Jay Jones to take on Jason Miyares in Virginia Attorney General race
Jones narrowly defeated Shannon Taylor, securing 51% of the votes compared to Taylor's 49%. This victory positions him to challenge Miyares in the general election scheduled for November 4, 2025.
Breaking down Virginia primary election results
'Virginians are ready for change, ready to get our state back on track,' said Jones, emphasizing his commitment to working for the people rather than select interests.
Jones has outlined his priorities, which include addressing crime, gun violence, and workforce issues. His campaign has focused on these key areas as he prepares to face Miyares in the election.
In addition to the Attorney General race, Virginians will also decide on their next governor in November. Abigail Spanberger and Winsome Earle-Sears, who ran unopposed in their respective primaries, will make history regardless of the outcome, as Virginia has never had a woman governor.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Kamala Harris tells Stephen Colbert that U.S. democracy is ‘broken'
Former vice president Kamala Harris expressed deep concern about U.S. democracy, describing it as a broken system on CBS's 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' on Thursday evening, in her first interview since the 2024 presidential election. She denounced Congress for 'sitting on their hands' and for failing to 'stand in the way' of some of President Donald Trump's policies. Harris did not address a question from host Stephen Colbert about the possibility of her running for the White House in 2028.
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Kamala Harris's Post-Election TV Diet: ‘Lots of Cooking Shows'
Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous night's highlights that lets you sleep — and lets us get paid to watch comedy. Here are the 50 best movies on Netflix right now. Questions? Read the Book. Kamala Harris appeared on Thursday's 'Late Show,' giving Stephen Colbert her first interview since she lost the presidential election to Donald Trump in November. 'First of all, you look rested,' Colbert told the ex-vice president, who was promoting her forthcoming campaign memoir. Harris said she was, and then asked Colbert how he was doing, a nod to 'Late Show's' recently announced cancellation. 'I'll get plenty of rest in June,' he said. Colbert had questions about the 2024 campaign, many of which Harris responded to by saying that the answers would be in her book, '107 Days.' 'There's a lot of personal stuff in the book. I mean, poor Dougie,' Harris said with a laugh, referring to her husband, Douglas Emhoff. 'You've blown the lid off of Doug? What's going on?' — STEPHEN COLBERT'For example, my birthday's in October. The election's in November. You see where I'm going? And Dougie kind of dropped the ball on my big birthday.' — KAMALA HARRIS'He didn't get you anything?' — STEPHEN COLBERT'Oh, you have to read the book.' — KAMALA HARRIS Colbert gave Harris credit for predicting what Trump would do if elected. 'You said he would prosecute his political enemies, he would cut Medicaid and Medicare. He would ignore court orders, he would alienate our allies, he would give massive tax cuts to the rich. And I know you're not here to say, 'I told you so,' but would you like to?' — STEPHEN COLBERT'Let me just say this — you are correct that I did predict a lot of it. But Stephen, what I did not predict was the capitulation. I didn't predict that.' — KAMALA HARRIS Harris said it took 'months' before she could watch the news again after her loss. 'You know, I'm just not into self-mutilation,' she told Colbert. Instead, she watched 'lots of cooking shows.' The Punchiest Punchlines (Presidential Fitness Test Edition) 'President Trump signed an executive order today to revive the Presidential Fitness Test for public schools, and then immediately had to lie down for a bit.' — SETH MEYERS 'Yeah, which means now children will have to be as fit as President Trump.' — STEPHEN COLBERT 'Trump's very into fitness. In fact, right now he's trying to run from the Epstein story as fast as he can.' — JIMMY FALLON 'Yeah, the Presidential Fitness Test is back. Trump was like, 'It's time to bring back my favorite sport: public humiliation.'' — JIMMY FALLON 'Apparently, it changed in 2012 during the Obama administration to focus more on individual health than athletic feats. Boo! Make the children perform athletic feats for our amusement! I had to do it when I was in school, and so did all of you — and I think every child should have a chance to struggle through timed situps while the meanest boy in school sits on their feet and farts.' — STEPHEN COLBERT 'Yeah, Trump says he wants to ensure America's future generations are strong, healthy and successful. At least, I think that's what he said. He was gnawing on a K.F.C. 12-piece at the time.' — JIMMY FALLON The Bits Worth Watching Desi Lydic weighed in on the debate over Sydney Sweeney's new American Eagle ad on 'The Daily Show.' Also, Check This Out Nine American artists who have dealt with censorship shared how it has informed their work and lives.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
A Big, Beautiful Fiction - Does The EU/US Trade Deal Make Sense?
James Thurber's famous book 'The Secret Life of Walter Mitty' is yet another book I would recommend to readers, to continue a recurring theme of recent weeks. It is especially apt in the context of the US-EU trade deal. Walter Mitty appeared at the end of the 1930's, a decade that was shaped by Herbert Hoover's tariff policy, and that was marked by profound economic and geopolitical tensions. Mitty's fantasies were provoked by the reality of his pedestrian, harangued life – which will appeal to European leaders who care to dream of better days. Equally, the giddiness of Mitty's fantasies has its equivalent in the promises that Donald Trump has elicited from the EU – namely, to buy and invest hundreds of billions of dollars in energy. One week on, reaction to the US-EU trade deal is still mixed, and it is not quite clear who has 'won'. This may be because it is not a trade deal in the classical sense – at least in the sense of the laborious trade deals that the EU is used to striking, partly because a large facet of the 'deal' is based on a promise and also because the optics of the deal are quite depressing for Europe. At the headline level, EU exports into the US will be met with a 15% tariff to be paid by the US consumer, not unlike the Japanese 'deal'. Auto companies will not be displeased with a 15% tariff. Wines and spirits, steel and notably pharmaceuticals have yet to have tariff levels finalised and there will be some relief on the confirmation of 15% tariffs on pharmaceuticals, though the investigation into pharmaceutical exports back to the US is a tail risk. Interestingly, the EU has resisted attempts to water down its digital regulations. Politically the spin that the EU is putting on the agreement is that it was the best possible outcome in a difficult geopolitical climate (recall that the recent EU-China summit was a damp-squib). While there were some public expressions of dismay, notably from the French prime minister Francois Bayrou – these can be seen to be largely aimed at the public, rather than Brussels. Though Ursula von der Leyen is unpopular with EU governments for the singular way she runs her office – it is populated with officials who are close to national government (i.e. Alexandre Adam one of von der Leyen's key deputies is an arch Macronist) – there is no sense that the large countries were left out of the negotiation process, and any effort to isolate von der Leyen for blame, is ignoble. However, amongst the professional trade staff, there is still some despair at the humiliating optics of the deal, the fact that it is in many ways not binding, and the risk that there is no undertaking that it is final in the sense that another round of tariffs is imposed later. On the positive side for Europe, and flipping to the 'Mitty-esque' part of the deal, two of the key undertakings in the deal – that European companies invest USD 600 bn in the US, in addition to a commitment to purchase microchips, as well as a commitment from the EU to buy USD 750bn in energy from the US over the course of the Trump presidency – are not at all clear in their implementation, and very much open to a fudge, with the right accounting treatment. In particular the energy purchase commitment is unrealistic because it exceeds what the EU spends on energy in a given year and US energy firms do not have the capacity to service a commitment of USD 250bn in demand from Europe, whilst also serving other markets. In my view there are several aftershocks to watch for. The first is that the deal further damages trans-Atlantic relations, and the level of trust between the EU and the US is likely the lowest it has ever been, and this has strategic implications as far afield as Russia/Ukraine and the Middle East. One other implication may be a drift, by government and consumers, away from US brands – as this may well be an effect that is seen in other regions. Two financial market implications are that the dampening of growth in Europe will maintain downward pressure on rates in Europe. More importantly, in the context of a very oversold dollar, there is now an incentive for EU policy makers to try hard to talk down the euro, and we may see a short-term rebound in the currency pair. On the whole, if this is a 'final' deal and the topic of tariffs does not re-emerge in the next three years, it is not a bad deal for the semi's, autos and aerospace sectors in Europe, though the public optics are not good for the EU. The best parts of the deal for Europe are the fantastical claims of incoming European investment and energy purchases in the US. This is a Mitty style fairy tale that the Europeans hope Mr Trump believes in. The telling factor is that this deal has now emptied all goodwill from the trans-Atlantic relationship, and effectively completes another diplomatic rupture by President Trump. From a European point of view, this is yet another 'wake up call' and the best that can be hoped for is that it accelerates projects like the savings and investment union and 'strategic autonomy'. European leaders and the European policy elite keep talking about this, but until we see hard evidence (for example, German real GDP over the last five years is close to zero), they are the fantasists. Have a great week ahead Mike
