Nebraska's $11 billion budget for 2025-27 advances to final round with $1.1 million to spare
LINCOLN — Nebraska lawmakers gave second-round approval Monday to a series of budget bills for the next two years, moving one stage away from closing a projected deficit of more than half-a-billion dollars.
The mainline budget bills, Legislative Bills 261 and 264, dominated debate Monday with a handful of changes. Other budget bills to appropriate additional funds to agencies for this fiscal year (LB 260) and to appropriate salaries for state senators (LB 262) and constitutional officers (LB 263) advanced last week with little debate.
Also advancing Monday were LB 513, from State Sen. Carolyn Bosn of Lincoln, to give all judges in the state a 1.5% salary increase in each of the next two years, and LB 534, from State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, to cover about $2 million in legal claims against the state.
With no further amendments expected, lawmakers will vote one last time on the budget bills Thursday, the final day to pass the budget, and send them to Gov. Jim Pillen, according to a scheduling announcement by Speaker John Arch of La Vista. Lawmakers will have $1.1 million to spare.
However, using the one-time fixes in cash fund sweeps and borrowing from the state's 'rainy day fund' to close the budget gap for the next two-year budget mean that lawmakers for the following biennium would be at least $110 million in the hole, current projections indicate.
Pillen retains his veto pen, including for line items, which could change the final figures. It takes 30 votes to override a veto.
The narrow positive balance will make it difficult to pass other senator priority bills this year with a revenue impact or cost, such as to reduce the state's inheritance tax (LB 468), ban most tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products in the state (LB 316) or crack down on adversarial nations' 'agents' (LB 644).
State Sen. Rob Clements of Elmwood, chair of the Legislature's Appropriations Committee, confirmed the hundreds of millions of dollars moved to close the projected deficit through June 30, 2027 — in cash fund transfers, reduced spending and taking from the state's 'rainy day' fund — is the most he's seen in his ninth year on the committee.
He said appropriators shifted hundreds of millions of dollars in 2017, too, but had more time to respond, rather than this year's 'devastating' economic forecast that came in April.
'I'm pleased with the results of the budget,' Clements said after the debate. 'I'm glad that we have a balanced budget again.'
When lawmakers returned in January, they faced a projected $433 million shortfall for the next two years, a number that has since grown. Lawmakers have shifted funds or cut spending by $850 million to cover the deficit since it was identified last November.
A large part of the deficit, but not all, came because the state's economy, measured by per capita income, is doing well compared to other states. As a result, the federal government pulled back on the percentage of Medicaid costs it covers in Nebraska, passing on a cost of about $55 million this fiscal year and nearly $300 million next year.
Blame for the remaining deficit largely differs by political ideology in the Legislature, with conservatives blaming shaky economic forecasts and progressives, such as State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln, blaming 'inequitable, unaffordable tax cuts' passed in 2023.
By Jan. 1, 2027, Nebraska's income tax rate for corporations and for individuals making $18,000 or more will fall to 3.99%. At that point, there will be three individual tax tiers, rather than four.
Conrad blamed Pillen and his legislative allies for the tax cuts, stating the economic forecasts are not like a 'weather forecast' and that economic projections are lower 'not by fluke, not by accident, not by surprise, but by design.' She said 'chickens are coming home to roost.'
State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha, a member of the Appropriations Committee, alleged Clements and other committee members didn't do their work or properly vet all the proposals before the Legislature. Instead, she said, senators gave a 'rubber stamp' to many budget cuts and fund transfers that Pillen and his staff requested.
'We have cooked the books,' Cavanaugh said. 'This isn't real. This isn't real money.'
Echoing Cavanaugh, State Sen. Ashlei Spivey of Omaha, a freshman on the Appropriations Committee, cautioned that one budget-balancing measure — sweeping an estimated $24 million in unspent agency funds by this June 30 — also isn't reality. She said at least $7 million of those funds intended to be swept from the Nebraska Department of Education are already obligated and will be spent.
However, State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte told colleagues not to get 'too carried away' on what he termed as 'demagoguing' of 'the sky is falling.' He pointed to possibly rosier forecasts in the state's future that opponents rejected as natural wage growth.
