Delhi HC restrains DDA from taking coercive action against Idgah committee
The Delhi high court on Thursday restrained the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) from taking coercive action against the Shahi Idgah Management Committee, which is facing a recovery notice from the administrative body following its annual Ijtema congregation at the Eidgah Park near Delhi's Sadar Bazar.
On February 11, DDA issued a notice to the committee, seeking ₹12 lakh as booking charges for the religious function organised in December 2024, on the grounds that the parkland belonged to DDA.
Justice Vikas Mahajan, however, said DDA must not take coercive action until further orders, after the committee's counsel, Sanjoy Ghose, submitted that it filed a suit with the Delhi Waqf Tribunal, claiming that the park was on the Idgah land and seeking demarcation of the land where the Shahi Eidgah was situated. Ghose said the matter could not be heard due to lack of quorum and non-constitution of the tribunal and therefore, the committee had been rendered remediless.
'The problem is that the tribunal is not functional. Till that time, he (committee) has no remedy. It is a government land, but he is not encroaching upon it. It is a religious function, the recovery can come later on,' justice Mahajan said to DDA's lawyer.
'Having regard to the fact that the Waqf Tribunal is not functional, it is directed that the DDA shall not take any coercive action pursuant to notice dated 11/2,' the court said in its order.
The bench also issued a notice in the Shahi Idgah Management Committee's petition against the February 11 notice and fixed September 10 as the next date of hearing. In its petition, the committee had asserted that the park was part of the Idgah premises and DDA had no claim over it.
However, DDA's counsel submitted that a single judge, while previously dealing with the committee's petition against the installation of Maharani Lakshmi Bai's statute on September 23, 2024, had given a finding that the park was DDA's property. The counsel argued the religious function had been held on DDA land without prior approval. The committee had appealed against the single judge's decision before the division bench, but was not granted relief, the DDA counsel told the court.
Ghose, however, contended that the single judge had no power to rule on the issue of title of the park and the division bench had left open all contentions of the parties.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 days ago
- News18
Trinamool MPs visit Jai Hind camp in Delhi, welcome court order staying eviction
Agency: PTI Last Updated: New Delhi, Jul 25 (PTI) A delegation of Trinamool Congress MPs on Friday visited the Jai Hind camp in Delhi's Vasant Kunj, and welcomed a court order staying eviction at the settlement. Welcoming the court order staying the eviction until August 8, Trinamool's deputy leader in Rajya Sabha, Sagarika Ghose, alleged that the locals were being targeted for speaking Bangla. Besides Ghose, Trinamool MP from Cooch Behar Jagadish Basunia, and Rajya Sabha MPs Mausam Noor and Mamata Bala Thakur were part of the delegation. 'We had staged a dharna here… People here are being attacked and called Bangladeshis even though they have all the valid documents – ration card, Aadhaar card, etc. Yet they are being called Bangladeshis because they speak Bangla," Ghose said. 'Our main demand was that their eviction should be stayed… We have got some satisfaction as the eviction has been stayed by a court. 'But the issue of water supply and electricity connections still remains to be resolved. We will continue our movement till they get these amenities," she added. The informal settlement, which lies amid the posh sectors in Vasant Kunj and Masoodpur village, houses around 5,000 migrant workers, who say they hail from Cooch Behar in West Bengal. Power supply was snapped in the camp following a court order on July 8 in an encroachment case. Trinamool MPs had staged a sit-in protest at the settlement on July 14-15. PTI AO ARI view comments First Published: July 26, 2025, 00:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Bengal Real Target Of Voter List Revision: Trinamool MP Sagarika Ghose To NDTV
New Delhi: The ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the assembly elections is an "exclusionary and not an inclusionary" exercise, Trinamool Congress MP Sagarika Ghose said, as she accused the Election Commission (EC) of trying to "disenfranchise" and harass the citizens. Speaking to NDTV, the Rajya Sabha MP also alleged a conspiracy and said the exercise is being held mainly to target voters in West Bengal that also goes to the polls early next year. "We are going to oppose this tooth and nail in Bengal because we feel that Bengal is the real target. It is being done in Bihar but the real target is Bengal," she said. Ms Ghose's remarks came amid a political row over the poll body's exercise, with the Opposition calling it a "gimmick" and an attempt to disenfranchise poor voters. The EC, however, said the exercise follows a transparent process and is laying down the "foundation stone for fair elections and a strong democracy". "We are opposed to this SIR exercise of the Election Commission on multiple levels. We oppose it on the basis of principle, we oppose it on the basis of the Constitution because its focus is on exclusion and not inclusion. SIR is an exclusionary exercise and not an inclusionary exercise," Ms Ghose said. She alleged the exercise is "forcing citizens to undergo citizenship tests". "Is the EC trying to clean up electoral rolls or trying to create a voter or a citizenship register. Establishing citizenship and establishing a citizenship register is not the job of the Election Commission," she said. "The EC is not here to decide who is a citizen and who is not. It is only mandated to clean up the electoral rolls and to ensure the sanctity of the electoral rolls. When citizens are producing every proof of their citizenship, how can they be excluded from these electoral rolls?" she asked. The Trinamool lawmaker also slammed the poll body for not accepting Aadhaar cards as a standalone document to prove eligibility for voter registration. "All this while, the EC has been focusing on linking the Aadhaar card. Suddenly under the SIR, the EC is saying Aadhaar is no longer sufficient proof of citizenship? Then why were you screaming Aadhaar for the last decade? This is another flaw in the SIR," she said. "On a practical level, this is a completely misguided exercise. It is basically an exercise to disenfranchise the poorest and it is against the basic structure of the Constitution because it is snatching away the right to vote," she added. In a 789-page affidavit filed before the Supreme Court recently, the poll body said while Aadhaar is proof of identity, it is not valid proof of Indian citizenship or residence - essential requirements for voter eligibility under Article 326 of the Constitution. New Aadhaar cards issued after January 2024 also state that Aadhaar is not proof of citizenship. Ms Ghose alleged the poll exercise is being carried out primarily to target voters in West Bengal. Slamming the "nasty politics" of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), she said: "The BJP has lost two elections in Bengal, in 2021 and 2024, and now this is just a conspiracy by the BJP acting through the Election Commission to take away the right to vote from lakhs of Bengal voters. This is a concerted attempt by the BJP to take away the right to vote from the voters of Bihar and Bengal and they are going to do this across the country," she said. "The EC is not being transparent about this procedure," she added. Amid concerns that a similar voter list revision is likely to be carried out in West Bengal, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said she will not allow such an exercise in the state. The Supreme Court has also raised " serious doubts" over the poll body's management of the revision exercise. "Your exercise is not the problem... it is the timing. We have serious doubts if you can manage this exercise. With such a big population (an estimated eight crore people) being subject to this 'intensive review', is it possible to link this to the forthcoming election?" it asked the poll body earlier this month. On Thursday, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar strongly defended the exercise and asked if the poll body can come under influence and allow the dead, those who have migrated permanently or have registered themselves as electors at multiple places be included in the voters' list. "Isn't a pure voter list being prepared by the Election Commission through a transparent process, the foundation for fair elections and a strong democracy?" he said. He said the electoral roll revision in Bihar has weeded out 52 lakh voters who are dead or migrated, assuring that "all eligible electors are included in the draft electoral roll to be published on August 1".
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
‘We don't want lip service': HC on delay in housing for judicial officials
New Delhi: Taking a grim view of delay in the construction of housing for the district judiciary, Delhi High Court on Thursday laid down strict timelines for the authorities. "We don't want lip service," a bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela told Delhi govt, PWD, and DDA, as it gave roughly a month for the start of construction at one of the sites in Shahdara. The high court fixed deadlines after DDA submitted that it would hand over a large parcel of land in Shahdara to the govt's law department. The court took on record the statement of the principal secretary law that tenders will be floated for hiring a project management consultant by PWD. Appearing for Delhi govt, standing counsel Sameer Vashisht assured the bench that by July 28, the draft document would be finalised, prompting the bench to direct that a week thereafter, the process to select a consultant would be over so that the project could start. During the hearing, DDA submitted that it would identify alternative land at Rohini rather than the one earmarked earlier and sought some time. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi The high court earlier censured the authorities for not ensuring funds to build official residences for district judiciary officials, warning that any laxity or even slackness on the part of officers or any authority in implementing the directions of the Supreme Court, passed in this regard, would not be allowed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Compare Spreads: Bitcoin vs Ethereum CFDs IC Markets Learn More Undo It is hearing petitions filed by Judicial Service Association, which sought a direction to expedite the availability of govt residential homes to Delhi judicial service officers and Delhi higher judicial services officers. The high court earlier noted that while the total sanctioned strength of judicial officers was 897, the number of available flats stood at 348. It also asked govt to decide on the release of funds meant for flats in Dwarka.
