BBOWT says government plan is threat to counties' nature
BBOWT says the government's plan for the Nature Restoration Fund, managed by Natural England, is an "attempt to cover its tracks" over potential nature damage."Our natural world underpins every element of our economy, and if we want long-term sustainable growth, we must invest in nature," Estelle Bailey, its chief executive, said."We know that a thriving economy depends on a thriving natural world, but Keir Starmer is bizarrely pushing a false choice between protecting nature and building homes. This is an unnecessary and divisive rhetoric – the two can and must be considered together."Labour has promised to build 1.5 million new homes in England over the next five years, with the pledge key to boosting economic growth.
Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said in February that there would be "no excuses" to not hit that target in England by 2029.The government spokesperson said: "We have inherited a failing system that has held up the building of homes and infrastructure, blocking economic growth but doing nothing for nature's recovery. Communities and the environment deserve better than this broken status-quo."Our Planning and Infrastructure Bill will deliver a win-win for the economy and nature – introducing the Nature Restoration Fund to unblock the building of much-needed homes and infrastructure, funding large scale environmental improvements across whole communities, and introducing robust protections so that our new approach can only be used where it will create positive outcomes for the environment."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Government and opposition alike must do much better
Out of the three parties that matter most, only one will be looking forward to autumn. When parliament packed up for the summer recess this time last year, the new Labour administration had a stonking majority, a sense of confidence and a clear plan of action. Twelve months on, morale has collapsed. Rarely have a government's fortunes declined so far, so fast. This is not the consequence of world events or the vagaries of the global economy: Sir Keir Starmer is to blame. He came into power with the stated aim of boosting the economy's performance to improve public services. But prioritising growth demanded a degree of discipline that he has signally failed to demonstrate. Although the government has chalked up a few achievements — for instance, in reforming the planning system — too often other considerations have taken precedence over growth. Workers' rights have been strengthened to the detriment of companies. Taxes on employers have been raised with the consequence that firms are hiring fewer people. Higher pay for public servants has contributed to the deterioration of public finances. The government's big effort to rein in spending centred on its planned reform of the welfare system, but Labour backbenchers rebelled against it. Instead of facing up to the rebels by making the issue a vote of confidence, the prime minister backed down. Predictably, this cave-in has encouraged further dissent. The prime minister's problem is that he is a conciliator rather than a leader. That is why he has proved to be an effective diplomat in his dealings with foreign leaders. With his low-key style, he has succeeded in improving Britain's relationship with Europe, in encouraging European leaders to co-operate over defence and in establishing a good working relationship with Donald Trump, despite the two men's glaring ideological differences. These external successes cannot compensate for Sir Keir's domestic failures, however. They have cost him credibility and the economy momentum. In the past two months, national output has shrunk while public debt continues to mount. In June, the government borrowed £20.7 billion. That is £6.6 billion more than in June last year and £3.6 billion more than expected. As Sir Keir has lost focus on the economy, concentrating on averting short-term difficulties rather than pursuing a coherent agenda, he has come to look like a tactical politician rather than a strategic one. Both MPs and voters are increasingly unclear about what his government is for. Labour is divided between pragmatists who want order in the public finances and leftwingers who want to spend more. The autumn budget, in which Rachel Reeves will have to reconcile the conflicting demands of the bond markets and Labour MPs' desire to protect social spending, will be a pivotal moment in the government's life. Sir Keir's greatest boon has been the state of the Conservative Party. Despite a welcome recent attempt to reassert the party's commitment to fiscal rectitude in the wake of the government's welfare debacle, Kemi Badenoch has failed to establish a clear identity around which her party can coalesce. At 23.7 per cent, its share of the vote in the last election was the lowest yet; it has declined further in polling since then, to 17 per cent. This week's reshuffle will not by itself reverse the Tories' decline: changes in personnel cannot compensate for the lack of a compelling story. The one party that has succeeded in devising one in the past year is Reform. Nigel Farage has capitalised on the loss of direction in both main parties to seize a commanding lead in the polls. Sir Keir and Ms Badenoch need to develop better ways of countering Mr Farage over the summer, or he will make short work of them in the coming year. For both, it is a case of 'must do better'.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