Clements, too, has said lawmakers knew getting to 2027 would be a 'pinch point.'
'Let's focus on real numbers. Let's focus on the numbers we know,' Jacobson said.
Conrad, a former eight-year member of the Appropriations Committee, said she was 'intimately familiar' with the budget and told Jacobson and others she would 'not be mansplained by anybody in this body how the state budget works.'
State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair described what he viewed as a federal 'carrot becoming a stick' for state spending cuts and that lawmakers should be looking at 'tightening our belts as best we can.' He noted federal proposals in Congress to cut spending, particularly to Medicaid.
'It's not about tightening our belt, as it is, we might be having to lop off limbs in order to help pay for our budget,' Hansen said of the future.
Cavanaugh has suggested lawmakers might need to come back for a special session, which some Republicans rejected publicly but quietly acknowledged is possible. If state revenues don't bounce back, lawmakers who are set to adjourn in less than a month could be back sooner than next January.
After the budget bills pass, Pillen has set his sights on additional property tax relief that, with the final budget balance, would likely only come with increased sales or 'sin' tax revenue, such as through currently exempt goods or services, a proposal that failed to gain traction last summer.
Throughout Monday, the budget deficit fluctuated as lawmakers approved final cash transfers and additional spending. Lawmakers closed the last remaining gap by taking $5 million more from the state's 'rainy day' cash fund.
'It's the 'rainy day' fund, and folks, it's raining,' said State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue, who secured $3 million more for the Nebraska Supreme Court.
Holdcroft framed his proposal as investing in the Nebraska Supreme Court's 'core judicial services that are delivering results' and uplifting public safety, such as problem-solving courts and probation services that court officials said could be in jeopardy without additional funds.
Problem-solving courts are intensive court programs bringing individuals and families together with one-on-one interactions with judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys, law enforcement, court officials and more to help Nebraskans.
This includes Adult Drug and DUI Courts, Veterans Treatment Courts, Reentry Courts, Juvenile Drug Courts, Young Adult Courts, Mental Health Courts and Family Treatment Courts.
Each year, it costs the state about $4,400 per participant in problem-solving courts, Holdcroft said, compared to $41,000 for incarceration.
Clements and State Sen. Rob Dover of Norfolk said the courts had enough funds for the next year, citing the Legislative Fiscal Office, but that if the courts needed additional funds, officials could request more funding in January for the following fiscal year.
State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln, an attorney, said that even if that was true, the fiscal office doesn't make policy. He told senators to listen to county attorneys and others 'who are running around like their hair is on fire' to promote a 'need,' not a 'want.'
Holdcroft said he understood that all senators were looking for ways to close spending but that they needed to distinguish between 'cost savings' and 'cost shifting,' which he said would fall to county jails, emergency responders, the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and families or communities 'already under stress.'
If the programs were cut, Holdcroft said, the people who need the programs 'don't disappear.'
'They simply fall through the cracks into more expensive and less effective systems,' Holdcroft. 'If we let that happen, we are not saving the state money. We are making the problem worse and paying more for it down the line.'
State Sen. Bob Hallstrom of Syracuse also made a deal to take $8 million out of the state's Affordable Housing Trust Fund to preserve $4 million each in the Middle Income Workforce Housing Fund and the Rural Workforce Housing Fund.
Hallstrom said some projects in the workforce housing funds were put 'in limbo' with the pending cuts, echoing Dover that 'a house built today is much better than delaying the building of that house until a later time.'
'I will pledge to use whatever is at my disposal to try and avoid the ultimate transfer a couple years down the road from this fund,' Hallstrom said.
Conrad said lawmakers budget for two years, not one, and shouldn't 'backfill.'
Another major change, but not to the state's bottom line, came in Bosn earning support for $3 million in each of the next two years to support domestic violence services for survivors.
Bosn said the 'life-saving interventions' are required under state law but that it has been a 'critical funding failure' as a previous 'fix' fell short in actually getting dollars to survivors. She said federal funding in this area has also been cut.
