Anwar says judiciary appointments to be announced by Conference of Rulers tomorrow, urges end to ‘negative perception'
He said the announcement can hopefully dispel the 'negative perception' from Malaysians surrounding the issue.
'There are of course concerns expressed, and I must take note of that. First is the delay of appointment and secondly is the perception that some appointments to the key positions in the judiciary may be somewhat compromised,' he said in his speech at the International Conference On Governance And Integrity 2025 here.
'I can assure you that is not the case. I'm sure my legal friends can respect the fact that we must work based on the law and facts. Not perception. Leave the perception issue to the politicians, then only we can continue governing.'
Anwar reiterated that he had a lengthy discussion with the Conference of Rulers on the matter this morning.
MORE TO COME
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
Judicial picks expected today
PUTRAJAYA: An announcement regarding judicial appointments is expected today, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said. He acknowledged delays and public unease over certain appointments but assured them all processes have been carried out fairly and transparently. Anwar said he had a lengthy discussion with the Conference of Rulers yesterday morning. 'I think let them decide and tomorrow (today), hopefully, there will be an announcement that will clearly dispel the so-called negative perceptions,' he said in his speech at Malaysia's International Conference on Integrity and Governance here yesterday. Anwar, who is also Finance Minister, stressed that the government fully upholds judicial independence and has not interfered in any court proceedings or decisions during his tenure. 'I rest my case, and I hope when the announcement is made, it will prove this government is committed to reform, including the principle of judicial independence,' he said, as reported by Bernama. Meanwhile, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said noted that the government will review the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 amid public confusion over the recent Chief Justice appointment process. She said a special committee will be set up, comprising members of the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara, as well as constitutional experts, legal practitioners and academics. 'We have to improve because what is happening now is that there is a lot of confusion. (There's) no clarity from the public perspective. But then this particular JAC, which was passed and established in 2009, is responsible for the appointment of five Chief Justices. It has never been an issue. 'Sadly, now there is an issue, so we have to study it. Where did the non-clarity or confusion come in? Is it the processes, or is it the wording of the Act?' she said to reporters after attending the International Conference on Integrity and Governance here yesterday. She said the government had announced the implementation of a Comparative Study of the Judicial Appointment System by the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime Minister's Department last week, as part of efforts to enhance transparency in the appointment procedure of superior court judges She said the study aims to provide a clearer understanding of the JAC's role and to also address issues raised by the Malaysian Bar. 'The government is always open to the views of all parties, including the Malaysian Bar, who will also be invited to join in this study, to ensure a more transparent, integrity-based and trusted judicial appointment system for the people. 'In addition, issues raised by the Malaysian Bar should be considered within the framework of the Federal Constitution, the Judicial Appointments Commission Act and other laws in force,' she said in a statement. On Monday, Azalina clarified that the JAC does not have binding authority in judicial appointments. She explained the JAC's primary role is to screen, assess and recommend candidates to the Prime Minister, while appointments to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court must ultimately comply with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution.
New Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
PM: Conference of Rulers expected to announce new Chief Justice today
PUTRAJAYA: The Conference of Rulers is expected to decide and announce the appointment of the new Chief Justice today, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said yesterday. He also confirmed having met with the Conference of Rulers on Tuesday morning. "I had a lengthy discussion with the Conference of Rulers, and it is best to let them decide. God willing, there will be a clear announcement tomorrow (today) that will dispel all negative perceptions," he said during his keynote address at Malaysia's International Conference on Governance and Integrity 2025, here, yesterday. The prime minister also acknowledged public concern over the delay in appointing the chief justice and the negative perceptions surrounding the matter. "There is a perception that some appointments to key positions in the judiciary may appear to be compromised or tainted. "Certain candidates have reportedly been questioned or doubted by some quarters, but I can assure you that this is not the case. "And the names that have been questioned or viewed with suspicion were never even submitted to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Conference of Rulers. "So I am closing this chapter, and I hope, God willing, when the announcement is made, it will prove that the Madani Government is committed to reforms, including upholding the principle of judicial independence," he said. Additionally, he emphasised that he has never discussed any court cases with any judge, to preserve the principle of judicial independence. "I have never discussed any case with any judge, whether with the chief justice or other judges. I remain committed to the principle of judicial independence," he said.
Free Malaysia Today
39 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Young people favour ban on racist landlords, survey shows
A forum on the proposed Residential Tenancy Act heard of survey findings showing that Malaysians of different generations hold opposing views on racial discrimination in the housing market. KUALA LUMPUR : Malaysians aged 18 to 24 are in favour of making it illegal for landlords to choose tenants by race, according to a market survey, while almost 59% of Malaysians aged 35 to 54 were in favour of allowing landlords to do so. The survey, by market research firm YouGov, showed that almost 57% of the 1,104 survey respondents were in favour of a law to regulate the market, and only 10% opposed to the proposed Residential Tenancy Act, which has been years in the making. However, respondents were split by age group on whether to ban racial discrimination in housing. Almost 50% believed that landlords should be allowed to choose tenants based on race, while 31% believed it should be made illegal. Those aged 18 to 24 were the only age group in which a plurality (39%) supported making it illegal to practise racial discrimination in renting, while 58.7% of Malaysians aged 35 to 54 were more inclined to believe that landlords should retain the right to select tenants based on race. Almost two in five Malaysian Indians in the survey reported facing racial discrimination in the housing market. Support for banning racial discrimination was highest among Indians (63.8%), those aged 18 to 24 (39%) and full-time students (42%). The survey findings were released at a forum by civil society organisation Architects of Diversity, held in conjunction with the launch of its latest report on discrimination in rented housing. Jason Wee. Participants at the forum called for the government to pass the long-delayed law. 'If the government fails to pass the Residential Tenancy Act, or worse, passes it without addressing racial discrimination, it will have missed its greatest opportunity to protect Indian Malaysians,' said the group's executive director, Jason Wee. Wee said young Malaysians were worse affected by the discrimination, especially those from minority groups who rely on rented housing while working or studying in cities According to those at the forum, landlords cited three main reasons for choosing tenants by race: fear of losing income because of problematic tenants; cultural or religious clashes; and personal prejudice cloaked as 'racial preference'. One respondent, identified as being a 'Serani', described how property agents often appeared more interested in their ethnicity than in financial credentials. Fikri Faisal. Independent researcher Fikri Faisal, who spoke at the forum, took issue with the figure of RM608 average rent reported by the statistics department for the Klang Valley, while private property listings showed rent of between RM2,200 and RM2,500. Fikri called for improved data collection, as the gap in the data could skew national housing policy. Just over 50% of respondents supported the setting up of a rent tribunal to resolve disputes between landlords and tenants, such as over deposits or evictions, without the high cost of lawyers and court proceedings The tribunal found greater support among older Malaysians, especially those aged 45 and above, Chinese respondents, and higher-income earners. Support was lowest among students and the unemployed, the groups most vulnerable to discrimination and insecure tenancy. Rajiv Rishakaran. Bukit Gasing assemblyman Rajiv Rishakaran said policy intervention was justified if even a small percentage of tenants faced racial bias. 'Everyone fears the worst when they hear about a residential tenancy act, because they fear rent controls or that too many terms and conditions will be included in the contracts, making things very difficult for them,' he said. He said he hoped that housing minister Nga Kor Ming would consider establishing the rental tribunal, as it would help reduce the incidence of rental discrimination. Wee said: 'You don't stop prosecuting theft because some thieves get away. The law exists to draw a moral line and offer recourse to those harmed.'
