Vanuatu Citizenship Office hits back at Tate report
123rf
The Vanuatu Citizenship Office and Commission has hit back at a report from the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project on its golden passport scheme.
The OCCRP report focused on citizenship granted to self-described misogynist influencer Andrew Tate after it was revealed he
allegedly received a Vanuatu passport
.
A government spokesperson had told the
ABC
it was investigating the matter.
"We're definitely looking into it and once we have the files, definitely the processes will be in place to revoke his citizenship," he said.
In response, the Vanuatu Citizenship Commission chairman, Charles Maniel, told the
Vanuatu Daily Post
it can't carry out any revocation until allegations are proven by a court of law.
Then, in a press statement responding to the OCCRP report, the Citizenship Office and Commission said Tate's application for Vanuatu citizenship was approved on 15 December 2022.
It said the application was considered genuine, based on clearances from the Financial Intelligence Unit, Interpol, and UK police, his country of origin, at the time citizenship was granted.
"The Vanuatu Citizenship Office and Commission reject the report issued by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), which claims that Mr. Tate was under high-profile investigation in the United Kingdom when applying for Vanuatu citizenship," the statement read.
But the
Vanuatu Daily Post
reported that a spokesperson from OCCRP stated the Vanuatu citizenship commission's response to OCCRP's reporting was factually inaccurate.
"Our reporting shows that Andrew Tate was granted Vanuatu citizenship while under criminal investigation by Romanian - not UK - authorities on rape and human trafficking charges," the spokesperson said.
Andrew Tate talks to reporters outside the Court of Appeal on October 15, 2024 in Bucharest, Romania.
Photo:via CNN Newsource
"His Vanuatu passport was issued while he was in detention in a Romanian jail. This was covered in global media at the time and was publicly accessible information in Vanuatu."
The Citizenship Office and Commission reiterated that, at the time Tate applied for Vanuatu citizenship, he submitted a clear police record. The authorities also noted that their designated agency, NXT Citizen, has remained compliant with the Citizenship Act and related regulations for over five years.
But it said that "if there is sufficient evidence that Mr Tate has been convicted by a court of law" , the Commission will revoke his Vanuatu citizenship without delay.
Meanwhile, Vanuatu's opposition leader says the government must immediately release the report from the Commission of Inquiry into the country's Citizenship Programme.
The report was handed to the Justice Minister last week.
Former prime minister Ishmael Kalsakau told the
Vanuatu Daily Post
the people deserve to know what has been uncovered.
The Commission of inquiry, which ran for nearly a year, was investigating allegations of corrupt practices within the passport and citizenship schemes.
Under the Development Support Program, applicants can be granted citizenship for a minimum investment of $US$130,000.
Prime Minister Jotham Napat, through his public relations officer, said the standard procedure requires that the report must first be presented to the Council of Ministers.
The
Daily Post
contacted a government minister, who confirmed the report was set to be presented to the Council this week.
The passport programme has caused concern for some time.
It has affected its visa-free access
to the UK
and
to the European Parliament's Schengen area
.
The
Daily Post
reported the inquiry followed public outrage and claims of systemic abuse involving the sale of passports and misuse of the programme for personal and political gain.