'This amendment is about making sure survivors are not turned away,' Bosn said.
Conrad, in a tense exchange with Bosn, asked whether she voted for Trump and envisioned the cuts coming. Bosn said she did vote for Trump but didn't expect the cuts.
State Sen. Jason Prokop of Lincoln had brought similar legislation this year, LB 348, seeking to find a long-term fix for domestic violence services.
The solution fell on the Medicaid Managed Care Excess Profit Fund, a cash fund that collects excess Medicaid dollars for use in other areas, such as supporting new moms and babies.
However, that's the same fund that Clements and a majority of his committee targeted for $10 million to help rightsize the budget.
Taken together with Bosn's changes and others this session, fiscal estimates show the fund would be depleted next fiscal year for a variety of services.
In other changes to the state's main budget, State Sen. Wendy DeBoer of Omaha clarified that lawmakers could sweep only $4 million in unspent funds for work on broadband, rather than a planned $5 million transfer. Clements and State Sen. Mike Moser of Columbus, chair of the Legislature's Transportation and Telecommunications Committee, confirmed the situation.
DeBoer identified the error Monday morning after continuing to review a last-minute 'murder sheet' of additional cuts last week.
'If this was a road, I'd be all over it,' Moser said, praising DeBoer.
State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil restored $264,488 of a larger planned cut to Educational Service Units in a 42-0 vote. An earlier amendment from Murman that didn't specify where the funds would come from failed 17-26 before he refiled the amendment to use general funds.
Murman, chair of the Education Committee, said ESUs might have made up the cut by increasing property taxes.
Dover secured $1 million for the Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute at the University of Nebraska 'to support water and agricultural research and existing collaborative initiatives to implement best practices in water conservation.' A vote to preserve the funding in committee stalled 4-4, with Dover missing the vote for a doctor's appointment.
State Sen. Brad von Gillern of the Elkhorn area, chair of the Revenue Committee, said the state funding was critical in the public-private partnership to not 'run-off' private investors.
Clements said that NU could find the funding elsewhere as he noted its set to get more than $13 million more in the next biennium, which is less than the NU Board of Regents requested. NU President Jeffrey Gold has said tuition increases could be in the future.
Lawmakers rejected an amendment from Conrad, to restore $500,000 in a Nebraska State Patrol cash fund for equipment, and State Sen. Terrell McKinney of Omaha, to continue diverting at least $20 million in interest from the proposed new state prison and proposed Perkins County Canal to economic recovery.
McKinney said the previous deal was transferring interest for three years, not two, and that 'a deal is a deal and a deal should be honored.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Texas governor says Dems can't do ‘anything about' GOP plans
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) said Monday that Democrats cannot do 'anything about' Republican redistricting plans amid tension between the two parties over the plans. 'What is your response to Kathy Hochul, who says that 'We are at war over Texas and the redistricting push that's going on in Texas,'' Fox News's Sean Hannity asked Abbott on his show. 'That's a bunch of crazy bluster. Democrats are freaking out because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict, and we're going to do so in a way that's going to lead to these additional seats that will vote Republican, and they will be serving in Congress in the next session,' Abbott replied. 'And so Democrats are freaking out about it, engaging in rhetoric, but I don't think they have the capability of actually living up to it and doing anything about it. Texas will continue to fight for what is right, and that's exactly what we are doing,' he added. Texas Democrats on Sunday left their state to deny Republicans a legislative quorum as part of an effort to halt Republicans from redrawing Texas congressional maps. The action deprives the Texas state Legislature of the numbers required to operate, halting progress on the maps. Members of the Texas state House pledged to keep going with their fight against Republicans' efforts to redraw the congressional district map after Abbott ordered their arrests for leaving the state to deny the chamber quorum. On Sunday, Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said that his party is 'absolutely' well-positioned to fight back against Republican redistricting efforts.


