private schools typically close each year for a range of reasons, including financial struggles and school standards issues. The government maintains that the policy is not causing significant disruption but fell short of providing data on how many pupils had left the independent sector. 'Ending tax breaks for private schools will raise £1.8 billion a year by 2029-30 to help fund public services, including supporting the 94 per cent of children in state schools to achieve and thrive,' a Department for Education spokesman said. • Parents and private schools lose High Court case against VAT on fees 'The number of children in independent schools has remained steady, while the most recent data shows the rate of families getting a place at their preferred secondary school is at its highest in almost ten years.' However, the latest school census figures suggest a sharper decline in private school numbers than expected. Latest government figures show that in January, there were 582,477 pupils in independent schools in England, down from 593,486 the previous year, a drop of 1.9 per cent or 11,009 pupils. It is the first fall in private school enrolment since the Covid-19 pandemic. While the number of independent schools still rose slightly over the same period, from 2,421 in January last year to 2,456 in January this year, the increase would likely have been higher were it not for the introduction of VAT on school fees, the drop in pupil numbers seen as the more significant pressure on the system. The government insists the drop in pupil numbers is to be expected, yet independent schools say the 20 per cent surcharge and business rates are pricing parents out. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said the number of pupils leaving independent education was 'already much higher than the government predicted' and warned that many schools were unlikely to survive the next few years. 'Anyone interested in this policy as a revenue raiser should be concerned by the number of pupils who have already left independent education, which is already much higher than the government predicted,' she said. According to the ISC, it is reasonable to assume that the majority of pupils who have left the independent sector have been absorbed into mainstream education. Robinson added: 'While there is a combination of factors contributing to school closures, for many the government's decision to tax education has proven a bridge too far. We are likely to see further closures over the coming months and years as the effects of VAT and other tax measures mount up.' Earlier this year, parents and private schools lost their legal battle against VAT on fees in the High Court. The judgment, passed in June, dismissed the joint case brought by three groups, which had argued that the policy discriminated against children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send), among others. For families of children with complex needs who depend on specialist provision at smaller schools — often with lower fees and tighter budgets — the ruling has heightened fears that financial pressure could force closures, displacing students without suitable alternatives. Independent schools support more than 100,000 children with Send, provision Robinson described as 'crucial in meeting capacity shortages and local need for specialist education'. She said that parents turned to independent schools after struggling with the 'time, cost and stress' of securing an education, health and care plan, a legal document that outlines specialist provisions for disabled children and those with additional needs. 'For some, VAT has meant that this is no longer an option and we remain concerned about children falling through the cracks as specialist schools are threatened or become out of the reach of the parents who have depended on them,' she said.