
An explosion of sea urchins threatens to push coral reefs in Hawaii ‘past the point of recovery'
The turquoise water of Hōnaunau Bay in Hawaii, an area popular with snorkelers and divers, is teeming with spiny creatures that threaten to push the coral reef 'past the point of recovery,' new research has found.
Sea urchin numbers here are exploding as the fish species that typically keep their populations in check decline due to overfishing, according to the study, published last month in the journal PLOS ONE. It's yet another blow to a reef already suffering damage from pollution as well as climate change-driven ocean heat waves and sea level rise.
Kelly J. van Woesik, a researcher at the North Carolina State University Center for Geospatial Analytics and a study author, first noticed unusually high numbers of sea urchins on snorkeling trips. 'I knew there was a story to be told,' she said.
She and her fellow researchers used data from scuba surveys and images taken from the air to track the health of the reef.
'We found on average 51 urchins per square meter, which is among the highest recorded densities on coral reefs anywhere in the world,' van Woesik said.
Sea urchins are small marine invertebrates, characterized by their spiny bodies and found in oceans around the world. They play a useful role in preventing algae overgrowth, which can choke off oxygen to coral. However, they also eat the reef and too many of them can cause damaging erosion.
In Hōnaunau Bay, the coral is already struggling to reproduce and grow due to ocean heat and water pollution, leaving it even more vulnerable to the erosion inflicted by sea urchins.
Its rate of growth has plummeted according to the study.
Reef growth is typically measured by the amount of calcium carbonate — the substance which forms coral skeletons — it produces per square meter each year.
The reef in Hōnaunau Bay is growing 30 times more slowly than it did four decades ago, according to the study. Production levels were around 15 kilograms (33 pounds) per square meter in parts of Hawaii, signaling a healthy reef, according to research in the 1980s.
Today, the reef in Hōnaunau Bay produces just 0.5 kg (1.1 pounds) per square meter.
To offset erosion from urchins, at least 26% of the reef surface must be covered by living corals – and even more coral cover is necessary for it to grow.
Gregory Asner, an ecologist at Arizona State University and study author, said what was happening in this part of Hawaii was emblematic of the mounting pressures facing reefs throughout the region.
'For 27 years I have worked in Hōnaunau Bay and other bays like it across Hawaii, but Hōnaunau stood out early on as an iconic example of a reef threatened by a combination of pressures,' he said, citing warming ocean temperatures, pollution from tourism and heavy fishing.
The implications of coral decline are far-reaching. Coral reefs are sometimes dubbed the 'rainforests of the sea' because they support so much ocean life. They also play a vital role protecting coastlines from storm surges and erosion.
'If the reef can't keep up with sea-level rise, it loses its ability to limit incoming wave energy,' said van Woesik. 'That increases erosion and flooding risk of coastal communities.'
Kiho Kim, an environmental science professor at American University, who was not involved in the study, said the findings highlight the fragility of reef ecosystems under stress.
'Dramatic increases in any species indicate an unusual condition that has allowed them to proliferate,' Kim said. That imbalance can undermine diversity and reduce the reef's ability to provide essential ecosystem services including food security and carbon storage, he told CNN.
Despite the challenges, researchers emphasize that the reef's future is not sealed. Local groups in Hōnaunau are working to reduce fishing pressure, improve water quality and support coral restoration.
'These reefs are essential to protecting the islands they surround,' van Woesik said. 'Without action taken now, we risk allowing these reefs to erode past the point of no return.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
NOAA delays the cutoff of key satellite data for hurricane forecasting
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday it is delaying by one month the planned cutoff of satellite data that helps forecasters track hurricanes. Meteorologists and scientists warned of severe consequences last week when NOAA said, in the midst of this year's hurricane season, that it would almost immediately discontinue key data collected by three weather satellites that the agency jointly runs with the Defense Department. The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program's microwave data gives key information that can't be gleaned from conventional satellites. That includes three-dimensional details of a storm, what's going on inside of it and what it is doing in the overnight hours, experts say. The data was initially planned to be cut off on June 30 'to mitigate a significant cybersecurity risk,' NOAA's announcement said. The agency now says it's postponing that until July 31. Peak hurricane season is usually from mid-August to mid-October. Spokespeople from NOAA and the Navy did not immediately respond to a request for more details about the update. NOAA — which has been the subject of hefty Department of Government Efficiency cuts this year — said Friday the satellite program accounts for a 'single dataset in a robust suite of hurricane forecasting and modeling tools' in the National Weather Service's portfolio. The agency's 'data sources are fully capable of providing a complete suite of cutting-edge data and models that ensure the gold-standard weather forecasting the American people deserve,' a spokesperson said. But Union of Concerned Scientists science fellow Marc Alessi told The Associated Press on Friday that detecting the rapid intensification, and more accurately predicting the likely path, of storms is critical as climate change worsens the extreme weather experienced across the globe. 'Not only are we losing the ability to make better intensification forecasts, we are also losing the ability to predict accurately where a tropical cyclone could be going, if it's in its development stages,' Alessi said. 'This data is essential. 'On the seasonal forecasting front, we would see the effects,' he added, 'but also on the long-term climate change front, we now are losing an essential piece to monitoring global warming.' ___ Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at [email protected]. ___ Read more of AP's climate coverage at ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
Living near a golf course is linked to Parkinson's risk in new study as some cite limitations