Kalsakau said making the findings public is essential for transparency and accountability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Ni-Vanuatu youth celebrate landmark ICJ ruling as a new era for climate change justice
By Aui'a Vaimaila Leatinu'u , PMN Save the Children Vanuatu NextGen Youth Ambassadors and youth climate activists demonstrating ahead of the historic International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change. Photo: Save the Children A youth climate advocate from Vanuatu says the United Nations' court ruling on countries' climate responsibility has given new hope to young people across the Pacific. The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) advisory opinion found that countries have binding legal obligations under international law to prevent climate harm and protect human rights. While the opinion is not legally enforceable, it carries substantial political and legal weight for states and communities seeking accountability. Speaking to Khalia Strong on Pacific Mornings, 16-year-old Ni-Vanuatu *Vepaiamele welcomes the ICJ verdict. Vepaiamele was part of the Vanuatu delegation that attended The Hague last December. "It is an amazing advisory opinion because it completely clarifies what states need to be doing in regards to the climate crisis. We know that the climate crisis isn't just an environmental crisis, it's also a human rights crisis and affects children's rights. So I'm sure that it will pave the way for justice for everyone around the world," she says. For Vepaiamele, the struggle against climate change is personal. Growing up in Vanuatu, she has witnessed the impacts of climate change firsthand, including schools and clinics being put out of commission, forcing children to learn in tents. "We see the effects of climate change in our nation and economy, from things that have happened even years ago. Cyclones that have happened two years ago or10 years ago. We still see the effects lingering to this day." Vepaiamele writing poetry at her home in Port Vila, Vanuatu. Photo: Save the Children This ruling follows years of advocacy led by youth in the Pacific, especially students from Vanuatu, supported by their government. Minister for Climate Change Ralph Regenvanu says the court's unanimous ruling confirms what vulnerable states have long argued. "These aren't aspirational ideas as some would have it. It's important now as the world goes forward that we make sure our actions align with what was decided. Today's ruling will also inspire new cases where victims around the world, in a legal sense, realise that they can claim their rights and seek accountability," Regenvanu says. The Vanuatu government plans to present the ruling to the UN General Assembly in order to push for global implementation. "The implementation of this decision, we hope, will set a new status quo and provide the structural changes needed to give our current and future generations hope for a healthy planet and a sustainable future," he says. Save the Children's Polly Banks Photo: PMN Polly Banks, the country director for Save the Children in Vanuatu, sees the ruling as a "huge win for human rights" and believes it will add moral pressure on governments. Although the advisory opinion is not legally binding, Banks remains "thrilled at this outcome". "It's expected that the advisory opinion will influence future climate litigation, environmental negotiations or climate change negotiations, and national policy frameworks," she says. "Leading environmental lawyers have described the advisory opinion as a potential guiding star in terms of climate action. So we see this as an absolute landmark moment for climate change." Vepaiamele expresses her pride in the achievements of the youth and emphasises the moment's importance for justice and future generations. "It's amazing what the students have achieved and also our government and governments that have supported this," she says. "It will pave the way for climate justice for communities and people all around the world. I'm so proud and happy with this outcome. I hope that everyone else is listening and will take climate change seriously." -This article was first published by PMN .
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
UN's top court finds countries can be liable for emissions
climate politics 34 minutes ago Vanuatu's Climate Change Minister has said the Pacific now has more leverage in climate negotiations after the UN's top court found that countries can be held legally responsible for their greenhouse gas emissions. The president of the International Court of Justice, Yuji Iwasawa, said climate change is an urgent and existential threat. From the Hague, Jamie Tahana reports.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Climate Change: ICJ Ruling Is A Landmark Win For Children
The historic climate change ruling at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) today is a landmark win for child campaigners, acknowledging the adverse impacts of climate change on child rights, and offering children renewed hope, Save the Children said. The Advisory Opinion delivered by the world's highest court finds that states' legal obligations to address climate change extend beyond existing climate agreements. It also found that "states must take their obligations under international human rights law into account when implementing their obligations under the climate change treaties and other relevant environmental treaties." While not legally binding, leading environmental lawyers say the ruling "could become a guiding star for climate policies at all levels of governance", including how States are held accountable under multiple areas of international law. The Advisory Opinion originated from an extensive campaign led by a group of law students from the Pacific Islands, with strong support from the Republic of Vanuatu [1]. In December last year, Vepaiamele, 16, a child campaigner with Save the Children Vanuatu, travelled to The Hague with the Government of Vanuatu - the only child to attend as part of a government delegation - to speak about the impacts of climate change on the Pacific island nation and call for action. Vepaiamele said today: "This Advisory Opinion is everything I hoped for and I am so happy with this outcome as I know it will pave the way for a safer future for youth like myself and future generations, too." Speaking from The Hague last year, Vepaiamele said: "As a young Ni-Vanuatu girl, I feel the effects of climate change every day of every year. I've experienced many cyclones. It can be kind of terrifying sometimes, especially the really strong ones. Every cyclone, our classrooms are destroyed, our homes are flattened to the ground, and hospitals and communication towers are ripped apart. And then there's also the mental health impacts, and we don't really talk about it that much, but it can really cause anxiety in children and young people." Human-induced climate change is driving up global temperatures, with the past 10 years the warmest on record, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Children, particularly those affected by inequality and discrimination, bear the brunt of climate change impacts that are already forcing them from their homes, putting food out of reach, damaging schools and increasing risks like child marriage as they are forced out of education and into poverty. Limiting warming temperatures through the rapid phase-out of the use and subsidy of fossil fuels is critical for children's rights and lives, Save the Children said. Earlier this year, research released by the child rights organisation with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) found that the difference between global temperature rise of 1.5°C and 2.7°C could see 38 million more children from the 2020 birth cohort face unprecedented lifetime exposure to extreme heatwaves. [2] Save the Children also called for increased climate finance targeted at helping children and their families, child-centred and locally led adaptation and an increase in the participation of children in shaping climate action. Save the Children New Zealand CEO Heather Campbell says, "The ICJ's opinion strengthens the argument that climate inaction is a form of intergenerational injustice, disproportionately borne by those least responsible and least equipped to adapt. "At home in Aotearoa New Zealand, children and their families are experiencing the devastating impacts of extensive flooding and other climate-related emergencies, including Cyclone Gabrielle. Communities across the Nelson Tasman region are still reeling from floods that have destroyed homes and farmland, displaced families and closed schools. "On a recent visit to Solomon Islands, children told us about the impact rising sea levels were having on their communities, including monthly flooding in homes and schools, saline infiltration into fresh water supplies, and crops being destroyed. In other parts of the Pacific, communities are having to constantly rebuild after multiple cyclones in the last few years alone. These are not future scenarios - they are current realities. "Save the Children welcomes the finding from the ICJ, and we also urge governments and development agencies to ensure that climate finance reaches those on the frontline of this crisis. "Currently, only 2.4% of climate finance from multilateral funding sources is child centred. Even without the Court's opinion, we know that states must do far more to protect children from the worst impacts of this crisis, including by significantly increasing climate finance to uphold children's rights and access to health, education and protection." In light of the ICJ's Advisory Opinion, Save the Children New Zealand is calling on the New Zealand Government to renew its commitment to provide climate finance to help communities recover from climate induced loss and damage as well as working to reduce the country's carbon emissions. As the world's leading independent child rights organisation, Save the Children works in about 110 countries, tackling climate change across everything we do. Save the Children supports children and their communities across the Pacific and globally in preventing, preparing for, adapting to, and recovering from both sudden climate disasters and slow onset climate change. We have set up floating schools, rebuilt destroyed homes and provided cash grants to families hit by disasters. We also work to influence governments and other key stakeholders in Aotearoa New Zealand and around the world on climate policies, including at the UNFCCC COP summits, giving children a platform for their voices to be heard. Notes: [1] The Advisory Opinion is in response to a Pacific-led resolution (A/RES/77/276) to the UN General Assembly adopted by consensus on 29 March 2023. This was the result of an extensive campaign by a group of law students from the University of the South Pacific ( Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change ) with strong support from the Republic of Vanuatu. Save the Children has worked closely with the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change to ensure the voices of children and young people are incorporated into countries' written and oral submissions to the Court. As part of her campaigning work, Vepaiamele and other activists met with embassies of high emitting countriesin Vanuatu ahead of the hearing to try and influence their submissions. [2] The report found that, for children born in 2020, if global temperature rise is limited to 1.5°C rather than reaching 2.7°C above pre-industrial levels: - About 38 million would be spared from facing unprecedented lifetime exposure to heatwaves; - About 8 million would avoid unprecedented lifetime exposure to crop failures; - About 5 million would be spared from unprecedented lifetime exposure to river floods; - About 5 million would avoid unprecedented lifetime exposure to tropical cyclones; - About 2 million would avoid unprecedented lifetime exposure to droughts; - About 1.5 million children would be spared unprecedented lifetime exposure to wildfires.