India, UK to sign free trade deal during Modi's visit, cut tariffs on whisky, garments
NEW DELHI/LONDON, July 23 (Reuters) - India and Britain will sign a free trade agreement on Thursday during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's UK visit, officials said, with New Delhi to ease tariffs on British whisky, cars and some food items, and the UK offering duty-free access to Indian textiles and electric vehicles. The pact, concluded in May after three years of stop-start talks, should boost bilateral trade by removing numerous barriers and granting each country greater market access to the other. It will take effect after the British parliament and India's federal cabinet approve it, likely within a year. "This is a significant agreement," Vikram Misri, India's foreign secretary, told reporters on Tuesday, adding that legal vetting of the deal was near completion ahead of Modi's four-day trip to the UK and Maldives. Trade minister Piyush Goyal will accompany Modi for the formal signing, a commerce ministry official said. This will be Modi's fourth visit to the UK since he took office in 2014. He is scheduled to meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer to discuss trade, energy, security, health and education issues, and also hold talks with business leaders. Bilateral trade between the two countries reached $55 billion in 2023/24, while the UK has become India's sixth-largest investor, with cumulative investments of nearly $36 billion, Misri said. Around 1,000 Indian companies operate in the UK, employing 100,000 people, and they have invested about $20 billion there, he added. Under the trade agreement, tariffs on Scotch whisky will drop to 75% from 150% immediately, and then slide to 40% over the next decade, according to the British government, and on cars, India will cut duties to 10% from 100% under a quota system that will be gradually liberalised. In return, Indian manufacturers are expected to gain access to the UK market for electric and hybrid vehicles, also under a quota system, Indian commerce ministry officials said. The ministry has said 99% of Indian exports to Britain would benefit from zero duties under the deal, including textiles, while Britain will see reductions on 90% of its tariff lines. "The UK is an important market for Indian exporters," said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, adding that the trade pact will boost bilateral trade and provide access for Indian sectors such as textiles, footwear, marine and engineering products.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Air India families in Britain ‘receive the wrong bodies'
The grieving families of Britons killed in the Air India crash have been sent the wrong bodies in a bungled repatriation scheme, a lawyer acting for them has said. Air India Flight 171 lost power and hit a building on June 12 just after take-off from Ahmedabad airport. It was heading for London. All but one of the 242 passengers and crew and 19 people on the ground were killed. A total of 52 victims were British citizens. The remains of a number of British victims were wrongly identified before they were flown home, it was reported on Tuesday. One victim's relatives abandoned funeral plans after allegedly being told that the coffin contained a different passenger's body. That body has yet to be identified. the crash were commingled in a single coffin. The remains had to be separated before the funeral could go ahead. The mishandling of repatriations was uncovered when Dr Fiona Wilcox, senior coroner for inner west London, compared DNA from the bodies with samples provided by victims' families. Investigations are under way in Britain and India. Sir Keir Starmer is expected to discuss the case with Narendra Modi, the Indian prime minister, when he makes a state visit to Britain this week. Some crash victims were cremated or buried soon after their bodies were recovered, in accordance with Hindu, Muslim and other religious customs. SAM PANTHAKY/AFP/GETTY IMAGES James Healy-Pratt, a lawyer representing several British families, said that the remains of at least 12 British victims had been repatriated. He told the Mail: 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back. But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. It has been going on for a couple of weeks and I think these families deserve an explanation.' Healy-Pratt is seeking formal responses from Air India and its emergency response contractor, Kenyon International Emergency Services. It is understood that the families affected by the bungled repatriations are in contact with their MPs and the Foreign Office. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner burst into flames, making identification of victims difficult. Some families received remains from the Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad in a plastic container rather than a coffin. Indian authorities had claimed on June 28 that DNA tests had identified all 260 victims of the crash.