If living near a golf course seems scenic and relaxing, it may also be linked to a higher risk of Parkinson's disease, according to a surprising new study that comes with some limitations. Led by the Barrow Neurological Institute in Arizona, along with Mayo Clinic, the study found that the greatest risk was found among those who live within one to three miles of a golf course. "The strongest effects were in municipal water service areas with a golf course and in regions with vulnerable groundwater based on the bedrock and topography," lead study author Brittany Krzyzanowski, Ph.D., assistant professor at the Barrow Neurological Institute, told Fox News Digital. "These findings suggest that pesticides applied to golf courses may play a role in the incidence of PD [Parkinson's disease] for nearby residents," the researchers concluded in the study, which was published in JAMA Network Open. The case-control study analyzed data from 419 Parkinson's patients averaging 73 years of age and living near 139 golf courses in southern Minnesota and western Wisconsin. They then made comparisons to control data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project from 1991 to 2015. "We had accurate data on golf course locations, and we could accurately determine the source of an individual's drinking water – whether that be municipal water or private well water," Krzyzanowski noted. Living within one mile of a golf course was associated with 126% increased odds of developing the neurological disease compared to living more than six miles away, the study found. People living near water service areas with a golf course had nearly twice the risk of developing Parkinson's, according to the new study. People living near water service areas with a golf course had nearly twice the risk of developing Parkinson's compared with individuals in water service areas without golf courses. Those living in water service areas with a golf course in vulnerable groundwater regions had an 82% higher risk, according to the findings. (Vulnerable groundwater is more susceptible to contamination from human activities and environmental factors.) The associations remained even after the researchers adjusted for age and income, which suggests there could be something more than demographics driving the relationship between golf course proximity and risk of Parkinson's disease, Krzyzanowski noted. "We speculate that pesticides might play a role; however, we didn't include data on pesticides in this study, so future research is needed to better understand what's going on," she said. Dr. Mary Ann Picone, medical director of the MS Center at Holy Name Medical Center in Teaneck, New Jersey, was not involved in the study but shared her opinion of the findings. "There has often been discussion regarding risks for development of Parkinson's disease and environmental agents such as pesticides," she told Fox News Digital. "Further research is needed with larger groups of patients, but this study does increase the concern about the association between pesticide exposure and risk of Parkinson's, especially within a one- to three-mile radius and groundwater and well vulnerability." Airborne exposure to the pesticides was also a factor, she added. The main limitation of the study is that it is not possible to quantify the amount of exposure each person receives, according to Dr. Rodolfo Savica, Mayo Clinic neurologist and senior author of the study. "Unfortunately, there are many other aspects as well that can interfere with developing a disease," he told Fox News Digital. "Despite that, we are trying our best to contemplate and adjust for any possible additional information, but sometimes that is not possible." The study was limited to a region with hot and humid summers, specifically southern Minnesota and western Wisconsin, where golf courses may have applied pesticides with more frequency compared to other geographic regions. "Therefore, our results might not generalize to other areas," the study lead noted. Other relevant Parkinson's risk factors, such as head trauma history and genetic predisposition, were not accounted for, Picone noted. Krzyzanowski also pointed out that Parkinson's disease develops many decades after exposure, so the study aimed to estimate exposure from long ago. "If pesticides were involved, they would be the ones sprayed a long time ago and that might be different from what's being sprayed today," she said. "The study's methodological limitations make it difficult to draw conclusions from the data." Picone agreed that because this study looked back to 2013, it is possible that different pesticides used before 2013 were not tracked. "However, this study does provide evidence for an association between living on a golf course and pesticide groundwater exposure and risk of Parkinson's development, and does raise concern and the need for larger population sample research," she shared with Fox News Digital. Krzyzanowski added that because this was an observational study, the researchers couldn't make causal conclusions about the results. "If you're worried about exposure of any kind, you should consult with your doctor," she advised. A spokesperson from the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America, headquartered in Lawrence, Kansas, provided a statement to Fox News Digital in response to the study. "Public health experts and researchers who have reviewed the study have noted that the study's methodological limitations make it difficult to draw conclusions from the data. As noted by the authors of the study, the role of pesticide exposure from golf courses in Parkinson's disease risk remains unclear. Without the methodological gaps being filled, the hypothesis linking golf-course pesticide exposure to Parkinson's Disease remains speculative." "Pesticides registered by the EPA do not … create unreasonable adverse effects to human health and the environment when used according to label directions." The spokesperson noted that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rigorously tests and registers the pesticides that the golf industry uses to maintain healthy golf course turf. "Pesticides registered by the EPA do not, according to the top researchers in their field, create unreasonable adverse effects to human health and the environment when used according to label directions," the spokesperson continued. For more Health articles, visit "Golf course superintendents are leading practitioners of integrated pest management, a philosophy that reduces the potential environmental risks of pesticide usage." Mayo Clinic's Savica recommended that older adults continue to stay active, which is crucial for their well-being. "I recommend people continue to play sports outdoors and enjoy the sociality of any activity, including playing golf," he said. "On the other hand, I would recommend that people be very careful and avoid exposure to places where we know there can be an interaction between pesticides and contaminants."

Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Megabill Deal Struck to Ban State AI Laws
Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Marsha Blackburn (R., Tenn.) are proposing a five-year ban on state laws seeking to regulate artificial intelligence as part of the 'big, beautiful bill.' The provision could dictate who sets guardrails for AI moving forward. Here's what to know: