Alabama food banks worry about Congress proposing billions in cuts to food aid program
According to multiple reports, the U.S. House of Representatives is considering cutting $230 billion from the program and shifting more of the cost from the federal government to the states.
State sales tax on diapers, formula, feminine hygiene products ends Sept. 1
But the food bank coalition Feeding Alabama tells News 19 the cuts come at a time when other federal dollars for food banks and school nutrition programs are also being cut, and hunger problems are not declining. There are food banks in every county in the state, but Feeding Alabama officials say a major cut to SNAP would be very difficult to make up elsewhere.
Congress on Tuesday was beginning its debate on the proposed $230 billion, 10-year SNAP benefit cut. The initial proposals would shift more costs to states, expand qualifying requirements and increase work demands on older recipients.
But advocates say SNAP in Alabama has an economic impact of $1.80 for every program. They said SNAP recipients include several people every year in Alabama who need temporary food assistance as they navigate a crisis brought on by a job loss or medical problems.
The goal, advocates say, is to provide a temporary source of reliable food to help allow them to get back on their feet and resume productive lives. Feeding Alabama says the program benefits farmers, small grocery stores and rural communities, and the impact is widespread. Feeding Alabama's network includes the Food Bank of North Alabama and food banks across the state, including the Gulf Coast.
'Over 700,000 folks in Alabama turn to SNAP at one time or another in any given year,' said Michael Ledger, CEO of Feeding the Gulf Coast. 'And it's a vital program, for every pound of food we put out in the food bank, SNAP can provide nine.''The vast majority of the people getting SNAP are either seniors or children that are benefiting from this. And these are two population segments, we know, the choices they have are limited. A child is not really going to be able to affect their circumstances. A senior who is on a fixedincome is not going to be able to affect their circumstances and so reducing that could have a real dramatic impact,' Ledger added.
Feeding Alabama also estimates that 23,000 veterans in Alabama are using SNAP benefits.
The proposed cuts are part of a House GOP-led budget and tax cut overhaul.
News 19 has reached out to North Alabama U.S. Representatives Dale Strong and Robert Aderholt regarding their views of the proposed SNAP cuts. So far, neither congressman has responded.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate passes Trump's major policy bill with $150 billion for the DOD
The Senate passed a massive party-line spending package Tuesday, including a one-time surge in defense spending the Pentagon is counting on for its upcoming fiscal year 2026 budget. By a vote of 51-50 — with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie — the chamber advanced the vast tax, healthcare and border security bill President Donald Trump has championed as key to his legislative agenda. That 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' also features $150 billion in funding for the military, which would go toward shipbuilding, the Golden Dome homeland missile defense project, munitions and other key priorities. The bill next goes back to the House for final consideration. Trump has set a deadline of July 4 to pass the spending package out of that chamber, though some lawmakers in the House have already said they're unlikely to approve the bill before the end of the week. The Pentagon has argued this package should be counted as part of the DOD's overall defense budget plan for the coming year, and defense officials moved spending priorities usually reserved for its base spending plan into the one-time package. In its delayed spending request last week, the Defense Department issued an $848 million base budget request, which is a cut when accounting for inflation. That said, the Pentagon is counting on $113 billion in immediate funding from the supplemental spending bill in Congress, bringing the total for military spending closer to $960 billion. Still, many top Republicans and Democrats in Congress have argued that the unusual arrangement will cause unnecessary confusion for the Pentagon and the defense industry responsible for major weapons programs. In a briefing to describe the funding request, senior defense and military officials countered this argument, saying the immediate surge in funding may reassure some of these companies, which are accustomed to Congress starting the fiscal year on temporary spending plans known as continuing resolutions. One official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the administration would likely keep military funding close to $1 trillion for next year as well, though it hasn't yet decided on an appropriate baseline. If not, the Defense Department will face extremely difficult choices when deciding how to factor the priorities included in the one-time spending package back into its yearly budget.
Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
Elizabeth Pipko: I Knew Right Away That Mamdani Would Be A Threat In The NYC Mayoral Primary
Former GOP National Spokesperson Elizabeth Pipko joins Fox Across America With guest host Jason Chaffetz to give her take on what led to the rise of socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani, the presumptive Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. Elizabeth Pipko Praises Trump's Tough Approach To Iran
Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
House Republicans push for quick vote on Senate-approved bill despite internal resistance
The House Rules Committee – which is the gateway for legislation to hit the House floor, meets shortly. That committee will tee up the bill for floor debate tomorrow. The House will meet at 9 a.m. Wednesday. The House GOP brass wants to consider the "rule" – which is the pre-debate. Expect dilatory tactics by the Democrats such as motions to adjourn. The House must first vote and approve the rule before debating the actual Senate-approved version of the so-called "big, beautiful bill." That vote on the rule – which is a test vote – could be challenging for the GOP leadership, but if the House approves the rule by midmorning, it's on to debate on the actual bill. In a speedy scenario, the House could debate the actual bill by midday and approve the bill itself by early afternoon. But as you know, this is Capitol Hill. And nothing ever seems to go as quickly as leadership hopes. (e.g. – see Senate, U.S.) Fox is told that leaders will tell reluctant Republicans that the bill is not going to get any better. But it's also not going to get any worse. In addition, Republicans are banking on the idea that GOP members will want to break off their vacations and other activities to get into town as quickly as possible – and then leave. That will provide "peer pressure" – as one source described it. Die-hard proponents of the bill would then blame GOP skeptics for dithering and keeping the House in session longer than is needed – especially before the 4th of July.