Fox News
6 hours ago
- Fox News
'All-out war': Fleeing Texas Dems side with Newsom as redistricting standoff continues: 'fire with fire'
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he is ready to fight "fire with fire" as state Republican lawmakers try to enact redistricting in Texas, opposing the move though promising to pursue similar measures if needed. At a press conference on Monday, Newsom said he supports independent redistricting, as well as a national framework, and a proposal being advanced in the legislature reinforces what he supports. "The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established," the governor said. "Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire." When asked about a meeting between California Democrats on Sunday night, during which time they drafted or were almost done with the draft of redistricting maps, and whether he had seen those maps, Newsom said he had not. But he said there has been an ongoing series of conversations into the evening last night, which continued on Monday morning and will continue until Democrats land on a process. "That process has to have the concurrence, the support of two-thirds of the legislature," he said. "The maps, we believe, should be transparent. They should be provided in a transparent way to the public, and as a consequence, those maps are being processed and will be brought to light." At the end of the day, though, Newsom said the people of California will have the ultimate say. "We will offer them the opportunity to make judgments for themselves, again, only if Texas moves forward," Newsom said. "I'll reinforce that we believe it should be a national model, independent national redistricting, and it would revert back to its original form, but it's done in response to the existential realities that we're now facing. Things have changed, facts have changed, so we must change." "They've triggered this response and we're not going to roll over and we're going to fight fire with fire, but we're going to do so not just punching with the weight of the fourth largest economy, the most populous state in our union, the size of 21 state populations combined," he continued. "We also will punch above our weight in terms of the impact of what we're doing, and I think that should be absorbed by those in the Texas delegation. Whatever they are doing will be neutered here in the state of California, and they will pay that price." California GOP Chairwoman Corrin Rankin told Fox News Digital that Newsom's actions could threaten the constitutional rights of Californians while also setting a dangerous precedent. "While Governor Newsom frames this redistricting as a defensive move, it undermines California's nationally respected, voter-approved Citizens Redistricting Commission, and if successful, sets a dangerous precedent that voters' choices can be overruled whenever politicians find it politically convenient," Rankin said. "Our primary concern is safeguarding Californians' constitutional rights against partisan manipulation disguised as defending democracy; true democracy means empowering voters, not politicians, to decide representation." Dozens of Texas Democrats fled their state and went to Chicago and New York on Sunday night in an effort to block a redistricting vote on Monday. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has since threatened to arrest and expel the lawmakers if they do not return by Monday afternoon. Shortly after Abbott released his statement, the Texas House Democratic Caucus issued a simple response, writing: "Come and take it." The statement also described Republicans' proposed districts, which would potentially secure five new GOP U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, as a "racist mid-decade redistricting scheme." Abbott criticized the Democrats' dramatic departure, saying that "real Texans don't run from a fight." On Monday evening, Illinois lawmakers hosted Texas Democrats for a press conference, during which time none of the lawmakers took a single question from the press. Still, Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Ill., welcomed her colleagues and said they could stay as long as they wanted because they believed in what they were doing. "What you're doing and what…they're trying to do in Texas affects you guys, but it affects the whole country," she said. "When you want to remove five Democrats…that hurts us in the House." She explained that when there are not enough Democrats, things like the Big Beautiful Bill, or as she referred to it as "the Big Ugly Bill," and other Republican initiatives get through. "They are trying to destroy our democracy, destroy fairness in our country," Kelly said. "And unfortunately, they're starting with Texas. But we want you to know, we stand by your side." Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., accused Abbott of not stepping up for the people affected by devastating floods in the Hill Country region of Texas. Specifically, he accused Abbott of not having a special session to help families rebuild, but instead of doing "the bidding" of President Donald Trump to "banish Democrats" from the federal delegation. Krishnamoorthi then directed his comments to Abbott, saying, "don't mess with Texas," because the people standing with him represent Texas. "You can silence them. You can smear them. You can saddle them with debts and fins. But you cannot intimidate them," Krishnamoorthi said. "You can gerrymander the hell out of that map. Guess what? Two can play that game. That's right. Other states will do exactly the same thing and neutralize what you're trying to do in Texas." Other lawmakers standing side-by-side in Illinois chose to accuse Trump's policies of being race-driven. Texas State Rep. Ana-Maria Rodriguez Ramos said Trump's policies hurt working families. "That is nothing short of racism," she said. "He is coming after all of us who don't look like him and his Republican colleagues in the Texas House." Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, followed Rodriguez Ramos with more accusations of racism, saying Republicans are doing what Trump has insisted be done. "I want you to know that we didn't introduce the race card when this message was sent by and through the Justice Department to the State of Texas, to our attorney general," he said. "They mentioned the race card because they talked about racial gerrymandering. They brought it up, and when they brought it up, they did it, knowing that this was a buzz word. It was a trigger." "They know that that's a buzz word that people would respond to in Texas, but we are going to respond to that buzz word by telling them that your racism is not going to change democracy in the state of Texas," Green continued. "In the United States of America, racism is going to be met with our taking a stand for democracy. You take a stand for racism, we will stand for democracy, and we will win." Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, said she was pleased that states like California and New York were standing up for Texas Democrats because, once it happens in Texas, it will spread to other states. She called the issue a "national war," and "an all-out war" in which everything is on the table. "We come from a state of great pride, and I never thought as a Texan, as an elected member of the Texas House of Representatives and now as an elected member from Texas to the United States House of Representatives, that I would see the governor of the proud state of Texas bend a knee to a felon from New York," Johnson added. "I never thought I'd see the day, but here we are." Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, was also standing with fellow Democrats in Illinois and accused Abbott of talking "a lot of noise." She also accused Republicans of being "weak." "The difference is they expect Democrats to kind of be the nice guys that we are," Crockett said. "They expect us to take the punch and say thank you. Well, I am here to tell you not only are we going to punch back, but we about to beat you down." Still, Abbott told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday that Texas is doing what it is allowed to do by law. He also accused state Democrats of doing something "un-Texas" by turning their back on Texans and not dealing with the flooding issues still echoing across the state. Abbott said four of the five seats that could change because of redistricting will be primarily Hispanic. "These are seats where Democrats are having to come to grips with reality," he said, explaining that Democrats are losing votes to Hispanics and Black voters in Texas. He also said Democrats are "freaking out" because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict. "Texas will continue to fight for what is right," Abbott said.


Politico
9 hours ago
- Politico
Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests
A White House official told POLITICO Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the brewing battle, deferring to Texas Republicans. 'We made our case and now we're counting on them to get it done,' added the person, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss a matter being privately negotiated. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, captured her group's predicament in an interview. 'We really do not have a choice,' she said. 'What is our alternative? Rolling down and rolling over for Trump's economy to continue to destroy America?' The risks are big for Texas Democrats — from $500-a-day fines, to extradition, to the more unlikely scenario of Abbott replacing them with hand-picked legislators, to facing civil arrest for violating the Legislature's rules. They do not, however, face any civil or criminal charges and can only be forced back into the Capitol to take votes. It's unclear who would foot the bill for the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines members are collectively racking up by abstaining from the legislative session. There are also political risks. Texas Democrats are not just missing votes related to redistricting, but also on legislation that would provide relief following last month's devastating floods. 'No one is fooling around this time in Texas,' said Dave Carney, an adviser to Abbott. 'In the past, it was like, they came back. Everything was forgiven. It was like kumbaya. That's not happening. There's no appetite to say, 'Okay, never mind. We're going to let you do this anytime you fucking want.' Abbott also threatened to arrest Texas Democrats in 2021 when they used the same walkout tactics. If Abbott chooses to call multiple special sessions to pass the redrawn map that would net five GOP-friendly seats, lawmakers could run into time constraints: New lines must be adopted by early December in order to take effect for the 2026 midterm cycle. The Legislature could collide with filing deadlines for the midterms. Under state law, candidates can declare their intent to seek office from Nov. 8 through Dec. 8, but the state legislature has the authority to extend the deadline. Each side lacks good options to resolve the stalemate. Earlier in the day, appearing on the MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's show, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acknowledged the struggles ahead for Abbott and his fellow Republicans, saying his 'first move would have been to chain them to their desk and not let them out of the door,' before adding, 'I think the governor is going to be forced into calling several special sessions.'